CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06077890Updated Apr 30, 2024

Effectiveness of Digital Rehabilitation (SIMPLI.REHAB) in Hand Arthritis

An interventional study of Digital Rehabilitation and Conventional Rehabilitation in Arthritis, Psoriatic, Arthritis, Rheumatoid and Deformity, Hand, sponsored by Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-30.

Sponsored by Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates the effectiveness of SIMPLI.REHAB, a digital tool employed as an interface for administering occupational rehabilitation programs to patients diagnosed with Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis. Both of these conditions are inflammatory joint disorders capable of causing significant morphofunctional alterations in the hands, especially in their advanced stages. The introduction of digital technology emerges as a complementary tool when implementing rehabilitation programs.

Utilizing a prospective, longitudinal, single-blinded experimental study, 35 patients will be allocated into two groups: one receiving a complementary digital intervention through SIMPLI.REHAB and the other through a conventional rehabilitation program. Each group consists of six patients and the program spans seven weeks, focusing on therapeutic exercises, training in manual dexterity, and motor coordination, among other interventions, led by a Physiatrist.

The study intends to measure outcomes based on functionality scores, pain, disease activity, joint range, grip, pinch strength, and manual dexterity, both before and after each intervention, in order to ascertain the efficacy of integrating dynamic content through the digital tool SIMPLI.REHAB, as a supplementary resource in occupational rehabilitation programs. The potential limitations of the study include potential losses of follow-up and difficulties in assessing adherence to the digital tool precisely. Nonetheless, the digital tool aims to augment functional gains in rehabilitation programs by providing patients with accessible dynamic content of home-based strategies.

Read the detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis are inflammatory joint conditions that often affect the distal extremity of the upper limb responsible for manual functionality. If these conditions progress, they can lead to significant morphofunctional alterations. Occupational rehabilitation programs are essential for controlling and improving functional limitations. With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, various technologies have emerged that allow the implementation of rehabilitation programs in distinct manners. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an occupational rehabilitation program using the digital tool SIMPLI.REHAB as an interface for administering home-based strategies to patients diagnosed with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis compared to a conventional rehabilitation program.

Using a prospective, longitudinal, single-blinded experimental study of superiority and randomized block design, 35 patients will be allocated to two intervention groups. An experimental intervention group will integrate an occupational rehabilitation program using the digital tool SIMPLI.REHAB for smartphones, compared to a group for a conventional rehabilitation program using a leaflet. Each group will consist of 6 patients and the program duration will be 7 weeks. This rehabilitation program, coordinated by a Physiatrist, includes classes for therapeutic exercises for flexibility and muscle strengthening, training in manual dexterity and motor coordination, thermotherapy, and patient education on joint protection principles conducted by the Occupational Therapy Team. The primary outcome to be assessed will be the functionality score with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. The surrogate endpoints will be pain (numerical pain scale), disease activity (DAS-28/DAPSA), joint range (digit-o-meter), grip and pinch strength (dynamometer), and assessment of manual dexterity (Moberg Pickup Test; 9-Hole Peg Test, and Kapandji's Pinches). The measurement of outcomes will be done before and after each intervention.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of integrating a digital tool that provides dynamic content as a supplement to an occupational rehabilitation program, compared to the strategy traditionally used in patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis with morphofunctional alterations in the hand. Certain study limitations may relate to losses of follow-up during the rehabilitation program period and difficulty in precisely assessing adherence to the digital tool. However, this tool will allow patients to access dynamic content of home-based strategies that will enhance the functional gains obtained in a rehabilitation program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis, Psoriatic
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid
  • Deformity, Hand
  • Limitation, Mobility
  • Hand Arthritis
  • Hand Deformity

Keywords

  • Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Digital Technology
  • Occupational therapy
  • Hand
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 35 is below the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

" Must be referred patients from the Rheumatology Service of CHVNG/E. " Age 18 or older. " Must have a clinical diagnosis of either rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis by a Rheumatology specialist, as per the diagnostic criteria of the American College of Rheumatology.

" Must present pain, joint stiffness, joint instability, or osteoarticular deformities in the joints of the wrist, hand, and fingers.

" Must have a functional impact with a QuickDASH score > 31.5. " Must be capable of using the SIMPLI.REHAB app on a smartphone with internet connectivity.

" Must possess digital literacy allowing the use of the app. " Must have the ability to understand and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

"Presence of other medical conditions that might interfere with participation or interpretation of results, such as: neoplasms, other systemic autoimmune diseases, diabetic polyneuropathy and/or uncontrolled diabetes " Having had local surgery on the joint of the wrist, hand, and fingers or a history of fracture in the last 6 months.

" History of intra-articular or intramuscular corticoanesthetic infiltration in the previous 4 weeks.

" Inability to perform hand exercises due to significant understanding, cognitive, or physical limitation.

" Participation in an occupational rehabilitation program during the study period or in the last 6 months.

" Severe hearing loss or visual impairment. " Undergoing other types of therapies or localized interventions in the hand and fingers during the study period.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
35 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Digital Intervention Group

    This group incorporates the SIMPLI.REHAB digital tool as a complementary strategy for a rehabilitation program, including flexibility exercises and muscle strengthening, manual dexterity and motor coordination training, thermotherapy, and education on joint protection principles.

    Other: Digital Rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Intervention Group

    This group follows a conventional rehabilitation program delivered in a more traditional, non-digital manner to serve as a comparison to assess the superiority of the experimental intervention using SIMPLI.REHAB digital tool.

    Other: Conventional Rehabilitation

Interventions

  • OtherDigital Rehabilitation

    Participants in this arm will undergo an in-person rehabilitation program coordinated by a Physiatrist and will be able to access home-based rehabilitation strategies through dynamic content provided by SIMPLI.REHAB digital tool.

  • OtherConventional Rehabilitation

    Participants in this arm will undergo an in-person rehabilitation program coordinated by a Physiatrist and will be given home-based strategies in a printed paper brochure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score

    Hand functionality in basic and instrumental daily life activities, occupational and artistic or sports activities, through the score in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) 30-item questionnaire, calculated before and after the intervention. For each question, the patient rates on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score will range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (severe disability). It is a valid and reliable questionnaire (Pearson r \> 0.70; ICC(2,1) = 0.96), with a minimal clinically important difference ranging between 10.83 and 15. (33, 37, 38).

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  2. QuickDASH Outcome Measure

    Shortened version of the DASH questionnaire which includes 11 items for clinical and functional evaluation of the upper limb. The QuickDASH questionnaire assesses an individual's ability to complete daily life activities, the ability to bear load, as well as the intensity of symptoms. It is also a valid and reliable questionnaire (Pearson r \> 0.70; ICC(2,1) = 0.90), with the minimal clinically important difference ranging between 15.91 and 20.

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with New Osteoarticular Deformities

    Classification of osteoarticular deformities

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  2. Rate of Rescue Medications Usage

    Proportion of Pain-relief medications used

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  3. Number of Participants with Assistive Devices

    Determine the use of assistive devices and/or orthosis

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Numeric Pain Scale

    Score on the Numeric Pain Scale pre and post-intervention The Numeric Pain Scale is a unidimensional measurement instrument for pain intensity, frequently used in rheumatic diseases. The reliability of this scale is high (r = 0.96 to 0.95) with also high validity (r = 0.86 to 0.95). The minimal clinically significant difference is estimated at 1.1 points in patients with arthritis. (30, 31

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  2. Range of Motion

    Joint range of motion using a digit-o-meter pre and post-intervention

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  3. Muscular Strength

    Measurement of muscular strength using a pinch and palmar grip dynamometer pre and post-intervention. Dynamometry for objective assessment of pinch and palmar grip strength will allow for the evaluation of muscle strength in the hand and fingers. The minimal clinically important difference is estimated to be between 5 to 6 kgs.

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  4. Moberg Pickup Test Score

    Tool for objective assessment of manual dexterity and fine motor coordination pre and post-intervention.

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  5. 9-Hole Peg Test Score

    Tool for objective assessment of manual dexterity and fine motor coordination pre and post-intervention.

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  6. Kapandji score

    Tool for objective assessment of manual dexterity and fine motor coordination pre and post-intervention.

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  7. Disease Activity Index for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (DAS-28)

    Score on Disease Activity Index pre and post-intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. The DAS-28, or Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, is a measure commonly used to assess disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It evaluates the number of swollen and tender joints out of a total of 28, the patient's global assessment of their health, and an acute phase reactant (usually the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein level). The DAS-28 provides a score that falls into one of the following categories to represent the patient's disease activity:Remission: DAS-28 \< 2.6; Low disease activity: DAS-28 between 2.6 and 3.2; Moderate disease activity: DAS-28 between 3.2 and 5.1; High disease activity: DAS-28 \> 5.1

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

  8. Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis Patients (DAPSA)

    Score on Disease Activity Index pre and post-intervention for Psoriatic Arthritis Patients. DAPSA stands for Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis. It is a tool used to assess disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis. The score is calculated by summing the scores of the number of tender joints (68 joints are assessed), the number of swollen joints (66 joints are assessed), patient's assessment of pain, the patient's global disease activity and C-reactive protein (CRP) level (mg/dl). Low disease activity if DAPSA ≤ 15, moderate disease activity if DAPSA \> 15 and ≤ 28 and, finally, high disease activity if DAPSA \> 28.

    Time frame: Average of 7 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06077890
Lead sponsor
Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.
Responsible party
Eugénio Moita Gonçalves (Principal Investigator, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 11, 2023
Start date
Jul 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 30, 2024

Study contacts

Eugénio M Gonçalves, MD
Contact
eugenio.goncalves@chvng.min-saude.pt
+351914964951
Ana M Campolargo, MD
Contact
ana.campolargo@chvng.min-saude.pt
+351966961202
Eugénio M Gonçalves, MD
principal investigator · Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.
Ana M Campolargo, MD
study director · Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion