CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06077734ATROMABUpdated Mar 4, 2026

Muscle Stem Cell Quality in Atrophy

An observational study in Muscle Weakness, Atrophy, Muscle and Cachexia, sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-04.

Sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center · Observational

Why this study was terminated
This study was terminated prior to its planned completion due to unexpected low participant inclusion.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
7
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the quality of mesoangioblasts isolated from various patient groups suffering from muscle atrophy. This study includes cancer cachexia and muscle-impaired elderly and a control group of the same age.

The quality will be defined on these following outcomes:

  • The number and distribution of the mesoangioblasts in a muscle biopsy to define if there are sufficient mesoangioblasts to start a culture.
  • The proliferation capacity to define if we can culture them the numbers required for systemic treatment.
  • The myogenic capacity to define if the mesoangioblasts are sufficiently capable to generate muscle fibres.

Participants will:

  • Undergo a muscle biopsy (needle biopsy or rest material from surgery, \~50mg)
  • Donate blood (\~20 ml)
  • Fill in SARC-F questionnaire (evaluate sarcopenia score)
  • Fill in SQUASH questionnaire (evaluate physical activity of previous week) Researchers will compare groups (muscle-impaired elderly vs control; cancer cachexia vs control) to see if there is a difference regarding quality. These results will define the potential of autologous mesoangioblast therapy within these groups.
Read the detailed description

No effective treatment is available for the loss of muscle tissue in non-genetic muscle diseases such as (cancer) cachexia and sarcopenia. Such a treatment would improve the quality of life, therapy success, and independency of these patients. The administration of healthy autologous muscle stem cells, called mesoangioblasts, that lead to muscle regeneration and increased muscle mass and function could be a novel therapeutic strategy to achieve this. A prerequisite is that the therapeutic potential of these mesoangioblasts is sufficient. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to assess this potential for mesoangioblasts of patients with lung cancer cachexia and with sarcopenia and determine the effect the cancer or age might have on the therapeutic potential.

This study is part of a larger project, called Generate Your Muscle (GYM), which aims to develop and commercially produce a stem cell therapy for recovery of muscle mass and strength in patients with genetic and non-genetic muscle disease and muscle breakdown. This will be achieved by administering large numbers of autologous mesoangioblasts (MABs) as an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (asCTMP) in the arteries, which will migrate to the damaged muscle, thereby restoring muscle mass and function. This strategy can only be successful for patients suffering from cachexia or sarcopenia, if these patients have enough mesoangioblasts, if these MABs can proliferate into the numbers requested for systemic treatment, if the energy capacity of the MABs is sufficient and if these mesoangioblasts still have a high myogenic potential. The aim of this study is to determine these parameters for patients with cancer cachexia or sarcopenia, as we know that they can be affected by the underlying condition. They will be compared to age-matched controls. If positive, the MABs will qualify as asCTMP for a clinical trial in a follow-up study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Muscle Weakness
  • Atrophy, Muscle
  • Cachexia
  • Sarcopenia
  • Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells
03

In context

Muscle Weakness

601 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscle Weakness; 99 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 98 across 144 observational studies indexed under Muscle Weakness.

Browse Muscle Weakness studies →

Lead sponsor

Maastricht University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 835 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Two study populations are included in this study. The Muscle Impaired Elderly (MIE) are considered elderly who struggle with muscle weakness. MIE is used as a substitute group for sarcopenia as their muscle weakness and daily impairments are confirmed, but confirmation via medical imaging lacks. Sarcopenia is multifactorial and the balance between nutrition and activity is disturbed.

Cachexia is defined as an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass due to an illness that cannot be reversed by conventional nutrition and/or exercise. Lung cancer cachexia is a group where non-small cell lung cancer is confirmed along with non-intentional weight loss.

Both groups will be compared to a Control group consisting of eldery undergoing knee/hip/back surgery but are otherwise considered healthy.

Inclusion criteria

Lung cancer cachexia:

  • Diagnosed with NSCLC, stage III-IV
  • Diagnosed with cachexia (>5% unintentional body weight loss in past six months, >2% body weight loss with BMI \<20, or skeletal muscle index for males \<7.26 kg/m2; females \<5.45 kg/m2)
  • Age 50-60 or 60-70
  • Written informed consent

Patient group: MIE

  • Scheduled for total hip, knee, or back surgery
  • Age 60-70 or 70-80 year
  • Written informed consent

Controls

  • Patients with scheduled knee-, hip-, and back surgery
  • Age 50-60, 60-70, and 70-80 year
  • Age and sex-matched to patient groups
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No filled-in IC
  • Suffering from a muscular dystrophy or other disease known to affect muscle morphology or function
  • Have a weekly alcohol intake of ≥ 35 units (men) or ≥ 24 units (women)
  • Ongoing participation in other intervention clinical trials
  • Major surgery of the muscle within 4 weeks of the visit unrelated to the study
  • Patients unable and/or unwilling to comply with treatment and study instructions
  • Any other factor that in the opinion of the investigator excludes the patient from the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Muscle impaired elderly

    Elderly scheduled for hip/knee/back surgery with III-IV ASA score, low grip strength and high scoring for sarcopenia

    Other: In vitro analyse

  • Lung cancer cachexia

    Non-small cell lung cancer patients stage III with reported cachexia

    Other: In vitro analyse

  • Controls

    Elderly scheduled for hip/knee/back surgery without any recorded muscle defects, I-II ASA score, average or high grip strength, low scoring for sarcopenia.

    Other: In vitro analyse

Interventions

  • OtherIn vitro analyse

    In vitro analysis on isolated mesoangioblasts obtained from muscle biopsies

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of mesoangioblasts ex vivo isolated from muscle biopsy

    The number of mesoangioblasts obtained from a muscle biopsy. Once cells reached \>80% confluency in a culture dish, FACS analysis will determine the amount of mesoangioblasts obtained.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Proliferation capacity of mesoangioblasts in vitro

    The proliferation capacity to define whether we can culture them in the numbers required for systemic treatment. Doubling time will be assessed 3 separate instances with a hemocytometer. Population doubling level = 3.32 (log viable cells at harvest - log seeded cells)

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Myogenic capacity of mesoangioblasts in vitro

    The myogenic capacity to define if the mesoangioblasts are sufficiently capable to generate muscle fibres. Myogenic capacity is calculated as the number of nuclei in MF20-positive fibers divided by total number of nuclei per field.

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Distribution of mesoangioblasts in a muscle biopsy

    The number of mesoangioblasts in a muscle biopsy. Histochemistry will reveal the location of the pericyte-like mesoangioblasts surrounding the blood vessels when stained for pericyte marker NG2 proteoglycan.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Homing potential of mesoangioblasts in vitro

    The homing potential of the mesoangioblasts in these patients by characterizing inflammatory parameters via qPCR. Muscle damage reflected by inflammation is essential for the migration and engraftment of mesoangioblasts in the affected muscles. Differences in gene expression levels of cytokine IL6 and cytokine mediator HMGB1 in the groups MIE and Lung cancer patients vs Controls will be determined.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. ATP production of mesoangioblasts in vitro

    ATP production as a marker for metabolic health will be determined via the CellTiterGlo assay. Luminescence (Relative Light Unit) corrected for DNA content per well determines the ATP production.

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Difference in myogenic potential of mesoangioblasts and satellite cells in vitro

    Differences in myogenic potential between mesoangioblasts and satellite cells with respect due cachexia and sarcopenia. Myogenic capacity is calculated as the number of nuclei in MF20-positive fibers divided by total number of nuclei per field.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum
    Maastricht, Limburg 6229HX, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06077734
Lead sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 11, 2023
Start date
Nov 27, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2026
Completion
Feb 16, 2026
Last update
Mar 4, 2026

Study contacts

Monique Hochstenbag, MD, PhD
study director · Maastricht University Medical Centre
Bert Smeets, Professor
principal investigator · Maastricht University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion