ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06067997POPEIHEUpdated Oct 5, 2023

Prevalence Of Pulmonary Embolism In Patients With HEmoptysis (POPEIHE)

An observational study in Hemoptysis and Pulmonary Embolism, sponsored by Società Italiana di Medicina di Emergenza-Urgenza. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-05.

Sponsored by Società Italiana di Medicina di Emergenza-Urgenza · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
550
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Estimation of the incidence of pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the Emergency Department with hemoptysis.

Read the detailed description

Multicenter prospective observational cross-sectional study with non-commercial (non-profit) objectives.

The study population consists of consecutive patients who present to the Emergency Departments of the participating hospitals with hemoptysis.

The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism will be made using the diagnostic algorithm suggested by the 2019 European guidelines. The pre-test clinical probability of pulmonary embolism will be defined based on the simplified Wells score, which classifies pulmonary embolism as "likely" or "unlikely". In patients with a low pre-test clinical probability ("unlikely") and a D-dimer level below the threshold value (negative), the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism will be excluded, and further testing will not be necessary in this regard. The D-dimer level will be measured using the quantitative assay routinely used in each participating center; the threshold value for a positive result compared to a negative result is 500 μg per milliliter for patients under 50 years of age. For each additional decade of age, the exclusion cutoff will increase by 100 μg per milliliter.

For patients with a high pre-test clinical probability ("likely"), a positive D-dimer test, or both, a pulmonary CT angiography will be the diagnostic test of choice.

The criterion for the presence of pulmonary embolism is the detection of an intraluminal filling defect on CT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemoptysis
  • Pulmonary Embolism
03

In context

Hemoptysis

37 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemoptysis; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 550 is above the median of 176 across 15 observational studies indexed under Hemoptysis.

Browse Hemoptysis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Società Italiana di Medicina di Emergenza-Urgenza as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of consecutive patients who present to the Emergency Department of the participating hospitals with hemoptysis and agree to participate in the study. Patients under 18 years of age, pregnant patients, and patients with terminal illnesses with an estimated prognosis of less than 3 months will be excluded from the study. Data will be collected prospectively. The 30-day follow-up will be conducted by reviewing hospital documentation, any scheduled outpatient visits, any readmissions to the Emergency Department within the first 30 days in all Emergency Departments of the region, and, if necessary, through telephone follow-up.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Consecutive patients who present to the Emergency Department of the participating centers with hemoptysis
  • consent to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy.
  • Age below 18 years.
  • Terminal illnesses with an estimated prognosis of less than 3 months.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
550 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
30 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testpulmonary embolism diagnosis

    The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism will be made using the diagnostic algorithm suggested by the 2019 European guidelines . The pre-test clinical probability of pulmonary embolism will be defined based on the simplified Wells score. In patients with a low pre-test clinical probability and a D-dimer level below the threshold value the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism will be excluded. The D-dimer level will be measured using the quantitative assay routinely used in each participating center; the threshold value for a positive result compared to a negative result is 500 μg per milliliter for patients under 50 years of age. For each additional decade of age, the exclusion cutoff will increase by 100 μg per milliliter. The criterion for the presence of pulmonary embolism is the detection of an intraluminal filling defect on CT.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. incidence of pulmonary embolism

    The incidence of pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the Emergency Department with hemoptysis/haemoptysis.

    Time frame: 30 days within initial evaluation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • AOU Careggi
    Florence, Tuscany, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hirshberg B, Biran I, Glazer M, Kramer MR. Hemoptysis: etiology, evaluation, and outcome in a tertiary referral hospital. Chest. 1997 Aug;112(2):440-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.2.440. PubMed 9266882 ↗
  • Vanni S, Bianchi S, Bigiarini S, Casula C, Brogi M, Orsi S, Acquafresca M, Corbetta L, Grifoni S. Management of patients presenting with haemoptysis to a Tertiary Care Italian Emergency Department: the Florence Haemoptysis Score (FLHASc). Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;13(3):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1618-8. Epub 2017 Feb 3. PubMed 28160237 ↗
  • Larici AR, Franchi P, Occhipinti M, Contegiacomo A, del Ciello A, Calandriello L, Storto ML, Marano R, Bonomo L. Diagnosis and management of hemoptysis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):299-309. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.13426. PubMed 24808437 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2019 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 40 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 12, 2023
First posted
Oct 5, 2023
StartActual
Dec 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2023
CompletionActual
Aug 30, 2023
Last update
Oct 5, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06067997
Lead sponsor
Società Italiana di Medicina di Emergenza-Urgenza
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2023
Start date
Dec 1, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2023
Completion
Aug 30, 2023
Last update
Oct 5, 2023

Study contacts

Simone Vanni, Professor
study chair · University of Florence

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion