ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05634200Updated Aug 21, 2024

Utility of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Haemoptysis and Negative Chest CT Scan (ULYSSES)

An observational study in Hemoptysis, sponsored by University of Milan. Recruiting at 14 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-21.

Sponsored by University of Milan · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2024, 2 years 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Conflicting evidence exist in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan.

The primary aim of this prospective, observational, multicenter study is to evaluate the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans. Secondary aims are related to the utility of bronchoscopy to detect occult malignancies, the source of the bleeding and the clinical features of the cohort

Read the detailed description

Haemoptysis, i.e., coughing up blood from the airways, is a common and alarming symptom in the context of respiratory diseases. Studies conducted in Europe and North America in the last ten years have identified lung cancer (13.9-30.3%), bronchiectasis (6-21%) and low respiratory tract infection (4.2-40%) as the most common causes of the symptom. No international guidelines exist suggesting the optimal diagnostic work-up in patients with haemoptysis, based on demographics characteristics, risk factors (such as smoking history) and clinical presentation. The full diagnostic pathway of the symptom includes patient anamnesis, blood tests, chest X-ray, chest computed tomography (CT) scan and bronchoscopy. The 2020 international guidelines of American College of Radiology recommends performing chest CT scan with intravenous (IV) contrast or a CT angiography after the first episode of haemoptysis of any severity. Many studies recommend CT scan before bronchoscopy, underlining the diagnostic complementarity of the tests and the role of tCT as a guide for endoscopic examination. There is conflicting evidence in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with a negative CT scan or in cases of CT showing non-specific or non-diagnostic benign findings (e.g., calcified parenchymal nodule, linear subsegmental atelectasis, pleural thickening). Due to this conflicting evidence, we deem necessary to conduct a prospective, observational, multicentre study. The primary aim is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis.

The secondary objectives are:

  • to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
  • to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
  • to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
  • to evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a subsequent endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological (endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
  • to evaluate the proportion of patients with negative CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
  • to evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity, duration of haemoptysis) of patients with haemoptysis with negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up in this cohort.

The study will be performed in twelve Respiratory Units throughout Europe. The study will last two years, and it is estimated to enroll at least 150 adult patients of any nationality referred for haemoptysis of unknown origin with negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan, for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis. Patients will undergo pulmonary examination and blood tests (complete blood count, PT, PTT, urea, blood creatinine and CRP) before bronchoscopy. A chest CT scan with IV contrast is considered necessary, except for patients with absolute contraindications (renal failure, allergy to iodinate IV contrast). Only patients with chest CT scan performed within 72 hours from the last episode of haemoptysis will be enrolled in the study. Bronchoscopy will be performed within two weeks of the chest CT scan. All the enrolled patients will be followed-up for 12 months with a telephone interview at one, three, six and twelve months after the enrolment. In case of haemoptysis relapse, a clinical evaluation could be performed. Each centre will decide upon the subsequent diagnostic work-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemoptysis

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Bronchoscopy
  • Lung cancer
  • CT scan
  • Haemoptysis
03

In context

Hemoptysis

37 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemoptysis; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is below the median of 176 across 15 observational studies indexed under Hemoptysis.

Browse Hemoptysis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Milan is the lead sponsor of 183 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients (i.e., ≥18 years) of any nationality (inpatients and outpatients) with haemoptysis of unknown aetiology and negative chest CT scan/with CT scan showing non-diagnostic findings (i.e. focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter \<5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis \<1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter \<1 cm), in whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years old
  • Haemoptysis of unknown origin
  • Negative or non-diagnostic chest CT scan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known bleeding lesions of the upper or lower respiratory airways
  • Chest CT scan diagnostic for hemoptysis etiology
  • Refusal to sign the
  • Refusal of bronchoscopy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan

    Patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan (i.e. with focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter \<5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis \<1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter \<1 cm) for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis.

    Procedure: Bronchoscopy

Interventions

  • ProcedureBronchoscopy

    During bronchoscopy endobronchial biopsy, transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial needle aspiration, bronchial washing, bronchoalveolar lavage, EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA may be performed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis

    The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis

    Time frame: One year

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)

    To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)

    Time frame: One year

  2. To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding

    To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding

    Time frame: One year

  3. To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients

    To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients

    Time frame: One year

  4. To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a an endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological diagnosis

    To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a subsequent endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological (endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis

    Time frame: One year

  5. To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up

    To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up

    Time frame: One year

  6. To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity of haemoptysis) of these patients, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up.

    To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity, duration of haemoptysis) of patients with haemoptysis with negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up in this cohort.

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

13 of 14 sites recruiting
  • - Respiratory Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XVIII
    Bergamo, Italy
    Recruiting
  • - Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
    Bologna, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Sant'Anna Hospital
    Como, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Respiratory Unit, ASST Lodi
    Lodi, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo
    Milan, 20142, Italy
    Recruiting
  • - Respiratory Unit, Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco
    Milan, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza
    Monza, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Dept of Pulmonology, Oncology and Hematology, Cardarelli Hospital
    Naples, Italy
    Recruiting
  • - Respiratory Unit, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Italy
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • Pulmonology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia
    Reggio Emilia, Italy
    Recruiting
  • - Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli
    Roma, Italy
    Recruiting
  • - Respiratory Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
    Torino, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Udine (ASUFC)
    Udine, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Respiratory Department, University Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau
    Barcelona, Spain
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2024, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 21, 2022
First posted
Dec 2, 2022
StartActual
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2025
Last update
Aug 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05634200
Responsible party
Michele Mondoni (Associate Professor of Respiratory Medicine, University of Milan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 2, 2022
Start date
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2024

Study contacts

Giulia Nalesso, MD
Contact
giulia.nalesso@unimi.it
0039 0281843025
Michele Mondoni, MD
principal investigator · Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Milan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion