An observational study in Hemoptysis, sponsored by University of Milan. Recruiting at 14 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-21.
Sponsored by University of Milan · Observational
Conflicting evidence exist in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan.
The primary aim of this prospective, observational, multicenter study is to evaluate the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans. Secondary aims are related to the utility of bronchoscopy to detect occult malignancies, the source of the bleeding and the clinical features of the cohort
Haemoptysis, i.e., coughing up blood from the airways, is a common and alarming symptom in the context of respiratory diseases. Studies conducted in Europe and North America in the last ten years have identified lung cancer (13.9-30.3%), bronchiectasis (6-21%) and low respiratory tract infection (4.2-40%) as the most common causes of the symptom. No international guidelines exist suggesting the optimal diagnostic work-up in patients with haemoptysis, based on demographics characteristics, risk factors (such as smoking history) and clinical presentation. The full diagnostic pathway of the symptom includes patient anamnesis, blood tests, chest X-ray, chest computed tomography (CT) scan and bronchoscopy. The 2020 international guidelines of American College of Radiology recommends performing chest CT scan with intravenous (IV) contrast or a CT angiography after the first episode of haemoptysis of any severity. Many studies recommend CT scan before bronchoscopy, underlining the diagnostic complementarity of the tests and the role of tCT as a guide for endoscopic examination. There is conflicting evidence in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with a negative CT scan or in cases of CT showing non-specific or non-diagnostic benign findings (e.g., calcified parenchymal nodule, linear subsegmental atelectasis, pleural thickening). Due to this conflicting evidence, we deem necessary to conduct a prospective, observational, multicentre study. The primary aim is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis.
The secondary objectives are:
The study will be performed in twelve Respiratory Units throughout Europe. The study will last two years, and it is estimated to enroll at least 150 adult patients of any nationality referred for haemoptysis of unknown origin with negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan, for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis. Patients will undergo pulmonary examination and blood tests (complete blood count, PT, PTT, urea, blood creatinine and CRP) before bronchoscopy. A chest CT scan with IV contrast is considered necessary, except for patients with absolute contraindications (renal failure, allergy to iodinate IV contrast). Only patients with chest CT scan performed within 72 hours from the last episode of haemoptysis will be enrolled in the study. Bronchoscopy will be performed within two weeks of the chest CT scan. All the enrolled patients will be followed-up for 12 months with a telephone interview at one, three, six and twelve months after the enrolment. In case of haemoptysis relapse, a clinical evaluation could be performed. Each centre will decide upon the subsequent diagnostic work-up.
37 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemoptysis; 6 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 150 is below the median of 176 across 15 observational studies indexed under Hemoptysis.
Browse Hemoptysis studies →University of Milan is the lead sponsor of 183 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Adult patients (i.e., ≥18 years) of any nationality (inpatients and outpatients) with haemoptysis of unknown aetiology and negative chest CT scan/with CT scan showing non-diagnostic findings (i.e. focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter \<5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis \<1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter \<1 cm), in whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan (i.e. with focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter \<5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis \<1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter \<1 cm) for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis.
Procedure: Bronchoscopy
During bronchoscopy endobronchial biopsy, transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial needle aspiration, bronchial washing, bronchoalveolar lavage, EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA may be performed
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a an endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological diagnosis
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a subsequent endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological (endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity of haemoptysis) of these patients, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up.
To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity, duration of haemoptysis) of patients with haemoptysis with negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up in this cohort.
Time frame: One year
Not enrolling at this site.
Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2024, 24 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.