CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06063694Updated Mar 5, 2024

Comparing Wound Complication Following TMA With Aid of Electrospun Fiber Matrix

An interventional study of Synthetic electrospun fiber matrix in Amputation, Wound; Foot and Wound Complication, sponsored by Scripps Health. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-05.

Sponsored by Scripps Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2024, 2 years 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) patient populations commonly have poor healing outcomes and a large number of complications. There has been little study on the benefits of augmenting a TMA with a synthetic graft substitute. The long term goal is to push for an application of synthetic graft substitute to reduce infection rates and aid in the healing process. Augmenting a TMA with a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will demonstrate utilization of the product and other comparators in generating wound healing and infection rate outcomes including rate of infection, wound dehiscence and total healing response. Electrospun fiber matrices have long been investigated as an innovative construct for use in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research due to their ability to mimic the structure and scale of native tissue. Clinical studies have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating both chronic and acute wounds. There is strong evidence to support the application of a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will generate favorable wound healing and reduce infection rates.

Read the detailed description

Intervention or Exposure

  • Transmetatarsal amputation with application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix
  • After surgery, patient will be off-loaded to the surgical site with an off-loading device based on the investigator's decision, e.g., a boot for forefoot and a heel protector for hindfoot. Patients should be instructed on how to care for the surgical site, utilize an off-loading device, and keep the surgical site moist and clean.

Comparison intervention or Exposure

  • Transmetatarsal amputation without application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix
  • After surgery, patient will be off-loaded to the surgical site with an off-loading device based on the investigator's decision, e.g., a boot for forefoot and a heel protector for hindfoot. Patients will be instructed on how to care for the surgical site, utilize an off-loading device, and keep the surgical site moist and clean.

Outcomes

  • Primary: Infection rate at 1 week postoperative follow-up visit
  • Secondary: Wound dehiscence rate and wound healing status at 12 weeks post operatively. Infection rate at 2, 4, and 12 weeks post operatively.
  • Patients will have follow-up visits at week 1, 2, 4, and 12. Assessment and imaging of the wound will occur at each visit. Assessment of adverse events, infection, and dehiscence will occur during each visit. Assessment of wound(s) through gross observation and analysis, wound progression, and tissue healing. Gross observation will be utilized to determine the necessity of standard dressing change. Carefully assess the wound(s) for signs of infection, dehiscence, and description of exudate present. Debridement and dressing changes may occur at each weekly visit or as needed. Debride the wound(s) as needed while not disrupting healing tissue. Photographic image will be obtain to document wound appearance. The clinician will inspect the wound bed for signs of infection and healing. Frequency of secondary dressing changes will be dependent upon the volume of exudate produced, type of dressing used and the clinician's decision upon inspection of the wound(s).
  • Measurement and imaging of wound(s). If debridement is completed during this visit, then the assessment must be completed after debridement.

Timing of study

  • Preop visit for eligibility and randomization
  • Surgical visit: TMA with or without application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix
  • 1, 2, 4, and 12 week post-op visits.

Setting of study

  • Inpatient at Scripps Mercy Hospital
  • Outpatient follow-up Scripps Mercy Podiatry Specialty Clinic or Dr. Brookshier's private clinic North Park Podiatry

Study exit: patient's participation in the study will end after any of the following

  • Completion of 12 week follow-up period
  • Pathology results from TMA surgery revealing active infection within remaining surgical margins
  • Patient withdrawal
  • The Investigator may withdraw the patient if he/she determines it is in the patient's best interest
  • Patient lost to follow-up
  • Amputation of the study limb
  • Closure of study
  • Patient death

Variables that can be collected: HbA1c, patients that require revascularization prior to TMA due to poor vascular status, age, gender, smoking status

Application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix (SEFM)

  1. Wound Bed Preparation post TMA. Following amputation, prepare the wound bed using standard methods to ensure it is free of devitalized tissue. An initial excision or debridement of the wound is necessary to ensure the wound edges contain viable tissue. Cleanse the wound thoroughly with sterile saline prior to application of SEFM.
  2. Preparation of SEFM. Select the appropriate size sheet of SEFM based on the size of the post-amputation defect. Heavily fenestrate with a scalpel or mesh prior to application. SEFM must be fenestrated prior to use in any wound prone to exudate in order to permit effective exudate management. SEFM is packaged in a nested pouch configuration. Peel open the outer foil pouch starting from the chevron sealed edge. The inner pouch is sterile and may be placed on the sterile field. Rinse surgical gloves, if necessary, to remove any glove powder prior to touching the product. SEFM can be cut to the desired shape in a wet or dry state. In order to increase pliability of the product, hydrate in warm, sterile, hypertonic solution (i.e., saline, water, etc.) for a minimum of 1 minute. The matrix should be cut down to fit the size of the wound and applied in full contact with the wound bed.
  3. Application of SEFM. Place the SEFM within the surgical defect within the open space. Discard any unused pieces of study product. Management of wound exudate will determine the required dressing. The dressing will be securely in place and dressing determined by provider preference.

Adverse events will be documented. The following adverse events whether or not they are related to a study product/procedure:

  • Infection of wound and/or area surrounding wound
  • Complete or partial amputation of lower extremity
  • Allergic reaction to a study product
  • Excessive redness, pain, swelling or blistering of wound
02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation
  • Wound; Foot
  • Wound Complication

Browse trials for

03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 52 across 3,239 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Scripps Health is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergoing TMA
  • At least 18 years old
  • Adequate perfusion demonstrated by either TcPO2 or ankle-brachial index (ABI) or toe-brachia index (TBI) within 60 days prior to enrollment/randomization (Dorsum TcPO2 of study leg(s) ≥40mmHg OR ABI of study leg(s) with results of ≥ 0.7 and ≤ 1.3 OR TBI of study extremity(ies) with results of ≥ 0.5).
  • Patient is willing and capable of complying with all protocol requirements.
  • Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) is willing to provide written informed consent prior to any study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously enrolled into this study or is currently participating in another prospective drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint.
  • Patient is pregnant, breast feeding or planning to become pregnant.
  • Patient has a known allergy to resorbable suture materials.
  • Patient has a life expectancy less than three months as assessed by the investigator.
  • Patient has received skin substitutes during the run-in period or within 14 days prior to beginning of run-in period.
  • Patient currently undergoing cancer treatment.
  • Patient diagnosed with autoimmune connective tissue.
  • Patient is taking parenteral corticosteroids or any cytotoxic agents for 7 consecutive days during the run-in period or up to 30 days before the run-in period.
  • Chronic oral steroid use is not excluded if dose is \<10 mg per day for prednisone.
  • Patient unwilling or unable to safely utilize appropriate offloading device to unweight wound(s).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Transmetatarsal amputation with primary closure

    Transmetatarsal amputation with primary closure and no application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix.

  • Experimental
    Transmetatarsal amputation with application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix

    Transmetatarsal amputation with application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix

    Device: Synthetic electrospun fiber matrix

Interventions

  • DeviceSynthetic electrospun fiber matrix

    Electrospun fiber matrices have long been investigated as an innovative construct for use in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research due to their ability to mimic the structure and scale of native tissue. Clinical studies have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating both chronic and acute wounds. There is strong evidence to support the application of a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will generate favorable wound healing and reduce infection rates when used to augment transmetatarsal amputation.

    Also known as: Restrata

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Infection rate of transmetatarsal amputation site at 1 week postoperative

    Assessment for signs of infection to transmetatarsal amputation site in both groups at 1 week post-operative follow-up visit. * Assess if patient currently on antibiotics * Amount of wound exudate (none, scant, small, moderate or large) * Type of wound exudate (bloody, serosanguinous, serous, purulent, or foul purulent) * Erythema, edema, and/or increased warmth at surgical site * Presence of fevers or chills * Clinical signs of infection * Photographs taken of the surgical site to document appearance * Wounds measured in centimeters (length, width, depth)

    Time frame: 1 week post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Infection rate of transmetatarsal amputation site at 2, 4 and 12 weeks postoperative

    Assessment for signs of infection to transmetatarsal amputation site in both groups at 2, 4 and final 12 weeks post-operative follow-up visit. Assessment for signs of infection to transmetatarsal amputation site in both groups at 1 week post-operative follow-up visit. * Amount of wound exudate (none, scant, small, moderate or large) * Type of wound exudate (bloody, serosanguinous, serous, purulent, or foul purulent) * Erythema, edema, and/or increased warmth at surgical site * Presence of fevers or chills * Clinical signs of infection * Wounds measured in centimeters (length, width, depth) * Assessments will then be aggregated into yes or no for infection

    Time frame: 2, 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively

  2. Wound dehiscence rate of transmetatarsal amputation site at 12 weeks postoperative

    Assess for signs of wound dehiscence in both groups at final 12 weeks postoperative follow-up visit. * Photographs taken of the surgical site to document appearance * Wounds measured in centimeters (length, width, depth) * Assess if surgical edges are intact and well-coapted * Assess wound bed condition (necrotic tissue, granulation tissue or epithelialized) * If presence of necrotic tissue, assess amount (Not able to visualize; none visible; \< 25% of wound covered; 25 to 50% of wound covered; \> 50% to 75% of wound covered; 75% to 100% of wound covered) * Assessments will then be aggregated into yes or no for wound dehiscence

    Time frame: 12 weeks postoperatively

  3. Wound healing status of transmetatarsal amputation site at 12 weeks postoperative

    Assess final wound healing status in both groups at 12 weeks postoperative follow-up visit. * Photographs taken of the surgical site to document appearance * Wounds measured in centimeters (length, width, depth) * Assess if surgical edges are intact and well-coapted * Assess wound bed condition (necrotic tissue, granulation tissue or epithelialized) * Assessments will then be aggregated into either fully healed, partially healed, or non-healing.

    Time frame: 12 weeks postoperatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • McCallum R, Tagoe M. Transmetatarsal amputation: a case series and review of the literature. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:797218. doi: 10.1155/2012/797218. Epub 2012 Jul 3. PubMed 22811912 ↗
  • Alexander J, Desai V, Denden S, Alianello N. Assessment of a Novel Augmented Closure Technique for Surgical Wounds Associated with Transmetatarsal Amputation: A Preliminary Study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2022 Sep-Oct;112(5):20-256. doi: 10.7547/20-256. PubMed 36251595 ↗
  • MacEwan M, Jeng L, Kovacs T, Sallade E. Clinical Application of Bioresorbable, Synthetic, Electrospun Matrix in Wound Healing. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;10(1):9. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010009. PubMed 36671580 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06063694
Lead sponsor
Scripps Health
Collaborators
North Park Podiatry
Responsible party
Trent Brookshier (Principal Investigator, Scripps Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 2, 2023
Start date
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 5, 2024

Study contacts

Faustine Vuong, DPM
Contact
vuong.faustine@scrippshealth.org
9096881274
Trent Brookshier, DPM
principal investigator · Scripps Health

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion