An interventional study of Synthetic electrospun fiber matrix in Amputation, Wound; Foot and Wound Complication, sponsored by Scripps Health. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-05.
Sponsored by Scripps Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) patient populations commonly have poor healing outcomes and a large number of complications. There has been little study on the benefits of augmenting a TMA with a synthetic graft substitute. The long term goal is to push for an application of synthetic graft substitute to reduce infection rates and aid in the healing process. Augmenting a TMA with a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will demonstrate utilization of the product and other comparators in generating wound healing and infection rate outcomes including rate of infection, wound dehiscence and total healing response. Electrospun fiber matrices have long been investigated as an innovative construct for use in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research due to their ability to mimic the structure and scale of native tissue. Clinical studies have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating both chronic and acute wounds. There is strong evidence to support the application of a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will generate favorable wound healing and reduce infection rates.
Intervention or Exposure
Comparison intervention or Exposure
Outcomes
Timing of study
Setting of study
Study exit: patient's participation in the study will end after any of the following
Variables that can be collected: HbA1c, patients that require revascularization prior to TMA due to poor vascular status, age, gender, smoking status
Application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix (SEFM)
Adverse events will be documented. The following adverse events whether or not they are related to a study product/procedure:
5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 52 across 3,239 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.
Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →Scripps Health is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Transmetatarsal amputation with primary closure and no application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix.
Transmetatarsal amputation with application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix
Device: Synthetic electrospun fiber matrix
Electrospun fiber matrices have long been investigated as an innovative construct for use in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research due to their ability to mimic the structure and scale of native tissue. Clinical studies have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating both chronic and acute wounds. There is strong evidence to support the application of a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will generate favorable wound healing and reduce infection rates when used to augment transmetatarsal amputation.
Also known as: Restrata
Infection rate of transmetatarsal amputation site at 1 week postoperative
Assessment for signs of infection to transmetatarsal amputation site in both groups at 1 week post-operative follow-up visit. * Assess if patient currently on antibiotics * Amount of wound exudate (none, scant, small, moderate or large) * Type of wound exudate (bloody, serosanguinous, serous, purulent, or foul purulent) * Erythema, edema, and/or increased warmth at surgical site * Presence of fevers or chills * Clinical signs of infection * Photographs taken of the surgical site to document appearance * Wounds measured in centimeters (length, width, depth)
Time frame: 1 week post-operatively
Infection rate of transmetatarsal amputation site at 2, 4 and 12 weeks postoperative
Assessment for signs of infection to transmetatarsal amputation site in both groups at 2, 4 and final 12 weeks post-operative follow-up visit. Assessment for signs of infection to transmetatarsal amputation site in both groups at 1 week post-operative follow-up visit. * Amount of wound exudate (none, scant, small, moderate or large) * Type of wound exudate (bloody, serosanguinous, serous, purulent, or foul purulent) * Erythema, edema, and/or increased warmth at surgical site * Presence of fevers or chills * Clinical signs of infection * Wounds measured in centimeters (length, width, depth) * Assessments will then be aggregated into yes or no for infection
Time frame: 2, 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively
Wound dehiscence rate of transmetatarsal amputation site at 12 weeks postoperative
Assess for signs of wound dehiscence in both groups at final 12 weeks postoperative follow-up visit. * Photographs taken of the surgical site to document appearance * Wounds measured in centimeters (length, width, depth) * Assess if surgical edges are intact and well-coapted * Assess wound bed condition (necrotic tissue, granulation tissue or epithelialized) * If presence of necrotic tissue, assess amount (Not able to visualize; none visible; \< 25% of wound covered; 25 to 50% of wound covered; \> 50% to 75% of wound covered; 75% to 100% of wound covered) * Assessments will then be aggregated into yes or no for wound dehiscence
Time frame: 12 weeks postoperatively
Wound healing status of transmetatarsal amputation site at 12 weeks postoperative
Assess final wound healing status in both groups at 12 weeks postoperative follow-up visit. * Photographs taken of the surgical site to document appearance * Wounds measured in centimeters (length, width, depth) * Assess if surgical edges are intact and well-coapted * Assess wound bed condition (necrotic tissue, granulation tissue or epithelialized) * Assessments will then be aggregated into either fully healed, partially healed, or non-healing.
Time frame: 12 weeks postoperatively
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Scripps Health