CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06062316Updated Apr 30, 2024

Warning Model of Myocardial Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction Using Multimodal Feature Structure Technology

An observational study in Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-30.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
4,000
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most important diseases threatening human life. The existing MI prognosis prediction scales mostly predict the incidence of death, recurrent MI and heart failure through 6-8 clinical text indicators, and the data are collected relatively simply. Myocardial remodeling, as an adverse pathological change that can start and continue to progress in the early stage after myocardial infarction, is the main pathological mechanism of heart failure and death. However, there is no quantitative early-warning model of myocardial remodeling, and the clinical guidance of early intervention is lacking.

Our previous study found that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can accurately quantify the necrotic area and recoverable myocardium in the edematous myocardium after myocardial infarction. In this study, machine learning algorithm, variable convolution network (DCN) and capsule network (capsnet) are used to build a new neural network architecture. Structural feature extraction of multi-modal clinical image data such as MRI and ultrasound is realized. Combined with the established database of 3000 patients with myocardial infarction, the multimodal feature matrix will be constructed, and a variety of classifiers such as support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) will be used for quantitative prediction of myocardial remodeling, and the effects of different classifiers were evaluated. It is expected that this project will establish a quantitative early warning model of myocardial remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in line with the characteristics of Chinese people. The same type of data outside the database will be used for verification to establish an efficient and stable early warning model.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • Computer aided diagnosis
  • Myocardial Remodeling
  • Early warning model
  • Myocardial infarction
  • MRI
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 418 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4,000 is above the median of 500 across 983 observational studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 217 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Criteria for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction:

increased or decreased cardiac biomarkers (preferably cTn), at least once exceeding the 99th percentile of the upper reference value, cut-off variability ≤10%, and at least one evidence of myocardial ischemia (including symptoms, electrocardiographic ischemic changes, pathological Q-waves, or imaging evidence).

Inclusion criteria

  • 1.Patients with acute myocardial infarction, aged 18-80 years; 2.The time from onset to treatment is less than 72h 3.Myocardial enzyme Tni/Tnt(+).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1.Patients with malignant tumors; 2.Patients who could not receive conventional treatment 3.Patients who did not receive coronary angiography, lacking anatomical and imaging data; 4.Patients who have undergone cardiac surgery (except coronary artery bypass surgery)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
4,000 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Novel convolutional neural network algorithm and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the occurrence of myocardial remodeling.remodeling after myocardial infarction.

    (Quantitative characterization of myocardial remodeling, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging quantifying necrotic areas and recoverable myocardium within the edematous myocardium after myocardial infarction).

    Time frame: 1year

Secondary outcomes

  1. The multi-dimensional indexes of existing database were compared with the location and course of myocardial remodeling by artificial intelligence method Degree of correlation analysis.

    Through the new Deformable Convolutional Capsule network that has been developed The Networks (DCCN) study focused on the existing clinical and imaging comprehensive database of patients with acute myocardial infarction Machine learning was performed on the data to complete the extraction of relevant features and logical relationship analysis of myocardial remodeling after myocardial infarction. Strong correlation features were screened.

    Time frame: 1year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Xicheng 100000, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Roth GA, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray CJ, Naghavi M. Temporal trends in ischemic heart disease mortality in 21 world regions, 1980 to 2010: the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014 Apr 8;129(14):1483-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004042. Epub 2014 Feb 26. PubMed 24573352 ↗
  • Abuomara HZA, Hassan OM, Rashid T, Baraka M. Myocardial performance index as an echocardiographic predictor of early in-hospital heart failure during first acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Egypt Heart J. 2018 Jun;70(2):71-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 24. PubMed 30166885 ↗
  • Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target. J Clin Invest. 2013 Jan;123(1):92-100. doi: 10.1172/JCI62874. Epub 2013 Jan 2. PubMed 23281415 ↗
  • Hendriks T, Schurer RAJ, Al Ali L, van den Heuvel AFM, van der Harst P. Left ventricular restoration devices post myocardial infarction. Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Nov;23(6):871-883. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9711-2. PubMed 29770903 ↗
  • Iborra-Egea O, Galvez-Monton C, Roura S, Perea-Gil I, Prat-Vidal C, Soler-Botija C, Bayes-Genis A. Mechanisms of action of sacubitril/valsartan on cardiac remodeling: a systems biology approach. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2017 Apr 18;3:12. doi: 10.1038/s41540-017-0013-4. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28649439 ↗
  • McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, Rouleau JL, Shi VC, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Zile MR; PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077. Epub 2014 Aug 30. PubMed 25176015 ↗
  • Seferovic PM, Fragasso G, Petrie M, Mullens W, Ferrari R, Thum T, Bauersachs J, Anker SD, Ray R, Cavusoglu Y, Polovina M, Metra M, Ambrosio G, Prasad K, Seferovic J, Jhund PS, Dattilo G, Celutkiene J, Piepoli M, Moura B, Chioncel O, Ben Gal T, Heymans S, Jaarsma T, Hill L, Lopatin Y, Lyon AR, Ponikowski P, Lainscak M, Jankowska E, Mueller C, Cosentino F, Lund LH, Filippatos GS, Ruschitzka F, Coats AJS, Rosano GMC. Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology update on sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;22(11):1984-1986. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2026. Epub 2020 Oct 27. PubMed 33068051 ↗
  • Pasternak B, Ueda P, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Franzen S, Gudbjornsdottir S, Hveem K, Jonasson C, Wintzell V, Melbye M, Svanstrom H. Use of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of major cardiovascular events and heart failure: Scandinavian register based cohort study. BMJ. 2019 Aug 29;366:l4772. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4772. PubMed 31467044 ↗
  • West R, Jones D. Cardiac rehabilitation and mortality reduction after myocardial infarction: the emperor's new clothes? Evidence against cardiac rehabilitation. Heart. 2013 Jul;99(13):911-3. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303705. Epub 2013 May 4. PubMed 23644409 ↗
  • Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, Zwisler AD, Rees K, Martin N, Taylor RS. Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 5;67(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044. PubMed 26764059 ↗
  • Milani RV, Lavie CJ. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on depression and its associated mortality. Am J Med. 2007 Sep;120(9):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.03.026. PubMed 17765050 ↗
  • Karuzas A, Rumbinaite E, Verikas D, Ptasinskas T, Muckiene G, Kazakauskaite E, Zabiela V, Jurkevicius R, Vaskelyte JJ, Zaliunas R, Zaliaduonyte-Peksiene D. Accuracy of three-dimensional systolic dyssynchrony and sphericity indexes for identifying early left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019 Jun;22(1):13-20. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.02844. PubMed 31264652 ↗
  • Kagiyama N, Shrestha S, Cho JS, Khalil M, Singh Y, Challa A, Casaclang-Verzosa G, Sengupta PP. A low-cost texture-based pipeline for predicting myocardial tissue remodeling and fibrosis using cardiac ultrasound. EBioMedicine. 2020 Apr;54:102726. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102726. Epub 2020 Apr 6. PubMed 32268274 ↗
  • Chirinos JA, Sardana M, Ansari B, Satija V, Kuriakose D, Edelstein I, Oldland G, Miller R, Gaddam S, Lee J, Suri A, Akers SR. Left Atrial Phasic Function by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Is a Strong Predictor of Incident Cardiovascular Events. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec;11(12):e007512. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007512. PubMed 30562112 ↗
  • Ranka S, Reddy M, Noheria A. Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2021 Jan;36(1):26-35. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000812. PubMed 33060388 ↗
  • Ahmad T, Lund LH, Rao P, Ghosh R, Warier P, Vaccaro B, Dahlstrom U, O'Connor CM, Felker GM, Desai NR. Machine Learning Methods Improve Prognostication, Identify Clinically Distinct Phenotypes, and Detect Heterogeneity in Response to Therapy in a Large Cohort of Heart Failure Patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 12;7(8):e008081. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008081. PubMed 29650709 ↗
  • Motwani M, Dey D, Berman DS, Germano G, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah MH, Andreini D, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Callister TQ, Chang HJ, Chinnaiyan K, Chow BJ, Cury RC, Delago A, Gomez M, Gransar H, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Hindoyan N, Feuchtner G, Kaufmann PA, Kim YJ, Leipsic J, Lin FY, Maffei E, Marques H, Pontone G, Raff G, Rubinshtein R, Shaw LJ, Stehli J, Villines TC, Dunning A, Min JK, Slomka PJ. Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017 Feb 14;38(7):500-507. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw188. PubMed 27252451 ↗
  • Tokodi M, Schwertner WR, Kovacs A, Toser Z, Staub L, Sarkany A, Lakatos BK, Behon A, Boros AM, Perge P, Kutyifa V, Szeplaki G, Geller L, Merkely B, Kosztin A. Machine learning-based mortality prediction of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: the SEMMELWEIS-CRT score. Eur Heart J. 2020 May 7;41(18):1747-1756. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz902. PubMed 31923316 ↗
  • Sanchez-Cabo F, Rossello X, Fuster V, Benito F, Manzano JP, Silla JC, Fernandez-Alvira JM, Oliva B, Fernandez-Friera L, Lopez-Melgar B, Mendiguren JM, Sanz J, Ordovas JM, Andres V, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bueno H, Ibanez B, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Lara-Pezzi E. Machine Learning Improves Cardiovascular Risk Definition for Young, Asymptomatic Individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 6;76(14):1674-1685. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.017. PubMed 33004133 ↗
  • Commandeur F, Slomka PJ, Goeller M, Chen X, Cadet S, Razipour A, McElhinney P, Gransar H, Cantu S, Miller RJH, Rozanski A, Achenbach S, Tamarappoo BK, Berman DS, Dey D. Machine learning to predict the long-term risk of myocardial infarction and cardiac death based on clinical risk, coronary calcium, and epicardial adipose tissue: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Dec 1;116(14):2216-2225. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz321. PubMed 31853543 ↗
  • Than MP, Pickering JW, Sandoval Y, Shah ASV, Tsanas A, Apple FS, Blankenberg S, Cullen L, Mueller C, Neumann JT, Twerenbold R, Westermann D, Beshiri A, Mills NL; MI3 Collaborative. Machine Learning to Predict the Likelihood of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):899-909. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041980. Epub 2019 Aug 16. PubMed 31416346 ↗
  • Tan JH, Hagiwara Y, Pang W, Lim I, Oh SL, Adam M, Tan RS, Chen M, Acharya UR. Application of stacked convolutional and long short-term memory network for accurate identification of CAD ECG signals. Comput Biol Med. 2018 Mar 1;94:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.12.023. Epub 2018 Jan 2. PubMed 29358103 ↗
  • D'Ascenzo F, De Filippo O, Gallone G, Mittone G, Deriu MA, Iannaccone M, Ariza-Sole A, Liebetrau C, Manzano-Fernandez S, Quadri G, Kinnaird T, Campo G, Simao Henriques JP, Hughes JM, Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Aldinucci M, Morbiducci U, Patti G, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Abu-Assi E, De Ferrari GM; PRAISE study group. Machine learning-based prediction of adverse events following an acute coronary syndrome (PRAISE): a modelling study of pooled datasets. Lancet. 2021 Jan 16;397(10270):199-207. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32519-8. PubMed 33453782 ↗
  • Fernandez-Ruiz I. Machine learning predicts risk in ACS. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Apr;18(4):230. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00521-8. No abstract available. PubMed 33531699 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06062316
Lead sponsor
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Collaborators
Beijing Institute of Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 2, 2023
Start date
Oct 10, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 30, 2024

Study contacts

Zhi Liu
principal investigator · Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion