ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06060002STONEUpdated Sep 29, 2023

Role of Prophylactic Biliary Stent in Reducing the Recurrence of Choledocholithiasis

An interventional study of Group A - Stent exchange if cholecystectomy dated beyond 3 months and Group B - Diagnostic EUS/MRCP/USG abdomen and LFT at 3 months in Choledocholithiasis, sponsored by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-29.

Sponsored by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
480
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We planned this multicenter randomized controlled trial to study the role of a prophylactic biliary stent in recurrence of stones and biliary complications in patients awaiting cholecystectomy after biliary stone clearance

Read the detailed description

Patients with cholelithiasis can have presence of concomitant choledocholithiasis (CDL) in upto 30%. These stones may remain asymptomatic or cause obstructive jaundice and complications like cholangitis and pancreatitis. In situations where there is a failure of CDL clearance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), biliary stenting is recommended to prevent complications. However, the role of prophylactic biliary stenting in situations where CDL clearance has been achieved, and the patient is awaiting cholecystectomy is debatable. One retrospective study showed benefit while a small prospective study and a retrospective study did not show benefit of prophylactic biliary stenting. Moreover, a randomized controlled trial addressing this question is lacking. Hence, we planned this multicenter randomized controlled trial to study the role of a prophylactic biliary stent in recurrence of stones and biliary complications in patients awaiting cholecystectomy after biliary stone clearance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Choledocholithiasis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Choledocholithiasis

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Choledocholithiasis; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 480 is above the median of 100 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Choledocholithiasis.

Browse Choledocholithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18-80 years
  • Cases of cholelithiasis with concomitant CDL in whom CBD clearance is achieved will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not available
  • Patients opting for single stage surgery
  • Previous hepatobiliary surgery
  • Failure to completely clear CDL on ERC
  • Concomitant benign biliary strictures (like chronic pancreatitis, portal cavernoma cholangiopathy, post cholecystectomy, primary biliary cholangitis related)
  • Previous cholecystectomy patients
  • Associated
  • Coagulopathy(>1.5, platlets\<1lac)
  • Severe cholangitis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
480 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A - Patients will undergo stent removal and cholangiogram at 3 months of follow up

    In group A, patients will undergo stent removal and cholangiogram at 3 months of follow up. If we detect recurrent stone/s on cholangiogram, clearance will be done accordingly. If the patient is dated for cholecystectomy beyond 3 months then stent exchange will be done and patient will be followed up till they undergo cholecystectomy. During this waiting period in the later group, patients will undergo monthly follow up for development of any new onset symptoms that are suggestive of biliary pain, pancreatitis, cholangitis and cholecystitis.

    Procedure: Group A - Stent exchange if cholecystectomy dated beyond 3 months

  • Sham comparator
    Group B - Patients will undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) at 3 months of follow up.

    In group B, patients will undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) at 3 months of follow up. If we detect recurrent stone/s in EUS then ERC and clearance will be done accordingly. Those who are dated for cholecystectomy beyond 3 months will undergo monthly follow up clinically (biliary pain, pancreatitis, cholangitis and cholecystitis) till they undergo cholecystectomy. Those patient in group B who are unwilling for EUS will be requested to get an magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) while those unwilling for both EUS/MRCP will be followed up with ultrasound abdomen and liver function test (LFT).

    Diagnostic Test: Group B - Diagnostic EUS/MRCP/USG abdomen and LFT at 3 months

Interventions

  • ProcedureGroup A - Stent exchange if cholecystectomy dated beyond 3 months

    Stent removal and cholangiogram and stone clearance (if recurrent stone/s is/are found). Stent exchange if cholecystectomy dated beyond 3 months

  • Diagnostic testGroup B - Diagnostic EUS/MRCP/USG abdomen and LFT at 3 months

    Diagnostic EUS/MRCP/USG abdomen and LFT at 3 months to see recurrence of CDL. ERC and stone clearance (if recurrent stone/s found on EUS/MRCP/USG abdomen)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the CDL recurrence rate between the 2 groups

    Time frame: 3 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare the pancreatic complications between the 2 groups -To compare the need for repeat ERC between the 2 groups The outcomes will be compared during the time period of 3 months irrespective of the timing of cholecystectomy.

    Time frame: 3 Months

  2. To compare the biliary complications between the 2 groups

    Time frame: 3 Months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2023; primary completion for Dec 2025, 27 months later.

Of 41 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Choledocholithiasis, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 27 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 43 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 13, 2023
First posted
Sep 29, 2023
StartEst.
Sep 30, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2025
Last update
Sep 29, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06060002
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 29, 2023
Start date
Sep 30, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 29, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion