CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06053268Updated Jul 23, 2026Results posted

Mindfulness Interventions to Improve Health Activation, Coping, and Stress Among Childhood Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of Headspace in Leukemia, Lymphoma and Childhood Cancer, sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-23.

Sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will explore feasibility and acceptability of using a daily mobile mindfulness app to cope with stress. In addition, feasibility of digital health data collection procedures including wrist-worn devices and ecological momentary assessments will be examined.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

  • Determine the feasibility and acceptability of completing the 30-day mobile mindfulness program
  • Evaluate the feasibility of digital health data collection procedures to detect autonomic nervous system (ANS) activation associated with stress (e.g., electrodermal activity, pulse rate variability, skin temperature) via wearable devices and self-reported ecological momentary assessments (EMA) among adult survivors of childhood cancer in the SJLIFE cohort
  • Generate preliminary data to estimate the effect size and power needed for an extramurally funded randomized controlled trials (RCT) examining the impact of daily mindfulness mediation on biomarkers of ANS activation, coping, health behaviors, and cardiometabolic outcomes in a cohort of survivors of childhood cancer.
Read the detailed description

Prior to engaging in the intervention participants will complete baseline assessments of stress and coping. Participants will then engage in a daily mindfulness practice via the Headspace mobile application. The basic application program includes daily 10-minute sessions in guided mindfulness meditation that include mindful breathing, body awareness, emotion and thought recognition, and attentional control. During the first and fourth week of the intervention, participants will complete EMAs assessing mood, current activity, and intervention engagement. Participants will also wear a wrist-worn device to assess biomarkers of stress. At the completion of the intervention participants will complete follow-up assessments related to intervention and data collection procedures feasibility and acceptability as well as coping behaviors and stress.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leukemia
  • Lymphoma
  • Childhood Cancer
03

In context

Leukemia

5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 636 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is above the median of 38 across 4,247 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 434 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 35 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Research participant is at least 18 years old at enrollment
  • Research participant is followed by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH)
  • Research participant has a diagnosis history of leukemia or lymphoma
  • Research participant takes part in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE)
  • Research participant has elevated psychological stress scores of 6 or greater on most recent SJLIFE questionnaire
  • Participant can speak and read English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Research participant currently engages in mindful stress-reduction practices >2x per week (e.g., tai chi, meditation)
  • Research participant takes psychiatric medications or medications that impact cardiac functioning, beta-blockers, alpha-blockers
  • Research participant wears a pacemaker
  • Research participant has a diagnosis of a congenital heart disease
  • Research participant has no access to a smartphone
  • Research participant has elevated pain interference scores (T≥70)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-arm, Within-subject Feasibility Pilot:

    Single-arm, within-subject feasibility pilot: Participants completed a 30-day app-based mindfulness intervention with wearable biosensor monitoring, ecological momentary assessment, surveys, and blood specimen collection.

    Device: Headspace

Interventions

  • DeviceHeadspace

    The intervention was delivered via the Headspace mobile application. The basic application program includes daily 10-minute sessions in guided mindfulness meditation that include mindful breathing, body awareness, emotion and thought recognition, and attentional control

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mindfulness App Adherence

    Mindfulness app adherence was defined as the proportion of participants who completed at least 4 meditation sessions on average during the 30-day intervention.

    Time frame: 30 days (during intervention)

  2. Intervention Acceptability

    Treatment Acceptability and Adherence Scale - Participants will rate on a 0 ("Strongly disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree") scale regarding their perceptions of acceptability of the mindfulness intervention (10 items). Scores range from 0-70. An overall score is provided with higher scores indicating higher intervention acceptability.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week post intervention

  3. Ecological Momentary Assessment Data Collection Acceptability

    An adapted version of the Treatment Acceptability and Adherence Scale was created to evaluate ecological momentary assessment acceptability (7 items). Scores range from 0-49. An overall score is provided with higher scores indicating higher intervention acceptability.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week post intervention

  4. Biosensor (Wrist-worn Device) Adherence

    Biosensor adherence was defined as the proportion of participants who wore the wrist-worn biosensor for at least 10 hours per day across the approximately 37-day study window.

    Time frame: Approximately 37 days over the study window (7-day baseline washout plus 30-day intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived Stress Scale

    This measure is a 10-item, widely used and validated assessment of stress and efficacy of managing stress. The Participants are asked to respond to each question on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), indicating how often they have felt or thought a certain way within the past month. A single score is provided and ranges from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stress.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention

  2. Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE)

    The Brief COPE is a validated measure of coping strategies. Six subscales were included in this analysis: behavioral disengagement, planning, positive reframing, meditation/religious coping, self-blame, and emotional support. Participants rated each item on a 4-point Likert scale, and subscale scores range from 2 to 8 for each domain, with higher scores indicating greater use of the given coping strategy. Higher scores are not uniformly better or worse outcomes because interpretation depends on the coping strategy; for example, higher planning, positive reframing, and emotional support generally reflect greater use of adaptive coping strategies, whereas higher behavioral disengagement and self-blame reflect greater use of maladaptive coping strategies.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention

  3. Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein

    Oxidized low-density lipoprotein was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker of oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein particles. Values are reported in units per liter. Higher values indicate greater oxidized low-density lipoprotein concentrations.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention

  4. Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide

    Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker related to cardiac wall stress. Values are reported as log-transformed concentrations in picograms per milliliter (log pg/mL). Higher values indicate higher pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention

  5. P-selectin

    P-selectin was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker of platelet activation and vascular inflammation. Values are reported as log-transformed concentrations in picograms per milliliter (log pg/mL). Higher values indicate higher P-selectin concentrations.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention

  6. Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

    Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker of endothelial activation and vascular inflammation. Values are reported in nanograms per milliliter. Higher values indicate higher vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 concentrations.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention

  7. Homocysteine

    Homocysteine was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker related to vascular and cardiometabolic risk. Values are reported in micromoles per liter. Higher values indicate higher homocysteine concentrations.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention

  8. High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

    High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker of systemic inflammation. Values are reported in milligrams per liter. Higher values indicate higher systemic inflammation.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention

07

Results

Posted Jul 23, 2026
Limitations and caveats
This single arm feasibility pilot was not powered to assess efficacy. Findings should be interpreted cautiously due to small sample size, lack of a comparison group, short follow up duration, and exploratory analyses.

Participant flow

Recruitment occurred 5/23/24-2/4/25. Potential participants were identified by St. Jude Life and provided to the psychology study team. The participants' medical records were reviewed in Epic to assess eligibility. Eligible participants were contacted via email, followed by a phone call. Upon contact, participants were screened for remaining criteria following an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved script.

Initiated Baseline (Consented)
Participant flow — Initiated Baseline (Consented)
MilestoneSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot: EmbracePlus Smartwatch
Started50
Completed45
Not completed5
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up4
Initiated Intervention
Participant flow — Initiated Intervention
MilestoneSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot: EmbracePlus Smartwatch
Started45
Completed45
Not completed0
Initiated Post
Participant flow — Initiated Post
MilestoneSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot: EmbracePlus Smartwatch
Started45
Completed41
Not completed4
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3

Outcome measures

PrimaryMindfulness App Adherence

Mindfulness app adherence was defined as the proportion of participants who completed at least 4 meditation sessions on average during the 30-day intervention.

Time frame:
30 days (during intervention)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mindfulness App Adherence
ParticipantsSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Mindfulness App Adherence37
PrimaryIntervention Acceptability

Treatment Acceptability and Adherence Scale - Participants will rate on a 0 ("Strongly disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree") scale regarding their perceptions of acceptability of the mindfulness intervention (10 items). Scores range from 0-70. An overall score is provided with higher scores indicating higher intervention acceptability.

Time frame:
Up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Total score
Intervention Acceptability
Total scoreSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Intervention Acceptability51.95 ± 8.52
PrimaryEcological Momentary Assessment Data Collection Acceptability

An adapted version of the Treatment Acceptability and Adherence Scale was created to evaluate ecological momentary assessment acceptability (7 items). Scores range from 0-49. An overall score is provided with higher scores indicating higher intervention acceptability.

Time frame:
Up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Total score
Ecological Momentary Assessment Data Collection Acceptability
Total scoreSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Ecological Momentary Assessment Data Collection Acceptability28.49 ± 4.69
PrimaryBiosensor (Wrist-worn Device) Adherence

Biosensor adherence was defined as the proportion of participants who wore the wrist-worn biosensor for at least 10 hours per day across the approximately 37-day study window.

Time frame:
Approximately 37 days over the study window (7-day baseline washout plus 30-day intervention)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Biosensor (Wrist-worn Device) Adherence
ParticipantsSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Biosensor (Wrist-worn Device) Adherence36
SecondaryPerceived Stress Scale

This measure is a 10-item, widely used and validated assessment of stress and efficacy of managing stress. The Participants are asked to respond to each question on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), indicating how often they have felt or thought a certain way within the past month. A single score is provided and ranges from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stress.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Score
Perceived Stress Scale
ScoreSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Baseline23.17 ± 3.83
1 Week Post Intervention23.32 ± 2.94
SecondaryBrief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE)

The Brief COPE is a validated measure of coping strategies. Six subscales were included in this analysis: behavioral disengagement, planning, positive reframing, meditation/religious coping, self-blame, and emotional support. Participants rated each item on a 4-point Likert scale, and subscale scores range from 2 to 8 for each domain, with higher scores indicating greater use of the given coping strategy. Higher scores are not uniformly better or worse outcomes because interpretation depends on the coping strategy; for example, higher planning, positive reframing, and emotional support generally reflect greater use of adaptive coping strategies, whereas higher behavioral disengagement and self-blame reflect greater use of maladaptive coping strategies.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Score
Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE)
ScoreSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Baseline: Behavioral Disengagement3.15 ± 1.31
Baseline: Planning5.80 ± 1.60
Baseline: Positive Reframing4.78 ± 1.90
Baseline: Meditation/Religious Coping4.33 ± 2.13
Baseline: Self-Blame5.29 ± 1.85
Baseline: Emotional Support4.51 ± 1.70
1 Week Post Intervention: Behavioral Disengagement3.02 ± 1.39
1 Week Post Intervention: Planning6.24 ± 1.45
1 Week Post Intervention: Positive Reframing5.68 ± 1.57
1 Week Post Intervention: Meditation/Religious Coping5.30 ± 1.91
1 Week Post Intervention: Self-Blame4.93 ± 1.81
1 Week Post Intervention: Emotional Support4.93 ± 1.93
SecondaryOxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein

Oxidized low-density lipoprotein was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker of oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein particles. Values are reported in units per liter. Higher values indicate greater oxidized low-density lipoprotein concentrations.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Units/liter
Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein
Units/literSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Baseline8.33 ± 5.95
1 Week Post Intervention8.26 ± 4.85
SecondaryPro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide

Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker related to cardiac wall stress. Values are reported as log-transformed concentrations in picograms per milliliter (log pg/mL). Higher values indicate higher pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · log pg/mL
Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide
log pg/mLSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Baseline4.12 ± 0.99
1 Week Post Intervention4.17 ± 1.10
SecondaryP-selectin

P-selectin was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker of platelet activation and vascular inflammation. Values are reported as log-transformed concentrations in picograms per milliliter (log pg/mL). Higher values indicate higher P-selectin concentrations.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · log pg/mL
P-selectin
log pg/mLSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Baseline6.49 ± 0.49
1 Week Post Intervention6.62 ± 0.45
SecondaryVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker of endothelial activation and vascular inflammation. Values are reported in nanograms per milliliter. Higher values indicate higher vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 concentrations.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · nanograms/milliliter
Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1
nanograms/milliliterSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Baseline203.646 ± 58.32
1 Week Post Intervention183.79 ± 49.49
SecondaryHomocysteine

Homocysteine was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker related to vascular and cardiometabolic risk. Values are reported in micromoles per liter. Higher values indicate higher homocysteine concentrations.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · micromoles/liter
Homocysteine
micromoles/literSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Baseline9.04 ± 2.34
1 Week Post Intervention8.37 ± 2.21
SecondaryHigh-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured from dried blood spot specimens as a biomarker of systemic inflammation. Values are reported in milligrams per liter. Higher values indicate higher systemic inflammation.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams/liter
High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
milligrams/literSingle-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Baseline0.23 ± 0.33
1 Week Post Intervention0.13 ± 0.20

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline and up to 1 week post intervention. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Single-arm, Within-subject Pilot0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Adult survivors of pediatric leukemia and lymphoma participated in a 30 day, app based mindfulness intervention delivered remotely, including daily guided meditation, ecological momentary assessments, wearable biosensor monitoring, and pre and post intervention assessments.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Single-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Mean28.36 ± 5.45
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Single-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Male17
Female32
Non-binary1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Single-arm, Within-subject Pilot
Hispanic7
Non-Hispanic Black13
Non-Hispanic White27
Other3
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Single-arm, Within-subject Pilot
United States50
08

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 1, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant de-identified datasets containing the variables analyzed in the published article will be made available (related to the study primary or secondary objectives contained in the publication). Supporting documents such as the protocol, statistical analyses plan, and informed consent are available through the CTG website for the specific study. Data used to generate the published article will be made available at the time of article publication. Investigators who seek access to individual level de-identified data will contact the computing team in the Department of Biostatistics (ClinTrialDataRequest@stjude.org) who will respond to the data request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06053268
Lead sponsor
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2023
Start date
May 23, 2024
Primary completion
May 9, 2025
Completion
Sep 27, 2026 (estimated)
Results posted
Jul 23, 2026
Last update
Jul 23, 2026

Study contacts

Rachel Webster, PhD
principal investigator · St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion