CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06052826Updated Sep 25, 2026

Geriatric Assessment Guided Interventions to Accelerate Functional Recovery After CAR-T Therapy for Patients 60 Years and Older With B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma, GOCART Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of Best Practice and Cognitive Intervention in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by City of Hope Medical Center. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by City of Hope Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
164
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial compares the effectiveness of geriatric assessment (GA) guided interventions to accelerate functional recovery after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy compared to standard of care (SOC) in patients 60 years and older with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM). A large number of patients diagnosed with cancer are over the age of 60, yet most cancer treatments are developed for younger patients. Therefore, older patients may be less likely to be offered stronger treatments, such as CAR-T therapy, due to possible side effects. Geriatric assessment is a multi-dimensional health assessment tool combining patient reported and objective measures covering physical function, mental processes (cognitive), and nutrition. Pre-treatment assessments may identify weaknesses in older adults and may guide interventions for physical therapy, cognitive changes and nutrition to decrease CAR-T therapy side effects and improve care in older adults with NHL or MM.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Evaluate the effects of a GA-informed multi-disciplinary intervention in attenuating physical function decline among older patients receiving CAR-T therapy at day +30 post-CAR-T infusion.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine success in coordinating trimodality optimization before lymphodepletion.

II. Compare rates of geriatric syndromes of frailty, cognitive impairment and malnourishment in SOC and GA-intervention cohorts at 30 days post-CAR-T infusion.

III. Evaluate rates and duration of CAR-T related neurotoxicity in SOC and GA-intervention groups.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Quantify trimodality optimization intensity throughout treatment course. II. Compare longitudinal trajectory of Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), frailty, cognitive impairment and malnourishment between the two arms, at day +100 post-CAR-T infusion.

III. Evaluate quality of life trajectories using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale at baseline and days +30 and +100 in both cohorts.

IV. Incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions by day 100. V. Overall survival, response rate and progression-free survival through one year.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo GA before lymphodepleting chemotherapy and recommendations based on assessment results communicated to treating physicians. Patients receive physical therapy (PT) and delirium prevention education prior to lymphodepletion, at least once before CAR-T therapy, at least 2 times a week while inpatient, and at least once every other week outpatient up to day 30. Additionally, patients receive personalized nutritional guidance from a registered dietician prior to lymphodepletion, prior to CAR-T therapy and at least once a week up to day 30.

ARM II: Patients undergo GA and receive standard of care throughout study.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at day 100 and then up to 1 year.

02

Conditions studied

  • B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Patient's physician must agree for patient participation. A physician may elect to provide blanket agreement for participation of any eligible CAR-T patient under their care
  • Ability to read English, or Spanish. Other languages will be acceptable with site principal investigator (PI) agreement if surveys are available and language does not preclude completing study procedures
  • Age: >= 60 years at the time of enrollment
  • Scheduled to receive an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved CAR-T for treatment of multiple myeloma or B-cell non- Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Willing and able to complete study requirements
  • Patients expect to be able to participate at least once before lymphodepletion with trimodality optimization visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior CAR-T therapy
  • Any condition that would, in the Investigator's judgment, contraindicate the patient's participation in the clinical study due to safety concerns with clinical study procedures
  • Prospective participants who, in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with all study procedures (including compliance issues related to feasibility/logistics)
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
164 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I (PT, cognitive education, nutrition education)

    Patients undergo GA before lymphodepleting chemotherapy and recommendations based on assessment results communicated to treating physicians. Patients receive PT and delirium prevention education prior to lymphodepletion, at least once before CAR-T therapy, at least 2 times a week while inpatient, and at least once every other week outpatient up to day 30. Additionally, patients receive personalized nutritional guidance from a registered dietician prior to lymphodepletion, prior to CAR-T therapy and at least once a week up to day 30.

    Other: Cognitive Intervention · Other: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment · Other: Nutritional Intervention · Procedure: Physical Therapy · Other: Questionnaire Administration

  • Active comparator
    Arm II (standard of care)

    Patients undergo GA and receive standard of care throughout study.

    Other: Best Practice · Other: Questionnaire Administration

Interventions

  • OtherBest Practice

    Undergo standard of care

    Also known as: standard of care, standard therapy

  • OtherCognitive Intervention

    Receive delirium prevention education

  • OtherComprehensive Geriatric Assessment

    Undergo geriatric assessment

  • OtherNutritional Intervention

    Undergo nutritional optimization

  • ProcedurePhysical Therapy

    Undergo physical function optimization

    Also known as: Physiatric Procedure, Physical Medicine Procedure, Physical Therapeutics, Physical Therapy Procedure, Physiotherapy, Physiotherapy Procedure, PT

  • OtherQuestionnaire Administration

    Ancillary studies

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    T-test will be used to compare SPPB changes score between two arms at 30 days after CAR-T infusion.

    Time frame: From baseline to day 30 after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) infusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful in coordinating initial optimization

    A physical or virtual visit will be tabulated separately for functional optimization, delirium prevention and nutrition. Adherence will be deemed to have been met if \>=70% or more comlete tri-modality optimization before lymphodepletion in the modified intent to treat population.

    Time frame: From enrollment to start of lymphodepletion

  2. Frailty progression

    Frailty progression will be defined as a score of 3 or more at T2 if T1 not frail (\<3); if frail at T1 (score 3-5), any worsening of the score; a score of 5 at day 30 if baseline score already at the maximum frailty of 5.

    Time frame: At 30 days post CAR-T infusion

  3. Cognitive impairment

    Assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Cognitive impairment defined as MoCA score of \< 23 or unable to complete the MoCA due to cognitive impairment. The proportion of patients with cognitive impairment at day 30, irrespective of baseline cognition, will be compared between the two arms using Chi-square test.

    Time frame: At 30 days post CAR-T infusion

  4. Weight loss

    Malnourishment will be measured using weight loss and dichotomized as \> 5% weight loss from baseline to day +30. The proportion of patients with over 5% weight loss from T1 to T2 will be compared between the two arms using Chi-square test.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days post CAR-T infusion

  5. CAR-T associated neurotoxicity

    Assessed using American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The time to neurotoxicity (days), the maximum grade (1-4) and the duration of neurotoxicity (days) will be recorded. The cumulative incidence of ICANS (percentages) will be compared between arms as well as the maximum grade (1-4), and duration of neurotoxicity (days).

    Time frame: Up to day 100

06

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • City of Hope Medical Center
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
    • Andrew S. Artz · Contact · aartz@coh.org · 626-218-2405
    • Andrew S. Artz · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • City of Hope at Irvine Lennar
    Irvine, California 92618, United States
    Recruiting
  • Wake Forest University, School of Medicine Dept. of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
    Recruiting
  • Ohio State University Medical Center Dept. of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06052826
Lead sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2023
Start date
Jun 23, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 5, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 5, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Andrew S Artz
principal investigator · City of Hope Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion