CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06052787Updated Nov 19, 2025

Combined Cerebrolysin and Amantadine Sulfate Administration for Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury in the ICU

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cerebrolysin and amantadine sulfate in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-19.

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this interventional study is to Measure the potential benefits of combined administration of cerebrolysin and amantadine sulfate as an add-on therapy to the standard management of patients admitted to the ICU with traumatic brain injury.

Read the detailed description

Sixty-nine million individuals worldwide are estimated to sustain a TBI each year. The proportion of TBIs resulting from road traffic collisions was greatest in Africa and Southeast Asia (both 56%) and lowest in North America (25%).

Head injury remains the leading cause of death and severe disability in young adults, and it is also the most important single injury contributing to traumatic mortality and morbidity.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a non-degenerative, non-congenital insult to the brain from an external mechanical force, possibly leading to permanent or temporary impairment of cognitive, physical, and psychosocial functions, with an associated diminished or altered state of consciousness.

There is growing evidence that medications may speed recovery by enhancing some neurological functions without impacting others. Pharmacotherapy is increasingly being used in both the sub-acute (less than 1 month post-TBI) and chronic (more than 1 month post-TBI) phases.

Amantadine is known to enhance neurotransmission, through the activation of dopamine-dependent brain circuits, and increases dopamine activity in pre-synapses and post- synapses, acting as an antagonist of the N-methyl D-aspartate receptor.

A study done on 184 patients of severe traumatic brain injury found better οutϲοme in the treatment group with amantadine sulfate as compared with the plaϲeƅο group over the 4-week treatment interval, and they demonstrated that amantadine improved recovery in patients with moderate and severe TBI.

Giaϲinο et al. used amantadine in 184 patients for 4 to 16 weeks after TBI, They found that Amantadine accelerated the pace of functional recovery during active treatment in patients with post-traumatic disorders of consciousness.

Cerebrolysin is a peptide preparation produced by a biotechnological process, a standardized enzymatic breakdown of purified, lipid-free brain proteins, a pharmacological agent with neuro-restorative and neuro-protective effects. It stimulates neuronal survival and differentiation, axonal growth and sprouting, the formation of new synapses, and neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus.

El Sayed et al. published a meta-analysis of the effect of different neuroprotective drugs in management of patients with traumatic brain injury resulting in substantial superiority of the cerebrolysin that was reflected in three-fold cognitive improvement and favorable Glasgow outcome score.

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center phase IIIb/IV trial, the CAPTAIN I trial registered beneficial effects of Cerebrolysin after moderate to severe TBI.

The CAPTAIN II trial, enrolled 142 patients with moderate to severe TBI in a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial confirms the benefits of Cerebrolysin in moderate to severe TBI.

In their retrospective case -control study, Lee et al., identified that an amantadine-plus-cerebrolysin regimen was shown to additively affect the conscious state of patients with prolonged disturbed consciousness secondary to acute brain injury, especially in patients who remained in a prolonged vegetative state.

  • Type of the Study: a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blinded (Patients, healthcare providers, data collectors, and outcome assessors are blinded to treatment allocation), and phase III clinical trial.
  • Study setting: The study will be conducted at Ain Shams university hospitals.
  • Study period: The study will be conducted over 18-24 months.
  • Study population: patients admitted to the ICU with traumatic brain injury who are eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

sample size : 150 patients in three groups , 50 patients in each group.

Study procedures:

All selected patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be subjected to the following on admission:

  1. Formal written consent from patient relatives.
  2. Clinical data of all patients will be recorded in the admission sheets of ICU, these data includes: Demographic characteristics, etiology of trauma ,GCS ,vital signs (mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate, oxygen saturation) ,electrocardiogram (ECG), Pupil (size, reactivity and if symmetrical or not) and any other body trauma as bone fractures, chest trauma ,etc.
  3. The imaging findings: CT will be done to all patients on admission to ICU to detect the basal pathological lesions as brain edema, hemorrhagic contusions, extradural hemorrhage, and subdural hemorrhage.
  4. The patients of the study will be randomly allocated into three groups.
02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,775 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 448 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 56 across 1,133 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,876 studies on the registry; 423 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 70 years.
  • Clinical diagnosis of head injury with moderate to severe TBI and a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 7-12 at the time of hospital admission.
  • Pre-hospital intubation/sedation/paralysis was accepted if the GCS score had been assessed before intubation/sedation/paralysis by trained staff.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of intracranial interventions as well as ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Any neurological or non-neurological condition independent from TBI that might influence the functional outcome or other efficacy outcome measures.
  • Clear clinical signs of intoxication influencing the evaluation, in the investigator's judgment.
  • Patients with penetrating brain injury.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Patient with sever renal impairment (creatinine clearance > 30 ml/ minute).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    standard of care

    patients receiving the standard protocol of management of head injury in the ICU including * Ventilatory support, sedation and analgesia. * Hemodynamic support. * Hyperosmolar therapy. * Early post traumatic seizure prophylaxis. * Nutritional support: will try to start enteral feeds as soon as possible or total parenteral * nutrition will be used in the case of enteral feeding intolerance. * Temperature management: to maintain normothermia * Glycemic control: to maintain a glucose level of \[140 -180 mg/dl\] * Peptic ulcer prophylaxis: * Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis

  • Experimental
    standard of care + Cerebrolysin

    patients receiving the standard protocol of management of head injury in the ICU plus 2 cycles of Cerebrolysin , each cycle 10 days, for total 20 days. From day 1 to day 10: cerebrolysin 50 ml once daily diluted in 250 ml normal saline intravenous infusion over 15 minutes. From day 21-30 : cerebrolysin 20 ml once daily diluted in 250 ml normal saline intravenous infusion over 15 minutes.

    Drug: Cerebrolysin

  • Experimental
    standard of care + Cerebrolysin + Amantadine sulfate

    patients receiving the standard protocol of management of head injury in the ICU plus amantadine sulfate at a dose of 100 mg twice daily on the day after randomization, with this dose will be continued for 14 days. The dose will be increased to 150 mg twice daily at week 3 and to 200 mg twice daily at week 4 (total 4 weeks), combined with 2 cycles of Cerebrolysin , each cycle 10 days, for total 20 days. From day 1 to day 10: cerebrolysin 50 ml once daily diluted in 250 ml normal saline intravenous infusion over 15 minutes. From day 21-30 : cerebrolysin 20 ml once daily diluted in 250 ml normal saline intravenous infusion over 15 minutes.

    Drug: Cerebrolysin · Drug: amantadine sulfate

Interventions

  • DrugCerebrolysin

    Cerebrolysin, a mixture of free amino acids and low molecular weight peptides, has a neurotrophic factor-like activity with immediate pleiotropic neuroprotective activity and long-term multimodal effects on endogenous post-lesional regulation. Cerebrolysin has been suggested to exert beneficial effects on neurobehavioural functions, cognitive performance , and neuro-motor recovery , as part of initial therapy in severe and moderate acute TBI.

  • Drugamantadine sulfate

    The dopaminergic agonist amantadine enhances presynaptic dopamine release and inhibits dopamine reuptake, resulting in an increased amount of dopamine in the synaptic cleft. Amantadine may also increase the density of postsynaptic dopamine receptors and alter the conformation of these receptors. Amantadine acts as an NMDA receptor antagonist, blocking glutamate, an NMDA channel activator. This effect may be responsible for amantadine's possible beneficial effect soon after TBI

    Also known as: PK-MERZ

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

    The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is used to assess the level of consciousness. It depends on the best motor, verbal and eye opening responses. GCS is used to classify insult severity as minor \[GCS 13-15\], moderate \[GCS 9-12\] and severe \[GCS 3-8\].

    Time frame: Glasgow coma scale (GCS) will be recorded on admission, and every week up to 6 weeks of trauma to detect the improvement in level of consciousness after management in all groups.

  2. Disability rating-scale for severe head trauma (DRS)

    Disability rating-scale for severe head trauma (DRS) includes measures of arousability, awareness and responsivity of eye opening, verbalization, and motor response; cognitive ability of for Self Care Activities: understanding of feeding, dressing, and grooming; degree of assistance and supervision required; and employability. Scores range from 0 to 29, with higher values indicating greater disability.

    Time frame: DRS score will be collected at baseline and weekly through week 6 (during 4 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks after discontinuation).

  3. Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)

    Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is a standardized neurobehavioral assessment tool comprising six organized subscales (i.e., auditory, visual, motor, oro-motor,verbal, communication, and arousal); scores range from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicating a higher level of neurobehavioral function.

    Time frame: CRS-R will be compared over the 4 weeks of treatment and during 2-weeks after discontinuation of treatment

  4. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)

    The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is one of the most widely used outcome instruments to assess global disability and recovery after traumatic brain injury. Patients in all groups will be assessed with The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) on the end of 6th week which classify patients into: dead, vegetative state, severe disability, moderate disability and good recovery.

    Time frame: atients in all groups will be assessed with The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) on the end of 6th week.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of medicine - Ain shams university
    Cairo, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • El Sayed I, Zaki A, Fayed AM, Shehata GM, Abdelmonem S. A meta-analysis of the effect of different neuroprotective drugs in management of patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Apr;41(2):427-438. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0775-y. Epub 2016 Aug 18. PubMed 27539610 ↗
  • Chamoun RB, Robertson CS, Gopinath SP. Outcome in patients with blunt head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 at presentation. J Neurosurg. 2009 Oct;111(4):683-7. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.JNS08817. PubMed 19326973 ↗
  • Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung YC, Punchak M, Agrawal A, Adeleye AO, Shrime MG, Rubiano AM, Rosenfeld JV, Park KB. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. Print 2019 Apr 1. PubMed 29701556 ↗
  • Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033. PubMed 15605342 ↗
  • Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, Kalmar K, Childs N, Khademi A, Eifert B, Long D, Katz DI, Cho S, Yablon SA, Luther M, Hammond FM, Nordenbo A, Novak P, Mercer W, Maurer-Karattup P, Sherer M. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):819-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102609. PubMed 22375973 ↗
  • Gosseries O, Di H, Laureys S, Boly M. Measuring consciousness in severely damaged brains. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:457-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170339. Epub 2014 Jun 23. PubMed 25002279 ↗
  • Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92830-5. PubMed 46957 ↗
  • Lee S, Lee HH, Lee Y, Lee J. Additive effect of cerebrolysin and amantadine on disorders of consciousness secondary to acquired brain injury: A retrospective case-control study. J Rehabil Med. 2020 Feb 27;52(2):jrm00025. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2654. PubMed 32057086 ↗
  • Muresanu DF, Florian S, Homberg V, Matula C, von Steinbuchel N, Vos PE, von Wild K, Birle C, Muresanu I, Slavoaca D, Rosu OV, Strilciuc S, Vester J. Efficacy and safety of cerebrolysin in neurorecovery after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: results from the CAPTAIN II trial. Neurol Sci. 2020 May;41(5):1171-1181. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04181-y. Epub 2020 Jan 2. PubMed 31897941 ↗
  • Obenaus A. (2022).Traumatic brain injury, Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, Elsevier.
  • Poon W, Matula C, Vos PE, Muresanu DF, von Steinbuchel N, von Wild K, Homberg V, Wang E, Lee TMC, Strilciuc S, Vester JC. Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in acute brain injury and neurorecovery: CAPTAIN I-a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Asian-Pacific trial. Neurol Sci. 2020 Feb;41(2):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04053-5. Epub 2019 Sep 7. PubMed 31494820 ↗
  • Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Cope DN. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Mar;63(3):118-23. PubMed 7073452 ↗
  • Spritzer SD, Kinney CL, Condie J, Wellik KE, Hoffman-Snyder CR, Wingerchuk DM, Demaerschalk BM. Amantadine for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a critically appraised topic. Neurologist. 2015 Jan;19(2):61-4. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000001. PubMed 25607336 ↗
  • Stan A, Birle C, Blesneag A, Iancu M. Cerebrolysin and early neurorehabilitation in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study. J Med Life. 2017 Oct-Dec;10(4):216-222. PubMed 29362596 ↗
  • Talsky A, Laura R. Pacione, Tammy Shaw, Lori Wasserman, Adam Lenny, Amol Verma, Gillian Hurwitz, Robyn Waxman, Andrew Morgan, Shree Bhalerao .(2011).Pharmacological interventions for traumatic brain injury. BC Med J; 53:26-31
  • Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0. No abstract available. PubMed 4136544 ↗
  • Friedland D, Hutchinson P. Classification of traumatic brain injury. Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation. 27 Jul 2013.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06052787
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
Responsible party
ragab elshabasy (Principal Investigator, Ain Shams University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completion
May 30, 2025
Completion
Aug 1, 2025
Last update
Nov 19, 2025

Study contacts

Ragab D Elshabasy
principal investigator · faculty of medicine - Ain shams university

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion