ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06048159Updated Jul 10, 2026

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) for the Recovery of Phonological Short-Term Memory in Patients With Aphasia After Stroke

An interventional study of HD-tACS and Sham HD-tACS in Stroke and Aphasia, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will assess the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on language recovery after stroke.

Read the detailed description

Aphasia is a debilitating disorder, typically resulting from damage to the left hemisphere, that can impair a range of communication abilities, including language production and comprehension, reading, and writing. Approximately 180,000 new cases of aphasia are identified per year, and approximately 1 million or 1 in 250 are living with aphasia in the United States. Treatments are limited and provide modest benefits at best. The current emphasis in aphasia rehabilitation is to formulate intensive speech and language therapies and augment therapeutic benefits, potentially with brain stimulation concurrent with therapies.

The current study will investigate the efficacy of high-definition tACS (HD-tACS) to help restore neural oscillatory activity in stroke survivors with aphasia. TACS differs from trancranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a widely used brain stimulation paradigm, in that sinusoidal or alternating currents are delivered rather than direct currents. TACS is shown to manipulate ongoing oscillatory brain activity and also to modulate synchronization (or connectivity) between targeted brain areas. This feature of tACS is quite attractive, given the new body of evidence suggesting that language impairments stem from diminished brain connectivity and ensuing disruptions in the language network due to stroke.

The study will employ high-definition tACS (HD-tACS) in a parallel, double-blinded, sham-controlled design combined with language therapy targeting phonological short-term memory (STM) function in stroke survivors with aphasia. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and fMRI BOLD data collection will occur to determine tACS parameters and to evaluate stimulation-induced neural changes, respectively. The investigators plan to recruit 120 stroke survivors with aphasia in a 2-group tACS study design.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Aphasia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 548 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 57 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with left hemisphere stroke/aphasia
  • Consent date >= 1 month after stroke onset
  • Fluent in English
  • 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive, auditory or visual impairments that would preclude cognitive and language testing
  • Presence of major untreated or unstable psychiatric disease
  • A chronic medical condition that is not treated or is unstable
  • The presence of cardiac stimulators or pacemakers
  • to MRI or tACS, e.g. patients with metallic implants, and/or history of skull fractures, pregnancy, skin diseases
  • History of ongoing or unmanaged seizures
  • History of dyslexia or other developmental learning disabilities
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High Definition tACS with Short-term Memory Focused Speech Therapy

    High-Definition-tACS will be delivered via a battery operated alternating current stimulator (Soterix) using two 3x1 center-surround montages.The current is turned on and increased in a ramplike fashion over approximately 30 seconds. Participants will undergo tACS stimulation for 20-minutes with 2 milliampere (mA) peak-to-peak intensity. Stimulation will be maintained no longer than 20 minutes. This will be paired with short-term memory focused speech therapy.

    Device: HD-tACS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham-High Definition tACS with Short-term Memory Focused Speech Therapy

    High-Definition-tACS will be delivered via a battery operated alternating current stimulator (Soterix) using two 3x1 center-surround montages. The current is turned on and increased in a ramplike fashion for 10 to 30 seconds and then ramped down. In this way, the participants experience the same initial sensations (mild tingling) as the active tACS groups. This will be paired with short-term memory focused speech therapy.

    Device: Sham HD-tACS

Interventions

  • DeviceHD-tACS

    High definition tACS will be applied during speech therapy.

  • DeviceSham HD-tACS

    Sham high definition tACS will be applied during speech therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy on a phonological STM task

    Accuracy changes in a delayed sample-to-match task assessing phonological STM after tACS.

    Time frame: Upon the completion of therapy cycle (a cycle consists of 10 intervention days) and 10 weeks post

  2. fMRI measures of language network activation after tACS

    Activation in the language network regions involved in phonological STM will be assessed before and after tACS

    Time frame: Upon the completion of therapy cycle (a cycle consists of 10 intervention days) and 10 weeks post

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Communication Outcome

    Improvements in using language in daily life or functional communication as assessed by patient reported measure of Communication Effectiveness Index (CETI)

    Time frame: Upon the completion of therapy cycle (a cycle consists of 10 intervention days) and 10 weeks post

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol. 1995 Oct;38(4):659-66. doi: 10.1002/ana.410380416. PubMed 7574464 ↗
  • Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, Frei M, Born C, Ajdacic-Gross V, Gutzwiller F, Lyrer PA. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1379-84. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221815.64093.8c. Epub 2006 May 11. PubMed 16690899 ↗
  • Shah-Basak PP, Norise C, Garcia G, Torres J, Faseyitan O, Hamilton RH. Individualized treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia due to stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 21;9:201. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00201. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25954178 ↗
  • Shah-Basak PP, Wurzman R, Purcell JB, Gervits F, Hamilton R. Fields or flows? A comparative metaanalysis of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation to treat post-stroke aphasia. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016 May 2;34(4):537-58. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150616. PubMed 27163249 ↗
  • Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2004 Aug;13(3):236-49. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2004/025). PubMed 15339233 ↗
  • Leonard, C., Rochon, E., & Laird, L. (2008). Treating naming impairments in aphasia: Findings from a phonological components analysis treatment. Aphasiology, 22, 923-947. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701831474
  • Paulesu E, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):342-5. doi: 10.1038/362342a0. PubMed 8455719 ↗
  • Buchsbaum BR, Olsen RK, Koch P, Berman KF. Human dorsal and ventral auditory streams subserve rehearsal-based and echoic processes during verbal working memory. Neuron. 2005 Nov 23;48(4):687-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.029. PubMed 16301183 ↗
  • Buchsbaum BR, Baldo J, Okada K, Berman KF, Dronkers N, D'Esposito M, Hickok G. Conduction aphasia, sensory-motor integration, and phonological short-term memory - an aggregate analysis of lesion and fMRI data. Brain Lang. 2011 Dec;119(3):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 Jan 21. PubMed 21256582 ↗
  • Antal A, Paulus W. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 28;7:317. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00317. Print 2013. PubMed 23825454 ↗
  • Helfrich RF, Schneider TR, Rach S, Trautmann-Lengsfeld SA, Engel AK, Herrmann CS. Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr Biol. 2014 Feb 3;24(3):333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.041. Epub 2014 Jan 23. PubMed 24461998 ↗
  • Violante IR, Li LM, Carmichael DW, Lorenz R, Leech R, Hampshire A, Rothwell JC, Sharp DJ. Externally induced frontoparietal synchronization modulates network dynamics and enhances working memory performance. Elife. 2017 Mar 14;6:e22001. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22001. PubMed 28288700 ↗
  • Herrmann CS, Rach S, Neuling T, Struber D. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 14;7:279. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00279. eCollection 2013. PubMed 23785325 ↗
  • Benson, D. F., & Ardila, A. (1996). Aphasia: A Clinical Perspective. Oxford University Press.
  • Code C, Petheram B. Delivering for aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Feb;13(1):3-10. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2010.520090. PubMed 21329405 ↗
  • Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, Rubin GJ. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. Epub 2020 Feb 26. PubMed 32112714 ↗
  • Pietrabissa G, Simpson SG. Psychological Consequences of Social Isolation During COVID-19 Outbreak. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02201. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33013572 ↗
  • Pollock A, St George B, Fenton M, Firkins L. Top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke--consensus from stroke survivors, caregivers, and health professionals. Int J Stroke. 2014 Apr;9(3):313-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00942.x. Epub 2012 Dec 11. PubMed 23227818 ↗
  • Ellis C, Simpson AN, Bonilha H, Mauldin PD, Simpson KN. The one-year attributable cost of poststroke aphasia. Stroke. 2012 May;43(5):1429-31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.647339. Epub 2012 Feb 16. PubMed 22343643 ↗
  • Pillay SB, Stengel BC, Humphries C, Book DS, Binder JR. Cerebral localization of impaired phonological retrieval during rhyme judgment. Ann Neurol. 2014 Nov;76(5):738-46. doi: 10.1002/ana.24266. Epub 2014 Sep 19. PubMed 25164766 ↗
  • Mirman D, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Faseyitan OK, Coslett HB, Schwartz MF. Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion-symptom mapping. Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 16;6:6762. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7762. PubMed 25879574 ↗
  • Saffran EM, Marin OS. Reading without phonology: evidence from aphasia. Q J Exp Psychol. 1977 Aug;29(3):515-25. doi: 10.1080/14640747708400627. No abstract available. PubMed 905501 ↗
  • Friedrich FJ, Glenn CG, Marin OS. Interruption of phonological coding in conduction aphasia. Brain Lang. 1984 Jul;22(2):266-91. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90094-4. PubMed 6204712 ↗
  • Pillay SB, Gross WL, Heffernan J, Book DS, Binder JR. Semantic network activation facilitates oral word reading in chronic aphasia. Brain Lang. 2022 Oct;233:105164. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105164. Epub 2022 Aug 4. PubMed 35933744 ↗
  • Pillay SB, Gross WL, Graves WW, Humphries C, Book DS, Binder JR. The Neural Basis of Successful Word Reading in Aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Apr;30(4):514-525. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01214. Epub 2017 Dec 6. PubMed 29211656 ↗
  • Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055. Epub 2009 Mar 27. PubMed 19329570 ↗
  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press.
  • Baddeley A, Gathercole S, Papagno C. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):158-73. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.158. PubMed 9450375 ↗
  • Zaehle T, Rach S, Herrmann CS. Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 1;5(11):e13766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013766. PubMed 21072168 ↗
  • Reinhart RMG, Nguyen JA. Working memory revived in older adults by synchronizing rhythmic brain circuits. Nat Neurosci. 2019 May;22(5):820-827. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0371-x. Epub 2019 Apr 8. PubMed 30962628 ↗
  • Riddle J, Frohlich F. Targeting neural oscillations with transcranial alternating current stimulation. Brain Res. 2021 Aug 15;1765:147491. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147491. Epub 2021 Apr 20. PubMed 33887251 ↗
  • Frohlich F, Riddle J. Conducting double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 12;11(1):284. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01391-x. PubMed 33980854 ↗
  • Brittain JS, Probert-Smith P, Aziz TZ, Brown P. Tremor suppression by rhythmic transcranial current stimulation. Curr Biol. 2013 Mar 4;23(5):436-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.068. Epub 2013 Feb 14. PubMed 23416101 ↗
  • Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19. PubMed 16427357 ↗
  • Bikson M, Brunoni AR, Charvet LE, Clark VP, Cohen LG, Deng ZD, Dmochowski J, Edwards DJ, Frohlich F, Kappenman ES, Lim KO, Loo C, Mantovani A, McMullen DP, Parra LC, Pearson M, Richardson JD, Rumsey JM, Sehatpour P, Sommers D, Unal G, Wassermann EM, Woods AJ, Lisanby SH. Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop. Brain Stimul. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):465-480. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 29. PubMed 29398575 ↗
  • Wilson SM, Eriksson DK, Schneck SM, Lucanie JM. A quick aphasia battery for efficient, reliable, and multidimensional assessment of language function. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 9;13(2):e0192773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192773. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29425241 ↗
  • Pillay, S. B., & Binder, J. R. (n.d.). Language Imaging Lab (LIL) Aphasia Battery. https://wwwneuromcwedu/aphasiabattery/indexhtml
  • Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869. Epub 2010 Dec 23. PubMed 21253357 ↗
  • Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, Engemann DA, Strohmeier D, Brodbeck C, Goj R, Jas M, Brooks T, Parkkonen L, Hamalainen M. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 26;7:267. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267. eCollection 2013 Dec 26. PubMed 24431986 ↗
  • Villamar MF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Datta A, Dasilva AF, Fregni F. Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). J Vis Exp. 2013 Jul 14;(77):e50309. doi: 10.3791/50309. PubMed 23893039 ↗
  • Pruim RHR, Mennes M, van Rooij D, Llera A, Buitelaar JK, Beckmann CF. ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data. Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:267-277. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.064. Epub 2015 Mar 11. PubMed 25770991 ↗
  • Kielar A, Panamsky L, Links KA, Meltzer JA. Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG. Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:507-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 14. PubMed 25463470 ↗
  • Maris E, Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024. Epub 2007 Apr 10. PubMed 17517438 ↗
  • Saturnino GB, Puonti O, Nielsen JD, Antonenko D, Madsen KH, Thielscher A. SimNIBS 2.1: A Comprehensive Pipeline for Individualized Electric Field Modelling for Transcranial Brain Stimulation. 2019 Aug 28. In: Makarov S, Horner M, Noetscher G, editors. Brain and Human Body Modeling: Computational Human Modeling at EMBC 2018 [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. Chapter 1. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549569/ PubMed 31725247 ↗
  • Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;14(8):1133-45. doi: 10.1017/S1461145710001690. Epub 2011 Feb 15. PubMed 21320389 ↗
  • Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, Mourdoukoutas AP, Kronberg G, Truong D, Boggio P, Brunoni AR, Charvet L, Fregni F, Fritsch B, Gillick B, Hamilton RH, Hampstead BM, Jankord R, Kirton A, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Liu A, Loo C, Nitsche MA, Reis J, Richardson JD, Rotenberg A, Turkeltaub PE, Woods AJ. Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):641-661. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 15. PubMed 27372845 ↗
  • Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19. PubMed 28709880 ↗
  • Reckow J, Rahman-Filipiak A, Garcia S, Schlaefflin S, Calhoun O, DaSilva AF, Bikson M, Hampstead BM. Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps. Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):991-997. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 4. PubMed 29784589 ↗
  • Schuhmann T, Kemmerer SK, Duecker F, de Graaf TA, Ten Oever S, De Weerd P, Sack AT. Left parietal tACS at alpha frequency induces a shift of visuospatial attention. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0217729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217729. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31774818 ↗
  • Deng Y, Reinhart RM, Choi I, Shinn-Cunningham BG. Causal links between parietal alpha activity and spatial auditory attention. Elife. 2019 Nov 29;8:e51184. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51184. PubMed 31782732 ↗
  • Matsumoto H, Ugawa Y. Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2016 Dec 21;2:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003. eCollection 2017. PubMed 30214966 ↗
  • National Aphasia Association survey. (2020).

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06048159
Responsible party
Priyanka Shah-Basak, PhD (Principal Investigator, Medical College of Wisconsin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2023
Start date
Nov 6, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Sidney E Schoenrock, MA
Contact
sschoenrock@mcw.edu
414-955-7579
Priyanka Shah-Basak, PhD
Contact
prishah@mcw.edu
414-955-5752

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion