An interventional study of PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP BLOCK COMBINED WITH LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK in POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA, sponsored by Hanoi Medical University. Completed at 1 site in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-18.
Sponsored by Hanoi Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Background: this study aimed to describe the pain relief outcomes after hip replacement surgery by continuous Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) in combination with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block under the guidance of ultrasound.
Methods: patients who had hip surgery at E University hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam from August 2021 to August 2022 belonged to two groups: group of patients with pain relief with PENG block in combination with LFCN block (PENG BLOCK group) and group of patients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA group). Outcomes regarding clinical and pain score from initiation of insertion or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72) were recorded.
First, patients were explained about the study and asked to sign written informed consent if they agreed to participate in the study. Next, the patient was instructed to use the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain score, as well as how to press the button to request pain relief. Then, a monitor was installed and operated to assess the clinical parameters (electrocardiogram, blood pressure, SpO2, arterial blood pressure, temperature). The patient was oxygenated 3-5 liters/minute and performed a peripheral intravenous line, with an 18G catheter, infused with 0.9% NaCl solution. Spinal anesthesia was administered with ropivacaine 0.5% and fentanyl.
During and after the surgery, a group of patients received intravenous morphine analgesia via PCA (concentration 1mg/ml, bolus dose of 1mg, lock time 10 minutes, maximum dose 10mg/4 hours). The remaining group of patients receive pain relief by PENG block and LFCN block. In this group, the ultrasound probe was placed horizontally from the anterior superior iliac spine, and was moved along the femoral arc defining the pubic spine. Then, the transducer was rotated 45 degrees, moved parallel to the femoral arch identifying the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), iliopubic eminence (IPE) and inferior lumbosacral head. The ultrasound probe was moved lightly until the upper end of the femoral head was identified. Next, a 120 mm Tuohy 18G anesthetic needle was used under ultrasound guidance, which was moved lateral to medial in the plane between the ultrasound transducer and the superior tip of the femoral head. Then, 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.25% was injected through the anesthetic needle tip.
Data were collected at different times including: before surgery, before anesthesia, during surgery and after surgery. The information was recorded in the medical record.
Preoperative data: the collected information included the general characteristics of the study patients including age, gender, weight, height, history of smoking/motion sickness, diagnosis, health classification according to ASA, liver and kidney function tests. With pre-anesthesia data, information was collected including pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, SpO2.
Intraoperative data: the information collected includes information about anesthesia and surgical procedure.
Post-operative data: the collected information includes blood test results (urea, creatinine, liver enzymes), pain score (Visual analogue scale - VAS - scale from 0 to 10, the higher the score, the higher the pain level. more), analgesic drugs consumption status, respiratory and circulatory changes, adverse events, and analgesic satisfaction. Time was recorded from initiation of catheterization or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72).
1,190 studies on the registry are indexed under Agnosia; 508 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 78 across 1,024 interventional studies indexed under Agnosia.
Browse Agnosia studies →Hanoi Medical University is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
receiving pain relief through PENG and LFCN block
Procedure: PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP BLOCK COMBINED WITH LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK
receiving morphine PCA analgesia
Procedure: PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP BLOCK COMBINED WITH LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK
During and after the surgery, a group of patients received intravenous morphine analgesia via PCA (concentration 1mg/ml, bolus dose of 1mg, lock time 10 minutes, maximum dose 10mg/4 hours). The remaining group of patients receive pain relief by PENG block and LFCN block. In this group, the ultrasound probe was placed horizontally from the anterior superior iliac spine, and was moved along the femoral arc defining the pubic spine. Then, the transducer was rotated 45 degrees, moved parallel to the femoral arch identifying the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), iliopubic eminence (IPE) and inferior lumbosacral head. The ultrasound probe was moved lightly until the upper end of the femoral head was identified. Next, a 120 mm Tuohy 18G anesthetic needle was used under ultrasound guidance, which was moved lateral to medial in the plane between the ultrasound transducer and the superior tip of the femoral head. Then, 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.25% was injected through the anesthetic needle tip
VAS score at rest and on movement
the average VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale) at rest and on movement of both groups. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be'). Ask the patient to rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line. Use a ruler to measure the distance in centimetres from the 'no pain marker' (or zero) to the current pain mark.
Time frame: Time was recorded from initiation of catheterization or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72)
Side effects
Rate of vomitting/nausea, itchy, urinary retention, respiratory failure postoperative of both groups.
Time frame: Time was recorded from initiation of catheterization or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72)
Plan to share: Yes — We agree that all results and conclusion of this research will be used fully for other researchers
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hanoi Medical University