ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07835750Updated Oct 7, 2026

SafeLM Versus LMA Classic for Airway Management During Fibroadenoma Excision

An interventional study of SafeLM Video Laryngeal Mask and LMA Classic in Airway Management, sponsored by Hanoi Medical University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Sponsored by Hanoi Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
132
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial compares the airway management performance of the SafeLM video laryngeal mask with the LMA Classic in adult patients undergoing elective fibroadenoma excision under general anesthesia. Participants will be randomly assigned to airway management with either the SafeLM or the LMA Classic. The primary outcome is oropharyngeal leak pressure. Secondary outcomes include insertion performance, ventilation parameters, hemodynamic responses, and airway-related adverse events.

Read the detailed description

The SafeLM is a video-assisted laryngeal mask that allows visualization during placement, whereas the LMA Classic is a conventional supraglottic airway device. This study is designed to compare the clinical performance of these two devices under standardized conditions.

Adult patients scheduled for elective fibroadenoma excision under general anesthesia will be screened for eligibility. Only patients for whom both devices are considered clinically appropriate will be enrolled, thereby avoiding randomization when patient characteristics indicate a preference for a particular airway management technique. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to airway management with either the SafeLM or the LMA Classic.

After standardized induction of general anesthesia, the assigned laryngeal mask will be inserted according to the study protocol. The primary outcome is oropharyngeal leak pressure after successful placement. Device insertion characteristics, ventilation parameters, hemodynamic responses, and airway-related adverse events will also be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Management

Keywords

  • Laryngeal Mask Airway
  • Video Laryngeal Mask
  • SafeLM
  • LMA Classic
  • Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure
  • Supraglottic Airway Device
  • General Anesthesia
  • Fibroadenoma Excision
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hanoi Medical University is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients aged 18 years or older.
  • Scheduled for elective excision of benign breast fibroadenoma under general anesthesia.
  • Planned airway management with a laryngeal mask airway.
  • (ASA) physical status I-II.
  • Both the SafeLM and LMA Classic are considered clinically appropriate for airway management.
  • Provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Increased risk of pulmonary aspiration, including inadequate preoperative fasting, full stomach, or gastrointestinal obstruction.
  • Known or suspected difficult airway or other airway characteristics for which random allocation between the two study devices is considered clinically inappropriate.
  • Upper airway pathology or anatomical abnormality that may interfere with laryngeal mask placement.
  • Clinical or surgical indication requiring tracheal intubation rather than a laryngeal mask airway.
  • or known allergy to medications used in the standardized anesthesia protocol.
  • Inability to provide .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
132 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SafeLM Video Laryngeal Mask

    Participants randomized to this arm will receive airway management with the SafeLM video laryngeal mask during general anesthesia for elective fibroadenoma excision. The device will be inserted according to the standardized study protocol.

    Device: SafeLM Video Laryngeal Mask

  • Active comparator
    LMA Classic

    Participants randomized to this arm will receive airway management with the LMA Classic during general anesthesia for elective fibroadenoma excision. The device will be inserted according to the standardized study protocol.

    Device: LMA Classic

Interventions

  • DeviceSafeLM Video Laryngeal Mask

    The SafeLM is a video-assisted supraglottic airway device that allows visualization of the laryngeal structures during insertion and positioning. It will be used for airway management during general anesthesia according to the standardized study protocol.

  • DeviceLMA Classic

    The LMA Classic is a conventional supraglottic airway device without video guidance. It will be used for airway management during general anesthesia according to the standardized study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP)

    Oropharyngeal leak pressure will be measured after successful placement of the assigned laryngeal mask and establishment of effective ventilation. OLP will be recorded in cmH2O as the airway pressure at which an audible oropharyngeal leak is detected during a standardized leak test.

    Time frame: Immediately after successful laryngeal mask placement, before the start of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. First-attempt insertion success

    Proportion of participants in whom effective ventilation is achieved after the first insertion attempt of the assigned laryngeal mask.

    Time frame: During initial laryngeal mask insertion

  2. Overall insertion success

    Proportion of participants in whom effective ventilation is achieved with the assigned laryngeal mask within the maximum number of insertion attempts permitted by the study protocol.

    Time frame: During laryngeal mask insertion, up to 3 attempts

  3. Laryngeal mask insertion time

    Time in seconds from introduction of the assigned laryngeal mask into the mouth until establishment of effective ventilation.

    Time frame: During laryngeal mask insertion

  4. Number of insertion attempts

    Number of attempts required to achieve successful placement and effective ventilation with the assigned laryngeal mask.

    Time frame: During laryngeal mask insertion

  5. Need for additional airway maneuvers

    Proportion of participants requiring additional maneuvers to achieve satisfactory placement and ventilation.

    Time frame: During laryngeal mask insertion

  6. Peak inspiratory pressure

    Peak inspiratory airway pressure measured in cmH2O during mechanical ventilation.

    Time frame: At 5 and 30 minutes after successful laryngeal mask placement

  7. End-tidal carbon dioxide

    End-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) measured during mechanical ventilation.

    Time frame: At 5 and 30 minutes after successful laryngeal mask placement

  8. Heart Rate

    Heart rate will be recorded in beats per minute (bpm).

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after successful laryngeal mask placement, and at 5 and 30 minutes after placement

  9. Blood staining on the laryngeal mask

    Presence of visible blood staining on the laryngeal mask after removal.

    Time frame: Immediately after device removal

  10. Postoperative sore throat

    Presence of patient-reported sore throat following general anesthesia.

    Time frame: At 1 and 24 hours after surgery

  11. Postoperative hoarseness

    Presence of patient-reported hoarseness following general anesthesia.

    Time frame: At 1 and 24 hours after surgery

  12. Airway-related adverse events

    Occurrence of airway-related adverse events, including laryngospasm and clinically evident regurgitation.

    Time frame: From laryngeal mask insertion through postoperative observation, assessed up to 24 hours after surgery

  13. Arterial Pressure

    Arterial pressure will be recorded in mmHg.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after successful laryngeal mask placement, and at 5 and 30 minutes after placement

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 time frame changed, 2 added, 1 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedHeart RateTime frame: At baseline, immediately after successful laryngeal mask placement, and at 5 and 30 minutes after placement
  • AddedArterial PressureTime frame: At baseline, immediately after successful laryngeal mask placement, and at 5 and 30 minutes after placement
  • RemovedHemodynamic changesTime frame: At baseline, immediately after insertion, and 5 and 30 minutes after successful placement
  • Time frameAirway-related adverse eventsFrom laryngeal mask insertion through post-anesthesia care unit discharge → From laryngeal mask insertion through postoperative observation, assessed up to 24 hours after surgery
Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 1 time frame changed, 2 added, 1 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedHeart RateTime frame: At baseline, immediately after successful laryngeal mask placement, and at 5 and 30 minutes after placement
    • AddedArterial PressureTime frame: At baseline, immediately after successful laryngeal mask placement, and at 5 and 30 minutes after placement
    • RemovedHemodynamic changesTime frame: At baseline, immediately after insertion, and 5 and 30 minutes after successful placement
    • Time frameAirway-related adverse eventsFrom laryngeal mask insertion through post-anesthesia care unit discharge → From laryngeal mask insertion through postoperative observation, assessed up to 24 hours after surgery
    + 1 other change: oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07835750
Lead sponsor
Hanoi Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

Hung T. Tran, MD
Contact
thanhhungvt@gmail.com
+84367378519

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion