CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06033677Updated Jun 13, 2024

Increasing Security With End-zone Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring During Surgery

An interventional study of Distal radial artery cannulation and Forearm radial artery cannulation in Catheterization, Peripheral, sponsored by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-13.

Sponsored by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Short summary: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical research study was to compare distal radial artery cannulation with forearm radial artery cannulation in terms of efficacy and ease of administration. The investigators believe that cannulation of the distal radial artery in cases requiring invasive arterial monitoring should preserve the radial artery of the forearm for future health problems and reduce circulatory complications by working more distally.

The main question[s] aims to answer are:

  • [question 1]: whether artery monitoring can be performed with a more distal approach
  • [question 2]: efficacy and safety of the distal approach
Read the detailed description

The distal radial artery (dRA) in the snuffbox location is a popular arterial access site for interventional cardiological procedures and neurointerventions. The investigators aimed to investigate the distal radial artery as an alternative site to the classical radial artery (RA) in cases requiring intraoperative arterial cannulation and blood pressure monitoring. The superficial location of the classic radial artery, its collateral blood flow with the ulnar artery, and limited complications make it a preferred choice for catheterization purposes. Given its use in various medical procedures such as flap transplantation, creating arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis, and bypass grafting, the investigators believe that preserving the classic radial artery is essential for potential health issues likely to arise in the future. In addition, the investigators aim to minimize circulatory complications by working more distally. Furthermore, it's worth mentioning that alterations in wrist positioning causing disruptions in the invasive arterial waveform also create a need for a different puncture approach. For all these conditions, the investigators believe that the snuffbox approach to distal radial artery cannulation would be an advantageous alternative.

This study will be a prospective randomized, controlled single-blind study. Patients who are scheduled for elective surgery, aged 18 and above, with ASA 1, 2, or 3 classifications, and requiring intraoperative arterial cannulation at Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital will be included in the study. The exclusion criteria for participating in the study are as follows: under 18 years of age, ASA-4 classification, presence of non-palpable arteries, presence of burns or infection at the cannulation site, peripheral vascular disease, bleeding or coagulation disorders, negative modified Allen's test, and communication disorders. The withdrawal criteria for the study include a patient's desire to withdraw from the study at any stage and an extended cannulation time.

Participants will be divided into two groups, and ultrasound-guided cannulation will be performed for each group. One group will be cannulated through the classical radial artery of the forearm, while the other group will be cannulated through the distal radial artery using the snuffbox approach. Demographic data (age, gender, weight, height, BMI, comorbidity, medications, ASA, previous artery intervention, working position and working time), USG measurement data (diameter and depth of the artery) and procedural data (hand selection, first attempt success rate, arterial catheterization time, arterial posterior wall puncture rate, intraoperative artery waveform quality, postoperative compression time, and complications) will be recorded.

The sample size was determined by G-Power version 3.1.9.4, taking into account a two-tailed alpha error of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and an effect size of 0.5. Based on this savings and N2/N1 allocations of 0.98 in a previous study ( Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial Jingwei Xiong1 , Kangli Hui1 , Miaomiao Xu1 , Jiejie Zhou1 , Jie Zhang1 and Manlin Duan1,2* Xiong et al. BMC Anesthesiology (2022) 22:67 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01609-5 ), the minimum number required for the study was planned to be 52 patients in the dRA group and 50 patients in the RA group.

The intervention will be performed under USG guidance by a single anesthesiologist with at least 5 years of experience in arterial cannulation.

The anticipated study duration is 6 months, and once approved by your institution, the study will commence and will be concluded upon reaching the target number of participants.

SPSS 21.0 for Windows software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) will be conducted for statistical analysis of the data. When evaluating the data statistically, numerical data will be expressed as mean and standard deviation, while categorical data will be presented as frequency and percentage. The chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test will be used to compare categorical data between groups, and the results will be reported as percentages (%n). Non-categorical data's normal distribution will be assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For normally distributed data, Student's t-test was used for statistical comparison between groups. For non-normally distributed data, the Mann-Whitney U test was employed. In all analyses, p-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Catheterization, Peripheral

Keywords

  • Invasive arterial pressure monitoring
  • Distal radial artery cannulation
  • Fovea radialis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who are scheduled for elective surgery
  • Aged 18 and above
  • ASA 1, 2, or 3 classifications
  • Requiring intraoperative arterial cannulation
  • At TC SBÜ Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital will be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • ASA-4 classification
  • Presence of non-palpable arteries
  • Presence of burns or infection at the cannulation site
  • Peripheral vascular disease, bleeding or coagulation disorders
  • Negative modified Allen's test, and communication disorders. The withdrawal criteria for the study include a patient's desire to withdraw from the study at any stage and an extended cannulation time.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Grup 1-Forearm radial artery cannulation (FRA)

    The patients who were to undergo forearm radial artery catheterization were positioned with wrist dorsifection up to 30° and forearm supination. Intervention was planned after ultrasonographic measurements were taken.

    Procedure: Forearm radial artery cannulation

  • Active comparator
    Grup 2-Distal radial artery cannulation (DRA)

    The patients who will undergo distal radial artery catheterization were placed in the pronation position of the forearm with the anatomical snuffbox facing upwards. Intervention was planned after ultrasonographic measurements were taken.

    Procedure: Distal radial artery cannulation

Interventions

  • ProcedureDistal radial artery cannulation

    Interventional application for invasive blood pressure monitoring

  • ProcedureForearm radial artery cannulation

    Interventional application for invasive blood pressure monitoring

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of interventions performed with USG guidance

    The number of attempts will be recorded as 1st attempt, 2nd attempt and 3rd and above attempts.

    Time frame: during cannulation procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. arterial catheterization time

    Arterial catheterization time will be evaluated as under or over 3 minutes.

    Time frame: during cannulation procedure

  2. Monitored arterial waveform success

    Monitored arterial waveform success will be evaluated as follows 1. successful (there is a wave) 2. fail (no wave) 3. intraoperative damping time (the time during which the arterial wave disappears while the operation continues)

    Time frame: During the intraoperative period

  3. Compression time after catheter removal

    After the catheter is removed, the compression time will be measured in seconds. Bleeding will be checked every 30 seconds.

    Time frame: procedure (the process until the catheter is removed and the bleeding stops)

  4. complication follow-up

    Developing complications (vasospasm, hematoma, color and temperature change in the finger) 1. During the intraoperative period, 2. In the postoperative period * upon first arrival in the recovery room, * 1st hour at the end of the operation, * 6th hour at the end of the operation and * 24st at the end of the operation\] will be recorded.

    Time frame: Complication follow-up will be done from the beginning of cannulation procedure to the 24th hour postoperatively.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Health Sciences University Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital:
    Diyarbakır, 21070, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hamandi M, Saad M, Hasan R, Megaly M, Abbott JD, Dib C, Szerlip M, Potluri S, Lotfi A, Kiemeneij F, Al-Azizi KM. Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Oct;21(10):1209-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Mar 14. PubMed 32321695 ↗
  • Hammami R, Zouari F, Ben Abdessalem MA, Sassi A, Ellouze T, Bahloul A, Mallek S, Triki F, Mahdhaoui A, Jeridi G, Abid L, Charfeddine S, Kammoun S, Jdidi J. Distal radial approach versus conventional radial approach: a comparative study of feasibility and safety. Libyan J Med. 2021 Dec;16(1):1830600. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2020.1830600. PubMed 33147107 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06033677
Lead sponsor
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Meral Erdal Erbatur, MD (Anesthesiology and reanimation spesialist, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
Start date
Jan 17, 2024
Primary completion
May 15, 2024
Completion
May 15, 2024
Last update
Jun 13, 2024

Study contacts

Meral Edal Erbatur, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Health Sciences Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion