ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06025656Updated Jan 25, 2024

Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the Leg Lateral Reach Test in Adolescent Tennis Players

An interventional study of Leg Lateral Reach Test in Trunk Injury, Mobility Limitation and Spine Injury, sponsored by Gazi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-25.

Sponsored by Gazi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
11 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Leg Lateral Reach Test to measure thoraco-lumbo-pelvic segment mobility in adolescent tennis players. The fact that the test is valid and reliable for tennis players will contribute to monitoring trunk rotation flexibility in athletes, comparing them bilaterally, and revealing the exercise training necessary to improve performance.

Read the detailed description

Tennis is a sport characterized by coordinated, repetitive, and rotational movements along the kinetic chain. Ineffective use of the trunk segment to generate rotational momentum is thought to increase the load on the upper extremity. Limited trunk rotation flexibility can cause abnormal trunk motion patterns, resulting in lower back injuries and pain as well as upper extremity injuries in throwing athletes. Therefore, assessment of trunk flexibility in athletes who perform repetitive trunk rotations, such as tennis players, is critical for effective rehabilitation and prevention of sports injuries.

The Leg Lateral Reach Test was developed to measure the rotation of the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic segment and was found to be valid and reliable in physically active, healthy individuals. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Leg Lateral Reach Test to measure thoraco-lumbo-pelvic segment mobility in adolescent tennis players. The fact that the test is valid and reliable for tennis players will contribute to monitoring trunk rotation flexibility in athletes, comparing them bilaterally, and revealing the exercise training necessary to improve performance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trunk Injury
  • Mobility Limitation
  • Spine Injury
  • Athletic Injuries

Keywords

  • Spine
  • Leg lateral reach test
  • Range of motion
  • Tennis player
  • Low Back Pain
  • Mobility
03

In context

Mobility Limitation

381 studies on the registry are indexed under Mobility Limitation; 108 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 46 across 316 interventional studies indexed under Mobility Limitation.

Browse Mobility Limitation studies →

Lead sponsor

Gazi University is the lead sponsor of 551 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adolescent tennis players

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Athletes with a history of musculoskeletal injury or surgery in the last year that would prevent the tests from being performed
  • Athletes who feel pain in the trunk and lower extremities during the tests
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Experimental group

    adolescent tennis player

    Diagnostic Test: Leg Lateral Reach Test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testLeg Lateral Reach Test

    To conduct the leg reach test, participants began by positioning themselves with their arms hanging at their sides. They were then guided to raise the leg under assessment and extend it across the opposite leg to make contact with a wooden bar, employing trunk rotation in the process. During each trial, participants were consistently motivated to ensure that both shoulders remained in contact with the floor and to stretch their tested leg as far as they could along the length of the wooden bar. If a participant was unable to sustain contact between their foot and the wooden bar for a duration of 5 seconds at the point of maximal reach, or if both shoulders lifted off the floor, that specific trial was considered invalid and not included in the analysis. Each participant completed three repetitions of this test for both the right and left sides, and the average of their reach distances was subsequently calculated for assessment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Leg Lateral Reach Test-1

    The leg lateral reach test will be measured by the first investigator.

    Time frame: first day

  2. Leg Lateral Reach Test-2

    The leg lateral reach test will be measured by the second investigator.

    Time frame: first day

  3. Leg Lateral Reach Test-3

    The leg lateral reach test will be measured by the first investigator.

    Time frame: 5-7 days after

  4. Leg Lateral Reach Test-4

    The leg lateral reach test will be measured by the second investigator.

    Time frame: 5-7 days after

  5. Seated Rotation Test

    A seated rotation test will be measured for validity analysis.

    Time frame: first day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gazi University
    Ankara, 06490, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pontes-Silva A, Avila MA, de Araujo ADS, Penha TFC, Takahasi HY, Bassi-Dibai D, Dibai-Filho AV. Assessment of the Reliability of the Leg Lateral Reach Test to Measure Thoraco-Lumbo-Pelvic Rotation in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Sep;44(7):566-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.12.001. PubMed 35282857 ↗
  • Kim SH, Kwon OY, Park KN, Hwang UJ. Leg lateral reach test: The reliability and correlation with thoraco-lumbo-pelvic rotation range. J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jan;20(1):2-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 2. PubMed 27210501 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is not a plan to make IPD available.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2023, 2 months.

Of 198 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Mobility Limitation, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 42. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 203 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 29, 2023
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
StartActual
Sep 15, 2023
Primary completionActual
Nov 15, 2023
CompletionActual
Jan 15, 2024
Last update
Jan 25, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06025656
Lead sponsor
Gazi University
Responsible party
Sevim Beyza Ölmez (Principal Investigator, Gazi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
Start date
Sep 15, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2023
Completion
Jan 15, 2024
Last update
Jan 25, 2024

Study contacts

Zeynep Hazar
study director · Gazi University
Elif Aygün Polat
principal investigator · Gazi University
Sevim Beyza Ölmez
principal investigator · Gazi University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion