ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06025123PRINCESS2Updated Sep 16, 2026

Prehospital Resuscitation Intranasal Cooling Effectiveness Survival Study 2

An interventional study of Early transnasal evaporative cooling with the RhinoChill device in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Hypothermia and Ventricular Fibrillation, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Recruiting at 17 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,022
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to study the impact of ultra-early transnasal evaporative cooling after cardiac arrest and subsequent hypothermia at hospital, on survival with complete neurologic recovery, compared to currently recommended normothermia. The study population will consist of patients 18-79 years old, with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial shockable rhythm.

The main research question it aims to answer is whether there is a difference in survival with complete neurologic recovery at 90 days after cardiac arrest between the group of patients that received ultra-early cooling, compared to the group that was treated with normothermia.

Participants will be randomized to two groups. One group (the intervention group) will receive ultra-early trans-nasal evaporative cooling initiated by EMS personnel at the scene of the cardiac arrest, and subsequent systemic hypothermia for 24 hours at hospital arrival. The other group (the control group), will receive standard of care (advanced cardiac life support and normal body temperature (normothermia)).

02

Conditions studied

  • Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
  • Hypothermia
  • Ventricular Fibrillation

Keywords

  • Therapeutic hypothermia
  • transnasal cooling
  • neurologic outcome
  • ultrafast hypothermia
  • prehospital
  • ECPR
03

In context

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

314 studies on the registry are indexed under Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; 93 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,022 is above the median of 218 across 179 interventional studies indexed under Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Browse Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,148 studies on the registry; 276 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Patients ≥18 years that meet all of the following inclusion criteria:

  1. Adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with initial shockable rhythm
  2. Unconsciousness defined as Glasgow Coma Scale \< 8
  3. Inclusion within 20 minutes from EMS arrival

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Patients are not eligible if they meet one or more of the following criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 80 years
  2. Obvious non-cardiac causes to cardiac arrest
  3. Obvious already hypothermic
  4. Obvious barrier to placing intra nasal catheters
  5. Have a known Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate (DNAR) order or other limitations in care
  6. Have a known terminal disease
  7. Known or clinically apparent pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,022 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early transnasal evaporative cooling with the RhinoChill device

    Early transnasal evaporative cooling initiated during ACLS at the scene of the cardiac arrest within 20 minutes from EMS arrival and subsequent hypothermia at 33ºC for 24 hours and fever control for 72 hours at the ICU

    Device: Early transnasal evaporative cooling with the RhinoChill device

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    Standard advanced cardiac life support, subsequent fever control (Normothermia) for 72 hours at ICU

Interventions

  • DeviceEarly transnasal evaporative cooling with the RhinoChill device

    Early prehospital transnasal evaporative cooling followed by systemic hypothermia to 33 degrees Celsius for 24 hours and fever control for 72 hours

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients surviving with complete neurologic recovery at 90 days defined as modified Rankin scale (mRs) of 0-1.

    The modified Rankin Scale is a scoring system on neurologic function ranging from 0-6, where 0 means no symtoms at all, higher numbers indicating increasing neurologic disabilities and 6 equals death.

    Time frame: Day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with sustained ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation) and admitted alive to hospital

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Proportion of patients alive at hospital discharge

    Time frame: Day 1-90

  3. Proportion of patients with Modified Rankin scale 0-3 at hospital discharge

    The modified Rankin Scale is a scoring system on neurologic function ranging from 0-6, where 0 means no symtoms at all, higher numbers indicating increasing neurologic disabilities and 6 equals death.

    Time frame: Day 1-90

  4. Proportion of patients alive at 90 days

    Time frame: Day 90

  5. Proportion of patients with Modified Rankin scale 0-3 at 90 days

    The modified Rankin Scale is a scoring system on neurologic function ranging from 0-6, where 0 means no symtoms at all, higher numbers indicating increasing neurologic disabilities and 6 equals death.

    Time frame: Day 90

  6. Device related adverse event rate within the first 24 hours

    Safety

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Composite serious adverse event rate within the first 7 days

    Safety

    Time frame: Day 1-7

  8. Proportion of patients with new cardiac arrest prior to hospital admission

    Safety

    Time frame: Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. Hospital-free days alive at 90 days

    Time frame: Day 90

  2. Distribution of modified Rankin scale at 90 days

    The modified Rankin Scale is a scoring system on neurologic function ranging from 0-6, where 0 means no symtoms at all, higher numbers indicating increasing neurologic disabilities and 6 equals death.

    Time frame: Day 90

  3. Distribution of Cerebral Performance Category scale at 90 days

    The Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale is a measure for neurologic function. It ranges from 1-5, where 1 equals no or minimal neurologic disabilities, and 5 equals death.

    Time frame: Day 90

  4. Proportion of patients alive after 1 year

    Time frame: Day 365

  5. Proportion of patients with Modified Rankin scale 0-1 at 1 year

    The modified Rankin Scale is a scoring system on neurologic function ranging from 0-6, where 0 means no symtoms at all, higher numbers indicating increasing neurologic disabilities and 6 equals death.

    Time frame: Day 365

  6. Quality of life assessed with EQ-5D-5L at 90 days

    EQ-5D is a a measure of health status and quality of life defined in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into three levels; no problems, some or moderate problems or extreme problems.

    Time frame: Day 90

07

Study locations

15 of 17 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dillenbeck E, Berthelsen T, Corral Torres E, Lopez-de-Sa E, Rosillo Rodriguez SO, Sanchez-Garcia M, Martin Benitez JC, Busch HJ, Radsel P, Ristagno G, Nichol G, Holzer M, Moreau A, Forsberg S, Backstrom D, Awad A, Taccone FS, Falk A, Hollenberg J, Jonsson M, Liliequist A, Jurga J, Okas M, Svensson L, Nordberg P. On-scene selective brain cooling in ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest: pilot results from the PRINCESS2 randomised trial. Crit Care. 2026 Feb 12;30(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13054-026-05851-y. PubMed 41680915 ↗
  • Dillenbeck E, Hollenberg J, Holzer M, Busch HJ, Nichol G, Radsel P, Belohlavec J, Torres EC, Lopez-de-Sa E, Rosell F, Ristagno G, Forsberg S, Annoni F, Svensson L, Jonsson M, Backstrom D, Gellerfors M, Awad A, Taccone FS, Nordberg P. The design of the PRINCESS 2 trial: A randomized trial to study the impact of ultrafast hypothermia on complete neurologic recovery after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial shockable rhythm. Am Heart J. 2024 May;271:97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.02.020. Epub 2024 Feb 28. PubMed 38417773 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06025123
Responsible party
Per Nordberg (Senior consultant in cardiology and intensive care, Associate Professor, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
Start date
Mar 27, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Per Nordberg, MD, PhD
Contact
per.nordberg@ki.se
+46702802579
Emelie Dillenbeck, MD
Contact
emelie.dillenbeck@regionstockholm.se
+46736484567
Per Nordberg, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion