CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06022926Updated Aug 21, 2024

Investigation of the Intraoperative and Postoperative Effects of Warming Patients in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

An interventional study of warmed with electric blankets and patients without warming in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, sponsored by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Days to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-21.

Sponsored by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Days to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In our study, the investigators will investigate the effects of electric blanket heating on intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative nausea, vomiting, shivering, agitation and pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

Group 1: Patients warmed with electric blankets

  • Patients will be provided with electric blankets from the beginning to the end of the operation (approximately 1 hour)
  • all patients will receive standard general anesthesia
  • all patients will undergo electrocardiogram, peripheral oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by automatic pneumatic manometer.
  • each patient will undergo tympanic temperature measurement immediately before induction of general anesthesia, 20 minutes after induction of anesthesia, immediately after extubation and during exit from the postanesthesia recovery unit.
  • mean arterial pressure, intraoperative opioid consumption, nausea-vomiting, agitation, tremor and pain assessment will be performed on each patient immediately before induction of general anesthesia, 20 minutes after induction of anesthesia, immediately after extubation and during discharge from the postanesthesia recovery unit.
  • the same electric blanket was used for this group of patients
  • each time the electric blankets were set to 38 degrees and the blankets were preheated to 38 degrees approximately 30 minutes before the patients were placed on the operating table.
  • heat measurements will be made with the same tympanic heat meter device
  • heat measurements will be made by a blind anesthesiologist with at least 5 years of experience
  • Postoperative evaluations of the patients will be performed face to face.
  • patients will be warmed only during the time they are on the operating table
  • This study was followed up in the operating room and post-anesthesia recovery unit in the operating room.

Group 2: Control group (patients without warming): no electric blanket will be used, and no heating will be applied to this group of patients.

  • all patients will receive standard general anesthesia.
  • all patients will undergo electrocardiogram, peripheral oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by automatic pneumatic manometer.
  • each patient will undergo tympanic temperature measurement immediately before induction of general anesthesia, 20 minutes after induction of anesthesia, immediately after extubation and during exit from the postanesthesia recovery unit.
  • mean arterial pressure, intraoperative opioid consumption, nausea-vomiting, agitation, tremor and pain assessment will be performed on each patient immediately before induction of general anesthesia, 20 minutes after induction of anesthesia, immediately after extubation and during discharge from the postanesthesia recovery unit.
  • temperature measurements will be performed with the same tympanic thermometer device
  • heat measurements will be made by a blind anesthesiologist with at least 5 years of experience
  • Postoperative evaluations of the patients will be performed face to face.
  • This study was followed up in the operating room and post-anesthesia recovery unit in the operating room.

Statistical methods / analysis: G-Power version 3.1.9.4 (University Kiel, Germany) was used to calculate the sample size. Two-tailed alpha error was 0.05, power as 0.80 and effect size as 0.5, and according to a previous study (Comparison of different end-tidal carbon dioxide levels in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1789961.) allocation ratio was accepted as N2/N1:1. The minimum number of patients to be included in the study was calculated as 128.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Days to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation will be
  • To be between 18-65 years old.
  • Being American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification I-II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative body temperature >37.5°C or \<36°C.
  • Impaired temperature regulation such as systemic infection, mental retardation, isolated head trauma or brain injury.
  • Receiving a medication that affects thermoregulation.
  • Being American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification >III.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
128 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1: Patients warmed with electric blankets

    * Patients will be provided with electric blankets from the beginning to the end of the operation (approximately 1 hour) * all patients will receive standard general anesthesia * each patient will undergo tympanic temperature measurement immediately before induction of general anesthesia, 20 minutes after induction of anesthesia, immediately after extubation and during exit from the postanesthesia recovery unit. * the same electric blanket was used for this group of patients * each time the electric blankets were set to 38 degrees and the blankets were preheated to 38 degrees approximately 30 minutes before the patients were placed on the operating table. * heat measurements will be made with the same tympanic heat meter device

    Procedure: warmed with electric blankets

  • Other
    Group 2: Control group (patients without warming)

    * no electric blanket will be used, and no heating will be applied to this group of patients. * all patients will receive standard general anesthesia * all patients will undergo electrocardiogram, peripheral oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by automatic pneumatic manometer * mean arterial pressure, intraoperative opioid consumption, nausea-vomiting, agitation, tremor and pain assessment will be performed on each patient immediately before induction of general anesthesia, 20 minutes after induction of anesthesia, immediately after extubation and during discharge from the postanesthesia recovery unit. * temperature measurements will be performed with the same tympanic thermometer device

    Other: patients without warming

Interventions

  • Procedurewarmed with electric blankets

    warmed with electric blankets

  • Otherpatients without warming

    patients without warming: no electric blanket will be used, and no heating will be applied to this group of patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Agitation assessment

    Agitation assessment with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS). The Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) is a 10-point scale ranging from -5 to +4.Levels -1 to -5 denote 5 levels of sedation, starting with "awakens to voice" and ending with "unarousable." Levels +1 to +4 describe increasing levels of agitation. The lowest level of agitation starts with apprehension and anxiety, and peaks at combative and violent. RASS level 0 is "alert and calm.

    Time frame: Will be assessed from immediately after extubation until transfer from the recovery room to the ward.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain assessment

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."

    Time frame: Within 30 minutes from the time the patient was extubated to the time of extubation from the postoperative recovery unit to the ward.

  2. post-operative tremor

    The evaluation will be made according to this rating: Grade 1: no tremor Grade 2: mild tremor with mild facial and cervical muscle contraction Grade 3: moderate tremor with obvious tremor of the head and neck, shoulders and/or extremities Grade 4: severe tremor consisting of an obvious tremor all over the body

    Time frame: Within 30 minutes from the time the patient was extubated to the time of extubation from the postoperative recovery unit to the ward.

  3. Amount of fentanyl consumed intraoperatively

    micrograms of fentanyl consumed

    Time frame: during surgery]

  4. Average blood pressure

    Blood pressure will be measured with a non-invasive automatic pneumatic cuff in the operating theatre.

    Time frame: Assessments will be performed at 0 minutes immediately before induction of anesthesia, 20 minutes after induction, immediately after extubation and 20 minutes in the recovery unit after anesthesia.

  5. Heart rate

    the measurement will be obtained by electrocardiographic monitoring

    Time frame: Assessments will be performed at 0 minutes immediately before induction of anesthesia, 20 minutes after induction, immediately after extubation and 20 minutes in the recovery unit after anesthesia.

  6. nausea-vomiting

    -Postoperative nausea and vomiting will be assessed using a 100 mm VAS: 1- severe nausea (VAS\>70 mm), 2- moderate nausea (50\<VAS\<70 mm), 3- mild nausea (VAS \<50 mm).

    Time frame: The evaluation will be performed at postoperative 0th hour, 2nd hour, 6th hour and 24th hour.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
    Diyarbakır, 21070, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tanaka N, Ohno Y, Hori M, Utada M, Ito K, Suzuki T. A randomised controlled trial of the resistive heating blanket versus the convective warming system for preventing hypothermia during major abdominal surgery. J Perioper Pract. 2013 Apr;23(4):82-6. doi: 10.1177/175045891302300404. PubMed 23691884 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06022926
Lead sponsor
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Fatma Acil,MD (Anesthesiology and Reanimation Spesialist, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2023
Start date
Oct 3, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 19, 2024
Completion
Aug 20, 2024
Last update
Aug 21, 2024

Study contacts

Cem K. Kaçar, Assoc.Prof
study director · Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion