ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06022705Updated Aug 21, 2024

Evaluation of the Effect of APFEL Risk Score and Fasting Periods on Postoperative Nausea and/or Vomiting

An observational study in Nausea, Postoperative, Vomiting, Postoperative and APFEL RİSK SCORE, sponsored by Cukurova University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-21.

Sponsored by Cukurova University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
321
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study, it is aimed to determine the effect of Apfel risk score and fasting times on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Read the detailed description

PONV are common causes of delayed discharge. PONV; nausea and/or vomiting in the first 24 hours after surgery. The incidence of PONV after elective surgeries varies between 30-80% depending on anesthesia, type of surgery, and risk factors of the patient. PONV is not only an uncomfortable complication for the patient but is associated with significant patient dissatisfaction. It also includes dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, acid-base imbalance, pulmonary aspiration, pneumothorax, hypoxia, esophageal rupture, increased intracranial pressure, wound problems, bleeding, delayed oral intake, prolonged hospitalization, fatigue, anxiety, unexpected hospital readmission, increased medical costs. Therefore, the prevention and management of nausea and/or vomiting in the perioperative period in surgical patients is very important.

In the preoperative period, patients' risk of nausea and/or vomiting should be evaluated with standard measurement tools. The most commonly used is the Apfel risk score, including four risk factors. These; female gender, history of PONV and/or motion sickness, non-smoking, and postoperative opioid use. In the presence of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 risk factors, the incidence of PONV is approximately 10%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%, respectively. It has been observed that the use of risk scoring for PONV significantly reduces the rate of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative period. The risk of PONV varies depending on the patient, the type of anesthesia and the surgery. Female gender, young age, non-smoking, history of PONV or motion sickness are important risk factors for PONV. Type of anesthesia, duration of administration, use of volatile anesthetics and nitrous oxide, and use of opioids in the perioperative period are among other risk factors. It has been reported that PONV is seen more frequently after laparoscopic, bariatric, gynecological surgery, and cholecystectomy.

In order to prevent the development of nausea-vomiting and aspiration pneumonia during and after the operation, patients should be fasted for a certain period of time before the operation. Fasting periods in the preoperative period should not be long enough to cause adverse outcomes in patients. It has been reported in the literature that long preoperative fasting periods do not prevent some complications, but on the contrary increase them. Therefore, it is emphasized that it is unnecessary to starve patients for a long time in the preoperative period. In the study of Hausel et al., it was reported that patients who were fasted for 12-24 hours before surgery had more nausea and vomiting in the postoperative period than patients who were fasted for a short time and were given oral carbohydrate-containing fluids. According to the results of different studies conducted in this area, it has been reported that reducing the preoperative fasting period eliminates the patient's feeling of thirst before the operation, reduces nausea and vomiting, alleviates anxiety, increases patient comfort, accelerates recovery, and significantly shortens the length of hospital stay. It is stated that a short pre-operative fasting period reduces the loss of nitrogen in the urine and prevents loss of muscle strength, reduces the feeling of anxiety and thirst before the operation, and increases patient comfort by reducing nausea and vomiting in the early postoperative period. It has been reported that there are limited clinical studies to explain the relationship between perioperative fasting time and PONV in terms of the level of evidence. In this respect, it is important to determine the relationship between risk factors preoperative fasting times, and PONV.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nausea, Postoperative
  • Vomiting, Postoperative
  • APFEL RİSK SCORE

Keywords

  • APFEL Risk Score,
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
  • Preoperative Fasting
03

In context

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

629 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; 113 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 321 is above the median of 197 across 88 observational studies indexed under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

Browse Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting studies →

Lead sponsor

Cukurova University is the lead sponsor of 258 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The population of the study will be composed of patients who applied for elective surgery to Çukurova University Medical Faculty Balcalı Training and Research Hospital General Surgery Clinic and Tarsus State Hospital General Surgery Clinic between the dates of the study. The sample, on the other hand, will consist of a total of 250 patients who comply with the selection criteria, agree to participate in the study, and are determined by power analysis.

The sample of the study was carried out using an unknown population model. The data obtained from the study of Weibel et al. (2020) were used for the effect size to be used in the calculation of the sample number (Weibel et al., 2020).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being over 18 years old
  • To have applied for elective surgery,
  • Being hospitalized 6 hours before the operation,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I-III
  • Not having a vision-hearing problem
  • Not having chronic pain,
  • No alcohol and/or substance addiction,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Performing emergency surgical intervention,
  • Need for intensive care after surgery
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
321 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determining the risk of posoperative nausea and vomiting.

    APFEL risk score. It is a valid tool to assess PONV and/or motion sickness, non-smoking status, and postoperative opioid use. Accordingly, 0-1 indicates low, 2-3 moderate and ≥3 high risk for ASBK. Accordingly, 0-1 indicates low risk, 2-3 moderate and ≥3 high risk for ASBK. In the presence of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 risk factors, the incidence of ASBK was reported as 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80%, respectively.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Determination of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

    Nausea and Vomiting Evaluation Form. In our study, ASBK status will be evaluated as "Yes/No" at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours using the Nausea and Vomiting Evaluation Form.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tarsus University
    Mersin, Tarsus 33400, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Apfel CC, Heidrich FM, Jukar-Rao S, Jalota L, Hornuss C, Whelan RP, Zhang K, Cakmakkaya OS. Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;109(5):742-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes276. Epub 2012 Oct 3. PubMed 23035051 ↗
  • Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, Chung F, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, Jin Z, Kovac AL, Meyer TA, Urman RD, Apfel CC, Ayad S, Beagley L, Candiotti K, Englesakis M, Hedrick TL, Kranke P, Lee S, Lipman D, Minkowitz HS, Morton J, Philip BK. Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020 Aug;131(2):411-448. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004833. PubMed 32467512 ↗
  • Wan KM, Carter J, Philp S. Predictors of early discharge after open gynecological surgery in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Oct;42(10):1369-1374. doi: 10.1111/jog.13045. Epub 2016 Jun 29. PubMed 27353883 ↗
  • Parrish RH 2nd, Findley R, Elias KM, Kramer B, Johnson EG, Gramlich L, Nelson GS. Pharmacotherapeutic prophylaxis and post-operative outcomes within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) program: A randomized retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Dec 14;73:103178. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103178. eCollection 2022 Jan. PubMed 35003725 ↗
  • Elvir-Lazo OL, White PF, Yumul R, Cruz Eng H. Management strategies for the treatment and prevention of postoperative/postdischarge nausea and vomiting: an updated review. F1000Res. 2020 Aug 13;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-983. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21832.1. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32913634 ↗
  • Obrink E, Jildenstal P, Oddby E, Jakobsson JG. Post-operative nausea and vomiting: update on predicting the probability and ways to minimize its occurrence, with focus on ambulatory surgery. Int J Surg. 2015 Mar;15:100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.024. Epub 2015 Jan 29. PubMed 25638733 ↗
  • Veiga-Gil L, Pueyo J, Lopez-Olaondo L. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: physiopathology, risk factors, prophylaxis and treatment. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017 Apr;64(4):223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Dec 29. English, Spanish. PubMed 28041609 ↗
  • Cao X, White PF, Ma H. An update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):617-626. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2363-x. Epub 2017 Apr 28. PubMed 28455599 ↗
  • Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y. PubMed 30426190 ↗
  • Gecit S, Ozbayir T. Evaluation of Preoperative Risk Assessment and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Importance for Nurses. J Perianesth Nurs. 2020 Dec;35(6):625-629. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Aug 7. PubMed 32778493 ↗
  • Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):693-700. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022. PubMed 10485781 ↗
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology. 2011 Mar;114(3):495-511. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fcbfd9. No abstract available. PubMed 21307770 ↗
  • Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017 Mar;126(3):376-393. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452. No abstract available. PubMed 28045707 ↗
  • Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hubner M, Klek S, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Martindale R, Waitzberg DL, Bischoff SC, Singer P. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;36(3):623-650. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 7. PubMed 28385477 ↗
  • Weibel S, Rucker G, Eberhart LH, Pace NL, Hartl HM, Jordan OL, Mayer D, Riemer M, Schaefer MS, Raj D, Backhaus I, Helf A, Schlesinger T, Kienbaum P, Kranke P. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. PubMed 33075160 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Results regarding the relationship between APFEL risk score fasting times and PONV will be shared. However, personal information will not be shared.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 7 months.

Of 49 non-industry observational studies under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 37. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 49 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2023
First posted
Sep 5, 2023
StartActual
Aug 28, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 5, 2024
CompletionActual
Aug 20, 2024
Last update
Aug 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06022705
Collaborators
Tarsus University
Responsible party
Derya Gezer (Assistant Profesor, Tarsus University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2023
Start date
Aug 28, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 5, 2024
Completion
Aug 20, 2024
Last update
Aug 21, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion