An interventional study of Enhanced Cue Exposure Therapy and Behavioral Lifestyle Intervention in Disordered Eating Behaviors and Binge Eating, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-06.
Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Enhanced Cue Exposure Therapy (E-CET) in reducing negative emotional eating (NEE), compared to an active control intervention, behavioral lifestyle intervention (BLI), in a parallel-group, participant-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The secondary aim is to evaluate whether changes in conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) expectancies mediate the changes in NEE.
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental treatment or control BLI group. Participants in the experimental group will receive 6 weeks of E-CET treatment and those in the control group will receive 6 weeks of behavioral counselling integrating behavioral strategies for making changes related to diet and exercise. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and 3- and 12-month follow-ups.
Research question 1:
Is E-CET an efficacious intervention for reducing NEE?
Hypothesis 1:
E-CET will lead to greater reductions in NEE at posttreatment and follow-up compared to BLI.
Research question 2:
Does E-CET work via the violation of the CS-US expectancies?
Hypothesis 2:
Changes in the believability of CS-US expectancies will mediate the treatment effects of E-CET on NEE.
173 studies on the registry are indexed under Bulimia; 33 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 138 is above the median of 60 across 143 interventional studies indexed under Bulimia.
Browse Bulimia studies →The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,292 studies on the registry; 348 are open to participants now.
Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
This is the experimental arm. Participants will receive the 6-session enhanced cue exposure therapy.
Behavioral: Enhanced Cue Exposure Therapy
This is the active control arm. Participants will receive the 6-session behavioral lifestyle intervention.
Behavioral: Behavioral Lifestyle Intervention
The E-CET will consist of six weekly sessions and will be delivered by a clinical psychology trainee in person. Session #1 will be used to introduce to the participant the rationale and procedures of E-CET to establish therapeutic alliance, agreement on treatment goals and tasks, and to collect information on idiosyncratic CS-US expectancies to be targeted in exposures. Sessions #2 to #5 will be in vivo exposures. The interventionist will prompt the participant to evaluate the CS-US expectancy to facilitate the violation of the CS-US expectancy maintaining NEE. Between-session homework exposures will be planned and conducted by the participant in their naturalistic environment. They will also be reviewed at the beginning of the following session to consolidate learning. The final session will consist of consolidation of treatment gains and relapse prevention.
The BLI will consist of six weekly sessions of behavioral counselling integrating behavioral strategies for participants to make dietary changes. These behavioral strategies will include education about healthy and balanced diets, goal-setting, problem-solving, and relaxation. A manualized protocol developed by the PI's team for previous studies in the local community will be used.
Changes in the score on the emotional eating subscale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ)
The subscale consists of 13 items assessing the tendency to eat in response to negative emotions, on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). The cutoff point of \>3.25 is used to indicate negative emotional eating tendencies. Higher scores indicate greater tendency and severity.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Number of EMA-measured NEE episodes
Participants will respond to fixed-interval prompts asking whether they have engaged in NEE in the assessment period. The sum of all the reported episodes during the seven days will be computed to indicate the frequency of NEE per week.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Changes in NEE
It will be indexed by the association between negative emotionality and caloric consumption measured in three days a week. Negative emotionality will be measured using the four fixed interval prompts per day. Participants will be asked to select the negative emotions applied to them at the moment and rate the intensity of the selected negative emotions on a visual analog scale from 0 (not at all) to 100 (very intense). Caloric consumption will be measured by the 24-hour dietary recall interview conducted for three days a week. Stronger associations will indicate greater NEE.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Changes in caloric consumption
It will be measured by the 24-hour dietary recall interview conducted for three days a week. Nutrition information on food intake (calories, protein, carbohydrates, fat, dietary fibre, sugar, and sodium) will be processed by trained research assistants.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Changes in external eating measured by the external eating subscale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ)
The subscale consists of 10 items assessing the tendency to eat in response to external cues on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Higher scores indicate greater frequencies of disordered eating.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Changes in eating disorder symptoms measured by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-Short (EDE-QS)
It consists of 12 items assessing the symptoms of eating disorders for the preceding seven days rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (0 days) to 3 (6-7 days). Higher global scores indicate greater eating disorder symptoms.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Changes in body weight
It will be measured in the laboratory using a digital weighing scale.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Changes in mood measured using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21)
The scale consists of 21 items rated on 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) Likert scales assessing symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Changes in quality of life measured using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
It is a 5-item scale measuring subjective life satisfaction on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Higher total scores indicate greater life satisfaction.
Time frame: 14 months (up to 12-month follow-up)
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual patient data may be shared upon request for research purposes.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code
Time frame: De-identified data will become available indefinitely
Access criteria: Requests to share data will be evaluated by the principal investigator
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Dec 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2025, 20 months after the start.
Of 68 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bulimia, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 20 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 70 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 52.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.