ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06004154EvHortimUpdated Jun 4, 2024

Post-therapeutic Imaging Evaluation of Patients With Horton's Disease (Giant Cell Arteritis) (EvHortim)

An observational study in Giant Cell Arteritis, sponsored by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-04.

Sponsored by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), also known as Horton's disease, is an inflammatory arteritis of the large and medium-sized arteries, with an estimated incidence of 17.8/100,000 in people over 50.

The disease presents potential ophthalmological, neurological, cardiac and aortic vascular complications, making diagnosis an emergency in cases of suspected Horton's disease.

only corticosteroid therapy started as early as possible can prevent these complications.

Diagnosis has historically relied on temporal artery biopsy, but the recent ACR/EULAR 2022 classification criteria propose alternatives to this invasive examination, in particular imaging tests such as temporal artery ultrasound and PET scans. Although not included in these latest recommendations, high-definition wall MRI can also provide arguments in favor of this diagnosis, and avoid the need for a temporal artery biopsy, the sensitivity of which is only 75%. The investigators recently demonstrated in a prospective cohort that wall MRI, possibly coupled with temporal artery ultrasound or retinal angiography, was far superior to temporal artery biopsy in diagnostic performance.

The main limitation of these imaging tests is the lack of data in the literature on the evolution of abnormalities over time, and in particular after initiation of oral corticosteroid therapy. This uncertainty makes it difficult to use these examinations to monitor disease activity, particularly in cases of suspected relapse, a frequent situation in which the clinician is regularly put at fault due to an often frustrating symptomatology and the possible absence of a frank biological inflammatory syndrome.

The investigators propose to conduct a study aimed at describing the evolution of cranial vessel wall abnormalities on wall MRI and ultrasound by systematically repeating these examinations at 1 month, 3 months from the initial MRI performed at diagnosis, in addition to the follow-up performed as part of care at 6 and 12 months from diagnosis. In the event of a relapse in the intervening period, a new MRI scan can be performed and compared with the most recent MRI scan, to look for evidence of disease activity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Giant Cell Arteritis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Giant Cell Arteritis

147 studies on the registry are indexed under Giant Cell Arteritis; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 128 across 78 observational studies indexed under Giant Cell Arteritis.

Browse Giant Cell Arteritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild is the lead sponsor of 316 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients treated at the Fondation A de Rothschild Hospital for Horton's disease.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient aged 50 and over
  • Having received to participate in the study
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of a social insurance scheme
  • Patients with giant cell arteritis according to ACR/EULAR 2022 criteria
  • Diagnosed with MRI and ultrasound.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute or relative to MRI (incompatible implantable device, claustrophobia, etc.)
  • to gadobutrol
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testInjected cerebral MRI angiography and ultrasound of the superior aortic trunks, temporal and axillary arteries

    Injected cerebral MRI angiography and ultrasound of the superior aortic trunks, temporal and axillary arteries added to the usual follow-up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Describe the evolution over time of angiographic-MRI abnormalities at 1 month, 3 months, 6 and 12 months from the diagnosis of Horton's disease.

    thickening (yes/no)

    Time frame: Day0 to Month12

  2. Describe the evolution over time of ultrasound abnormalities at 1 month, 3 months, 6 and 12 months from the diagnosis of Horton's disease.

    contrast enhancement (yes/no)

    Time frame: Day0 to Month12

  3. Describe the evolution over time of ultrasound abnormalities at 1 month, 3 months, 6 and 12 months from the diagnosis of Horton's disease.

    halo measurement (in mm)

    Time frame: Day0 to Month12

  4. Describe the evolution over time of ultrasound abnormalities at 1 month, 3 months, 6 and 12 months from the diagnosis of Horton's disease.

    intima-media thickness measurement (in mm)

    Time frame: Day0 to Month12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 41 months after the start.

Of 44 observational studies under Giant Cell Arteritis, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 164. This study's planned 41 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 16, 2023
First posted
Aug 22, 2023
StartActual
Nov 28, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 2027
Last update
Jun 4, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06004154
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 22, 2023
Start date
Nov 28, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2024

Study contacts

Amélie Yavchitz, PhD
Contact
ayavchitz@for.paris
0148036454
Gaelle Clavel-Refregiers, PhD
Contact
gclavel@for.paris
01 48 03 62 28

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion