ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07719374MAGRITTEUpdated Nov 6, 2026

Medico-Economic Evaluation of MRI Versus CT as Diagnostic Imaging Strategies in Patients With Suspected Ischemic Stroke: the MAGRITTE Study.

An interventional study of CT and CT angiography (CTA) and MRI and MR angiography (MRA) in Stroke, sponsored by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Updated Nov 6, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide. In patients with suspected large vessel occlusion, rapid diagnosis and reperfusion therapy are critical, as treatment delays are associated with worse functional outcomes and increased mortality. Current French guidelines recommend brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference imaging modality because of its high diagnostic accuracy. However, MRI availability remains limited in many stroke centers, often resulting in delays in diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, computed tomography (CT) is more widely available and can substantially shorten time to reperfusion, although it may be less sensitive for early ischemic changes.

The MAGRITTE study aims to determine whether an initial CT-based imaging strategy is more cost-effective than an MRI-based strategy for patients with suspected severe acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset.

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups enrolling 600 adult patients presenting with a high suspicion of acute ischemic stroke due to proximal large vessel occlusion (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≥10). Participants will be randomized to undergo either CT with CT angiography or MRI with MR angiography as the first-line diagnostic imaging examination. Additional perfusion imaging may be performed at the investigator's discretion.

The primary objective is to compare the cost-utility of the two diagnostic strategies at 12 months, expressed as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, using EQ-5D-5L-derived utilities. Secondary objectives include lifetime cost-effectiveness modeling, 5-year budget impact analysis, comparison of functional outcomes, mortality, imaging-to-treatment and reperfusion times, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, diagnostic accuracy, management pathways, adverse events, radiation exposure, and healthcare costs.

The study will provide evidence on whether a CT-first imaging strategy can improve the efficiency of acute stroke care while maintaining favorable clinical outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Computed tomography (CT)
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Cost-effectiveness
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild is the lead sponsor of 316 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Symptoms consistent with suspected acute ischemic stroke due to proximal large vessel occlusion
  • National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥10 at admission
  • Symptom onset \<6 hours before randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnostic brain imaging performed within the preceding 24 hours for the index stroke event
  • to MRI (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, metallic implant or foreign body, surgical clips) or CT (e.g., pregnancy, severe renal impairment)
  • Contraindication to iodinated contrast agent (e.g., known severe allergy)
  • Not affiliated with the French national health insurance system
  • Not residing in France
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Adults under legal protection
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial (RIPH1 or equivalent)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    First-line non-contrast CT and CT angiography for suspected acute ischemic stroke.

    Diagnostic Test: CT and CT angiography (CTA)

  • Active comparator
    First-line brain MRI and MR angiography for suspected acute ischemic stroke.

    Diagnostic Test: MRI and MR angiography (MRA)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCT and CT angiography (CTA)

    Participants randomized to this intervention undergo first-line non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA) for the diagnosis of suspected acute ischemic stroke.

  • Diagnostic testMRI and MR angiography (MRA)

    Participants undergo first-line brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR angiography (MRA) for the evaluation of suspected acute ischemic stroke.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after stroke onset

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Sep 2030, 45 months later.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 45 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Dec 2026, on Nov 6, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 17, 2026
First posted
Jul 22, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2030
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2030
Last update
Nov 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Sep 1, 2026→Dec 1, 2026
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Start date Sep 1, 2026→Dec 1, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07719374
Collaborators
Université Paris Descartes- Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Appliquée en Économie-Gestion et Santé - LIRAES
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 22, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Mikael Mazighi, MD PhD
Contact
mmazighi@for.paris
+33148036333

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion