CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05999448WellCASTUpdated Aug 21, 2023

Promoting the Well Being of Caregivers Via Telehealth

An interventional study of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual in Caregivers and Parents, sponsored by Purdue University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-21.

Sponsored by Purdue University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2023; still recruiting 3 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
800
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which types of telehealth-based treatments best fit the needs of caregivers of people with rare neurogenetic conditions. The main questions it plans to answer are:

  • Which telehealth support programs best meet the needs of rare disorder caregivers?
  • How can individuals be matched to support programs that are right for them? What aspects of an individual (e.g., demographics, mental health symptoms, family characteristics, lifestyle) predict whether treatment will be a good fit?
  • Does peer-to-peer coaching help improve patients' experiences during telehealth treatment?

Participants will be asked to complete a 12-week treatment program, which may include self-guided resources, individual therapies, group therapies, and/or peer-to-peer coaching.

Before, during, and after treatment, participants will complete questionnaires to help researchers understand their experiences, symptoms, and impressions of their support program. Questionnaires will include both standard forms (administered up to 5 times throughout the study) and brief "snapshot surveys" that participants complete on their smartphones up to 3 times per day.

Some participants will be assigned to a waitlist control, which means that they will provide data while they are not yet completing a support program. These participants will be assigned to a support program in the next treatment phase.

Read the detailed description

Project WellCAST (Supporting Wellbeing of Caregivers via Telehealth) is a multi-phase research study that aims to develop a scalable, personalized health approach for supporting caregivers of people with rare disorders. Two previous studies by this research team have piloted individual interventions in subsets of rare disorder caregiving communities to establish initial feasibility and acceptability. Now in its third phase, Project WellCAST 3.0 aims to generate a scalable, innovative model for personalizing digital treatments to caregiver needs. This project has two specific aims:

AIM 1: Develop and optimize a personalized health algorithm to match neurogenetic syndrome (NGC) caregivers to digital health treatments using a combination of standard clinical tools and smartphone-based EMA data.

Extant clinical and EMA data on NGC caregiver response to COVID-19 was used to develop an initial routing algorithm to match families to treatment type and intensity. This aim will compare the effectiveness of algorithm-assigned treatment to "treatment as usual," optimizing the algorithm across four waves of intervention. Interventions will be brief, evidence-based, digital health treatments administered by highly supervised clinical trainees, a cost-efficient model for directly targeting the secondary health effects of COVID-19.

AIM 2: Test the efficacy of peer-to-peer coaching, deployed by trained NGC caregivers using an evidence-based motivational interviewing protocol, in enhancing treatment uptake and clinical outcomes.

Peer coaches who are also NGC caregivers will be trained to deploy evidence-based Participation Enhancement Interventions designed to support treatment engagement and reduce potential barriers. This aim will evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of this approach in reducing secondary health effects of COVID-19 by comparing outcomes across participants who were randomized to complete treatment with and without peer coaches. Peer coaches will also provide valuable stakeholder input for designing and optimizing the digital treatment network.

DETAILED HUMAN SUBJECTS PROCEDURE:

ENROLLMENT AND CONSENT 1. At the entry of the study, caregivers will be assessed by the study team to determine eligibility. The caregivers will then consent to baseline collection. A subset of caregivers will be enrolled at this phase as waitlist controls. Waitlist controls will complete the same data collection described below, but without any support program.

BASELINE. The baseline period of the study lasts two weeks. During this time, caregivers will complete initial study forms and "snapshot surveys," which are brief questionnaires sent three times per day via their smartphones.

ROUTING. After baseline data collection is complete, caregivers will be routed to a support program. Random number generators will be used to route caregivers to their study arm, described below.

Caregivers may opt out of broadly completing either child-focused or self-focused treatments but may not select their specific treatment modality. As an exception, any Black caregiver in the study is eligible to add the CICBT group to their assigned support program.

CONSENT 2 and INTERVENTION. Participants will provide informed consent specific to their assigned intervention then begin their 12-week support program. Programs are described below. During intervention, caregivers will be asked to complete study forms to assess how their characteristics and experiences have changed interventions; forms will be collected at start of treatment, midpoint, and endpoint. Caregivers will also complete "snapshot surveys" (3x/day) during this time.

FOLLOW UP. Two weeks after completing treatment, caregivers will complete follow-up forms and a 2-week period of "snapshot surveys."

ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES:

This study will occur across four phases. Phases I and II will enroll up to 500 participants (to yield 400 participants total) who will be randomly assigned to Algorithm (Algorithm 1 versus No Algorithm) and Peer Coaching (Peer Coaching versus No Peer Coaching).

After Phase II, investigators will convene a "think tank" that will evaluate primary and secondary endpoints across arms, with the goal of determining how to optimize the algorithm. Data analyses will be performed by staff who are not involved in clinical operations. Peer coaches (who are rare disorder caregivers), clinicians, biostatisticians, and scientists will collaboratively participate in this think tank, with the goal to optimize the algorithm prior to Phase III.

Phase III will enroll up to 250 participants (to yield 200) who will receive the optimized Algorithm 2 and be randomly assigned to Peer Coaching conditions. After Phase III, a second think tank will be convened to optimize Algorithm 3.

Phase IV will enroll up to 250 participants (to yield 200) who will receive the optimized Algorithm 3 and will be randomly assigned to Peer Coaching conditions.

Final analyses will compare Algorithm 3 to Algorithm 2, Algorithm 1, and Waitlist Controls.

RIGOR AND REPRODUCIBILITY.

Algorithms will be uploaded to a secure, locked site prior to each round of study assignment. Analyses will be preregistered, and all code will be available for replication efforts. Masking procedures are described elsewhere in this document.

02

Conditions studied

  • Caregivers
  • Parents
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Purdue University is the lead sponsor of 168 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Caregiver and legal guardian of child age 2-35 with neurogenetic condition
  • Child's syndrome must (1) have an established genetic cause, (2) affect the brain, resulting in moderate to severe intellectual disability in the majority of patients
  • Reside in US
  • Fluent in English (spoken and written)
  • Seeking support for caregiver mental health/well-being and/or caregiving needs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious mental illness or active addiction that would be inadequately addressed through dosage of treatments
  • Actively in treatment that would be redundant with those offered in the protocol
  • Child's syndrome is not commonly associated with (1) life expectancy less than 35 years or (2) deterioration of previously gained skills.

Additional treatment-specific inclusion criteria are embedded in the experimental algorithm that will be adjusted through Aim 1.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    No Algorithm + Participation Enhancement Intervention

    Participants are randomly assigned to support program without use of a personalized health algorithm AND receive the participation enhancement intervention.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group · Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) · Behavioral: Durand Sleep Intervention · Behavioral: RUBI Intervention · Behavioral: Naturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI) · Behavioral: Self-Guided Resources · Behavioral: Participation Enhancement Intervention (PEI)

  • Experimental
    No Algorithm + No Participation Enhancement Intervention

    Participants are randomly assigned to support program without use of a personalized health algorithm AND do not receive the participation enhancement intervention.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group · Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) · Behavioral: Durand Sleep Intervention · Behavioral: RUBI Intervention · Behavioral: Naturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI) · Behavioral: Self-Guided Resources

  • Experimental
    Algorithm 1 + Participation Enhancement Intervention

    Participants are assigned to support programs using Algorithm 1 AND receive the participation enhancement intervention.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group · Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) · Behavioral: Durand Sleep Intervention · Behavioral: RUBI Intervention · Behavioral: Naturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI) · Behavioral: Self-Guided Resources · Behavioral: Participation Enhancement Intervention (PEI)

  • Experimental
    Algorithm 1 + No Participation Enhancement Intervention

    Participants are assigned to support programs using Algorithm 1 AND do not receive the participation enhancement intervention.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group · Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) · Behavioral: Durand Sleep Intervention · Behavioral: RUBI Intervention · Behavioral: Naturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI) · Behavioral: Self-Guided Resources

  • Experimental
    Algorithm 2 + Participation Enhancement Intervention

    Participants are assigned to support programs using Algorithm 2 AND receive the participation enhancement intervention.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group · Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) · Behavioral: Durand Sleep Intervention · Behavioral: RUBI Intervention · Behavioral: Naturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI) · Behavioral: Self-Guided Resources · Behavioral: Participation Enhancement Intervention (PEI)

  • Experimental
    Algorithm 2 + No Participation Enhancement Intervention

    Participants are assigned to support programs using Algorithm 2 AND do not receive the participation enhancement intervention.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group · Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) · Behavioral: Durand Sleep Intervention · Behavioral: RUBI Intervention · Behavioral: Naturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI) · Behavioral: Self-Guided Resources

  • Experimental
    Algorithm 3 + Participation Enhancement Intervention

    Participants are assigned to support programs using Algorithm 3 AND receive the participation enhancement intervention.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group · Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) · Behavioral: Durand Sleep Intervention · Behavioral: RUBI Intervention · Behavioral: Naturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI) · Behavioral: Self-Guided Resources · Behavioral: Participation Enhancement Intervention (PEI)

  • Experimental
    Algorithm 3 + No Participation Enhancement Intervention

    Participants are assigned to support programs using Algorithm 3 AND do not receive the participation enhancement intervention.

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual · Behavioral: Culturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group · Behavioral: Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) · Behavioral: Durand Sleep Intervention · Behavioral: RUBI Intervention · Behavioral: Naturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI) · Behavioral: Self-Guided Resources

  • No intervention
    Waitlist Control

    Participants are enrolled in the waitlist control condition, which includes identical data collection procedures to participants enrolled in support programs. Waitlist controls are offered the opportunity to enroll in future cycles.

Interventions

  • BehavioralAcceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

    ACT will be deployed weekly for 12 weeks on an individual basis via secure Zoom. Treatments will be deployed by supervised graduate student clinicians under the supervision of a licensed psychologist.

  • BehavioralCulturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Individual

    CICBT-Individual will be deployed weekly for 12 weeks on an individual basis via secure Zoom. Treatments will be deployed by supervised graduate student clinicians under the supervision of a licensed psychologist.

    Also known as: Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

  • BehavioralCulturally Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CICBT), Group

    CICBT-Group will be deployed weekly for 12 weeks in small groups via secure Zoom. Treatments will be deployed by supervised graduate student clinicians under the supervision of a licensed psychologist.

    Also known as: Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

  • BehavioralDialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT)

    DBT will be deployed weekly for 12 weeks in small groups via secure Zoom. Treatments will be deployed by supervised graduate student clinicians under the supervision of a licensed psychologist.

  • BehavioralDurand Sleep Intervention

    Durand Sleep Intervention will be deployed weekly for 12 weeks, alternating between individual and group formats, via secure Zoom. Treatments will be deployed by supervised graduate student clinicians under the supervision of a licensed psychologist or behavioral analyst.

  • BehavioralRUBI Intervention

    RUBI will be deployed weekly for 12 weeks in small groups via secure Zoom. Treatments will be deployed by supervised graduate student clinicians under the supervision of a licensed behavioral analyst.

  • BehavioralNaturalistic Communication Intervention (NCI)

    NCI will be deployed weekly for 12 weeks on an individual basis via secure Zoom. Treatments will be deployed by supervised graduate student clinicians under the supervision of a licensed behavioral analyst.

  • BehavioralSelf-Guided Resources

    Participants will be provided a self-guided resource notebook that includes 12 weeks of content that parallels the topics examined in other support programs (child behavior management, child sleep, child communication, caregiver mental health, caregiver health behaviors, community connection)

  • BehavioralParticipation Enhancement Intervention (PEI)

    A standardized PEI intervention will be conducted by trained peer coaches who are also rare disorder caregivers. Each peer coach will work with their clients to complete a "Change Plan Worksheet" and will complete two booster sessions at midpoint and end of treatment. Coaches will also meet with their clients after follow-up data are complete to support connection back to community resources and patient-specific rare disorder communities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline on DASS-21 Total-Score at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-reported Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale, 21 Total Score ranges from 0-63; higher scores indicate greater impairment. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  2. Change from Baseline on PSOC Total Score at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-reported Parenting Sense of Competence Total Score includes ranges from 17-102; higher scores indicate greater parenting sense of competency. Wording was adapted from the original 1978 measure to be inclusive of caregivers who are not biological parents or mothers. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  3. Change from Baseline on PSI-4-SF Total Score at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-reported Parenting Stress Index, 4th Edition (PSI-4-SF) Total T-Score ranges from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater stress. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  4. Change in Average PANAS Negative Affect between Baseline and End-of-Treatment

    The patient-reported Positive and Negative Affect Scale (10 items) Negative Affect subscale total score ranges from 10-50; higher scores indicate greater negative affect. For each evaluation period, scores will be averaged across week-long patient-reported ecological momentary assessments, which are collected 3 times per day and 7 days per week. Change will be measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  5. Change in Average Momentary Stress between Baseline and End-of-Treatment

    The patient-reported momentary stress item ranges from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater stress. For each evaluation period, scores will be averaged across week-long patient-reported ecological momentary assessments, which are collected 3 times per day and 7 days per week. Change will be measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  6. Change from Baseline on CGI-S at End-of-Treatment

    The Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) is rated by the patient's primary clinician on a scale of 1-7, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Change will be measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  7. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at End-of-Treatment

    The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-S) is rated by the patient's primary clinician on a scale of 1-7, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Change will be measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: End-of-Treatment (single administration at Treatment Week 12)

  8. Peer Coach Fidelity Across Treatment Sessions

    Fidelity will be observer-rated by reliable coders to generate a fidelity ratio (0-100%), defined as the proportion of pre-defined critical session components administered to "acceptable" criterion; higher ratios indicate greater fidelity. The total fidelity score for each patient is calculated as the average of completed Baseline, Midpoint, and End-of-Treatment sessions.

    Time frame: Calculated at End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  9. Coaching Session Completion

    Completion will be reported by project staff and used to generate a completion ratio (0-100%), defined as the proportion of sessions attended; higher ratios indicate greater completion.

    Time frame: Calculated at End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  10. Treatment Session Completion

    Completion will be reported by clinicians to generate a completion ratio (0-100%), defined as the proportion of sessions attended; higher ratios indicate greater completion. Participants in the self-guided resource condition will self-report completion across 12 weeks of tasks using a log submitted at end of treatment.

    Time frame: Calculated at End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  11. Peer Coaching Satisfaction

    Patient-reported peer coaching satisfaction scores are averaged across a study-specific feedback survey and range from 1-5; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: End-of-Treatment (single administration at Treatment Week 12)

  12. Treatment Satisfaction

    Patient-reported treatment satisfaction scores are averaged across a study-specific feedback survey and range from 1-5; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: End-of-Treatment (single administration at Treatment Week 12)

  13. Drop Out Status

    "Drop out" is defined as discontinuation of treatment after consenting to treatment and attending at least one session, including active discontinuation and patients lost to follow-up. Variable is dummy coded where 0=patient did not drop out, 1=patient dropped out.

    Time frame: Calculated at End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  14. Homework Completion

    Completion will be reported by clinicians to generate a completion ratio (0-100%), defined as the proportion of assigned session homework completed; higher ratios indicate greater completion. Participants in the self-guided resource condition will self-report completion across 12 weeks of tasks using a log submitted at end of treatment.

    Time frame: Calculated at End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline on EES-2 Total Score at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-reported Emotion Efficacy Scale-2 (Revised) generates a Total Score from 10-50; higher scores indicate greater emotion efficacy. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  2. Change from Baseline on DERS Total Score at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-reported Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) Total Score includes possible scores that range from 36-180; higher scores indicate greater difficulties in emotion regulation. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  3. Change from Baseline on CBCL Total Problem Behaviors at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-rated Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL 1.5-5), which the patient uses to describe their child's behaviors, yields a Total Problem Behaviors T-Score that ranges from 50-100; higher scores indicate greater child challenging behavior. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  4. Change from Baseline on CDI-Words and Gestures at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-rated Communicative Development Inventory, Words and Gestures Edition (Vocabulary Checklist: Level I), which the patient uses to describe their child's language, yields a yields a total raw score ranging from 0-89; higher scores indicate greater communicative development. Primary outcome will be "understanding" subscale total score. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  5. Change from Baseline on CSHQ at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-rated Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire, which the patient uses to describe their child's behaviors, yields a total raw score ranging from 33-99; higher scores indicate greater sleep challenges. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  6. Change from Baseline on Albany Sleep Problems scale at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-rated Albany Sleep Problems scale, which the patient uses to describe their child's behaviors, yields a total raw score ranging from 0-164; higher scores indicate greater sleep challenges. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  7. Change from Baseline on ZBI-7 at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-reported Zarit Burden Inventory Short Form (7 item version) generates a Total Score that ranges from 0-49; higher scores indicate greater burden. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  8. Change from Baseline on ABC-2 at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-rated Aberrant Behavior Checklist - 2nd edition, which the patient uses to describe their child's behaviors, yields a total raw score that ranges from 0-174; higher scores indicate greater child challenging behavior. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  9. Change from Baseline on MIBI at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-reported Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity (MIBI) generates a Total Score that ranges from 0-49; higher scores indicate greater burden. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  10. Change from Baseline on PCL-5 at End-of-Treatment Survey

    The patient-reported PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) generates a Total Score that ranges from 0-80; higher scores indicate greater burden. Change is measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Daily Reports of Health Behaviors between Baseline and End-of-Treatment

    Patients report daily on prior day exercise and substance use; these values will be averaged to yield total scores between 0-100%; higher scores indicate greater proportion of days engaged in exercise and substance use, respectively. For each evaluation period, scores will be averaged across week-long data collection period; these items are collected one time per day, 7 days per week. Change will be measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  2. Change in Daily Reports of Caregiver Sleep between Baseline and End-of-Treatment

    Patients report daily on prior day sleep quality (0-100) and duration (0-24 hours); higher scores indicate greater sleep quality and duration, respectively. These items are collected one time per day, 7 days per week, and will be averaged to create one value per week. Change will be measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  3. Change in Momentary Self-Efficacy between Baseline and End-of-Treatment

    The patient-reported momentary competency item is a single rating from 0-100, and higher scores indicate greater perceptions that a person can handle their day. For each evaluation period, scores will be averaged across week-long patient-reported ecological momentary assessments, which are collected 3 times per day and 7 days per week. Change will be measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

  4. Change in Daily Reports of Child Challenging Behaviors between Baseline and End-of-Treatment

    The patient-reported challenging behavior items monitor (1) severity (scale 0-100) and (2) frequency (0-4 on Likert scale), where higher scores indicate more challenging behaviors. These items are collected one time per day, 7 days per week, and will be averaged to create one value per week. Change will be measured as (Week 12-Baseline), statistically controlling for Baseline levels.

    Time frame: Baseline and End-of-Treatment (Treatment Week 12)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Purdue University
    West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States
    • Veronika Vozka, MS · Contact · wellcast@purdue.edu · 765-494-6754
    • Bridgette Kelleher, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD will be shared with other researchers using best-practices in open science.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05999448
Lead sponsor
Purdue University
Collaborators
University of Virginia, University of Oregon, University of Canterbury, University of Missouri-Columbia, Indiana University, Georgia State University
Responsible party
KelleherLab (Associate Professor, Purdue University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2023
Start date
Jun 28, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 8, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 29, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2023

Study contacts

Bridgette L Kelleher, PhD
Contact
bkelleher@purdue.edu
18438100238
Bridgette Kelleher, PhD
principal investigator · Purdue University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion