ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05988437PHSaDomUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Contribution of the Indoor Environment Medical Advisor in the Management of Fibrosing Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

An observational study in Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Recruiting at 7 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Updated Oct 16, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+4 moreGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a diffuse infiltrative pneumonitis (DIP) of immuno-allergic origin, caused by exposure to one or more antigenic substances of organic origin, in genetically predisposed individuals. It can take a fibrosing form, eventually leading to chronic respiratory failure. Diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical, biological, CT scan and histological evidence, and is made during multidisciplinary discussions (MDD) of diffuse interstitial lung disease.

The antigens responsible, of domestic or professional origin, may be micro-organisms, animal proteins or chemical agents. However, the antigen remains unknown in almost 50% of cases. Lack of antigen identification is an independent risk factor for death in patients with fibrosing HP. In fibrosing forms, corticosteroid therapy does not appear to improve functional prognosis, and ninedanib, an antifibrosing treatment offered in progressive forms, only slows functional decline. Identifying the causative antigen is therefore an essential element in the overall management of these patients, with the aim of implementing avoidance measures. A medical exposure questionnaire has been translated into French to help physicians identify the antigen.

The serum precipitin assay is a tool developed to help identify sensitization to an antigen. It is all the more useful when investigations are targeted at the patient's suspected exposure. However, their sensitivity and specificity are variable.

The activity of the indoor environment medical advisor (CMEI) has developed in the care of patients with chronic respiratory or allergic pathologies. Their role is to carry out an audit of the dwelling, take environmental measurements to assess the health risk, inform patients about appropriate eviction measures and, in some cases, refer patients to organizations specializing in home improvement.

The CMEI visits the patient's home. The environmental audit includes a rigorous macroscopic examination and microbiological swabs of visible anomalies. The CMEI can also supplement its analysis with electrostatic dust collectors, which are left in the home for 4 weeks, enabling both qualitative and quantitative characterization of antigens.

To date, no study has prospectively evaluated the contribution of CMEI to antigen identification in patients with fibrosing HP. At the Nantes University Hospital and Angers University Hospital, the environmental audit carried out by the CMEI is an integral part of routine patient management in the event of a HP diagnosis.

The main objective of this study is to measure the diagnostic contribution of the indoor environment medical advisor in the identification of antigens responsible for respiratory pathology in patients with fibrosing HP.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be prospectively recruited as incidental cases during multidisciplinary discussions of diffuse interstitial lung disease organized on a regular monthly basis between university hospitals, private lung specialists and those practising in outlying hospitals.

Once the patient's non-objection has been collected, a medical self-exposure questionnaire will be completed, and the antigens identified by the questionnaire will be listed (time T1).

As in current practice, the indoor environment medical advisor (CMEI) will then visit the patient's home to carry out an environmental audit, including a macroscopic assessment and swabbing for any abnormalities that might suggest risky antigenic exposure. The results of the swab analysis will be collected along with a number of antigens (T2 time). During this visit, a sensor will be placed in the patient's home for a period of 4 weeks, and the results will be collected after 4 weeks in the home with a number of antigens (time T3).

Following these 3 evaluation times, serum precipitins will be collected according to the antigens identified during the 3 visits.

As part of the patient follow-up, a telephone call by the CMEI at 6 months from the initial environmental audit will assess whether eviction of the identified antigens has been effective. Similarly, at 12 months, the CMEI will make another home visit to assess the rate of eviction of the antigens identified at the initial visit.

In parallel, as part of routine care, a clinical and functional evaluation will be carried out at diagnosis, 6 months and 12 months. A radiological assessment involving a chest CT scan will be performed at diagnosis and at 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Keywords

  • Fibrosing
  • indoor environment medical advisor
03

In context

Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic

34 studies on the registry are indexed under Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 147 across 16 observational studies indexed under Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic.

Browse Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients will be prospectively recruited as incidental cases during multidisciplinary discussions of diffuse interstitial lung disease (Diffuse Interstitial Lung Disease) organized on a regular monthly basis between hospital-university centers, private lung specialists and those practising in outlying hospitals.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient of legal age,
  • French-speaking patient,
  • Patient with a diagnosis of fibrosing PHS following a multidisciplinary discussion of diffuse interstitial lung disease pneumonitis .
  • Patient who had received an information note presenting the study and who had not expressed opposition to participating in this research.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opposition of the patient to participate in the study,
  • Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice,
  • Patients who have moved within the last 12 months, or who plan to move within the next 6 months,
  • Patients who have already had a visit from the indoor environment medical advisor.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To measure the diagnostic contribution of the indoor environment medical advisor in the identification of antigens responsible for respiratory pathology in patients with fibrosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis

    Difference in the number of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) risk antigens identified on the one hand by the medical exposure questionnaire and on the other by the indoor environment medical consultant in subjects with HP.

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measure the diagnostic contribution of electrostatic dust sensors in the identification of antigens in patients with fibrosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis

    Time frame: 12 month

  2. Quantify the number of antigens identified using the medical exposure questionnaire, the number of antigens identified by the environment medical advisor, and the number of antigens identified using electrostatic sensors

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Measure the positivity rate of serum precipitins collected in a manner appropriate to the exposures found

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Measure the application of eviction advice and the rate of eviction of previously identified antigens 6 months and 12 months after the visit of the environment medical advisor

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Evaluate the clinical evolution of the patient with fibrosing PHS at 6 months after the environment medical advisor assessment

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Evaluate the clinical evolution of the patient with fibrosing PHS at 12 months after the environment medical advisor assessment

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Evaluate the functional evolution of the patient with fibrosing PHS at 6 months after the environment medical advisor assessment

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Evaluate the functional evolution of the patient with fibrosing PHS at 12 months after the environment medical advisor assessment

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Evaluate the scanographic evolution of the patient with fibrosing PHS at 6 months after the environment medical advisor assessment

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Evaluate the scanographic evolution of the patient with fibrosing PHS at 12 months after the environment medical advisor assessment

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

5 of 7 sites recruiting
  • CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, Loire-Atlantique 44093, France
    Recruiting
    • Stéphanie DIROU, PH · Contactstéphanie.dirou@chu-nantes.fr
    • Stéphanie DIROU · Principal investigator
    • François Xavier BLANC · Sub investigator
    • Charlotte MENIGOZ · Sub investigator
  • CH Ancenis
    Ancenis, France
    Not yet recruiting
    • Carole HERVE · Contact+33 2.44 76 85 06
    • Carole HERVE · Principal investigator
  • CHU Angers
    Angers, France
    Recruiting
  • CH Chateaubriant
    Châteaubriant, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHD LRSY
    La Roche-sur-Yon, France
    Recruiting
  • CH Cote de lumière
    Les Sables-d'Olonne, France
    Recruiting
  • CH St Nazaire
    Saint-Nazaire, France
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 42 months after the start.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Sep 28, 2026: start Dec 2023 → Nov 2023, primary completion Jun 2026 → May 2027 and completion Jun 2026 → May 2028.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2023
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
StartActual
Nov 16, 2023was Dec 2023
Primary completionEst.
May 16, 2027was Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
May 16, 2028was Jun 2026
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Sep 28, 2026
Sites
6 sites added. CHU de Nantes is now Recruiting
Show 6 added (6 France)
  • CH Ancenis · Ancenis, France
  • CHU Angers · Angers, France
  • CH Chateaubriant · Châteaubriant, France
  • CHD LRSY · La Roche-sur-Yon, France
  • CH Cote de lumière · Les Sables-d'Olonne, France
  • CH St Nazaire · Saint-Nazaire, France
across 2 updates, Sep 28, 2026 – Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Dec 12, 2023→Nov 16, 2023 (actual)
Sep 28, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 12, 2026→May 16, 2027
Sep 28, 2026
Study completion
Jun 12, 2026→May 16, 2028
Sep 28, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    6 sites added
    Show 6 added (6 France)
    • CH Ancenis · Ancenis, France
    • CHU Angers · Angers, France
    • CH Chateaubriant · Châteaubriant, France
    • CHD LRSY · La Roche-sur-Yon, France
    • CH Cote de lumière · Les Sables-d'Olonne, France
    • CH St Nazaire · Saint-Nazaire, France
  2. Sep 28, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    CHU de Nantes is now Recruiting
    Start date Dec 12, 2023→Nov 16, 2023 (now actual)
    Primary completion Jun 12, 2026→May 16, 2027
    Study completion Jun 12, 2026→May 16, 2028
    + 2 other changes: index terms and verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05988437
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Start date
Nov 16, 2023
Primary completion
May 16, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 16, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Stéphanie DIROU, PH
Contact
stéphanie.dirou@chu-nantes.fr
+33 2 53 48 27 74
François Xavier BLANC, PU PH
Contact
xavier.blanc@chu-nantes.fr
+33 2 40 16 52 36
Stéphanie DIROU, PH
principal investigator · Nantes University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion