ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05986890Updated Jul 16, 2026

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Loop Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

An interventional study of Roux-en-Y Bypass and gastrojejunostomy in Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction, sponsored by Corewell Health West. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Corewell Health West · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study was terminated early due to poor participant accrual, resulting in inadequate enrollment to support the planned analysis and study endpoints.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is intended to investigate whether roux-en-y bypass surgery is superior to conventional loop gastrojejunostomy for Malignant gastric outlet obstruction in terms of tolerance to solid food intake. We hypothesize that roux-en-y bypass will be associated with improved solid food intake in the first 30 days after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction is when malignant tumor growth obstructs the gastric outlet at the level of the distal stomach or duodenum, causing food intolerance with nausea and vomiting. Most often, this signifies advanced neoplastic disease with associated poor prognosis for patients. Restoring patients to oral intake is important for palliative purposes. The current standard of care in patients requiring long-term alleviation of symptoms (≥2 months) is performing a loop gastrojejunostomy. This involves creating an intestinal bypass to the site of obstruction in the duodenum or distal stomach. This procedure has long been criticized for its poor resultant function for patients, mainly due to poor tolerance to food intake that include frequent episodes of nausea and vomiting and inability to for solid food intake. The need for a durable solution to malignant gastric outlet obstruction that provides better tolerance to solid food intake is evident. The roux-en-y gastric bypass procedure has been performed for a variety of indications for decades, most commonly for weight loss but also with oncologic resections of the stomach in cases of gastric cancer. Laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass (R-Y bypass) has become the standard for this procedure in experienced hands and has been found to be safe in the short- and long term. The long-term function after R-Y bypass is generally favorable across published literature. No studies exist to compare loop gastrojejunostomy to roux-en-y gastric bypass in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Keywords

  • MGOO
  • Malignant gastric outlet obstruction
  • gastric outlet
  • malignant tumor
  • proximal bowel obstruction
  • bowel obstruction
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 60 across 7,703 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Corewell Health West is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provision of signed and dated form.
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
  3. Male or female aged ≥18 years old.
  4. Patients with a diagnosis of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. i. Defined as malignant cancer growth of any organ origin in the area of the distal stomach or duodenum preventing normal gastric emptying as determined by symptoms and cross-sectional imaging studies.

    ii. Symptoms can include abdominal distention, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting.

    iii. Cross sectional imaging findings can include tumor growth in the area of the distal stomach or duodenum, gastric distention, fluid filled stomach and decompressed bowel distal to obstruction point.

  5. Patients deemed to benefit from surgical bypass as opposed to stent placement, by the primary surgeon. This includes assessing participants survival chances and ability to undergo a surgical procedure.
  6. Patients in a general health status that permits abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. As determined by primary surgeon and anesthesiologist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients that have had previous treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

    a. Including any previous surgery or stent placement for MGOO

  2. Patients with MGOO deemed to benefit more from endoscopic stent placement rather than surgery for symptom relief. This assessment will be at treating surgeon's discretion.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Roux-en-Y Bypass

    laparoscopic Roux-en-Y (R-Y) procedure is a well-established procedure, commonly utilized in the setting of bariatric- and gastric cancer surgery. The procedure establishes intestinal continuity that bypasses the distal stomach and duodenum. This is achieved by dividing the jejunum 30-40 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz, bringing the distal end of jejunum up anterior to the transverse colon to be anastomosed to the back wall of the stomach (forming the Roux-limb). The proximal cut end of jejunum then gets anastomosed to the downstream roux-limb (forming the Y-limb). The benefits of this reconstruction include less chance of gastric contents travelling into the afferent limb and similarly, avoiding bile reflux from the afferent limb with associated bile gastritis.

    Procedure: Roux-en-Y Bypass

  • Other
    Gastrojejunostomy

    surgical gastrojejunostomy, a procedure dating back to the late 1800's.5 This surgical bypass consists of connecting the stomach to a loop of proximal small bowel, thus bypassing any duodenal or distal gastric obstruction.

    Procedure: gastrojejunostomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureRoux-en-Y Bypass

    laparoscopic Roux-en-Y

  • Proceduregastrojejunostomy

    surgical gastrojejunostomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gastric emptying as per gastric emptying scintigraphy at 7 days post-operatively.

    Results of this study are given as percentage gastric emptying of radioactive (99mTc-SC) nutrients

    Time frame: 7 days post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gastric emptying study at 30-days

    Results of this study are given as percentage gastric emptying of radioactive (99mTc-SC) nutrients

    Time frame: 30 days post operative

  2. Patient reported daily gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOS) score

    Patients will score each day with the score that reflects the diet that was tolerated that day by the patient. This includes what was able to be ingested without a subsequent vomiting.

    Time frame: 30 days postoperative

  3. Number of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 adverse event

    Time frame: 14 days postoperative

  4. Number of patients requiring reoperation for any indication

    Time frame: 30 days postoperative

  5. number of patients with diagnoses of delayed gastric emptying defined as per the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery

    Time frame: 30 days postoperative

  6. Time from surgery to death

    Time frame: 100 days postoperative

  7. Improvement of quality of life as measured by short form QOL Questionnaire

    The short form 36 question QOL questionnaire results in a cumulative score with an increase in score representing a better health-related quality of life

    Time frame: measured pre-operatively, at 25-35 days post op and 80-100 days post op

  8. Improvement of quality of life as measured GIQLI

    The Gastrointestinal quality of life questionnaire results in a cumulative score with an increase in score representing a better health-related quality of life

    Time frame: measured pre-operatively, at 25-35 days post op and 80-100 days post op

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Corewell Health West
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Weaver DW, Wiencek RG, Bouwman DL, Walt AJ. Gastrojejunostomy: is it helpful for patients with pancreatic cancer? Surgery. 1987 Oct;102(4):608-13. PubMed 2443991 ↗
  • Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Hardacre JM, Sohn TA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ. Is prophylactic gastrojejunostomy indicated for unresectable periampullary cancer? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1999 Sep;230(3):322-8; discussion 328-30. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00005. PubMed 10493479 ↗
  • Egrari S, O'Connell TX. Role of prophylactic gastroenterostomy for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Am Surg. 1995 Oct;61(10):862-4. PubMed 7545358 ↗
  • Del Piano M, Ballare M, Montino F, Todesco A, Orsello M, Magnani C, Garello E. Endoscopy or surgery for malignant GI outlet obstruction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):421-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02757-9. PubMed 15758914 ↗
  • ROBINSON JO. The history of gastric surgery. Postgrad Med J. 1960 Dec;36(422):706-13. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.36.422.706. No abstract available. PubMed 13742310 ↗
  • Doberneck RC, Berndt GA. Delayed gastric emptying after palliative gastrojejunostomy for carcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg. 1987 Jul;122(7):827-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400190093020. PubMed 2439057 ↗
  • Navarra G, Musolino C, Venneri A, De Marco ML, Bartolotta M. Palliative antecolic isoperistaltic gastrojejunostomy: a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic approaches. Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec;20(12):1831-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0454-5. PubMed 17063298 ↗
  • Mintziras I, Miligkos M, Wachter S, Manoharan J, Bartsch DK. Palliative surgical bypass is superior to palliative endoscopic stenting in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3153-3164. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06955-z. Epub 2019 Jul 22. PubMed 31332564 ↗
  • Johnsson E, Thune A, Liedman B. Palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with open surgical bypass or endoscopic stenting: clinical outcome and health economic evaluation. World J Surg. 2004 Aug;28(8):812-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7329-0. Epub 2004 Aug 3. PubMed 15457364 ↗
  • Singh SM, Longmire WP Jr, Reber HA. Surgical palliation for pancreatic cancer. The UCLA experience. Ann Surg. 1990 Aug;212(2):132-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199008000-00003. PubMed 1695834 ↗
  • Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM, Saxe JM, Bender JS, Lucas WF. Antrectomy. A safe and effective bypass for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg. 1994 Aug;129(8):795-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420320017001. PubMed 7519417 ↗
  • Mittal A, Windsor J, Woodfield J, Casey P, Lane M. Matched study of three methods for palliation of malignant pyloroduodenal obstruction. Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):205-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4396. PubMed 14760669 ↗
  • Bergamaschi R, Marvik R, Thoresen JE, Ystgaard B, Johnsen G, Myrvold HE. Open versus laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for palliation in advanced pancreatic cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Apr;8(2):92-6. PubMed 9566559 ↗
  • Telford JJ, Carr-Locke DL, Baron TH, Tringali A, Parsons WG, Gabbrielli A, Costamagna G. Palliation of patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction with the enteral Wallstent: outcomes from a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Dec;60(6):916-20. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02228-x. PubMed 15605006 ↗
  • Jeurnink SM, Steyerberg EW, van Hooft JE, van Eijck CH, Schwartz MP, Vleggaar FP, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD; Dutch SUSTENT Study Group. Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.042. Epub 2009 Dec 8. PubMed 20003966 ↗
  • Upchurch E, Ragusa M, Cirocchi R. Stent placement versus surgical palliation for adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD012506. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012506.pub2. PubMed 29845610 ↗
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2020. Published 2019. Accessed May 8, 2020. www2.tri-kobe/nccn/guideline/pancreas/english/pancreatic.pdf
  • He L, Zhao Y. Is Roux-en-Y or Billroth-II reconstruction the preferred choice for gastric cancer patients undergoing distal gastrectomy when Billroth I reconstruction is not applicable? A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(48):e17093. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017093. PubMed 31770192 ↗
  • Okuno K, Nakagawa M, Kojima K, Kanemoto E, Gokita K, Tanioka T, Inokuchi M. Long-term functional outcomes of Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstructions after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4465-4471. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6192-2. Epub 2018 Apr 13. PubMed 29654529 ↗
  • Nakanishi K, Kanda M, Ito S, Mochizuki Y, Teramoto H, Ishigure K, Murai T, Asada T, Ishiyama A, Matsushita H, Shimizu D, Tanaka C, Kobayashi D, Fujiwara M, Murotani K, Kodera Y. Propensity-score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional dataset to compare postoperative complications between Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2020 Jul;23(4):734-745. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01048-6. Epub 2020 Feb 17. PubMed 32065304 ↗
  • Edholm D. Early intake of solid food after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and complications. A cohort study from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Sep;14(9):1256-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.05.023. Epub 2018 Jun 6. PubMed 30001890 ↗
  • Potts JR 3rd, Broughan TA, Hermann RE. Palliative operations for pancreatic carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1990 Jan;159(1):72-7; discussion 77-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80609-9. PubMed 1688485 ↗
  • Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923. PubMed 21561347 ↗
  • Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, Seay T, Tjulandin SA, Ma WW, Saleh MN, Harris M, Reni M, Dowden S, Laheru D, Bahary N, Ramanathan RK, Tabernero J, Hidalgo M, Goldstein D, Van Cutsem E, Wei X, Iglesias J, Renschler MF. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369. Epub 2013 Oct 16. PubMed 24131140 ↗
  • Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, Alodat T, Memon B, Memon MA. Postoperative Early Major and Minor Complications in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) Procedures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Obes Surg. 2016 Oct;26(10):2273-84. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2101-8. PubMed 26894908 ↗
  • Peterli R, Borbely Y, Kern B, Gass M, Peters T, Thurnheer M, Schultes B, Laederach K, Bueter M, Schiesser M. Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2013 Nov;258(5):690-4; discussion 695. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a67426. PubMed 23989054 ↗
  • Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT. Use and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: Analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):880-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.059. Epub 2015 Feb 16. PubMed 25907869 ↗
  • Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):761-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005. PubMed 17981197 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05986890
Lead sponsor
Corewell Health West
Responsible party
Gerald P. Wright (Surgical Oncology and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgeon, Corewell Health West) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Start date
Aug 17, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 13, 2026
Completion
Jul 13, 2026
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Study contacts

G. Paul Wright, MD
principal investigator · Corewell Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion