ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05986604Updated Nov 2, 2026

NIA_Improving Function and Well-being by Improving Patient Memory: Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian Treatment

An interventional study of Memory Support Intervention and Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction in Sleep Disorder, Circadian Dysregulation and Memory Impairment, sponsored by University of California, Berkeley. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by University of California, Berkeley · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
178
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mental illness is often chronic, severe, and difficult to treat. Though there has been significant progress towards establishing effective and efficient interventions for psychological health problems, many individuals do not gain lasting benefits from these treatments. The Memory Support Intervention (MSI) was developed utilizing existing findings from the cognitive science literature to improve treatment outcomes. In this study, the investigators aim to conduct an open trial that includes individuals 50 years and older to assess if a novel version of the Memory Support Intervention improves sleep and circadian functioning, reduces functional impairment, and improves patient memory for treatment.

Read the detailed description

Life expectancy has increased drastically in the United States. Longer life is too often associated with illness, discomfort, disability, and dependency. Progress toward promoting health and well-being as we age must include the identification of novel treatment targets that are safe, powerful, inexpensive, and deployable. The proposed research will test one such target-patient memory for the contents of treatment.

Over 5 years, we will recruit adults who are 50 years and older and who are experiencing sleep and circadian problems (n = 178, including 20% for attrition). Participants will be randomly allocated to TranS-C plus the MSI ("TranS-C+MSI") or TranS-C alone via eight 50-minute, weekly, individual sessions. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-treatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up (6FU and 12FU).

Specific Aim 1: To evaluate if adding the MSI to TranS-C (a) improves sleep and circadian functioning, (b) improves daytime functioning, (c) improves well-being and (d) improves patient memory by comparing the effects of TranS-C+MSI vs. TranS-C alone. Hypothesis 1. Compared to TranS-C alone, people who receive TranS-C+MSI will improve more on all outcomes at post-treatment, 6FU and 12FU.

Specific Aim 2: To evaluate if patient memory for treatment mediates the relation between treatment condition and sleep and circadian functioning. Hypothesis 2. TranS-C+MSI will be associated with better memory for treatment relative to TranS-C alone, and in turn, better memory for treatment will be associated with better sleep and circadian functioning immediately following treatment and at 6FU and 12FU.

Specific Aim 3: To evaluate if subgroups hypothesized to derive added benefit from memory support moderate (a) patient memory for treatment and (b) treatment outcome. Hypothesis 3. Treatment effects for TranS-C+MSI will be larger at post-treatment for those who are older, have fewer years of education, poorer baseline cognitive functioning and more severe baseline sleep disruption and sleep-related impairment.

Exploratory analyses will compare the treatments on (a) patient adherence as well as patient-rated treatment credibility and utilization of treatment elements and (b) provider-rated acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Disorder
  • Circadian Dysregulation
  • Memory Impairment
03

In context

Sleep Wake Disorders

747 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Wake Disorders; 182 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 178 is above the median of 66 across 531 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Wake Disorders.

Browse Sleep Wake Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Berkeley is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 50 years and older;
  2. English language fluency;
  3. Experiencing a mobility impairment;
  4. Low income;
  5. Exhibit a sleep or circadian disturbance as determined by endorsing 4 "quite a bit" or 5 "very much" (or the equivalent for reverse scored items) on one or more PROMIS-SD questions.
  6. 25-30 on the , as a negative screen for cognitive impairment.
  7. Able/willing to give .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Severe untreated sleep disordered breathing (AHI>30) or moderate untreated sleep disordered breathing with severe daytime sleepiness (AHI of 15-30 and Epworth Sleepiness Scale >10);
  2. Medical conditions that prevent a participant from comprehending and following the basic tenants of treatment (e.g., dementia) or that interfere with sleep in a manner that can't be addressed by a cognitive behavioral treatment (e.g., the Structured Clinical Interview for Sleep Disorders will be used to screen for narcolepsy, REM sleep behavior disorder) or that may preclude full participation (e.g., receipt of end of life care);
  3. Homelessness;
  4. Night shift work >2 nights per week in the past 3 months;
  5. Substance abuse/dependence only if it makes participation in the study unfeasible;
  6. Suicide risk sufficient to preclude treatment on an outpatient basis.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
178 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TranS-C+MSI

    Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction will be combined with the Memory Support Intervention

    Behavioral: Memory Support Intervention · Behavioral: Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction

  • Active comparator
    TranS-C alone

    The Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian Intervention will be delivered alone

    Behavioral: Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction

Interventions

  • BehavioralMemory Support Intervention

    The Memory Support Intervention is designed to improve patient memory for treatment and involves a series of specific procedures that support the encoding and retrieval stages of episodic memory. The memory support strategies are proactively, strategically and intensively integrated into treatment-as-usual to support encoding. Memory support is delivered alongside each 'treatment point', defined as a main idea, principle, or experience that the treatment provider wants the patient to remember or implement as part of the treatment.

    Also known as: MSI

  • BehavioralTransdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction

    TranS-C aims to provide one protocol to treat a range of sleep and circadian problems because sleep and circadian problems are often not so neatly categorized and because the existing research provides few guidelines to treat more complex patients.

    Also known as: TranS-C

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep Disturbance

    Assesses perceived functional impairments related to sleep problems using a self-report questionnaire. The minimum value is 8. The maximum value is 40. Higher scores mean more sleep disturbance (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  2. Sheehan Disability Scale

    Assesses functional impairment on a scale from 0 to 30, where higher scores mean higher impairment

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  3. Satisfaction with Life Scale

    5-item instrument designed to measure global cognitive judgements of satisfaction with one's life. Scores can range from 5-35 with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction with life.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep Related Impairment

    Assesses perceived functional impairments related to sleep problems in a self-report questionnaire. The minimum value is 16. The maximum value is 80. Higher scores mean more sleep related problems (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  2. Positive and Negative Affect Scale

    Positive affect scores can range from 10-15, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Negative affect scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  3. WHODAS 2.0

    A measure of functional impairment

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  4. Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

    Used to assess the frequency with which people experienced cognitive failures. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of cognitive failures.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  5. Epworth Sleepiness Scale

    Used to assess daytime sleepiness. Scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores indicating higher levels of daytime sleepiness.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  6. Memory for Treatment: Cumulative recall

    Recall on the Patient Treatment Recall Task

    Time frame: Week 4 of treatment as well as Post Treatment, defined as two weeks after the final therapy session (i.e. 8-10 weeks after the initial intake interview) to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up]

  7. Thoughts and Applications Task

    Measures how treatment points have generalized to the participant's thinking and functioning during every day life

    Time frame: Week 4 of treatment as well as Post Treatment, defined as two weeks after the final therapy session (i.e. 8-10 weeks after the initial intake interview) to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up]

  8. Adapted Utilization Scale

    19-item; 0-4 scale. Scores can range from 0 to 76 (Higher score means more utilization).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  9. Composite Sleep Health Score

    Composite Sleep Health Score which is defined as the sum of scores on 6 sleep health dimensions: Regularity (Midpoint fluctuation), Satisfaction (Sleep quality question on PROMIS-SD), Alertness (Daytime sleepiness question on PROMIS-SRI), Timing (Mean midpoint), Efficiency (Sleep efficiency) and Duration (Total Sleep Time).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  10. Mean sleep efficiency (Daily Sleep Diary)

    Daily Sleep Diary mean for sleep efficiency (total sleep time/time in bed X 100)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  11. Mean total wake time (Daily Sleep Diary)

    Daily Sleep Diary mean for total wake time defined as sleep onset latency + wake after sleep onset + Early morning awakening

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  12. Mean for total sleep time (Daily Sleep Diary)

    Daily Sleep Diary mean for total sleep time

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment to 6-month follow-up to 12-month follow-up

  13. Mean for total wake time (Actigraphy)

    Actigraphy mean for total wake time defined as sleep onset latency + wake after sleep onset + early morning awakening

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  14. Mean for total sleep time (Actigraphy)

    Actigraphy mean for total sleep time

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  15. Mean for daytime activity (Actigraphy)

    Actigraphy mean for daytime activity

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment, which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  16. Provider level: Acceptability of Intervention Measure

    Assess provider perceptions of the acceptability of the treatment intervention using a self-report questionnaire

    Time frame: Through therapy completion, an average of 8 weeks following baseline

  17. Provider level: Appropriateness Intervention Measure

    Assesses provider perceptions of the appropriateness of the treatment intervention using a self-report questionnaire

    Time frame: Through therapy completion, an average of 8 weeks following baseline

  18. Provider level: Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    Assesses provider perceptions of the feasibility of the intervention using a self-report questionnaire

    Time frame: Through therapy completion, an average of 8 weeks following baseline

  19. Provider level: Provider-rated TranS-C Checklist

    A measure of the TranS-C elements that are delivered. This is completed by the therapist at the end of every treatment session

    Time frame: Every treatment session which is 8 sessions, spaced one week apart for approximately 8-10 weeks

  20. Provider level: Memory Support Treatment Provider Checklist

    A measure of memory support delivered. This is completed by the therapist at the end of every treatment session

    Time frame: Every treatment session which is 8 sessions, spaced one week apart for approximately 8-10 weeks

  21. Provider level: Patient adherence via the TARS

    A measure of patient treatment adherence completed by the therapist at the end of every treatment session

    Time frame: Every treatment session which is 8 sessions, spaced one week apart for approximately 8-10 weeks

  22. Provider level: Memory Support Rating Scale, total amount

    Assesses the total amount of memory support used by a provider via coding of session tapes

    Time frame: Randomly selected therapy tapes

  23. Provider level: Memory Support Rating Scale, number of types

    Assesses the number of types of memory support used by a provider via coding of session tapes

    Time frame: Randomly selected therapy tapes

Other outcomes

  1. WatchPAT One

    For participants who screen positive for obstructive sleep apnea, WatchPAT One will be offered to determine eligibility

    Time frame: Baseline only

  2. Side effects checklist

    To assess any side effects experienced as a result of participating in the study

    Time frame: Only at post-treatment which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  3. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    A measure of cognitive functioning/cognitive impairments to determine eligibility

    Time frame: Baseline only

  4. Adapted Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire

    Measures the credibility and expectation of improvement from the treatment.

    Time frame: At treatment Week 2 and at post-treatment which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

  5. Structured Clinical Interview for Sleep Disorders

    Measures sleep and circadian diagnoses according to DSM-5

    Time frame: Baseline only

  6. Adapted Brief Disability Questionnaire

    A measure of functional impairment

    Time frame: Baseline only

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Milner AE, Hache RE, Oliver S, Sarfan LD, Spencer JM, Cogan A, Jiang Y, Agnew ER, Zieve GG, Martin JL, Zeidler MR, Dong L, Carpenter JK, Varghese J, Bol K, Bajwa Z, Tighe CA, Harvey AG. Integrating the Memory Support Intervention into the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C): can improving memory for treatment in midlife and older adults improve patient outcomes? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Oct 3;25(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08468-0. PubMed 39363383 ↗
09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2028, 49 months after the start.

Of 208 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sleep Wake Disorders, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 49 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 243 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 2, 2023
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
StartActual
Jan 4, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 28, 2028
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Secondary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • Changedother outcomeBefore Adverse events checklistNow Side effects checklistTime frame: Only at post-treatment which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Changedother outcomeBefore Adverse events checklistNow Side effects checklistTime frame: Only at post-treatment which is 8-10 weeks after the beginning of treatment

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05986604
Responsible party
Allison Harvey (Professor, University of California, Berkeley) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Start date
Jan 4, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 28, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Allison Harvey, PhD
Contact
aharvey@berkeley.edu
5106427138
Allison Harvey, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, Berkeley

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion