ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05985304Updated Jan 21, 2026Results posted

Clinical Trial of a Hydrophilic EMV Toric Lens RAO210T in the Correction of Aphakia and Corneal Astigmatism

An interventional study of RayOne EMV Toric IOL and RayOne Monofocal IOL in Cataract and Corneal Astigmatism, sponsored by Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited. Completed at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-21.

Sponsored by Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
274
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objectives of the clinical investigation are to determine the safety and performance of the RayOne EMV Toric (Model RAO210T) following unilateral implantation and approximately 6 months (120 to 180 days) of post-operative assessment, as a randomized comparison to aspheric monofocal control for low cylinder (1.50 D). This patient population with cataracts and low corneal cylinder (+1.00 to +1.50 D) will have the natural crystalline lens removed and replaced with an intraocular lens in the capsular bag.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled, masked (assessor and subject) pivotal investigation for unilateral implantation of low cylinder (1.50 D) toric IOL. It compares the Rayner RAO210T toric IOL to the Rayner RAO600C aspheric monofocal IOL. Subjects who sign the ICF are considered enrolled in the study. After signing the ICF, subjects will be screened for eligibility. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria must be applied prior to subject randomization. Subjects who meet all protocol-specified eligibility criteria will be assigned to the randomized controlled study arms if the study eye's estimated IOL cylinder power using Barrett Toric Calculator is 1.50 D. Randomized subjects receive either the Rayner RAO210T Toric IOL (1.50 D low cylinder) or the Rayner RAO600C aspheric monofocal IOL in the study eye.

Up to 295 adult subjects will be enrolled (consented) assuming a 15% screen failure rate, then up to 250 subjects will be randomized, of which approximately 125 subjects will be randomized to receive low cylinder (1.50 D) RayOne EMV Toric (Model RAO210T) in one eye and approximately 125 subjects randomized to receive the RAO600C aspheric monofocal IOL in one eye, to complete 120-180 days follow-up for at least 100 subjects in each group.

All subjects who meet inclusion criteria will be assigned to the randomized controlled study arms to receive either the RAO210T toric IOL (1.50 D low cylinder) or the RAO600C aspheric monofocal IOL in the study eye according to a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified by site.

Up to 11 U.S. sites will be encouraged to enroll a minimum of 20 subjects. No site will enroll more than 25% of the subjects enrolled in the study.

If a subject has significant cataract in both eyes, it is recommended that cataract surgery is performed in one eye before the subject is enrolled in the study. Once a subject has been enrolled, it is recommended that the fellow eye does not undergo cataract surgery (except for a YAG capsulotomy) throughout the duration of the study. At screening, if both eyes qualify for the study, the eye to undergo cataract surgery and IOL implantation is the eye with worse pre-operative BCDVA. If pre-operative BCDVA is the same for each eye, the right eye will be the study eye.

Subjects will complete 6 study visits in approximately 9 months. Subject participation is calculated as the difference between the time of the pre-operative visit to completion of Visit 4 (120 to 180 days post-operative).

Standard clinical trial methods will be used to minimize bias, such as the use of site personnel performing manifest refraction and visual acuity assessments masked to subject treatment assignment, masking of subjects in the randomized controlled investigation evaluating low cylinder power, standardized test procedures, common Investigator training and common inclusion and exclusion criteria.

In order to minimize bias, measures will be taken to mask the site personnel performing post-operative manifest refraction and visual acuity assessments, as to the subject's treatment assignment until after the final database lock. Every attempt should be made to have the same masked site personnel perform the same masked post-operative assessments for an individual subject throughout the subject's study participation.

Subjects will be masked to their IOL assignment in the randomized controlled investigation evaluating low cylinder power. All material which may indicate the subjects' assignment, e.g., packaging, documents, etc., will be removed from any areas where subjects and/or masked site personnel may see them. Unmasked personnel will further be instructed to scrupulously avoid conversation and communication with masked personnel, subjects and all other persons regarding subjects' assignments, outcomes, clinical courses, and all other information potentially relevant to the study and its conduct.

Study Groups:

  • Toric (test) group - all subjects randomized to be implanted with the low cylinder (1.50 D) RayOne EMV Toric IOL (Model RAO210T)
  • Monofocal (control) group - all subjects randomized to be implanted with the RAO600C Monofocal IOL

Sample Size Determination:

Subjects will be enrolled with the goal of completing a total of 200 subjects through Visit 4 within the randomized groups, of whom 100 were implanted with the low cylinder RayOne EMV Toric IOL (Model RAO210T) and 100 were implanted with the RAO600C monofocal IOL.

Effectiveness For effectiveness, 100 subjects (eyes) randomized to the Toric (test) group (lowest cylinder power +1.50D) and 100 subjects (eyes) randomized to the Monofocal (control) group completing Visit 4 yields over 98% statistical power to reject H0e in favor of H1e and conclude the Toric IOL has statistically significantly lower mean residual manifest cylinder at Visit 4 compared to the Monofocal IOL, using a one-sided t-test with an alpha level of 0.025 and assuming a true mean difference of 0.4 D and a standard deviation of 0.7 D in both groups.

Safety For safety, ISO 11979-7 and ANSI Z80.30 specifies that a minimum of 100 subjects should complete a clinical evaluation of an IOL, where a parent IOL has been approved, to obtain appropriate specificity around adverse event and visual acuity rates.

Handling of Missing Data:

Missing data will be imputed for selected endpoints using the methods specified under the analysis descriptions for the endpoints. Where possible, multiple imputation will be used. Except where mentioned in Section 7, missing data will not be imputed.

Multiplicity Considerations:

The overall type I error rate for the toric effectiveness analyses will be controlled at 0.05. The study will be considered successful if all of the primary effectiveness and safety endpoints are met. Thus, no adjustments for multiplicity are necessary.

All primary effectiveness and primary safety endpoints as described below are required to achieve successful outcomes in order to demonstrate study success.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cataract
  • Corneal Astigmatism

Keywords

  • Toric Intraocular Lens
03

In context

Cataract

1,629 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 274 is above the median of 79 across 1,092 interventional studies indexed under Cataract.

Browse Cataract studies →

Lead sponsor

Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female, 22 years or older at the pre-operative visit who have cataract with best corrected distance visual acuity of 0.30 logMAR (20/40) or worse in at least one eye with or without a glare source present who are eligible for phacoemulsification cataract surgery
  2. Subjects who are projected to have best corrected distance visual acuity 0.20 logMAR (20/30) or better after IOL implantation by potential acuity meter (PAM) or Investigator estimation
  3. Clear intraocular media other than cataract
  4. Contact lens wearers must demonstrate stability of biometry
  5. Have the capability to understand and sign an IRB approved form and privacy authorization in accordance with local regulations
  6. Female subjects must be 1-year , surgically sterilized, or, if of , have a negative urine pregnancy test at the Pre-operative Visit. Women of childbearing potential must use an acceptable form of throughout the study.

    Acceptable methods include at least one of the following: intrauterine (intrauterine device), hormonal (oral, injection, patch, implant, ring), barrier with spermicide (condom, diaphragm), or abstinence.

  7. Have Investigator selected IOL spherical equivalent power between +10.0 D to +25.0 D in 0.5 D steps and IOL cylinder power of +1.50 D
  8. Have pre-existing corneal astigmatism of 1.00 D to 1.50 D as determined by keratometry
  9. Dilated pupil size 5.5 mm or greater to allow visualization of the toric IOL axis markings post-operatively

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous intraocular, corneal, or retinal detachment surgery, including corneal transplant, LASIK / LASEK / PRK, SMILE, astigmatic keratotomy and limbal relaxing incisions in the planned operative eye.
  2. Diagnosed degenerative visual disorders (e.g. macular degeneration, retinal detachment, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, or other retinal disorders) that are predicted to cause future acuity losses to a level of 0.20 logMAR (20/30) or worse
  3. Significant anterior segment pathology that might increase intraoperative risk or compromise IOL stability (e.g. pseudoexfoliation syndrome, any iris pathology)
  4. Subjects with conditions associated with increased risk of zonular rupture (that may affect post-operative centration or tilt of IOL) in the planned operative eye
  5. Potentially occludable angle or ciliary body tumor, or other pathology that might increase risk to subject safety, based on gonioscopic observation
  6. Subjects reasonably expected to require secondary ocular surgical intervention or laser treatment (other than YAG capsulotomy)
  7. Subjects with corneal pathology, potentially affecting corneal topography
  8. Subjects with traumatic cataract in the planned operative eye
  9. Participating in a concurrent drug or device clinical trial or who have participated in a drug or device trial within 30 days of the pre-operative visit
  10. Subjects with any other serious ocular pathology (e.g. glaucoma, severe dry eye, history of intraocular inflammation, history of retinal surgery or retinal laser procedure) or underlying systemic medical condition (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes) or circumstance that, based on the Investigator's judgment, poses a concern for the subjects' safety or could confound the results of the study (History of cataract surgery with PC-IOL in one eye is allowed.)
  11. Use of medications known to interfere with visual performance, pupil dilation, or iris structure within 30 days of the pre-operative visit, at the discretion of the Investigator
  12. Pregnant or nursing females
  13. Irregular astigmatism in the planned operative eye
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
274 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Toric (test) group

    All subjects randomized to be implanted with the low cylinder (1.50 D) RayOne EMV Toric IOL (Model RAO210T)

    Device: RayOne EMV Toric IOL · Procedure: Cataract Surgery

  • Active comparator
    Monofocal (control) group

    All subjects randomized to be implanted with the RAO600C Monofocal IOL

    Device: RayOne Monofocal IOL · Procedure: Cataract Surgery

Interventions

  • DeviceRayOne EMV Toric IOL

    Implantation of intraocular lens.

    Also known as: Model RAO210T

  • DeviceRayOne Monofocal IOL

    Implantation of intraocular lens.

    Also known as: RAO600C

  • ProcedureCataract Surgery

    Removal of natural crystalline lens due to cataracts

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Magnitude of Residual Manifest Cylinder

    Mean magnitude of residual manifest cylinder (as measured by manifest refractive cylinder).

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  2. Adjusted Mean Difference Magnitude of Residual Manifest Cylinder

    The adjusted mean difference of residual manifest cylinder (as measured by manifest refractive cylinder) between Toric and Monofocal groups will be given together with a 95% confidence interval and associated one-sided p-value. This endpoint will be considered successful if the one-sided p-value ≤ 0.025.

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  3. Axis Misalignment (Frequency and Percentage 10 Degrees)

    Frequency and percentage of RayOne EMV Toric (Model RAO210T) IOLs with IOL axis misalignment at Visit 4 (as determined by photographic method) less than 10 degrees.

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  4. Axis Misalignment (Frequency and Percentage 20 Degrees)

    Frequency and percentage of RayOne EMV Toric (Model RAO210T) IOLs with IOL axis misalignment at Visit 4 (as determined by photographic method) less than 20 degrees.

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  5. Stability of Toric IOL Axis Orientation (Frequency and Percentage)

    Stability of toric IOL axis orientation, expressed as frequency and percentage of RayOne EMV Toric (Model RAO210T) IOLs that rotate ≤ 5 degrees postoperatively between 30 to 60 days (Visit 3) and 120 to 180 days (Visit 4)

    Time frame: 30 to 60 days and 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  6. Rates of IOL Adverse Events Per ISO 11979-7

    Rates of IOL adverse events through 120 to 180 days post-operatively (Visit 4) compared to the ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint (SPE) rates as described in ISO 11979-7. Rates of cumulative and persistent adverse events from ISO 11979-7 (2018) Table E.2 will be reported by treatment group (Toric test group, Monofocal control group) and AE type. Rates of adverse events will be compared to the SPE rate from Table E.2. The one-sided p-value from the exact binomial test of each hypothesis will also be provided for each adverse event. If none of these hypothesis test results are statistically significant, this endpoint will be considered successful for the toric IOL.

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  7. Rates of All Other Adverse Events Not Included in ISO 11979-7

    The eyes with at least one adverse event not included in the cumulative and persistent adverse events from ISO 11979-7 (2018) Table E.2 through 120 to 180 days post-operatively (Visit 4) will be presented by treatment group (Toric test group, Monofocal control group).

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  8. Rates of Secondary Surgical Interventions for IOL Repositioning Due to IOL Misalignment

    The percentage of eyes implanted with the Toric test group IOL requiring a secondary surgical intervention for IOL repositioning due to IOL misalignment through 120 to 180 days post-operatively (Visit 4), as well as a two-sided 95% exact binomial confidence interval for the percentage, will be presented.

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  9. Rate of BCDVA of 0.30 logMAR or Better Compared to the ISO SPE Rates

    The percentage of eyes that achieve a BCDVA at 4 meters of 0.30 logMAR or better at 120 to 180 days post-operatively (Visit 4) will be presented by treatment group (Toric test group, Monofocal control group) for the Safety Set and Best Case Set. If neither of these hypothesis test results are statistically significant, this endpoint will be considered successful for the toric IOL.

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Residual Manifest Cylinder Stratified by Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder

    Residual manifest refractive cylinder by subgroups of 0.25 D preoperative keratometric cylinder at 120 to 180 days post-operatively

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

  2. Percent Change in Absolute Cylinder Stratified by Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder

    Percent reduction in absolute cylinder (as measured by residual manifest cylinder / preoperative keratometric cylinder), at 120 to 180 days post-operatively. Positive numbers represent an decrease in cylinder and negative numbers represent an increase in cylinder.

    Time frame: 120 to 180 days post-operatively

07

Results

Posted Jan 21, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneToric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) Group
Started118120
Completed117116
Not completed14
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject02
Withdrew: Subject was not implanted with the study device02

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Magnitude of Residual Manifest Cylinder

Mean magnitude of residual manifest cylinder (as measured by manifest refractive cylinder).

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Diopters
Mean Magnitude of Residual Manifest Cylinder
DioptersToric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) Group
Mean Magnitude of Residual Manifest Cylinder-0.368 ± 0.334-0.780 ± 0.532
PrimaryAdjusted Mean Difference Magnitude of Residual Manifest Cylinder

The adjusted mean difference of residual manifest cylinder (as measured by manifest refractive cylinder) between Toric and Monofocal groups will be given together with a 95% confidence interval and associated one-sided p-value. This endpoint will be considered successful if the one-sided p-value ≤ 0.025.

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Diopters
Adjusted Mean Difference Magnitude of Residual Manifest Cylinder
DioptersCombined Toric and Control Groups
Adjusted Mean Difference Magnitude of Residual Manifest Cylinder-0.430 (-0.5441 to -0.3159)
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Toric and Control Groups · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001
PrimaryAxis Misalignment (Frequency and Percentage 10 Degrees)

Frequency and percentage of RayOne EMV Toric (Model RAO210T) IOLs with IOL axis misalignment at Visit 4 (as determined by photographic method) less than 10 degrees.

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Axis Misalignment (Frequency and Percentage 10 Degrees)
ParticipantsToric (Test) Group
Axis Misalignment (Frequency and Percentage 10 Degrees)92
PrimaryAxis Misalignment (Frequency and Percentage 20 Degrees)

Frequency and percentage of RayOne EMV Toric (Model RAO210T) IOLs with IOL axis misalignment at Visit 4 (as determined by photographic method) less than 20 degrees.

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Axis Misalignment (Frequency and Percentage 20 Degrees)
ParticipantsToric (Test) Group
Axis Misalignment (Frequency and Percentage 20 Degrees)98
PrimaryStability of Toric IOL Axis Orientation (Frequency and Percentage)

Stability of toric IOL axis orientation, expressed as frequency and percentage of RayOne EMV Toric (Model RAO210T) IOLs that rotate ≤ 5 degrees postoperatively between 30 to 60 days (Visit 3) and 120 to 180 days (Visit 4)

Time frame:
30 to 60 days and 120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Stability of Toric IOL Axis Orientation (Frequency and Percentage)
ParticipantsToric (Test) Group
Stability of Toric IOL Axis Orientation (Frequency and Percentage)100
PrimaryRates of IOL Adverse Events Per ISO 11979-7

Rates of IOL adverse events through 120 to 180 days post-operatively (Visit 4) compared to the ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint (SPE) rates as described in ISO 11979-7. Rates of cumulative and persistent adverse events from ISO 11979-7 (2018) Table E.2 will be reported by treatment group (Toric test group, Monofocal control group) and AE type. Rates of adverse events will be compared to the SPE rate from Table E.2. The one-sided p-value from the exact binomial test of each hypothesis will also be provided for each adverse event. If none of these hypothesis test results are statistically significant, this endpoint will be considered successful for the toric IOL.

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rates of IOL Adverse Events Per ISO 11979-7
ParticipantsToric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) Group
Cumulative - Cystoid macular edema21
Cumulative - Hypopyon00
Cumulative - Endophthalmitis00
Cumulative - Lens dislocation from posterior chamber00
Cumulative - Mechanical pupillary block00
Cumulative - Retinal detachment00
Cumulative - Secondary Surgical Intervention20
Persistent - Cornea Stroma Edema00
Persistent - Cystoid macular edema00
Persistent - Iritis00
Persistent - Increased IOP00
PrimaryRates of All Other Adverse Events Not Included in ISO 11979-7

The eyes with at least one adverse event not included in the cumulative and persistent adverse events from ISO 11979-7 (2018) Table E.2 through 120 to 180 days post-operatively (Visit 4) will be presented by treatment group (Toric test group, Monofocal control group).

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rates of All Other Adverse Events Not Included in ISO 11979-7
ParticipantsToric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) Group
Cornea Stroma Edema65
Increased IOP47
IOL decentration/malposition resulting in secondary surgical intervention10
Iris pigment epithelium loss10
Progression or onset diabetic retinopathy10
Retained lens material10
Secondary Surgical Intervention - Wound burp (aqueous tap, or paracentesis)10
Other - Posterior capsular opacification requiring YAG capsulotomy144
Other - Posterior vitreous detachment711
Other - Corneal edema77
Other - Anterior chamber cells greater than Grade 2 at Visit 151
Other - Corneal abrasion30
Other - Epithelial defect21
Other - Choroidal nevus11
Other - Corneal dellen11
Other - Dermatochalasis11
Other - Epiretinal membrane20
Other - Subconjunctival hemorrhage11
Other - Worsening dry eye disease11
Other - Central capsular wrinkle10
Other - Chemosis10
Other - Double vision secondary to neurological adjustment following cataract surgery10
Other - Epithelial basement membrane dystrophy10
Other - Intraretinal hemorrhage10
Other - Photophobia10
Other - Retinal pigment epithelial mottling10
Other - Superficial punctate keratitis10
Other - Trace punctate epithelial erosions10
Other - Visually significant corneal edema resulting in BCDVA of 0.3 or worse10
Other - Worsening punctate epithelial erosion10
Other - Conjunctival injection02
Other - Dry eye disease01
Other - Iritis01
Other - Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, not specified as Sjogrens01
Other - Retinal pigment epithelial changes01
PrimaryRates of Secondary Surgical Interventions for IOL Repositioning Due to IOL Misalignment

The percentage of eyes implanted with the Toric test group IOL requiring a secondary surgical intervention for IOL repositioning due to IOL misalignment through 120 to 180 days post-operatively (Visit 4), as well as a two-sided 95% exact binomial confidence interval for the percentage, will be presented.

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rates of Secondary Surgical Interventions for IOL Repositioning Due to IOL Misalignment
ParticipantsToric (Test) Group
Rates of Secondary Surgical Interventions for IOL Repositioning Due to IOL Misalignment1
PrimaryRate of BCDVA of 0.30 logMAR or Better Compared to the ISO SPE Rates

The percentage of eyes that achieve a BCDVA at 4 meters of 0.30 logMAR or better at 120 to 180 days post-operatively (Visit 4) will be presented by treatment group (Toric test group, Monofocal control group) for the Safety Set and Best Case Set. If neither of these hypothesis test results are statistically significant, this endpoint will be considered successful for the toric IOL.

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rate of BCDVA of 0.30 logMAR or Better Compared to the ISO SPE Rates
ParticipantsToric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) Group
Safety Set117116
Best Case Set112111
SecondaryResidual Manifest Cylinder Stratified by Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder

Residual manifest refractive cylinder by subgroups of 0.25 D preoperative keratometric cylinder at 120 to 180 days post-operatively

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · Diopters
Residual Manifest Cylinder Stratified by Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder
DioptersToric (Test) Group With Low Preoperative Keratometric CylinderMonofocal (Control) Group With Low Preoperative Keratometric CylinderToric (Test) Group With High Preoperative Keratometric CylinderMonofocal (Control) Group With High Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder
Residual Manifest Cylinder Stratified by Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder-0.413 ± 0.333-0.794 ± 0.535-0.286 ± 0.325-0.764 ± 0.533
SecondaryPercent Change in Absolute Cylinder Stratified by Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder

Percent reduction in absolute cylinder (as measured by residual manifest cylinder / preoperative keratometric cylinder), at 120 to 180 days post-operatively. Positive numbers represent an decrease in cylinder and negative numbers represent an increase in cylinder.

Time frame:
120 to 180 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change in Absolute Cylinder Stratified by Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder
percent changeToric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) Group
Percent Change in Absolute Cylinder Stratified by Preoperative Keratometric Cylinder68.59 ± 29.1736.11 ± 45.69

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Toric (Test) Group0/117 (0%)1/117 (0.9%)49/117 (41.9%)
Monofocal (Control) Group0/116 (0%)0/116 (0%)40/116 (34.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventToric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) Group
Secondary Surgical Intervention - Surgical removal of retained lens fragmentEye disorders1/1170/116
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 38
Most frequent other events
EventToric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) Group
Posterior capsular opacification requiring YAG capsulotomyEye disorders14/1174/116
Posterior vitreous detachmentEye disorders7/11711/116
Corneal edemaEye disorders7/1177/116
Increased IOPEye disorders4/1177/116
Cornea Stroma EdemaEye disorders6/1175/116
Anterior chamber cells greater than Grade 2 at Visit 1Eye disorders5/1171/116
Corneal abrasionEye disorders3/1170/116
Conjunctival injectionEye disorders0/1172/116
Cystoid macular edemaEye disorders2/1171/116
Epithelial defectEye disorders2/1171/116

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Toric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years362359
>=65 years8297179
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Toric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) GroupTotal
Mean67.7 ± 7.469.4 ± 7.068.5 ± 7.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Toric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) GroupTotal
Female6670136
Male5250102
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Toric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native123
Asian101
Black or African American415
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
White112115227
Multiple022
Hispanic or Latino347
Not Hispanic or Latino115116231
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Toric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) GroupTotal
United States118120238
Study Eye
Study Eye(Participants)Toric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) GroupTotal
Right Eye (OD)6273135
Left Eye (OS)5647103
Axial Length
Axial Length(mm)Toric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) GroupTotal
Mean24.183 ± 1.11824.120 ± 1.11724.151 ± 1.116
Anterior Chamber Depth
Anterior Chamber Depth(mm)Toric (Test) GroupMonofocal (Control) GroupTotal
Mean3.337 ± 0.4013.247 ± 0.3813.292 ± 0.393

15 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Vold Vision
    Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704, United States
  • ICON Eyecare
    Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, United States
  • Vance Thompson Vision Alexandria
    Alexandria, Minnesota 56308, United States
  • Moyes Eye Center
    Kansas City, Missouri 64154, United States
  • Vance Thompson Vision North Dakota
    West Fargo, North Dakota 58078, United States
  • Cleveland Eye Clinic
    Avon, Ohio 44011, United States
  • Carolina Eyecare Physicians
    Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Vance Thompson Vision
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108, United States
  • Parkhurst NuVision
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — all collected IPD will be made available to U.S. FDA for supporting premarket approval, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: 6 months after device approval in the US

Access criteria: To be determined by the study sponsor after device approval.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2023 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2026, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 190 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Cataract, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 28. This study's 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 490 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 19, 2023
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
StartActual
Aug 10, 2023
Primary completionActual
Oct 23, 2024
CompletionActual
Oct 23, 2024
Results first posted
Jan 21, 2026
Last update
Jan 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05985304
Lead sponsor
Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Start date
Aug 10, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 23, 2024
Completion
Oct 23, 2024
Results posted
Jan 21, 2026
Last update
Jan 21, 2026

Study contacts

Mark Packer, MD
study chair

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion