ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05978180PANDORA2Updated Dec 22, 2025

Safety of Use and Efficacy of Pandora for Patients Suffering From Gonarthrosis (PANDORA2)

An interventional study of Medical Device : HO-1 and Medical Device : HS-3 in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Labrha. Completed at 35 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-22.

Sponsored by Labrha · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
252
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The knee osteoarthritis is a frequent degenerative condition that mainly affects subjects over 60, population often weakened by numerous comorbidities and concomitant treatments, justifying the development of new therapies.

The viscosupplementation is a symptomatic treatment for knee osteoarthritis ; the objective of this intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid is to reduce knee pain and improve mobility. In practice, there are two protocols to administer viscosupplementation : in a single injection or in three injections performed weekly.

The present clinical investigation has the objective to evaluate the safety and efficacy of use of Pandora, a hyaluronic acid associated with tranexamic acid, in a single injection (HO-1) or in three injections performed weekly (HS-3), compared to a referred and commercialized medical device.

Read the detailed description

This clinical investigation is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel groups study of a class III Medical Device.

This study is designed to compare the safety of use and the efficacy of Pandora in its two forms : in a single injection (HO-1) or in three injections (HS-3) to a single intra-articular injection of 2.5 ml (SINOVIAL®ONE)

A descriptive analysis will be carried out to characterize the demographic data, the history of the disease and its treatments, the clinical and radiological data of the patients at inclusion.

The efficacy of Pandora will be demonstrated by describing the variation of WOMAC A1 score "walking pain" of target knee in repeated measures.

In total, 252 participants will be enrolled across 40 study centers in France and Monaco.

The total duration of subjects' participation is 12 months ; overall study duration including the enrollment period is expected to take approximately 24 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Viscosupplementation
  • Hyaluronic acid
  • Knee
  • Intra-articular injection
  • Tranexamic acid
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 623 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 252 is above the median of 68 across 2,714 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Labrha is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient aged between 35 and 85 years.
  • (BMI) \< 35 kg.m2.
  • Medial or lateral femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis, diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, radiological stage 2 and 3 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence criteria modified by Felson on an X-ray, of the knee in extension, less than 6 months old.
  • Knee osteoarthritis responsible for walking pain in the target knee, assessed between 4 and 8 inclusive on an 11 points numerical scale (0 = none to 10 = extreme).
  • Unilateral or bilateral knee osteoarthritis if the walking pain in the contralateral knee is \< 3 based on 11 points numerical scale (0-10).
  • Ambulatory patient able to walk 50 meters without a cane, crutch or walker.
  • Patient giving his .
  • Patient agreeing to follow-up study visits.
  • Patient affiliated to the health social security system or beneficiary of such plan.
  • Patient requiring viscosupplementation according to the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria :

  • Patient presenting knee osteoarthritis without impingement joint space narrowing of the femoro-tibial compartment (modified Kellgren stage 0-1) or with complete impingement joint space narrowing on the knee weight-bearing radiograph in extension (modified Kellgren stage 4).
  • Patient with bilateral symptomatic gonarthrosis with walking pain of contralateral knee > 3.
  • Patient with stage 4 patello-femoral osteoarthritis associated with femoro-tibial osteoarthritis.
  • Patient with a flare of osteoarthritis of the target or contralateral knee.
  • Patient who received viscosupplementation or Rich Plasma (PRP) injection, in the target knee, in the 6 months prior to inclusion.
  • Patient who received an intra-articular injection of in the target knee in the 2 months prior to inclusion.
  • Patients with a skin condition or a wound next to or near the injection site.
  • Patients refusing to discontinue treatment with NSAIDs or cox-2 inhibitors during the follow-up period.
  • Patient receiving treatment with level III analgesics (strong opioids).
  • Patients receiving treatment with diacerhein, avocado and soy unsaponifiables, glucosamine or chondroitin initiated less than 2 months prior to inclusion.
  • Patient with to hyaluronic acid or tranexamic acid.
  • Patient with a history of seizures.
  • Patient who had arthroscopy of the target knee or major trauma to the target knee during the 3 months preceding inclusion.
  • Patient scheduled to undergo surgery, for any cause, of the target knee or other joint of the lower limbs, planned within 6 months of inclusion, likely to interfere with follow-up or evaluation of the patient in the study.
  • Patient with Fibromyalgia.
  • Patient with an active neurological or vascular musculoskeletal disorder (such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis or any other disease, Paget's disease, gout, coxopathy, tendinopathy of the lower limb, sciatic or crural radiculalgia) which, in the opinion of the investigator, would be likely to disrupt regular monitoring and/or interfere with the measurement of evaluated knee treatment efficacy.
  • Patient with serious hemostasis disorders, venous or lymphatic stenosis of the lower limbs, history of thromboembolic disease - phlebitis or pulmonary embolism - or a high risk of thromboembolism.
  • Patients with renal insufficiency.
  • Patients with all evolving general condition as cardiac, digestive, endocrine, haematological or broncho-pulmonary which, in the opinion of the investigator, would be likely to disrupt regular monitoring and/or interfere with the measurement of evaluated knee treatment efficacy.
  • Breastfeeding patient, pregnant or wishing to be during the 12 months of the study.
  • Patients of childbearing age, sexually active without .
  • Patients unable to give personal consent.
  • Patients participating or having participated in interventional research and whose follow-up ended within 2 months prior to inclusion.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
252 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Medical Device : HO-1

    Single injection Hyaluronic acid associated with tranexamic acid 4.8 ml will be injected in one time Intra-articular single injection * Both groups will receive their first injection after a selection visit ; first injection will be planned between 7 days to 30 days after to confirm the enrollment. * The injection will be performed at Day 1.

    Device: Medical Device : HO-1

  • Experimental
    Medical Device : HS-3

    Three injections Hyaluronic acid associated with tranexamic acid 2.2 ml will be injected in three times (one injection per week) Intra-articular single injection * Both groups will receive their first injection after a selection visit ; first injection will be planned between 7 days to 30 days after to confirm the enrollment. * The injections will be performed at Days 1, 8 and 15.

    Device: Medical Device : HS-3

  • Active comparator
    Medical Device : SINOVIAL® ONE

    Hyaluronic acid 2.5 ml will be injected in one time Intra-articular single injection * Both groups will receive their first injection after a selection visit ; first injection will be planned between 7 days to 30 days after to confirm the enrollment. * The injection will be performed at Day 1.

    Device: Medical Device : SINOVIAL® ONE

Interventions

  • DeviceMedical Device : HO-1

    The injection will be performed at Day 1.

    Also known as: Intra-articular single injection

  • DeviceMedical Device : HS-3

    The three injections will be performed at Days 1, 8 and 15.

    Also known as: Intra-articular three injections

  • DeviceMedical Device : SINOVIAL® ONE

    The injection will be performed at Day 1.

    Also known as: Intra-articular single injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the efficacy of the two medical devices containing Pandora gel, HO-1 and HS-3, on walking pain in the target knee, compared to the SINOVIAL® ONE.

    Variation of the WOMAC A1 score "walking pain" of the target knee in repeated measures (weeks 4,12 and 26), between the first or single injection and the potential injection at week 26.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation by HO-1 and HS-3 on walking pain of the target knee between day 1 and week 12.

    Variation of the WOMAC A1 score "walking pain" of the target knee between day 1 and week 12 considering the repeated measures at weeks 4 and 12.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. To evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation by HO-1 and HS-3 on the pain of the target knee at weeks 4, 12 and 26 and week 12 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26.

    Variation of the pain on target knee, with repeated measures by WOMAC A score, constituted of 5 questions about knee pain, between day 1 and week 12, day 1 and week 26 as well as between day 1 and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection of HO-1 at week 26.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. To evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation by HO-1 and HS-3 on the function of target knee at weeks 4, 12, 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26.

    Variation of the function , with repeated measures by the WOMAC C constituted of 17 questions, between day 1 and week 4, day 1 and week 12, day 1 and week 26 as well as between day 1 and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. To evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplémentation by HO-1 and HS-3 on the analgesic drug consumption at weeks 4, 12, 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26.

    Evaluation by the patient of his analgesic drug consumption during the two weeks prior each visit.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. To determine the number (and percentage) of patients "OMERACT-OARSI responsive" at weeks 4,12,26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26.

    Number (%) of "responsive" patients according to OMERACT OARSI criterion, at weeks 4, 12 and 26 (and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26).

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. To determine the number (and percentage) of "highly responsive" patients at weeks 4, 12 and 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26.

    Number (%) of "highly responsive" patients with a decrease of WOMAC A1 \> 50% at weeks 4, 12 and 26 (and week 52 for patients who didn't have HO-1 injection at S26).

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. To determine the number (and percentage) of patients in whom target knee pain is considered acceptable according to the PASS criterion at weeks 4,12 and 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26.

    Number (%) of patients reaching the threshold of PASS at weeks 4, 12 and 26 (and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26).

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. To determine the number (and percentage) of patients in whom the decrease of the target knee pain is considered important (MCII criterion) at weeks 4,12 and 26 as well as week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26.

    Number (%) of patients whom the improvement at weeks 4, 12 and 26 (and week 52 for patients who didn't require an injection at week 26), is superior to the MCII.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. To determine the number (and percentage) of patients requiring a new injection at S26.

    Number (%) of patients requiring an injection of HO-1 at week 26.

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. To evaluate, at S52, the efficacy of the additional injection of HO-1 at S26 on pain and function of the target knee.

    Variation of WOMAC between week 26 and week 52 at patients receiving injection of HO-1 at week 26.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. To evaluate, at S52, the benefit of the additional injection of HO-1 at S26 on analgesic drug consumption.

    Decrease of analgesic drug consumption between week 26 and week 52 at patients receiving injection of HO-1 at week 26.

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. To measure the self-reported treatment efficacy by the patient at weeks 4, 12, 26 and 52.

    Evaluation of the efficacy of the treatment by the patient based on a 11 points numerical scale (0-10) at weeks 12,26 and 52.

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. To evaluate the local tolerability (at the target knee), after each injection of HO-1 and HS-3, compared to SINOVIAL® ONE.

    Number of adverse events occurring, at the target knee, after each injection during the 4 weeks following the first or only one injection, whose treatments causality is not evaluated as "not related".

    Time frame: 1 month

  14. To evaluate the global tolerability of HO-1 and HS-3 throughout the follow-up between day 1 and week 52 in comparison with SINOVIAL® ONE.

    Number of adverse events occurring during the 52 weeks of follow up, whose treatments causality is not evaluated as "not related".

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. To assess patient's satisfaction regarding tolerability of HO-1 and HS-3 treatment between day 1 and week 4, compared to SINOVIAL® ONE.

    Subjective assessment of tolerability by the patient, based on a 5 points numerical scale, 0 corresponding to "Very Good" and 4 "Very Bad" at day 8, day 15 and week 4 for group's patients HO-1 and SINOVIAL® ONE.

    Time frame: 1 month

  16. To assess patient's satisfaction regarding the tolerability of HO-1 treatment at week 27 for patients who received an injection at week 26.

    Subjective assessment of tolerability by the patient, based on a 5 points numerical scale, 0 corresponding to "Very Good" and 4 "Very Bad" at week 27 for patients receiving injection of HO-1 at week 26.

    Time frame: 6 months and one week (=27 weeks)

07

Study locations

35 sites
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Annecy, France
  • Centre de Chirurgie Orthopédique du Beaujolais
    Arnas, France
  • Centre de Médecine du Sport du Beaujolais
    Arnas, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie La Savoureuse
    Belfort, France
  • Hôpital Nord Franche Comté
    Belfort, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie de Palente
    Besançon, France
  • Centre de Rhumatologie Nord Isère
    Bourgoin, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Castelnaudary, France
  • Polyclinique des Alpes du Sud
    Gap, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Gourdon, France
  • Centre Médical Dulac
    La Ciotat, France
  • Cabinet Médical Tilsitt
    Lyon, France
  • Centre Orthopédique Santy
    Lyon, France
  • Clinique de la Sauvegarde
    Lyon, France
  • Clinique Saint Charles
    Lyon, France
  • Centre Médico-Social du Lac
    Mantes-la-Jolie, France
  • Cabinet Médical Borely Mermoz
    Marseille, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Mâcon, France
  • Cabinet Médical
    Montélimar, France
  • Groupe Médical Adhémar
    Montélimar, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Montpellier, France
  • Centre Médical Saint Roch
    Montpellier, France
  • Cabinet Médical Pluridisciplinaire Wallach
    Mulhouse, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Nîmes, France
  • Clinique du Ter
    Ploemeur, France
  • Cabinet Médical
    Puyricard, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Roanne, France
  • Cabinet Médical
    Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, France
  • Groupe Médical Spécialisé - Le Premium
    Strasbourg, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier de la Haute Saône - Hôpital de Vesoul
    Vesoul, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Villeurbanne, France
  • Cabinet de Rhumatologie
    Viry-Châtillon, France
  • Pôle de santé des Sept Chemins
    Vourles, France
  • IM2S
    Monaco, Monaco
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sellam J, Courties A, Eymard F, Ferrero S, Latourte A, Ornetti P, Bannwarth B, Baumann L, Berenbaum F, Chevalier X, Ea HK, Fabre MC, Forestier R, Grange L, Lellouche H, Maillet J, Mainard D, Perrot S, Rannou F, Rat AC, Roux CH, Senbel E, Richette P; French Society of Rheumatology. Recommendations of the French Society of Rheumatology on pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2020 Dec;87(6):548-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 12. PubMed 32931933 ↗
  • Balazs EA. Viscosupplementation for treatment of osteoarthritis: from initial discovery to current status and results. Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:278-89. PubMed 15455338 ↗
  • Concoff A, Sancheti P, Niazi F, Shaw P, Rosen J. The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 21;18(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1897-2. PubMed 29268731 ↗
  • Diracoglu D, Tuncay TB, Sahbaz T, Aksoy C. Single versus multiple dose hyaluronic acid: Comparison of the results. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Nov 21;29(4):881-886. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160714. PubMed 27257981 ↗
  • Bhadra AK, Altman R, Dasa V, Myrick K, Rosen J, Vad V, Vitanzo P Jr, Bruno M, Kleiner H, Just C. Appropriate Use Criteria for Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in the United States. Cartilage. 2017 Jul;8(3):234-254. doi: 10.1177/1947603516662503. Epub 2016 Aug 10. PubMed 28618868 ↗
  • Li J, Liu R, Rai S, Ze R, Tang X, Hong P. Intra-articular vs. intravenous administration: a meta-analysis of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Dec 2;15(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02119-1. PubMed 33267906 ↗
  • Ng W, Jerath A, Wasowicz M. Tranexamic acid: a clinical review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):339-50. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0011. Epub 2015 Mar 23. PubMed 25797505 ↗
  • Jules-Elysee KM, Tseng A, Sculco TP, Baaklini LR, McLawhorn AS, Pickard AJ, Qin W, Cross JR, Su EP, Fields KG, Mayman DJ. Comparison of Topical and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study of Effects on Tranexamic Acid Levels and Thrombogenic and Inflammatory Marker Levels. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Dec 4;101(23):2120-2128. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00258. PubMed 31800425 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2025, 24 months.

Of 140 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Knee, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 34. This study's 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,251 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 28, 2023
First posted
Aug 7, 2023
StartActual
Oct 18, 2023
Primary completionActual
Nov 13, 2025
CompletionActual
Nov 13, 2025
Last update
Dec 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05978180
Lead sponsor
Labrha
Collaborators
Statitec
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2023
Start date
Oct 18, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 13, 2025
Completion
Nov 13, 2025
Last update
Dec 22, 2025

Study contacts

Patrick Sac-Epee
study director · Labrha
Jean-Charles Balblanc, Dr
principal investigator · Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, HNFC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion