ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05970081Updated May 22, 2024

Effectiveness and Safety of Implantable Intrathecal Systems for Refractory Pain in Spain (INTRATHECAL-RENASED)

An observational study in Refractory Pain, sponsored by Sociedad Espanola del Dolor. Recruiting at 9 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-22.

Sponsored by Sociedad Espanola del Dolor · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Aug 2023; still recruiting 3 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
504
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Refractory pain is a prevalent condition that negatively affects patients' quality of life. Intrathecal implantable systems have been proposed as a treatment option for refractory pain. However, real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of these therapies in Spain are scarce. This study aims to obtain real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal implantable systems for refractory pain treatment in Spain.

Read the detailed description

All Spanish hospitals that implant intrathecal systems for refractory pain will be invited to participate in the study. Patients will be recruited before the procedure, and before providing data to the registry, the study will be explained to them, and they will sign an informed consent form. Demographic data related to the pathology and procedure will be collected. Follow-up will be conducted at three and twelve months after the procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractory Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Intrathecal Drug Delivery
  • Implantable Infusion Pump
  • Refractory Pain
03

In context

Pain, Intractable

90 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Intractable; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 504 is above the median of 91 across 19 observational studies indexed under Pain, Intractable.

Browse Pain, Intractable studies →

Lead sponsor

Sociedad Espanola del Dolor is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with refractory pain who are candidates for treatment with an implantable intrathecal infusion system.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic pain patients candidates for treatment with an implantable neurostimulation system.
  • Accept to participate in the study and sign .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in whom it would be difficult to complete follow-up.
  • Insufficient understanding of the Spanish language.
  • Pregnancy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
504 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with at least 50 percent pain relief in the area of their predominant pain at one year

    Percentage of patients who experience a reduction of at least 50 percent in the intensity of their predominant pain compared to the initial value, assessed twelve months after the implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system. Pain intensity will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), with a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain possible)

    Time frame: Twelve months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with at least 50 percent pain relief in the area of their predominant pain at three months

    Percentage of patients who experience a reduction of at least 50 percent in the intensity of their predominant pain compared to the initial value, assessed three months after the implantation of the implantable intrathecal system. Pain intensity will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), with a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain possible)

    Time frame: Three months

  2. Percentage of patients with at least 50 percent pain relief in the area of their non-predominant pain at one year

    Percentage of patients who experience a reduction of at least 50 percent in the intensity of their non-predominant pain compared to the initial value, assessed twelve months after the implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system. Pain intensity will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), with a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain possible)

    Time frame: Twelve months

  3. Compared change from baseline on health-related quality of life scores (EQ Index)

    The impact of the treatment on the patient's health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at three and twelve months after implantation. The EQ-5D-5L assesses quality of life across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain is scored on a scale of 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems), generating a 5-digit code that corresponds to the patient's health status.

    Time frame: Three and twelve months

  4. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    Assessment of clinical global impression of improvement using the PGI-I scale at three and twelve months after implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system. The PGI-I score ranges from 1 (Very much better) through to 7 (Very much worse). The lower the score, the better the improvement.

    Time frame: Three and twelve months

  5. Patient Satisfaction

    Percentage of implanted subjects satisfied with the treatment at three and twelve months after the implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system. Defined as indicating: "since the start of the therapy has the pain improved? yes/no", "Are you satisfied with the treatment?" yes/no or "would you agree to the treatment again?" yes/no

    Time frame: Three and twelve months

  6. Number of Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety

    Number and percentage of patients with adverse effects related to therapy at three and twelve months after implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system.

    Time frame: Three and twelve months

07

Study locations

4 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Hospital Regional Univeristario de Málaga
    Málaga, Andalucia 29010, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Mariano Fernández Baena, MD · Contact
    • Mariano Fernández Baena, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitari Son Espases
    Palma De Mallorca, Balearic Island 07120, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Hermann Ribera Leclerc, MD · Contact
    • Hermann Ribera Leclerc · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario de Navarra
    Pamplona, Navarra 31008, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Laura Gómez Glia, MD · Contact
    • Laura Gómez Glia · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Antonio Ojeda, MD · Contact
  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
    Madrid, 28028, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Concepción Pérez, MD, PhD · Contact
    • Concepción Pérez, Md, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
    Madrid, 28222, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Agustín Mendiola, MD, PhD · Contact
    • Agustin Mendiola, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Cartagena
    Murcia, 30203, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Maria Luz Padilla del Rey, MD · Contact
    • Maria Luz Padilla del Rey, MD · Principal investigator
  • Complexo Hospitalario Univeritario de Ourense
    Ourense, 32005, Spain
    Not yet recruiting
    • Luz Cánovas Martínez, MD · Contact
    • Luz Cánovas Martínez, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Maria Ángeles Canós Verdecho, MD · Contact
    • Maria Ángeles Canós Verdecho, MD · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2025, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2023
First posted
Aug 1, 2023
StartActual
Aug 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Aug 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2025
Last update
May 22, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05970081
Lead sponsor
Sociedad Espanola del Dolor
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 1, 2023
Start date
Aug 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 22, 2024

Study contacts

Antonio Ojeda, MD
Contact
renased@sedolor.es
0034911729144

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion