CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05968794TWIN CerclageUpdated Nov 13, 2023

Cerclage for the Reduction of Extreme Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix or Dilatation

An interventional study of Vaginal cerclage in Preterm Birth, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Recruiting at 13 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-13.

Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
238
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of a cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy with a midpregnancy short cervix or cervical dilatation compared to standard treatment (no cerclage) in the prevention of extreme preterm birth \< 28 weeks of gestational age.

The main question it aims to answer is: What is the effectiveness of a cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy with a midpregnancy short cervix or cervical dilatation compared to standard treatment (no cerclage) in the prevention of extreme preterm birth \< 28 weeks of gestational age?

Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention (cerclage) or comparison (no cerclage) group.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: In the Netherlands, 250 women with a twin pregnancy deliver at \< 28 weeks per year, resulting in 157 perinatal deaths. A vaginal cerclage could be an effective surgical method to reduce cervical insufficiency and with that preterm birth, but the evidence regarding its effectiveness on extreme preterm birth and (long term) neonatal outcome is lacking.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy with a midpregnancy short cervix or cervical dilatation compared to standard treatment (no cerclage) in the prevention of extreme preterm birth \< 28 weeks of gestational age.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: A vaginal cerclage is a minor and safe surgical procedure commonly performed in singleton pregnancies with a short cervix and a previous preterm birth in all the participating centers, thus there is experience in the participating hospitals. The results of this study will show whether a vaginal cerclage reduces extreme preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy and a short cervix, and its accompanying perinatal complications. If proven effective, the implementation of this intervention will have a huge impact on the lifelong health of these children and their families.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preterm Birth

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Preterm birth
  • Twin pregnancy
  • Cerclage
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 238 is above the median of 84 across 1,689 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Women (> 16 years of age) with a twin pregnancy and:

  • an asymptomatic short cervix at routine ultrasound investigation (below 24 weeks of gestation) OR
  • cervical dilatation (below 24 weeks of gestation)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with a mono-amniotic twin pregnancy
  • Women with twin pregnancy in which one or both children are diagnosed with a major structural, congenital or chromosomal abnormality that is likely to influence the composite adverse neonatal outcome.
  • Women with dilatation of the cervix and signs of clinical intra-uterine infection, defined by the presence of fever ≥ 38 degrees Celsius.
  • Women with overt symptoms of preterm labour at time of measurement of short cervix (regular contractions, PPROM, recurrent blood loss).
  • Women with a placenta previa, defined as a placenta position covering the internal ostium of the cervix.
  • Women who do not master the Dutch of English language and therefore not able to give written consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
238 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cerclage

    A vaginal cerclage is a short and minor surgical procedure performed under general or regional anesthesia. An unabsorbable suture is placed around/through the cervix to close the cervical canal and to increase its firmness, in order to reduce cervical insufficiency.

    Procedure: Vaginal cerclage

  • No intervention
    Standard care

    The comparator will be standard treatment according to the current Dutch (NVOG) guideline from 2018, which is to not perform or offer an intervention such as vaginal cerclage. This is in line with the standard care in the participating hospitals in Belgium.

Interventions

  • ProcedureVaginal cerclage

    A vaginal cerclage is a short and minor surgical procedure performed under general or regional anesthesia. An unabsorbable suture is placed around/through the cervix to close the cervical canal and to increase its firmness, in order to reduce cervical insufficiency.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of extreme preterm birth

    Time frame: <28 weeks of gestation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Preterm birth

    Indicated and spontaneous

    Time frame: <24, <32, <34 and <37 weeks

  2. Rate of Premature rupture of membranes

    Time frame: Up to 42 weeks of pregnancy

  3. Gestational age at delivery

    Time frame: At delivery

  4. Days on ventilation support

    Neonatal

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  5. Days in NICU

    Neonatal

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  6. Maternal quality of life assessed by the 'European Quality of life 5-Dimension 5-Level' score

    The 'European Quality of life 5-Dimension 5-Level' score consists of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) that are rated using five levels (no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), extreme problems (5)). A unique health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions. Each state is referred to by a 5-digit code, The best score is 11111 and the worst score is 55555.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  7. Rate of maternal outcomes

    Sepsis, need for antibiotics, need to remove cerclage in operation room, mode of delivery (% caesarean delivery).

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  8. Adverse neonatal outcome

    A composite for adverse neonatal outcome (including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leucomalacia \> grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage \> grade 2, necrotizing enterocolitis \> stage 2, retinopathy of prematurity \> stage 2, proven sepsis and perinatal death)

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  9. Number of neonates with bronchopulmonary dysplasia

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  10. Number of neonates with periventricular leucomalacia > grade 1

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  11. Number of neonates with intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  12. Number of neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis > stage 2

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  13. Number of neonates with retinopathy of prematurity > stage 2

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  14. Number of neonates with proven sepsis

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

  15. Perinatal death

    Time frame: Up to 3 months corrected age

Other outcomes

  1. Healthcare costs assessed by the 'iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire'

    Costs will be measured from a societal perspective using a web-based questionnaires based on the 'iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire'. The scoring involves quantifying the reported healthcare resource use based on the responses provided by the participants. The questionnaire collects information about various types of healthcare services and resources, such as hospitalizations, outpatient visits and medication use.

    Time frame: Up to one week after labour and up to 3 months corrected age

  2. Healthcare costs assessed by the 'iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire'

    Costs will be measured using a web-based questionnaires based on the 'iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire'. It collects information on the duration and frequency of productivity loss, as well as associated costs.The questionnaire consists of multiple sections and items that gather data on work-related activities, job characteristics, and productivity impact. Respondents are asked to report on their own productivity or that of a specific population (e.g., patients, caregivers) over a defined period.

    Time frame: Up to one week after labour and up to 3 months corrected age

07

Study locations

1 of 13 sites recruiting
  • University Medical Center Antwerpen
    Antwerpen, Belgium
    • Y Jacquemyn, Prof. Dr. · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Medical Center Sint-Lucas Brugge
    Brugge, Belgium
    • C van Holsbeke, dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hospital Oost-Limburg Genk
    Genk, Belgium
    • W Gyselaers, Prof.Dr. · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Medical Center Gent
    Gent, Belgium
    • I Dehaene, Dr. · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Medical Center Leuven
    Leuven, Belgium
    • L Lewi, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Medical Center Amsterdam
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    • M.A. Oudijk, Prof.Dr. · Contact
    Recruiting
  • University Medical Center Groningen
    Groningen, Netherlands
    • J.R. Prins, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Medical Center Leiden
    Leiden, Netherlands
    • E.M. Lutke-Holzik, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Medical Center Maastricht
    Maastricht, Netherlands
    • S Al-Nassiry, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Radboud University Medical Center
    Nijmegen, Netherlands
    • J van Drongelen, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Erasmus Medical Centre
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    • S Schoenmakers, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    • J.B Derks, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Maxima Medical Centre
    Veldhoven, Netherlands
    • J van Laar, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The manuscript will be published in an Open Access journal that provides a PID (e.g., a DOI or URN)

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05968794
Lead sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Responsible party
Martijn A. Oudijk, MD, PhD (Prof.dr., Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 1, 2023
Start date
May 15, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 13, 2023

Study contacts

Lissa van gils, MD
Contact
TWINC@amsterdamumc.nl
+31642811240
Martijn A Oudijk, MD, PhD, Prof
Contact
TWINC@amsterdamumc.nl

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion