ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05966428Updated Jul 28, 2023

Sensory Integration Therapy and Cerebral Palsy

An interventional study of Conventional Exercises and Sensory Integration Therapy in Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 4 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-28.

Sponsored by Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2018, registered Jul 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
4 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This intervention study was planned to investigate the effects of Sensory Integration Therapy that added to the conventional therapy program on spasticity, balance, motor function and functional independency levels of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy

Read the detailed description

Cerebral Palsy is a disease that can cause motor skill and posture disorders due to a non-progressive lesion in the brain that has not yet completed its development. Cerebral palsy is among the most common causes of disability in childhood. There are many conditions that can cause Cerebral Palsy. Risk groups that cause brain damage can be considered as prenatal, perinatal and postnatal risk factors.The lesion that occurs in the central nervous system in patients with Cerebral Palsy causes some problems in the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory systems. In addition to these problems, depending on the level of the lesion, posture, movement disorders and balance problems occur in individuals with Cerebral Palsy. Sensory integration therapy is a neurological process of perceiving, interpreting and organizing our senses for an effective integration of the individual with the environment. When the literature is examined, the number of studies investigating the effect of sensory integration program in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy is insufficient. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of sensory integration therapy on spasticity, balance and motor function in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy and to provide the data obtained at the end of the study to the literature both theoretically and practically.

The hypothesis of the study is:

  • Sensory integration program reduces spasticity in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy.
  • Sensory integration program increases balance in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy.
  • Sensory integration program increases motor function in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy.
02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sensory Integration
  • Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,891 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 439 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 34 across 1,396 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi is the lead sponsor of 136 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the ages of 4-17
  • Diagnosed with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy
  • Having Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who underwent phenol and botulinum toxin-a injections in the last 6 months before the study
  • Had a previous surgical operation, and had a cardiopulmonary disease that could prevent exercise
  • Children with communication, hearing and vision problems
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Conventional Exercises

    Other: Conventional Exercises

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    Conventional Exercises + Sensory Integration Therapy

    Other: Conventional Exercises · Other: Sensory Integration Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherConventional Exercises

    This conventional exercises included stretching and strengthening, balance-coordination, mobility and range of motion exercises. The control group received conventional therapy 3 days a week for 8 weeks. Each therapy session a day lasted 45 minutes in control group.

  • OtherSensory Integration Therapy

    The Sensory Integration Therapy was applied to the intervention group in addition to the conventional exercise program. Sensory Integration Therapy included tactile, proprioceptive, and vestibular activities. The tactile sensory activities consisted of materials such as stepping stones, tactile box, brushing, fabric walking path. The vestibular sensory activities consisted of materials such as hammock swings, trampolines, rope nets, rock walls, river stones. Proprioceptive sensory activities consisted of materials such as weight bearing activities, heavy lifting, deep pressure, big ball activities, tug of war and ball pits. The intervention group underwent each session 45 minute conventional therapy and 15 minutes SIT. The therapy program continued 3 days a week for 8 weeks in intervention group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle Tone

    Modified Ashworth Scale (The muscle tone evaluated on this scale is graded between 0 and 4 and is scored between 0 and 5)

    Time frame: A day before the rehabilitation

  2. Muscle Tone

    Modified Ashworth Scale (The muscle tone evaluated on this scale is graded between 0 and 4 and is scored between 0 and 5)

    Time frame: 8 week

  3. Functional Balance

    Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (The scale consists of 14 section. Each section is scored from 0 lowest function to 4 highest function. )

    Time frame: A day before the rehabilitation

  4. Functional Balance

    Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (The scale consists of 14 section. Each section is scored from 0 lowest function to 4 highest function.)

    Time frame: 8 week

  5. Gross Motor Function

    Gross Motor Function Measure (The scores are in 4 categories as "0" not starting the activity, starting independently "1", partially completing "2" and independently completing "3".)

    Time frame: A day before the rehabilitation

  6. Gross Motor Function

    Gross Motor Function Measure (The scores are in 4 categories as "0" not starting the activity, starting independently "1", partially completing "2" and independently completing "3".)

    Time frame: 8 week

  7. Functional Independence

    Functional Independence Measure for Children (These items are scored from 1 to 7 according to whether they received help while performing each function)

    Time frame: A day before the rehabilitation

  8. Functional Independence

    Functional Independence Measure for Children (These items are scored from 1 to 7 according to whether they received help while performing each function)

    Time frame: 8 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gross Motor Function Classification

    Gross Motor Function Classification System (Children with Cerebral Palsy are classified in 5 levels (1-5) according to their motor skills, functional abilities, assistive technology and wheelchair requirements)

    Time frame: A day before the rehabilitation

  2. Gross Motor Function Classification

    Gross Motor Function Classification System (Children with Cerebral Palsy are classified in 5 levels (1-5) according to their motor skills, functional abilities, assistive technology and wheelchair requirements)

    Time frame: 8 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Atahan TURHAN
    Kırşehir, Merkez 40100, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kantor J, Hlavackova L, Du J, Dvorakova P, Svobodova Z, Karasova K, Kantorova L. The Effects of Ayres Sensory Integration and Related Sensory Based Interventions in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review. Children (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;9(4):483. doi: 10.3390/children9040483. PubMed 35455527 ↗
  • Warutkar VB, Krishna Kovela R. Review of Sensory Integration Therapy for Children With Cerebral Palsy. Cureus. 2022 Oct 26;14(10):e30714. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30714. eCollection 2022 Oct. PubMed 36439588 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in May 2018, 4 months.

Of 882 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cerebral Palsy, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 900 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 13, 2023
First posted
Jul 28, 2023
StartActual
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 1, 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2018
Last update
Jul 28, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05966428
Responsible party
Atahan TURHAN (Principal Investigator: Atahan Turhan, PhD, Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
May 1, 2018
Completion
Jun 1, 2018
Last update
Jul 28, 2023

Study contacts

Atahan TURHAN, PhD
principal investigator · Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion