CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05966142ADOPT PGxUpdated May 28, 2025Results posted

A Depression and Opioid Pragmatic Trial in Pharmacogenetics (Chronic Pain Trial)

An interventional study of Pharmacogenetic testing and Clinical decisions support in Chronic Pain, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-28.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2021, registered Jul 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,048
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is comprised of three separate pharmacogenetic trials grouped into a single protocol due to similarities in the intervention, the hypotheses, and the trial design. The three trials are the Acute Pain Trial, the Chronic Pain Trial, and the Depression Trial. Participants can enroll in only one of the three trials. All three trials were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT04445792. In July 2023 each of the three treatment trials was registered under a separate NCT# and NCT04445792 was converted to a screening record per recent guidance on master protocol research programs (MPRPs). This record is specific to the Chronic Pain Trial within the ADOPT-PGx protocol.

The Chronic Pain Trial is a prospective, multicenter, two arm randomized pragmatic trial. Participants meeting eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to either immediate pharmacogenetic testing and genotype-guided opioid therapy (Intervention arm) or standard care with 6-month delayed pharmacogenetic testing (Control arm). The investigators will test the hypothesis that pharmacogenetic testing and genotype guided pain therapy improves pain control after surgery in participants who's body processes some pain medicines slower than normal.

Read the detailed description

Pain and depression are conditions that impact substantial proportions of the US population. Finding safe and effective drug therapies for both conditions is challenging. In the case of treatment for acute and chronic pain, the challenge is finding effective therapy while minimizing adverse effects or opioid addiction (and the ensuing consequences). For depression, there are few clinically relevant predictors of successful treatment leading to multiple trials of inadequate therapy for some patients. Both opioid and antidepressant prescriptions can be guided by pharmacogenetics (PGx) data based on existing guidelines from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC).

This study is designed to evaluate the impact of pharmacogenetic testing and genotype-guided pain or anti-depressant therapy on pain control or depression symptoms in a pragmatic setting.

The rationale for examining a genotype-guided approach to acute and chronic pain management is based on the importance of CYP2D6 for the bioactivation of tramadol, codeine, and hydrocodone and data from a pilot study supporting improved pain control in intermediate and poor CYP2D6 metabolizers in the genotype-guided arm who are taking these drugs at baseline. Similarly, the rationale for examining a genotype-guided approach to depression medication therapy is based on the demonstrated role of CYP2D6 in the bio inactivation and CYP2C19 oxidation of select, commonly used SSRIs. Secondly, data from industry sponsored trials support the hypothesis of improved depression symptom control in a genotype-guided arm.

Study objectives:

Determine if a genotype-guided approach to pain therapy in participants with at least 3 months of chronic pain leads to improved pain control compared to usual care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pharmacogenetic
  • CYP2D6
  • CYP2C19
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,048 is above the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Chronic Pain Trial

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • English speaking or Spanish speaking
  • Seen at primary care clinics (such as, but not limited to, Internal Medicine, Family Medicine or Pediatrics) or patients seen in pain-relevant specialty clinics
  • History of pain for at least the last 3 months
  • Currently treated or being considered for treatment with tramadol, hydrocodone, or codeine to improve pain management

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Trial-wide:

  • Life expectancy less than 12 months
  • Are too cognitively impaired to provide informed consent and/or complete study protocol
  • Are institutionalized or too ill to participate (i.e. mental or nursing home facility or incarcerated)
  • Have a history of allogeneic stem cell transplant or liver transplant
  • People with prior clinical pharmacogenetic test results for genes relevant for the study in which they will enroll (CYP2D6 for the pain studies and CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 for depression) or already enrolled in an ADOPT PGx trial

Chronic Pain

  • Plan to move out of the area within 6 months of enrollment
  • Undergoing treatment for an active cancer diagnosis
  • Currently taking daily opioids other than tramadol, codeine or hydrocodone
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,048 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing

    Immediate genetic testing of CYP2D6 and clinical decisions support for pain management prescribing to the healthcare provider

    Other: Pharmacogenetic testing · Other: Clinical decisions support

  • Other
    Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing

    Delayed genetic testing of CYP2D6 and return of results after the conclusion of the 6-month follow-up period

    Other: Pharmacogenetic testing

Interventions

  • OtherPharmacogenetic testing

    Genetic testing of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19

  • OtherClinical decisions support

    Prescribing recommendations to the provider based on the pharmacogenetic testing results

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity

    The composite pain intensity score is derived from the 3-time PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain intensity scale. Composite pain intensity score is the sum of the 3 questions and ranges from 3 (no pain) to 15 (intense pain). Change in composite pain intensity score ranges from -12 (change from the highest level of pain to the lowest level of pain) to 12 (change from the lowest level of pain to the highest level of pain).

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Reduction Magnitude

    Ratio of Composite Pain Score at 3 months relative to baseline. Composite pain intensity scores were shifted to range 0-12 and the pain reduction magnitude is reported as the ratio of pain at 3 months relative to pain at baseline using this adjusted scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using the log ratio pain at 3 months relative to pain at baseline. Due to the presence of 0 values in the ratios, the log ratios include a +.5 offset, i.e. log(3-month pain +.5 / baseline pain + 0.5).

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

  2. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Pain Reduction

    Clinically significant pain reduction defined as ratio of 3-month composite pain score relative to baseline is \< 0.7, corresponding to a 30% or more improvement in pain scores.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

  3. Prescription Pain Medication Misuse as Measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)

    The 7-item PROMIS questionnaire assesses the extent to which participant experience prescription pain medication misuse symptoms in the past 3 months using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants are asked if they have had a prescription for pain medication in the last 3 months. If no, the questionnaire is not administered, if yes, the questionnaire is administered. For the completed questionnaires. Raw scores ranging from 7 to 35. Raw scores are converted to T-scores using the PROMIS conversion table, with T-scores ranging 36.3 to 54.1. Higher T-scores reflect greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Number of Participants With Drug-Gene Concordance

    Concordance between the participant reported opioid medications at 3 months and CYP2D6 phenotype.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Results

Posted May 28, 2025

Participant flow

This record is specific to the Chronic Pain Trial within the ADOPT PGx protocol. It only contains the participants consented to the Chronic Pain Trial.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneChronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing
Started527521
Completed456457
Not completed7164
Withdrew: Death33
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5552
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject98
Withdrew: Duplicate enrollment10
Withdrew: Study logistical reason10
Withdrew: Unable to complete follow up due to change in health11

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Pain Intensity

The composite pain intensity score is derived from the 3-time PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain intensity scale. Composite pain intensity score is the sum of the 3 questions and ranges from 3 (no pain) to 15 (intense pain). Change in composite pain intensity score ranges from -12 (change from the highest level of pain to the lowest level of pain) to 12 (change from the lowest level of pain to the highest level of pain).

Time frame:
Baseline to 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pain Intensity
score on a scaleChronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing
Change in Pain Intensity-0.7 ± 2.3-0.8 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing vs Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5913 · Mean difference (final values): 0.16 · 95% CI -0.42 to 0.74
SecondaryPain Reduction Magnitude

Ratio of Composite Pain Score at 3 months relative to baseline. Composite pain intensity scores were shifted to range 0-12 and the pain reduction magnitude is reported as the ratio of pain at 3 months relative to pain at baseline using this adjusted scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using the log ratio pain at 3 months relative to pain at baseline. Due to the presence of 0 values in the ratios, the log ratios include a +.5 offset, i.e. log(3-month pain +.5 / baseline pain + 0.5).

Time frame:
Baseline to 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · log ratio
Pain Reduction Magnitude
log ratioChronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing
Pain Reduction Magnitude-0.1 ± 0.4-0.1 ± 0.5
Statistical analysis
  • Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing vs Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.6803
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Pain Reduction

Clinically significant pain reduction defined as ratio of 3-month composite pain score relative to baseline is \< 0.7, corresponding to a 30% or more improvement in pain scores.

Time frame:
Baseline to 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Pain Reduction
ParticipantsChronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Pain Reduction1727
Statistical analysis
  • Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing vs Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing · Chi-squared · p = 0.1228
SecondaryPrescription Pain Medication Misuse as Measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)

The 7-item PROMIS questionnaire assesses the extent to which participant experience prescription pain medication misuse symptoms in the past 3 months using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants are asked if they have had a prescription for pain medication in the last 3 months. If no, the questionnaire is not administered, if yes, the questionnaire is administered. For the completed questionnaires. Raw scores ranging from 7 to 35. Raw scores are converted to T-scores using the PROMIS conversion table, with T-scores ranging 36.3 to 54.1. Higher T-scores reflect greater symptom severity.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Prescription Pain Medication Misuse as Measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)
T-scoreChronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing
Prescription Pain Medication Misuse as Measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)40.1 ± 4.840.5 ± 4.8
Statistical analysis
  • Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing vs Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5252 · Mean difference (final values): -0.4 · 95% CI -1.7 to 0.9
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Drug-Gene Concordance

Concordance between the participant reported opioid medications at 3 months and CYP2D6 phenotype.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Drug-Gene Concordance
ParticipantsChronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing
Number of Participants With Drug-Gene Concordance3336
Statistical analysis
  • Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing vs Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing · Chi-squared · p = 0.9657

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing3/527 (0.6%)0/527 (0%)0/527 (0%)
Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing3/521 (0.6%)0/521 (0%)0/521 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

ITT refers to the Intent To Treat population, while mITT, a subset of ITT, refers to the modified Intent To Treat population. The mITT population is the primary analytical population for the Chronic Pain Trial and includes participants who have a CYP2D6 activity scores \<= 0.75 after accounting for CYP2D6 phenoconversion.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotal
Mean58.2 ± 12.257.8 ± 11.958.0 ± 12.1
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotal
Mean58.0 ± 10.957.8 ± 11.357.9 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotal
Female373375748
Male151146297
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotal
Female95115210
Male393170
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotal
Hispanic or Latino484593
Not Hispanic or Latino468469937
Unknown or Not Reported11718
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotal
Hispanic or Latino131225
Not Hispanic or Latino119131250
Unknown or Not Reported437
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native6713
Asian279
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American207201408
White245245490
More than one race131730
Unknown or Not Reported534497
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native213
Asian257
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American494897
White6675141
More than one race268
Unknown or Not Reported151126

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

10 sites
  • University of Florida - Gainesville
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • University of Florida - Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
  • Eskenazi Health
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Indiana University
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • The Institute for Family Health
    New York, New York 10035, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Meharry Medical College
    Nashville, Tennessee 37208, United States
  • Nashville General Hospital
    Nashville, Tennessee 37208, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Skaar TC, Myers RA, Fillingim RB, Callaghan JT, Cicali E, Eadon MT, Elwood EN, Ginsburg GS, Lynch S, Nguyen KA, Obeng AO, Park H, Pratt VM, Rosenman M, Sadeghpour A, Shuman S, Singh R, Tillman EM, Volpi S, Wiisanen K, Winterstein AG, Horowitz CR, Voora D, Orlando L, Chakraborty H, Van Driest S, Peterson JF, Cavallari LA, Johnson JA, Dexter PR; IGNITE Pragmatic Trials Network. Implementing a pragmatic clinical trial to tailor opioids for chronic pain on behalf of the IGNITE ADOPT PGx investigators. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e70005. doi: 10.1111/cts.70005. PubMed 39177194 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 23, 2024
  • Informed consent form · Jul 14, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05966142
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), University of Florida, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 28, 2023
Start date
Feb 24, 2021
Primary completion
May 10, 2024
Completion
May 10, 2024
Results posted
May 28, 2025
Last update
May 28, 2025

Study contacts

Hrishikesh Chakraborty
study director · Duke University
Todd Skaar, PhD
principal investigator · Indiana University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion