ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05947630Imp&acte3DUpdated Jul 17, 2023

3D-printing and Acces to Tele Rehabilitation

An interventional study of Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) and Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO) in Orthopedic Disorder, sponsored by Lieven De Maesschalck. Completed at 4 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 4 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-17.

Sponsored by Lieven De Maesschalck · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2018, registered Oct 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
79
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will investigate whether 3D printing of orthoses (night splints and AFO/KAFO for walking, further named as dynamic AFO/KAFO) for the lower limbs can help to improve the limited accessibility to orthopaedic devices in developing countries. The 3D printed orthoses will be assessed for effectiveness, cost and feasibility. Measurement and manufacture of the orthoses is also supported remotely via video conferencing.

Read the detailed description

Specifically, the study is being conducted in 3 West African countries: Togo, Niger and Mali. A total of 4 orthopaedic centres are involved, whereby an equal number of patients are recruited everywhere.

There are 2 groups of patients, those who need a (knee) ankle-foot orthosis to move around (dynamic AFO/KAFO) and those who need a night splint to correct the ankle or knee position. All patients in the study will have a treatment route involving fitting a new traditional orthosis and a new 3D printed orthosis. The order of application of both treatments will be randomised in a crossover design. Patients will be measured at baseline after the first treatment period (3 weeks) and after the second treatment period (6 weeks). The primary outcome measures are different for both groups of patients: the walking speed when performing the 10-metre walk test in the patients wearing the dynamic AFO/KAFO, and the measured angle (of knee or ankle) in the patients wearing a night splint.

02

Conditions studied

  • Orthopedic Disorder

Keywords

  • lower limb
03

In context

Musculoskeletal Diseases

752 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 79 is close to the median of 76 across 518 interventional studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Browse Musculoskeletal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Lieven De Maesschalck is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pathology: foot stance abnormality
  • Both unilateral and bilateral orthoses are included
  • Pathology: genu varum

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is already wearing a night splint
  • The patient cannot stand upright
  • The patient is pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
79 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AFO (ankle foot orthosis) dynamic and correctional

    Groep A with AFO (ankle foot orthosis) dynamic and correctional

    Device: Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)

  • No intervention
    AFO or KAFO (knee ankle foot orthosis) correctional

    Groep B with AFO or KAFO (knee ankle foot orthosis) and only correctional

  • Experimental
    KAFO dynamic and correctional

    Groep C with KAFO dynamic and correctional

    Device: Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO)

  • No intervention
    KAFO correctional

    Groep D with KAFO only correctional

Interventions

  • DeviceAnkle Foot Orthosis (AFO)

    3D treatment (AFO will be printed) versus traditional made AFO

  • DeviceKnee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO)

    3D treatment (KAFO will be printed) versus traditional made KAFO

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 10 meter walk test

    10 meter walk test

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  2. knee angle test

    Knee angle test

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  3. Ankle angle test

    Ankle angle test

    Time frame: 5 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. OPUS questionnnaire

    OPUS questionnnaire (measure on 5 point Likertscale: Very easy, Easy, Slightly difficult, Very difficult and Cannot do this activity and this for 21 items.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  2. Range of motion

    Range of motion

    Time frame: 5 weeks

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • CNAOM
    Bamako, Mali
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Niamey
    Niamey, Niger
  • CRAO
    Dapaong, Togo
  • CNAO
    Lomé, Togo
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Creylman V, Knippels I, Janssen P, Biesbrouck E, Lechler K, Peeraer L. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking. Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Dec 19;15(Suppl 3):142. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0287-6. PubMed 28105945 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2018, 5 months.

Of 251 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Musculoskeletal Diseases, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 38. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 266 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 36.

Musculoskeletal Diseases covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 7, 2021
First posted
Jul 17, 2023
StartActual
May 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 31, 2018
CompletionActual
Apr 15, 2019
Last update
Jul 17, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05947630
Lead sponsor
Lieven De Maesschalck
Collaborators
Handicap International
Responsible party
Lieven De Maesschalck (Innovation Manager, Thomas More Kempen) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 17, 2023
Start date
May 15, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2018
Completion
Apr 15, 2019
Last update
Jul 17, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion