CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05945641LLSITUpdated Mar 30, 2025

Effect of Low-load Resistance Training vs. High-intensity Interval Training on Local Muscle Endurance

An interventional study of Low Load Resistance training and Sprint/High Intensity Interval Training in Hypertrophy, Muscle Strength and High-Intensity Interval Training, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-30.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Local muscle endurance (LME) is the ability of a muscle(s) to resist fatigue and is needed for daily activities of life such as climbing stairs, lifting/moving objects, and in sport contexts like rock climbing, mixed martial arts, cross-fit, kayaking and canoeing. Therefore, the investigators want learn how to improve LME and understand what in human bodies changes during exercise training to cause these changes. The investigators know that lifting weights improves muscle strength which is believed to improve LME. Specifically lifting less heavy weights (LLRET) for more repetitions leads to greater gains in LME opposed to heavier weights for fewer repetitions. Therefore, lifting less heavy weights likely causes greater changes in our muscles than lifting heavier weights that cause improvements in LME. Aerobic exercise preformed at high intensities in an interval format (HIIT) may also help improve LME by increasing our muscle's ability to produce energy during exercise. Therefore, the investigators want to see which of LLRET or HIIT leads to greater improvements in LME.

Read the detailed description

Local muscle endurance (LME) is the ability of a given muscle/muscle group to resist fatigue when performing resistance exercise at a submaximal resistance/load. LME is vital for daily activities of life such as climbing stairs, lifting/moving objects, and in sport contexts such as, rock climbing, mixed martial arts, cross-fit, kayaking and canoeing. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms that underpin LME are of significant interest. Mitochondrial content, mitochondrial function and muscle capillarization have been purported as potential physiological factors that may influence LME. However, currently these mechanisms are speculative in nature and further research is required to draw more conclusive evidence. Furthermore, tolerance to exercise induced discomfort is another a potential mechanism of LME, whereby individuals who train under conditions that induce significant feelings of discomfort may possess a greater capacity to push through discomfort induced via LME tests. However, distinguishing between potential physiological and psychological/neural adaptations regarding LME improvements would require further investigations with nuanced methodology. Low load resistance exercise training (LLRET) has been definitively shown to improve local muscle endurance via numerous investigations. Resistance exercise training (RET), LLRET inclusive improves muscle strength which leads to greater repetition reserve capacity at lower loads. Although, Improvements in muscle strength are not specific to LLRET, yet, LLRET does yield greater gains in LME opposed to high load RET (HLRET). Therefore, LLRET likely induces vital physiological adaptations to greater extent than HLRET that drive improvements in LME such mitochondrial function, mitochondrial content and muscle capillarization. HIIT/Sprint interval training (SIT) induce significant discomfort and improve mitochondrial content/function and muscle capillarization, therefore, HIIT/SIT may be effective interventions to improve muscle endurance.

It is evident that RET of varying loads can improve strength, hypertrophy and LME and that endurance exercise training (EET) improves, VO2 Max, mitochondrial content, mitochondrial function and muscle capillarization. However, minimal research has investigated the impact of RET on single leg maximal aerobic capacity, mitochondrial content, mitochondrial function and muscle capillarization and of EET on muscle strength and muscle hypertrophy and muscle endurance. Furthermore, the findings that do exist from this body of literature are conflicted, with some suggesting RET can improve EET associated adaptions while others suggest no benefit or even decrements in aerobic condition are induced via RET. A similar pattern emerges surrounding the impact of HIIT and SIT on muscle hypertrophy, strength and local muscle endurance, whereby SIT and HIIT may induce gains in hypertrophy, strength and local muscle endurance or may yield no benefit at all. Interestingly, SIT and LLRET fall the closest to one another on the resistance exercise-endurance exercise (RE-EE) continuum suggesting that in theory there would be the largest "crossover" effect from these stimuli. Whereby SIT would elicit the greatest improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy relative to other EET and LLRET would induce greater enhancement of EET associated adaptations relative to other RET. Although limited research has investigated this potential "crossover effect", evidence suggests that both stimuli may improve single leg maximal aerobic capacity ,mitochondrial content, mitochondrial function, muscle capillarization, muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy and local muscle endurance. However, results are in-consistent between investigations and findings are difficult to compare due to discrepancies in durations of studies, training architecture and intensity of sessions. Furthermore, to date no previous research has directly compared the effect of SIT/HIIT and LLRET on the aforementioned adaptations within the same study, leaving this topic up to speculation. The present study attempts to address this gap in the literature.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertrophy
  • Muscle Strength
  • High-Intensity Interval Training
  • Resistance Training

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Muscle Strength
  • Local Muscle Endurance
  • Muscle Hypertrophy
  • Mitochondrial Content
  • Mitochondrial Function
  • Muscle Capillarization
  • High-Intensity Interval Training
  • Sprint Interval Training
  • Low Load Resistance Training
  • Resistance Training
  • Interval Training
  • Knee Extension
  • Muscle Endurance
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Able to understand and communicate in English
  2. 19-30 years of age
  3. All "No" answers on the CSEP Get Active questionnaire or doctors' approval to participate
  4. Untrained participants: no structured resistance and/or endurance training over the past 12-months (i.e., >2 hours per week of structured/periodized training)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. BMI lower than 18 or greater than 30
  2. Current use of cigarettes or other nicotine devices
  3. Any major uncontrolled cardiovascular, muscular, metabolic, and/or neurological disorders
  4. Any medical condition impacting the ability to participate in maximal exercise
  5. Type one or type two diabetes
  6. Diagnosis of cancer or undergoing cancer treatment in the past 12 months
  7. Taking blood-thinning medication or the presence of a bleeding disorder
  8. Drug therapy with any drugs that alter skeletal muscle metabolism (i.e., Metformin, Benzodiazepines)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low Load Resistance Training

    LLRET - 12 weeks (2-3 times/week) 3 sets of Knee extension exercise (single leg) done at 30%1- RM. Performed to failure with 3 minutes of rest between sets, weight lifted will be adjusted throughout the study to keep repetitions completed in a 20-30 repetition range.

    Behavioral: Low Load Resistance training

  • Experimental
    Sprint/High Intensity Interval Training

    SIT/HIIT- 12 weeks (2-3 times/week), mix of SIT and HIIT (8-15 sets/session). SIT -30 second Super Maximal "Wingate style intervals" performed on a Kicking ergometer (single leg) with 4 minutes rest provided between sets (number of interval ranges from 4-5), load determined from DEXA leg lean mass and will not be altered throughout training. HIIT - 1-minute Submaximal efforts (90% single leg kicking ergometer VO2Peak Wattage) performed on a kicking ergometer (single leg) with 1 minute rest provided between sets (number of interval ranges from 8-10), if all sets completed wattage will be increased by 5watts for the next training session.

    Behavioral: Sprint/High Intensity Interval Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralLow Load Resistance training

    Performing single leg knee extension exercise with using equivalent to \~30%1-RM to failure,

    Also known as: LLRET

  • BehavioralSprint/High Intensity Interval Training

    Performing repeated submaximal/maximal 30second-60 seconds (1-3 minute rest between) aerobic intervals on a Kicking ergometer (modified bike that allows cycling to be performed with one leg using a kicking motion).

    Also known as: SIT/HIIT

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in repetitions completed for 30% pre-training 1- Repetition maximum (Single leg Knee extension)

    The number of single leg knee extension repetitions that one can complete at 30% of their pre-training 1-RM

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  2. Change in Repetitions completed for 30% pre-training 1- Repetition maximum (Single leg Knee extension)

    The number of single leg knee extension repetitions that one can complete at 30% of their pre-training 1-RM

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  3. Change in CFPE index (Capillary to fiber ratio normalized to fiber perimeter)

    Mean number of capillaries touching each muscle fibre (normalized to the fibre perimeter). Assessed using imaging of muscle samples gathered via muscle biopsies.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  4. Change in Maximal Citrate synthase (CS) Activity

    Indicator of Mitochondrial content and function in skeletal muscle.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Single leg Knee extension 1- Repetition maximum (weight lifted)

    Maximum Weight lifted for 1 repetition of single leg knee extension exercise.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  2. Change in Single leg Knee extension 1- Repetition maximum (weight lifted)

    Maximum Weight lifted for 1 repetition of single leg knee extension exercise.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  3. Change in Single leg Knee extension Isometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction

    Maximal force production at 90 degrees of knee flexion. Assessed via Biodex

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  4. Change in Single leg Knee extension Isometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction

    Maximal force production at 90 degrees of knee flexion. Assessed via Biodex

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  5. Change in Single leg Knee Flexion Isometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction

    Maximal force production at 90 degrees of knee flexion. Assessed via Biodex

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  6. Change in Single leg Knee Flexion Isometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction

    Maximal force production at 90 degrees of knee flexion. Assessed via Biodex

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  7. Change in Single leg Knee Flexion Isokentic Maximum Voluntary Contraction

    Maximal force production at 60 degrees/second. Assessed via Biodex

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  8. Change in Single leg Knee Flexion Isokentic Maximum Voluntary Contraction

    Maximal force production at 60 degrees/second. Assessed via Biodex

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  9. Change in Single leg Knee Extension Isokentic Maximum Voluntary Contraction

    Maximal force production at 60 degrees/second. Assessed via Biodex

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  10. Change in Single leg Knee Extension Isokentic Maximum Voluntary Contraction

    Maximal force production at 60 degrees/second. Assessed via Biodex

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks.

  11. Change in Single leg VO2 Peak on Kicking ergometer (ml/kg leg lean mass/min)

    Maximal Oxygen consumption/minute of single leg.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks.

  12. Change in Single leg Wingate test on kicking ergometer (Max Power)

    maximum 5 second power achieved during Single leg Wingate test on kicking. ergometer

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  13. Change in Single leg Wingate test on kicking ergometer (Max Power)

    maximum 5 second power achieved during Single leg Wingate test on kicking. ergometer

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  14. Change in Leg lean mass

    Assessed via Dual X-ray absorptiometry. Measured in Kg.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks.

  15. Change in Vastus Lateralis Cross sectional area (CSA)

    CSA of vests laterals muscle assessed via ultrasonography.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks.

  16. Change in Type I and II Fiber Cross sectional area (CSA)

    Mean CSA of Type I and II muscle fibers using imaging of muscle samples gathered via muscle biopsies.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

  17. Change in Capillary to fiber ratio (C/FI)

    Mean number of capillaries touching each muscle fibre. Assessed using imaging of muscle samples gathered via muscle biopsies.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Univeristy if British Columbia
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
    • Cameron J Mitchell, PhD · Contact · Cameron.mitchell@ubc.ca · 6048272072
    • Cameron J Mitchell, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data will be held by Lucas Wiens and will be released upon request to other researchers.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05945641
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Responsible party
Cameron Mitchell (Principal Investigator, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2023
Start date
Sep 27, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 30, 2025

Study contacts

Lucas A Wiens, BSc
Contact
wiensl55@student.ubc.ca
7788377665
Cameron J Mitchell, PhD
Contact
cameron.mitchell@ubc.ca
604 827 2072

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion