CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05938439MAGUS-CCSUpdated Nov 18, 2023

Evaluation of the Performance of MAgnetic Gastrointestinal Universal Septotome for Treatment of Candy Cane Syndrome

An interventional study of MAGUS placement in Blind Loop Syndrome Postoperative and Candy Cane Syndrome, sponsored by Erasme University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by Erasme University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Candy cane syndrome (CCS) is an adverse event (AE) from gastrectomy or gastric bypass and end-to-side anastomosis to a jejunal loop. It seems to be predominantly mechanical, the afferent blind loop enlarge and becomes preferential passage of food. This food accumulated in the blind loop increase luminal pressure, causing dilatation, early satiety, fullness, pain, reflux, regurgitation, postprandial vomiting, weight loss, and, ultimately, inability to eat, leading to cachexia.Up to now, main treatment is laparoscopic revision which is invasive. Adverse events related this surgical procedure occurred in 13,3% of cases and substantial improvement only in 73.9%.

A first clinical study with MAGUS including oesophageal diverticulum (n=2) and CCS (n=14) has been performed to assess safety and feasibility of this new device. MAGUS is an implantable device which is placed endoscopically and which, by using pressure necrosis, entailed the marsupialization of the blind loop in less than 30 days. Substantial improvement was observed in all patient and only 7,1% of patients experience an adverse event possibly related to the device. This study aim therefore to assess the safety and performance of the endoscopic treatment of CCS using a new medical device: MAGUS.

This will be a single-center, open-label prospective, safety and performance study on 51 patients with Candy Cane Syndrome (CCS). Patients will be followed for 12 months after the procedure, with an enrolment period of 3 years.

After the screening, the following data will be collected and examinations and tests performed : physical Exam, medical history including CCS cause and treatment(s) history, weight, Eckart and dysphagia score, Quality of Life questionnaire (SF 12 and GERD HRQL), Main symptom selection (Nausea, Vomiting/regurgitation or pain), nausea VAS, vomiting, regurgitation VAS, pain VAS, barium swallow X-ray or endoscopic assessment of Candy Cane. Follow-up visits will be performed at 14 days, 28 days, 3 months and 12 months post-procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Blind Loop Syndrome Postoperative
  • Candy Cane Syndrome

Keywords

  • candy cane syndrome
  • therapeutic endoscopy
  • steptotomy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is diagnosed with candy cane syndrome based on clinical and endoscopic and/or radiologic assessment
  • Patient has at least one of this 3 symptoms associated to CCS: pain, nausea, vomiting, regurgitation
  • Patient agrees and is able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refractory stenosis of the UGI proximal to the septum
  • Septum height smaller than 2 cm or higher than 8 cm
  • Coagulation disorders.

    • Previous implantation of a magnetic-sensitive medical device (including active electronic implant, metallic stent, ...).
  • Dysphagia related to motility disorder
  • Planned MRI in the following month (30 days) of intervention
  • Condition that could compromise patient safety
  • Patient who went through an abdominal surgery less than 8 weeks before implantation of the magnets
  • Patient pregnant, breastfeeding or incapacitated
  • Patient currently enrolled in another clinical trial
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
51 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interventional

    The procedure consists in Medical Device (MAGUS) placement by endoscopy under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic control.

    Device: MAGUS placement

Interventions

  • DeviceMAGUS placement

    An upper endoscopy will be performed with the use of fluoroscopy under general anaesthesia with orotracheal intubation. The delivery system will be placed over a guidewire, under fluoroscopy. The main steps are the following: * Placement through the endoscope of a soft guidewire through the upper GI tract; * Insertion of the MAGUS system on the guidewire; * Advancement of the MAGUS system until proximal magnet reach the top of the septum; * Release and placement of the proximal magnet at the bottom of the septum, pouch side; * Meeting of the distal and proximal magnet on both sides of the septum, by pulling on the delivery system; * Release of the distal magnet and activate the retractable wire; * Insure that wire is not blocked and unblocked it if applicable. Endoscopy and contrast injection will be performed before and after placement to ensure the correct positioning of the magnets.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety related to the number of adverse event

    All adverse events device or procedure related will be captured

    Time frame: During procedure (operative day) ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up

  2. Performance on symptoms evolution

    Evolution of pain will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)

    Time frame: At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up

  3. Performance on symptoms evolution

    Evolution of nausea will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)

    Time frame: At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up

  4. Performance on symptoms evolution

    Evolution of regurgitations/vomiting will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 (= no symptom) to 10 (= severe symptom)

    Time frame: At baseline ; at 14 days of follow-up ; at 28 days of follow-up ; at 3 months of follow-up ; at 12 months of follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety : adverse event at mid and long term

    All adverse events will be reported

    Time frame: After 3 months of implantation

  2. Safety : unplanned interventions

    Number of unplanned interventions

    Time frame: Within the year following device placement

  3. Efficacy : patient's satisfaction with the therapy

    Scored by a visual analogue scale from 0 (= not satisfied at all) to 5 (=very satisfied)

    Time frame: At 3 and 12 months of follow-up

  4. Efficacy : change in quality of life

    Short-Form-12 score. A higher score indicates a better quality of life

    Time frame: At 28 days, 3 months and 12 months of follow-up

  5. Efficacy : dysphagia evolution

    Eckart score from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more severe pathology.

    Time frame: At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up

  6. Efficacy : dysphagia evolution

    Dysphagia score from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates more severe pathology.

    Time frame: At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up

  7. Efficacy : weight evolution

    Weight measurment in kg

    Time frame: At 14 and 28 days, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Rio-Tinto R, Huberland F, Van Ouytsel P, Delattre C, Dugardeyn S, Cauche N, Delchambre A, Deviere J, Blero D. Magnet and wire remodeling for the treatment of candy cane syndrome: first case series of a new approach (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.027. Epub 2022 Jan 1. PubMed 34979115 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05938439
Lead sponsor
Erasme University Hospital
Collaborators
Brussel Medical Device Center (BMDC)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2023
Start date
Aug 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Study contacts

Pauline Van Ouytsel
Contact
pauline.vanouytsel@hubruxelles.be
025556531

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion