CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05937711Updated Jul 10, 2023

The Effect of Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Fibromyalgia

An interventional study of Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation + Duloxetine 30 MG and Duloxetine 30 MG in Fibromyalgia, sponsored by Ilker Fatih Sari. Completed at 2 sites in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-10.

Sponsored by Ilker Fatih Sari · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2020, registered Jun 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in reducing pain, improving quality of life, and decreasing disease severity in patients with fibromyalgia.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial included female patients newly diagnosed with fibromyalgia who had started duloxetine treatment (30 mg/day). Patients who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study were randomized (1:1) into two groups. Group 1 (PTNS+duloxetine) underwent six sessions of posterior tibial nerve stimulation, twice weekly, 3-4 days apart, in addition to duloxetine (30 mg/day). Group 2 (duloxetine) received duloxetine only (30 mg/day). Randomization was performed manually, with assignments placed in opaque and sequentially numbered envelopes by off-site researchers who were not involved in patient care or follow-up. Outcome measures were assessed by two investigators who were blinded to each patient's group. The participants and nerve stimulators were not blinded to the group allocation. Patients were briefed to not disclose which group they were in during the assessment process.Patients in the study group received six sessions of posterior tibial nerve stimulation, twice weekly, 3-4 days apart, in addition to duloxetine; the controls received duloxetine only. The patients were evaluated three times (at baseline, 1st month, and 3rd month). Pain was evaluated using a numeric rating scale, the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and quality of life with a 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Patient functional status and disease severity were evaluated using the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ).

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibromyalgia

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Electric stimulation therapy
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Quality of life
  • Small fiber neuropathy
03

In context

Fibromyalgia

1,336 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibromyalgia; 266 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is close to the median of 60 across 1,035 interventional studies indexed under Fibromyalgia.

Browse Fibromyalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ilker Fatih Sari as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients aged between 18 and 65 years, newly diagnosed according to the American Rheumatology Association 2016 revised FMS diagnostic criteria
  • Patients who come regularly to sessions for posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of fracture/musculoskeletal surgery in the last 3 years
  • Inflammatory joint disease, or neurological disease/neurological deficit with examination
  • Receiving medical treatment for polyneuropathy
  • Contraindications to PNS (pacemaker, epilepsy, diminished skin sensation in the area to be applied).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PTNS+Duloxetine

    Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), twice weekly, 3-4 days apart + Duloxetine 30 mg 1X1 p.o PTNS was applied using two 50 mm × 50 mm electrode pads per extremity. The live pad was placed superior to and medial to the medial malleolus. The ground pad was placed 5-10 cm proximal to the live pad. The PTNS was applied using biphasic square waves with a frequency of 10 Hz and pulse duration of 200 μs. The amplitude was adjusted to the level that produced painless paresthesia in each patient according to their tolerance. PTNS was applied for 30 minutes

    Other: Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation + Duloxetine 30 MG · Drug: Duloxetine 30 MG

  • Active comparator
    Duloxetine

    Duloxetine 30 mg 1X1 p.o

    Drug: Duloxetine 30 MG

Interventions

  • OtherTranscutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation + Duloxetine 30 MG

    PTNS was applied using two 50 mm × 50 mm electrode pads per extremity. The live pad was placed superior to and medial to the medial malleolus. The ground pad was placed 5-10 cm proximal to the live pad. The PTNS was applied using biphasic square waves with a frequency of 10 Hz and pulse duration of 200 μs. The amplitude was adjusted to the level that produced painless paresthesia in each patient according to their tolerance. PTNS was applied for 30 minutes Duloxetine 30 mg p.o 1X1 (daily)

  • DrugDuloxetine 30 MG

    Duloxetine 30 mg p.o 1X1 (daily)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain score at week 4 and 12

    NRS was used to evaluate the patients' general pain at rest and during activity (during activities of daily living). Patients were asked to rate their pain from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the most severe pain

    Time frame: At baseline, 4th week and 12th week

  2. Change from baseline in Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire at week 4 and 12

    This questionnaire was used to assess the patients' pain. This questionnaire consisted of 15 descriptive words that evaluated the sensory (11) and affective (4) dimensions of pain. Pain intensity was evaluated as follows: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Three pain scores were obtained: sensory, affective, and total (both sensory and affective). The total present pain intensity index was evaluated using a 6-point Likert rating scale. (0 = no pain, 1 = mild, 2 = discomforting, 3 = distressing, 4 = horrible, and 5 = excruciating)

    Time frame: At baseline, 4th week and 12th week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionaire at week 4 and 12

    This questionnaire consists of 20 questions evaluating physical function, job status, depression, anxiety, sleep, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being of patients with fibromyalgia. It was scored between 0 and 100. High scores indicate high disease severity and low functional status.

    Time frame: At baseline, 4th week and 12th week

  2. Change from baseline in The 36-item Short-Form Health Survey at week 4 and 12

    This scale is commonly used to evaluate the quality of life. It consists of eight subscales (physical function, physical role limitation, pain, general health, vitality, social function, social role limitation, and mental health) and a total of 36 items. Each subscale was scored between 0 and 100, with 100 points indicating the best health condition and 0 points indicating the worst health condition

    Time frame: At baseline, 4th week and 12th week

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Giresun University Faculty of Medicine
    Giresun, 28200, Turkey
  • Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine
    Samsun, 55139, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sarzi-Puttini P, Giorgi V, Marotto D, Atzeni F. Fibromyalgia: an update on clinical characteristics, aetiopathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020 Nov;16(11):645-660. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00506-w. Epub 2020 Oct 6. PubMed 33024295 ↗
  • Cheng CW, Wong CS, Hui GK, Chung EK, Wong SH. Fibromyalgia: is it a neuropathic pain? Pain Manag. 2018 Sep 1;8(5):377-388. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2018-0024. Epub 2018 Sep 13. PubMed 30212264 ↗
  • Uceyler N, Zeller D, Kahn AK, Kewenig S, Kittel-Schneider S, Schmid A, Casanova-Molla J, Reiners K, Sommer C. Small fibre pathology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Brain. 2013 Jun;136(Pt 6):1857-67. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt053. Epub 2013 Mar 9. PubMed 23474848 ↗
  • Lin T, Gargya A, Singh H, Sivanesan E, Gulati A. Mechanism of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2020 Aug 1;21(Suppl 1):S6-S12. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa164. PubMed 32804230 ↗
  • Slavin KV. Peripheral nerve stimulation for neuropathic pain. Neurotherapeutics. 2008 Jan;5(1):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.11.005. PubMed 18164488 ↗
  • Oaklander AL, Herzog ZD, Downs HM, Klein MM. Objective evidence that small-fiber polyneuropathy underlies some illnesses currently labeled as fibromyalgia. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2310-2316. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 5. PubMed 23748113 ↗
  • Dabby R, Sadeh M, Goldberg I, Finkelshtein V. Electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve reduces neuropathic pain in patients with polyneuropathy. J Pain Res. 2017 Nov 29;10:2717-2723. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S137420. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29238215 ↗
  • Thimineur M, De Ridder D. C2 area neurostimulation: a surgical treatment for fibromyalgia. Pain Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;8(8):639-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00365.x. PubMed 18028042 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05937711
Lead sponsor
Ilker Fatih Sari
Responsible party
Ilker Fatih Sari (Assistant Professor, Giresun University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2023
Start date
Nov 2, 2020
Primary completion
May 23, 2022
Completion
May 23, 2022
Last update
Jul 10, 2023

Study contacts

İlker Fatih Sarı
principal investigator · Giresun University Faculty of Medicine, The Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion