CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05932966COMPARE-CLIDSUpdated Aug 15, 2024

Comparison With Observational Methods and Performance Assessment From Real-life Experience of Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Systems

An observational study in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-15.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
317
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare glycemic control obtained under closed loop depending on the system : Smartguard (Medtronic 780) versus Control IQ (Tandem) in patients with diabetes type 1.

Read the detailed description

Since 2021, several closed-loop insulin delivery systems have been reimbursed in France for patients living with type 1 diabetes. The "real-life" efficacy and safety of these systems have already been the subject of several publications, confirming the results of clinical trials.

To date, there are no clinical trial comparing closed-loop systems. There are, however, a few observational studies that have attempted such a comparison, but with few patients included or a poorly adapted methodology.

Given the size of the cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes fitted with a closed-loop system in the diabetology department of the Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien since 2021 (> 400), we propose a single-center analysis to compare real-life performance of Smartguard (Medtronic 780) versus Control IQ (Tandem) in patients with diabetes type 1 during a follow-up of 12 months and using a propensity score

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

  • diabetes type 1
  • closed loop insulin delivery system
  • continuous glucose monitoring
  • sensor-augmented pump
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 577 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 317 is above the median of 120 across 748 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The population will be selected from the diabetes department of a French public hospital. All eligible patients will be included in the study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient > 16 years
  • Patient with diabetes type 1.
  • Patient treated with a CONTROL-IQ or SMARTGUARD closed-loop insulin delivery system between 01/2021 and 05/2022.
  • Follow-up patient in Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who had pregnancy within 12 months of system initiation.
  • Patient who have been treated with both systems within 12 months.
  • Patient or parental authority objecting the use of data
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
317 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with type 1 Diabetes equipped with control-IQ closed loop system

    Patients with type 1 Diabetes equipped with control-IQ closed loop system

    Device: Insulin closed-loop delivery system

  • Patients with type 1 diabetes equipped with Smart GUARD closed loop system

    Patients with type 1 diabetes equipped with Smart GUARD closed loop system

    Device: Insulin closed-loop delivery system

Interventions

  • DeviceInsulin closed-loop delivery system

    Insulin closed-loop delivery system

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of glycemic control obtained under closed loop according to the system used: SG versus CIQ

    Time spent in target range (between 70 and 180 mg/dL) after 12 months following initiation of the closed-loop system, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).system, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

    Time frame: at 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time below target (< 70 mg/dL)

    Compare glycemic control

    Time frame: at 12 months

  2. Glycemic coefficient of variation (CV)

    Compare glycemic control

    Time frame: at 12 months

  3. glucose management indicator

    Compare glycemic control

    Time frame: at 12 months

  4. HBA1c

    Compare glycemic control

    Time frame: at 12 months

  5. weight daily insulin dose

    Compare glycemic control

    Time frame: at 12 months

  6. daily insulin dose

    Compare glycemic control

    Time frame: at 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
    Corbeil-essonnes Cedex, 91106, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05932966
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 6, 2023
Start date
Jul 6, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 11, 2024
Completion
Jul 11, 2024
Last update
Aug 15, 2024

Study contacts

Coralie AMADOU, PHD
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion