CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05926895CSUpdated Sep 12, 2025

Investigation of the Effect of Central Sensitization (CS) on Steroid Injection Response in Rotator Cuff Lesion

An interventional study of Injection of 1 CC Betamethasone Dipropionate + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate (Diprospan) and 4 cc 2% Prilocaine (Priloc)mixture into the subacromial space in Central Sensitisation and Subacromial Impingement Syndrome, sponsored by Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-12.

Sponsored by Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether pretreatment central sensitization presence affect shoulder steroid injection resuls in patients with rotator cuff pathology.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Is central sensitization associated with decreased treatment response?
  2. Do the clinical features of patients with central sensitization differ from those of those without? Participants will be applied a shoulder injection and the treatment response will be monitored.
Read the detailed description

Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints and its prevalence varies between 7-26%. One of the most common sources of pain in these patients is subacromial impingement syndrome leading to rotator cuff pathology. In patients with shoulder pain, one of the factors associated with the persistence of pain in different etiologies, especially subacromial impingement syndrome, is reported as central sensitization (CS). CS can be summarized as an increase in the response of neurons located in the central nervous system to sub-threshold stimuli. In a meta-analysis of patients with shoulder pain, a decrease in pressure pain threshold was found in 29-77% of patients, and CS in 11-24%. There is increasing data showing that CS negatively affects response to different treatments, including surgery and injections. One of the most frequently used treatments in subacromial impingement syndrome is subacromial/intra-articular shoulder injection. Although various factors have been identified in the prediction of shoulder injection results, the effect of pain sensitization on these procedures is unknown. In this study, it is planned to investigate the effect of the presence and severity of pretreatment central sensitization on the results of the shoulder injection in patients with a rotator cuff lesion or subacromial impingement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Central Sensitisation
  • Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

  • central sensitisation
  • central sensitization inventory
  • subacromial impingement
  • shoulder pain
  • steroid injection
03

In context

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

304 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Impingement Syndrome; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 54 across 261 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.

Browse Shoulder Impingement Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Rotator cuff pathology confirmed clinically and radiologically (USG/MRI)
  • Failure to respond to medical/physical treatment
  • Agree to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shoulder trauma and history of previous shoulder surgery
  • History of injection to the painful shoulder in the last 3 months
  • Use of centrally acting drugs (antidepressants, pregabalin, gabapentin and myorelaxant etc.)
  • History of active cancer, systemic inflammatory disease, and infection
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (central sensitization positive)

    Subacromial steroid injection While the patient is in a sitting position the subacromial space and the rotator cuff will be evaluated with the sonosite-m turbo ultrasonography device linear probe. The area where the rotator cuff and subacromial bursa are most prominent will be determined under the deltoid muscle. The injection site is first covered with povidone iodine and then with 80% alcohol solution will be wiped to provide antisepsis. The subacromial bursa between the deltoid muscle and the rotator cuff will be advanced from lateral to medial with an inplane approach with a 21 g 38 mm needle under the guidance of ultrasonography. Bleeding after making sure that the needle tip is in the bursa by checking, 1 cc betamethasone dipropionate + betamethasone sodium phosphate and 4 cc 2% prilocaine mixture will be injected, showing that it is evenly distributed in the bursa.

    Drug: Injection of 1 CC Betamethasone Dipropionate + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate (Diprospan) and 4 cc 2% Prilocaine (Priloc)mixture into the subacromial space

  • Experimental
    Patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (central sensitization negative)

    Subacromial steroid injection While the patient is in a sitting position the subacromial space and the rotator cuff will be evaluated with the sonosite-m turbo ultrasonography device linear probe. The area where the rotator cuff and subacromial bursa are most prominent will be determined under the deltoid muscle. The injection site is first covered with povidone iodine and then with 80% alcohol solution will be wiped to provide antisepsis. The subacromial bursa between the deltoid muscle and the rotator cuff will be advanced from lateral to medial with an inplane approach with a 21 g 38 mm needle under the guidance of ultrasonography. Bleeding after making sure that the needle tip is in the bursa by checking, 1 cc betamethasone dipropionate + betamethasone sodium phosphate and 4 cc 2% prilocaine mixture will be injected, showing that it is evenly distributed in the bursa.

    Drug: Injection of 1 CC Betamethasone Dipropionate + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate (Diprospan) and 4 cc 2% Prilocaine (Priloc)mixture into the subacromial space

Interventions

  • DrugInjection of 1 CC Betamethasone Dipropionate + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate (Diprospan) and 4 cc 2% Prilocaine (Priloc)mixture into the subacromial space

    Treatment method used in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual analog scale

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated subjective measure for pain, scored in the 0-10 range (0:no pain; 10: worst pain).

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Visual analog scale

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated subjective measure for pain, scored in the 0-10 range (0:no pain; 10: worst pain).

    Time frame: 1 months

  3. Visual analog scale

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated subjective measure for pain, scored in the 0-10 range (0:no pain; 10: worst pain).

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Shoulder range of motion

    Goniometric measurement of flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and internal and external rotation angles of the shoulder complex

    Time frame: 1 weeks

  5. Shoulder range of motion

    Goniometric measurement of flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and internal and external rotation angles of the shoulder complex

    Time frame: 1 months

  6. Shoulder range of motion

    Goniometric measurement of flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and internal and external rotation angles of the shoulder complex

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. QuickDASH

    QuickDASH is a shortened version of the original DASH outcome measure used in upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Higher scores are associated with increased disability.

    Time frame: 1 weeks

  2. QuickDASH

    QuickDASH is a shortened version of the original DASH outcome measure used in upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Higher scores are associated with increased disability.

    Time frame: 1 months

  3. QuickDASH

    QuickDASH is a shortened version of the original DASH outcome measure used in upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Higher scores are associated with increased disability.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. SF-36 (Short form-36)

    The 36-item Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36) is used for objective measurement of quality of life. It consists of 8 dimensions scored between 0-100, and low scores are associated with poor in quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 week

  5. SF-36 (Short form-36)

    The 36-item Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36) is used for objective measurement of quality of life. It consists of 8 dimensions scored between 0-100, and low scores are associated with poor in quality of life.

    Time frame: 1 months

  6. SF-36 (Short form-36)

    The 36-item Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36) is used for objective measurement of quality of life. It consists of 8 dimensions scored between 0-100, and low scores are associated with poor in quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)

    Self-test questionnaire for anxiety and depression. The score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. A score of 8 and above is significant for the diagnosis of anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: 1 week

  8. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)

    Self-test questionnaire for anxiety and depression. The score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. A score of 8 and above is significant for the diagnosis of anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: 1 month

  9. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)

    Self-test questionnaire for anxiety and depression. The score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. A score of 8 and above is significant for the diagnosis of anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: 3 month

  10. hand grip strength

    Grip strength is a measure of muscle strength or the maximum force/tension produced by one's forearm muscles and is measured with a hand dynamometer.

    Time frame: 1 week

  11. hand grip strength

    Grip strength is a measure of muscle strength or the maximum force/tension produced by one's forearm muscles and is measured with a hand dynamometer.

    Time frame: 1 months

  12. hand grip strength

    Grip strength is a measure of muscle strength or the maximum force/tension produced by one's forearm muscles and is measured with a hand dynamometer.

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. Pressure pain threshold (PPT)

    Pain pressure threshold (PPT) is used to measure deep muscular tissue sensitivity. Algometer is used in the measurement and low values are interpreted in favor of increased sensitivity.

    Time frame: 1 week

  14. Pressure pain threshold (PPT)

    Pain pressure threshold (PPT) is used to measure deep muscular tissue sensitivity. Algometer is used in the measurement and low values are interpreted in favor of increased sensitivity.

    Time frame: 1 months

  15. Pressure pain threshold (PPT)

    Pain pressure threshold (PPT) is used to measure deep muscular tissue sensitivity. Algometer is used in the measurement and low values are interpreted in favor of increased sensitivity.

    Time frame: 3 months

Other outcomes

  1. Central sensitization inventory (CSI)

    Clinical instrument used in the diagnosis of central sensitization. A CSI part-A score of 40 and above is significant in the diagnosis.

    Time frame: 1week

  2. Central sensitization inventory (CSI)

    Clinical instrument used in the diagnosis of central sensitization. A CSI part-A score of 40 and above is significant in the diagnosis.

    Time frame: 1 months

  3. Central sensitization inventory (CSI)

    Clinical scale used in the diagnosis of central sensitization. A CSI part-A score of 40 and above is significant in the diagnosis.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sultan Abdülhamid Han Research and Training Hospital
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3 Suppl):S2-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030. Epub 2010 Oct 18. PubMed 20961685 ↗
  • Sanchis MN, Lluch E, Nijs J, Struyf F, Kangasperko M. The role of central sensitization in shoulder pain: A systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Jun;44(6):710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 13. PubMed 25523242 ↗
  • Coronado RA, Simon CB, Valencia C, George SZ. Experimental pain responses support peripheral and central sensitization in patients with unilateral shoulder pain. Clin J Pain. 2014 Feb;30(2):143-51. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318287a2a4. PubMed 23619203 ↗
  • Previtali D, Bordoni V, Filardo G, Marchettini P, Guerra E, Candrian C. High Rate of Pain Sensitization in Musculoskeletal Shoulder Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2021 Mar 1;37(3):237-248. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000914. PubMed 33399396 ↗
  • Walankar PP, Panhale VP, Patil MM. Psychosocial factors, disability and quality of life in chronic shoulder pain patients with central sensitization. Health Psychol Res. 2020 Oct 1;8(2):8874. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2020.8874. eCollection 2020 Oct 5. PubMed 33123644 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05926895
Lead sponsor
Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2023
Start date
Jun 2, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2024
Completion
Dec 30, 2024
Last update
Sep 12, 2025

Study contacts

Emre Ata, Asst.Prof
study chair · Sultan Abdülhamid Han Research and Training Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion