ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05925270Updated Feb 20, 2025

Substituting SMSs for Provider-delivered Care to Improve Alcohol Use Outcomes

An interventional study of mhGAP-Remote and mhGAP-Standard in Alcohol Use Disorder, Mild and Alcohol Use Disorder, Moderate, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Completed at 3 sites in Lesotho. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-20.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
255
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether a technology-substituted intervention (mhGAP-Remote) derived from the World Health Organization's (WHO) Mental Health Gap Action Programme-Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) is effective to reduce alcohol use among adults with and without HIV in Lesotho. Participants who receive the mhGAP-Remote intervention will complete one in-person intervention session pertaining to the mhGAP-IG module for alcohol use, followed by short message services (SMSs) related to the intervention material covered during the in person session. This will be compared to mhGAP-Standard, which involves 4 in-person sessions based on mhGAP-IG for alcohol use plus the option of 2 additional booster sessions. Participants in both treatment groups will complete assessments at baseline, 8-weeks follow-up, 20-weeks follow-up, and 32-weeks follow-up, consisting of self-reported questionnaires and laboratory tests.

Read the detailed description

Mental health and alcohol and other drug use problems account for over 20% of the years lived with disability globally, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Unfortunately, there is a severe shortage of treatment providers available in LMICs for these problems, and access to care is limited due to cost, transportation, infrastructure, lack of awareness, and stigma. The use of technology as a substitute for some provider-delivered time is an appealing and promising strategy to increase access to alcohol use treatment. Specifically, using SMSs to deliver intervention content is a feasible approach in low-resource settings and has been successfully implemented for other behavioral health problems. The primary objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of a technology substituted mhGAP intervention, mhGAP-Remote, to reduce alcohol use when compared to standard in-person treatment, mhGAP-Standard. Study results can inform barriers to accessing treatment and care for alcohol use.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Use Disorder, Mild
  • Alcohol Use Disorder, Moderate

Keywords

  • SMSs
  • alcohol use
  • Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP)
  • Lesotho
03

In context

Alcoholism

1,674 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholism; 331 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 255 is above the median of 88 across 1,428 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholism.

Browse Alcoholism studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 990 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥ 18 years old)
  • Meets criteria for "hazardous drinking" according to the AUDIT (total score of ≥ 6 for women, ≥ 8 for men)
  • Has cellphone access at least half the days of the week, regular access to electricity to charge the phone, and is comfortable receiving study-specific SMSs related to alcohol use treatment on the phone
  • Willing to participate in a study focused on problem drinking
  • Willing and able to regularly come to the health facility/clinic for intervention sessions during the active intervention period
  • Able to read in Sesotho or English or has a treatment supporter (e.g., family member) able to read study-related materials
  • Willing to have intervention sessions audio-recorded
  • Attends one of the study clinics and intends to remain at the same clinic for the duration of the trial

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High-risk alcohol use that warrants medical management
  • Known brain tumor or brain damage, history of epilepsy, or history of delirium
  • Untreated major mental illness that interferes with study participation, such as psychosis, or mania
  • Reported pregnancy at time of enrolment
  • Currently receiving psychological treatment for alcohol use
  • Participation in another trial that is judged by the site investigator as non-compatible with this study
  • Unable to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
255 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    mhGAP-Remote

    mhGAP-Remote was developed specifically by our team. It involves the same intervention components described in mhGAP-Standard. However, in mhGAP-Remote the intervention is delivered mostly through standardized SMSs. There is one in-person session with the interventionist, where the participant learns the core skills of mhGAP. This is followed by standardized SMSs to reinforce intervention content learned in the first session. Study interventionists will be able to provide brief telephonic support to participants if participants struggle to implement the skills learned.

    Behavioral: mhGAP-Remote

  • Active comparator
    mhGAP-Standard

    mhGAP-Standard refers to the existing evidence-based intervention guide that was developed by the WHO to help non-specialist providers in LMIC settings provide treatment for alcohol use, among other mental health and neurological conditions. For the current study, the intervention will focus on mhGAP's psychosocial interventions, which involve psychoeducation, brief motivational interviewing, and providing strategies to reduce and/or stop use. The intervention uses a harm reduction approach, meaning that participants do not need to stop using alcohol altogether. Interventionists will deliver 4 sessions, approximately 45-60 mins each, to participants in person. Sessions are designed to be delivered approximately weekly. Providers have the option to deliver up to 2 additional "booster sessions" to participants who may benefit from additional care.

    Behavioral: mhGAP-Standard

Interventions

  • BehavioralmhGAP-Remote

    One in-person session followed by standardized SMSs to reinforce the concepts learned in the first session. The intervention follows principles of the World Health Organization's Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). Study interventionists can provide telephonic support to participants to implement the skills.

  • BehavioralmhGAP-Standard

    Four in-person sessions with up to two booster sessions following the principles of World Health Organization's Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-reported alcohol use

    Self-report using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Higher scores indicate more alcohol use and associated problems.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks follow-up [range 6--16 weeks]

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-reported alcohol use

    Self-report using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Higher scores indicate more alcohol use and associated problems.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to approximately 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks] and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]

  2. Biomarker phosphatidylethanol (PEth)

    PEth concentration in dried blood spots

    Time frame: Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]

Other outcomes

  1. HIV viral load

    For patients with HIV, number of copies of HIV per millimeter in dried blood spots

    Time frame: Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]

  2. Liver function

    Aspartate Aminotransferase and Alanine Aminotransferase in whole blood

    Time frame: Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Butha Buthe District Hospital
    Butha-Buthe, Butha Buthe, Lesotho
  • Seboche Hospital
    Butha-Buthe, Butha Buthe, Lesotho
  • St. Paul's Health Centre
    Butha-Buthe, Butha Buthe, Lesotho
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Campbell AN, Nunes EV, Matthews AG, Stitzer M, Miele GM, Polsky D, Turrigiano E, Walters S, McClure EA, Kyle TL, Wahle A, Van Veldhuisen P, Goldman B, Babcock D, Stabile PQ, Winhusen T, Ghitza UE. Internet-delivered treatment for substance abuse: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;171(6):683-90. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13081055. Erratum In: Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 1;171(12):1338. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.17112correction. PubMed 24700332 ↗
  • Hahn JA, Dobkin LM, Mayanja B, Emenyonu NI, Kigozi IM, Shiboski S, Bangsberg DR, Gnann H, Weinmann W, Wurst FM. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) as a biomarker of alcohol consumption in HIV-positive patients in sub-Saharan Africa. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 May;36(5):854-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01669.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7. PubMed 22150449 ↗
  • mhGAP Intervention Guide for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders in Non-Specialized Health Settings: Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138690/ PubMed 23741783 ↗
  • Atkins DL, Cumbe VFJ, Muanido A, Manaca N, Fumo H, Chiruca P, Hicks L, Wagenaar BH. Validity and item response theory properties of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test for primary care alcohol use screening in Mozambique (AUDIT-MZ). J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Aug;127:108441. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108441. Epub 2021 Apr 28. PubMed 34134876 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The relevant anonymized data and statistical code will be deposited alongside the published peer-reviewed papers, in alignment with data sharing and verification procedures. Other investigators wishing to access the data for additional analyses can contact the study PI so that the appropriate documents (e.g., data sharing, ethics approvals) can be arranged.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: A de-identified dataset will be deposited in an open-access data repository at the end of the project and once the objectives specified in the protocol have been addressed.

Access criteria: The data can be accessed by the public, through creation of an account with Open Science Foundation, an open-access data repository.

Data sharing details ↗ · osf.io

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 7 months.

Of 470 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Alcoholism, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 55. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 493 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 53.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 21, 2023
First posted
Jun 29, 2023
StartActual
Aug 11, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 10, 2024
CompletionActual
Jan 14, 2025
Last update
Feb 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05925270
Collaborators
SolidarMed
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 29, 2023
Start date
Aug 11, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 10, 2024
Completion
Jan 14, 2025
Last update
Feb 20, 2025

Study contacts

Jennifer M. Belus, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion