CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05924412Updated May 15, 2025

Parecoxib in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intravenous study drug and Intravenous saline solution in Pain, Postoperative, Pain, Acute and Analgesia, sponsored by University of Chile. Completed at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.

Sponsored by University of Chile · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Early mobilization and rehabilitation can be difficult after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to a high incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are important to multimodal analgesic protocols. Parecoxib is an NSAID that selectively inhibits the enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Clinical trials have shown that it does not alter platelet function or gastric mucosa. A recent study, after comparing ketorolac and parecoxib used at the same time in infiltration and systemically, found no differences in perioperative analgesia with a tendency to less bleeding in the parecoxib group. This randomized study will compare the effectiveness of adding a COX-2 inhibitor in the pain management of patients undergoing TKA as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen. The morphine consumption was selected as the primary outcome. The study hypothesis is that patients receiving parecoxib would have a lower opioid consumption.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Pain, Acute
  • Analgesia
  • Analgesic Nephropathy
  • Analgesic Adverse Reaction
  • Knee Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chile is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

ASA I - III BMI 20 - 35 (kg/m2)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who are not capable of giving their own consent
  • Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed in the history and physical examination)
  • Coagulation disturbance (assessed on history and physical examination, if clinically necessary, by blood test, i.e. platelets ≤ 100,000, international normalized ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
  • Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination, if considered clinically necessary, by blood test, i.e. creatinine ≥ 1.04 mg/dl)
  • Hepatic impairment (assessed by history and physical examination, if considered clinically necessary, by blood tests, i.e. transaminases (GGT ≥ 50 u/lt)
  • Allergy to local anesthetics, morphine, paracetamol, ketorolac or parecoxib
  • Pregnancy
  • Chronic pain syndromes that require the use of opioids at home
  • Known history of sulfa allergy
  • History of ischemic heart disease
  • History of chronic gastritis or peptic ulcer
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Parecoxib

    This arm will receive intravenous parecoxib in the intraoperative period.

    Drug: Intravenous study drug

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    This arm will receive a placebo intravenous injection containing saline solution in the same volume as the intervention group

    Other: Intravenous saline solution

Interventions

  • DrugIntravenous study drug

    40mg parecoxib will be administered intravenously after general anesthesia induction and before tourniquet inflation and surgical incisión

  • OtherIntravenous saline solution

    Saline solution (same volume as the study drug) will be administered intravenously after general anesthesia induction and before tourniquet inflation and surgical incision

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Morphine consumption

    Morphine consumed postoperatively during the first 24 hrs utilizing a patient-controlled analgesia device programmed 1mg/ml morphine solution, no infusion, 1ml dose, 8 minutes lockout.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Basal quadriceps strength in the operative side

    Leg extension strength measured with a handheld dynamometer

    Time frame: 1 hour before surgery

  2. Basal level of pain during leg extension in the operative side

    Pain level measured with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 1 hour before surgery

  3. Basal plasmatic creatinine

    Plasmatic creatinine level measured in mg/dL from a blood sample

    Time frame: 1 hour before surgery

  4. Nerve block performance time

    Time elapsed between skin disinfection and the end of local anesthetic injection in femoral triangle and posterior capsule blocks.

    Time frame: 5 minutes after anesthesia induction (before surgical incision)

  5. Incidence of Block complications

    Report of vascular puncture, hematoma, local anesthetic systemic toxicity symptoms

    Time frame: 5 minutes after anesthesia induction and before surgical incision

  6. Time to first morphine dose request

    Time in minutes between arrival to post anesthesia care unit arrival and first request of morphine with the patient controlled analgesia device

    Time frame: 24 hours

  7. Morphine consumption during first 48 hours

    Morphine consumed postoperatively during the first 48 hrs utilizing a patient-controlled analgesia device programmed 0.01mg/Kg/ml morphine solution, no infusion, 1ml dose, 8 minutes lockout.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  8. Incidence of opioid related side effects

    Report of nausea, vomitus, pruritus, urinary retention, respiratory depression

    Time frame: 48 hours

  9. Incidence of NSAIDs related clinical side effects

    Report of allergic reactions, pyrosis, evident gastrointestinal bleeding, hematoma

    Time frame: 48 hours

  10. Postoperative static pain level at 3 hours

    Pain level measured at rest with an 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 3 hours

  11. Postoperative dynamic pain level at 3 hours

    Pain level measured during leg extension with an 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 3 hours

  12. Postoperative static pain level at 6 hours

    Pain level measured at rest with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 6 hours

  13. Postoperative dynamic pain level at 6 hours

    Pain level measured during leg extension with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 6 hours

  14. Postoperative static pain level at 12 hours

    Pain level measured at rest with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 12 hours

  15. Postoperative dynamic pain level at 12 hours

    Pain level measured during leg extension with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 12 hours

  16. Postoperative static pain level at 24 hours

    Pain level measured at rest with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 24 hours

  17. Postoperative dynamic pain level at 24 hours

    Pain level measured during leg extension with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 24 hours

  18. Postoperative static pain level at 48 hours

    Pain level measured at rest with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 48 hours

  19. Postoperative dynamic pain level at 48 hours

    Pain level measured during leg extension with a 11-points numeric rating scale (from 0 to 10 where 0 means absence of pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain)

    Time frame: 48 hours

  20. Medial malleolus sensory block level

    0 to 2 points for Sensory block to cold and touch in the medial malleolus. 0 point= can feel cold and touch; 1= can feel touch but not cold; 2= cannot feel cold or touch

    Time frame: 3 hours

  21. Lateral malleolus sensory block level

    0 to 2 points for Sensory block to cold and touch in the medial malleolus. 0 point= can feel cold and touch; 1= can feel touch but not cold; 2= cannot feel cold or touch

    Time frame: 3hours

  22. Medial malleolus sensory block level

    0 to 2 points for Sensory block to cold and touch in the medial malleolus. 0 point= can feel cold and touch; 1= can feel touch but not cold; 2= cannot feel cold or touch

    Time frame: 24 hours

  23. Lateral malleolus sensory block level

    0 to 2 points for Sensory block to cold and touch in the medial malleolus. 0 point= can feel cold and touch; 1= can feel touch but not cold; 2= cannot feel cold or touch

    Time frame: 24 hours

  24. Postoperative quadriceps strength

    Leg extension strength measured with a handheld dynamometer

    Time frame: 3 hours

  25. Postoperative quadriceps strength

    Leg extension strength measured with a handheld dynamometer

    Time frame: 24 hours

  26. Incidence of restriction to perform physiotherapy

    Inability to perform physiotherapy secondary to pain or motor blockade

    Time frame: 6 hours

  27. Incidence of restriction to perform physiotherapy

    Inability to perform physiotherapy secondary to pain or motor blockade

    Time frame: 24 hours

  28. Incidence of restriction to perform physiotherapy

    Inability to perform physiotherapy secondary to pain or motor blockade

    Time frame: 48 hours

  29. Postoperative plasmatic creatinine level

    Plasmatic creatinine level measured in mg/dL from a blood sample

    Time frame: 48 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile
    Santiago, Metropolitan 8380420, Chile
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aso K, Izumi M, Sugimura N, Okanoue Y, Kamimoto Y, Yokoyama M, Ikeuchi M. Additional benefit of local infiltration of analgesia to femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: double-blind randomized control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jul;27(7):2368-2374. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5322-7. Epub 2018 Dec 8. PubMed 30536047 ↗
  • Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008. PubMed 26827847 ↗
  • Bai JW, An D, Perlas A, Chan V. Adjuncts to local anesthetic wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;45(8):645-655. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101593. Epub 2020 May 30. PubMed 32474417 ↗
  • Andersen LO, Kehlet H. Analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;113(3):360-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu155. Epub 2014 Jun 17. PubMed 24939863 ↗
  • Hubbard RC, Naumann TM, Traylor L, Dhadda S. Parecoxib sodium has opioid-sparing effects in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Feb;90(2):166-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg038. PubMed 12538372 ↗
  • Harris SI, Kuss M, Hubbard RC, Goldstein JL. Upper gastrointestinal safety evaluation of parecoxib sodium, a new parenteral cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor, compared with ketorolac, naproxen, and placebo. Clin Ther. 2001 Sep;23(9):1422-8. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80117-x. PubMed 11589257 ↗
  • Stoltz RR, Harris SI, Kuss ME, LeComte D, Talwalker S, Dhadda S, Hubbard RC. Upper GI mucosal effects of parecoxib sodium in healthy elderly subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jan;97(1):65-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05265.x. PubMed 11808971 ↗
  • Seangleulur A, Vanasbodeekul P, Prapaitrakool S, Worathongchai S, Anothaisintawee T, McEvoy M, Vendittoli PA, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. The efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in the early postoperative period after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Nov;33(11):816-831. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000516. PubMed 27428259 ↗
  • Affas F, Eksborg S, Wretenberg P, Olofsson C, Stephanson N, Stiller CO. Plasma concentration of ketorolac after local infiltration analgesia in hip arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Oct;58(9):1140-5. doi: 10.1111/aas.12371. Epub 2014 Jul 31. PubMed 25078268 ↗
  • Laoruengthana A, Rattanaprichavej P, Reosanguanwong K, Chinwatanawongwan B, Chompoonutprapa P, Pongpirul K. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacies of ketorolac and parecoxib for early pain management after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2020 Dec;27(6):1708-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Nov 13. PubMed 33197808 ↗
  • Chan E, Howle R, Onwochei D, Desai N. Infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block in knee surgery: a narrative review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Sep;46(9):784-805. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102681. Epub 2021 May 14. PubMed 33990439 ↗
  • Summers S, Mohile N, McNamara C, Osman B, Gebhard R, Hernandez VH. Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Pain Control Modalities and Outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Apr 15;102(8):719-727. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01035. No abstract available. PubMed 31985507 ↗
  • Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Eachempati KK, Jangale A, Gurava Reddy AV. Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Oct;28(7):1391-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2218-7. Epub 2018 May 2. PubMed 29721648 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — deidentified data under reasonable request

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05924412
Lead sponsor
University of Chile
Responsible party
Julian Aliste (Associate Professor, University of Chile) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 29, 2023
Start date
Jul 6, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2024
Completion
Sep 1, 2024
Last update
May 15, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion