ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05921526ELUSUpdated Nov 9, 2023

Effectiveness of Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound for the Management of Childhood Lower Respiratory Infections

An interventional study of Point-of-care lung ultrasound and Chest X-ray (digital images) in Lower Respiratory Infection, LRTI and Pneumonia, sponsored by Nagasaki University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Nepal. Open to participants aged 2 Months to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-09.

Sponsored by Nagasaki University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2024, 2 years 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
616
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Months to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of point-of-care lung ultrasound versus chest X-ray for the management of childhood lower respiratory infections in a low-resource setting.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Is point-of-care lung ultrasound as effective as chest X-ray for the management of childhood LRIs in a low-resource setting?

Participants will be assigned to either a point-of-care lung ultrasound group (intervention) or a chest X-ray group (control), to compare the effect on overall case management and various clinical outcomes (time to symptom resolution, rate of antibiotic use, length of stay, treatment costs).

Read the detailed description

Background:

Lower respiratory infections (LRIs) are the leading causes of mortality in children of low-middle income countries (LMICs) including Nepal; pneumonia being the major killer in under-5 population. Often, the cause of mortality is the delay in diagnosis and treatment, particularly when clinical assessments do not hint toward a diagnosis. In resource-limited settings, routine availability of chest X-ray (CXR) service is a challenge, it can be hazardous to children due to exposure to ionizing radiation. The Point-Of-Care Lung UltraSound (POCLUS) could be an alternative solution for the diagnosis and management of LRIs. Studies have already shown that lung ultrasound has a higher sensitivity and specificity than CXR in diagnosing childhood LRIs, however, none of the studies have yet evaluated its role in overall case management.

Methods:

Prospective, single-center, pragmatic, open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial, which will be conducted in the outpatient and emergency departments of a pediatric hospital in Nepal. A total of 616 children with clinical suspicion of LRI and requiring chest imaging will be randomized at 1:1 allocation to the intervention (POCLUS) and control (CXR) arms. Pediatricians will be trained to perform lung ultrasonography in children.

Outcomes:

Primary outcome is the proportion of 'correctly (effectively) managed' cases. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of cases with 'change in diagnosis and management plan due to intervention', time to symptom resolution, rate of antibiotic use, length of stay, and in-hospital costs, compared between intervention and control groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lower Respiratory Infection
  • LRTI
  • Pneumonia
  • Bronchiolitis

Keywords

  • Point-Of-Care Lung UltraSound
  • POCLUS
  • Lung POCUS
03

In context

Pneumonia

1,564 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 616 is above the median of 129 across 975 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Nagasaki University is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Months to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children with a suspected lower respiratory infection (LRI) brought to the outpatient or emergency department,
  • Requiring chest image for evaluation at baseline.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children already hospitalized, received antibiotics, or had chest imaging at the hospital;
  • Follow-up (treated within the past 4 weeks) or referred cases;
  • Critical patients requiring emergency life-saving support including oxygen;
  • Children with one or more danger signs (lethargy or loss of consciousness, convulsion, unable to eat or vomiting everything, cyanosis, excess irritability)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
616 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Point-of-care lung ultrasound

    Diagnostic Test: Point-of-care lung ultrasound

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Chest X-ray

    Diagnostic Test: Chest X-ray (digital images)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPoint-of-care lung ultrasound

    Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive POCLUS which will be performed by one of the trained pediatricians. The procedure involves 12 views: two anterior views, two lateral views and two posterior views on both chest walls

    Also known as: POCLUS

  • Diagnostic testChest X-ray (digital images)

    Participants assigned to the chest X--ray group will be sent to the Radiology department to get a CXR (digital) which will be performed by radio technicians like in routine care. Anteroposterior and/or posteroanterior chest images will be obtained. Reading/ reporting of the digital images will be done by both the radiologist and the enrolling pediatrician. The image/ clinical expert review panels (IERP/ CERP) will also have access to the images for review.

    Also known as: CXR

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correct management plan at the baseline on the basis of clinical assessment and chest image findings

    Proportion of participants who are prescribed a correct management plan at the baseline on the basis of clinical assessment and chest image findings, either point-of-care lung ultrasound or chest X-ray

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until the final disposition of patient (i.e. discharge, refer), assessed up to 3 weeks. In case of non-hospitalized participants, outcomes evaluated during 2nd follow up (day 7-10 of enrollment), assessed up to 2 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in diagnosis and management plan

    * Diagnosis and Management Plan 1: Enrolling physician will fill a case report form with initial diagnosis and management plan (plan 1) based on the clinical assessment and LUS/CXR findings at baseline. * Decision regarding actual diagnosis and management plan (1a) is on treating physician's discretion. * Diagnosis and Management Plan 2: Enrolling physician will fill a second case report form (exactly same to the first one) on Day3-5 of enrollment with the diagnosis and management plan based on clinical assessment, chest image(s), and lab investigations. This outcome is measured in hospitalized cases only.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until Day3-5 of enrollment, assessed up to 1 week.

  2. Time to symptom/sign resolution

    In hospitalized cases only

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until disposition (i.e. discharge, referral) or symptom resolution criteria is met, whichever is earlier, assessed up to 3 weeks.

  3. Length of stay at hospital

    In hospitalized cases only

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until disposition (i.e. discharge, referral), assessed up to 3 weeks.

  4. Rate of antibiotic use

    In hospitalized cases only

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until disposition (i.e. discharge, referral), assessed up to 3 weeks.

  5. In-hospital treatment costs

    In hospitalized cases only

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until disposition (i.e. discharge, referral), assessed up to 3 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Siddhi Memorial Hospital
    Bhaktapur, Bagmati 44800, Nepal
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study protocol, deidentified participant data, and study tools may be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request, and decided by the investigators.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

Time frame: Study protocol will be published in a journal. Clinical study report may be shared after the study is closed.

Access criteria: It will be decided by the team of principle investigators.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2024; primary completion for Sep 2024, 8 months later.

Of 258 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pneumonia, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 265 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 18, 2023
First posted
Jun 27, 2023
StartEst.
Jan 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2024
CompletionEst.
Sep 2024
Last update
Nov 9, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05921526
Lead sponsor
Nagasaki University
Collaborators
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Siddhi Memorial Foundation
Responsible party
Suraj BHATTARAI (PhD Fellow, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2023
Start date
Jan 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2023

Study contacts

Bhattarai
Contact
Suraj.Bhattarai@lshtm.ac.uk
+977 9849158460 ext. 00
Suraj Bhattarai, MBBS, MSc, DTM&H
principal investigator · LSHTM/Nagasaki U/Siddhi Memorial Hospital
Bhim Dhoubhadel, MBBS MTM PhD DipPaed DTM&H
principal investigator · Nagasaki University
Shunmay Yeung, PhD MBBS FRCPCH MRCP DTM&H
principal investigator · London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion