CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05918835Updated Jul 15, 2026

Effects of rTMS on Food Choice in Anorexia Nervosa

An interventional study of High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (active rTMS) and Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham rTMS) in Anorexia Nervosa, sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-15.

Sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study will examine the impact of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on food choice behavior and related neural activity.

Read the detailed description

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a devastating illness with morbidity and mortality rates among the highest associated with any psychiatric disorder. Treatments for adults with AN have limited efficacy due to an inadequate understanding of the mechanisms underlying AN's core symptoms. The salient feature of AN is extreme restriction of food, particularly dietary fat intake, a behavior both highly resistant to change and central to relapse. Neuroimaging research of food restriction in AN has found that compared to healthy controls, patients with AN exhibit greater choice-related dorsal striatum activation and different connection strength within dorsal fronto-striatal circuits, suggesting that activity in this region and associated circuits may underlie maladaptive eating behavior. To confirm the significance of these brain regions in restrictive eating, this study will combine neuronavigation-guided high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS), individualized functional TMS targets, fMRI and a computerized food-choice task to test the effects of HF-rTMS on restrictive food choice and associated neural activity.

The study will utilize a double-blinded randomized parallel design: adult inpatients with AN will receive either HF-rTMS or sham to the DLPFC. We will compare group changes in brain and behavior to test whether activity in the dorsal striatum underlies restrictive eating behavior in AN and quantify the effects of HF-rTMS to the DLPFC on restrictive eating behavior. Our use of individualized TMS targets will enable us to identify whether resting-state functional connectivity predicts neural or behavioral response to HF-rTMS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anorexia Nervosa

Keywords

  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Anorexia Nervosa
  • Restrictive Eating
  • Feeding and Eating Disorders
03

In context

Anorexia Nervosa

455 studies on the registry are indexed under Anorexia Nervosa; 126 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 44 across 305 interventional studies indexed under Anorexia Nervosa.

Browse Anorexia Nervosa studies →

Lead sponsor

New York State Psychiatric Institute is the lead sponsor of 425 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Of its 50 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • DSM-5 Diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa
  • Age 18-35 years
  • Female
  • Right-handed
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 16.0
  • Voluntarily admitted to inpatient eating disorders unit at NYSPI
  • Competent to provide informed consent
  • English-speaking
  • Medically stable

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High risk of suicide
  • Current substance use disorder or other co- morbid psychiatric condition requiring specialized treatment (e.g., psychosis)
  • Diagnosis of major medical or neurological problem or taking medication that significantly increases risk for seizure or affects interpretation of findings (e.g., unstable hypertension, seizure disorder)
  • Food restrictions (e.g., allergies) which impact greater than 30% of food choice task's choice options
  • Indwelling ferromagnetic metallic object (e.g., pacemaker, pump), non- removable metal jewelry, medicinal patch or recent metallic ink tattoo
  • History of seizure
  • Diagnosis of epilepsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases, meningoencephalitis or intracerebral abscess, or parenchymal or leptomeningeal cancers
  • Prior exposure to TMS
  • Pregnancy
  • Currently breast-feeding
  • Significant claustrophobia
  • Implanted devices or stimulators
  • Hearing loss (e.g., currently undergoing treatment with ototoxic medications or those with cochlear implants)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS)

    Target: Region of right DLPFC with greatest resting-state functional connectivity to dorsal striatum (individualized functional target) Protocol: 10 pulses/sec, 4s trains, 120% MT, 3000 pulses/session

    Device: High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (active rTMS)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham rTMS)

    Target: Region of right DLPFC with greatest resting-state functional connectivity to dorsal striatum (individualized functional target) Protocol: same as HF-rTMS, with sham coil

    Device: Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham rTMS)

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (active rTMS)

    HF-rTMS is applied with a figure-of-8 coil using the Magstim TMS System. Participants receive one administration of HF-rTMS, delivered to the region of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with greatest resting-state functional connectivity to the dorsal striatum (individualized per participant). HF-rTMS is delivered at a frequency of 10 Hz for approximately 37 minutes (3000 total pulses).

    Also known as: Magstim TMS System active coil, High-frequency rTMS, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • DeviceSham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (sham rTMS)

    Sham rTMS is applied with a figure-of-8 sham coil using the Magstim TMS System, which is identical to the active coil, replicates the sounds of HF-rTMS, and is designed to mimic sensations of HF-rTMS. Participants receive one administration of sham rTMS, delivered to the region of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with greatest resting-state functional connectivity to the dorsal striatum (individualized per participant). Sham rTMS is delivered for approximately 37 minutes (3000 total pulses).

    Also known as: Magstim TMS System sham coil, Sham rTMS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neural activity and functional connectivity during the food choice task

    Change in: food choice-related BOLD activity within the dorsal striatum, food choice-related functional Change in: connectivity between the dorsal striatum and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Time frame: Baseline to post-treatment (approx. 1 week apart)

  2. Restrictive eating behavior during the food choice task

    Change in: proportion of high-fat foods selected; proportion of trials in which participants had an opportunity to implement self-control; proportion of trials in which participants implemented self-control

    Time frame: Baseline to post-treatment (approx. 1 week apart)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Predictors of HF-rTMS response

    Association between resting-state functional connectivity and: neural activity and functional connectivity during the food choice task (primary outcome #1); restrictive eating behavior during the food choice task (primary outcome #2)

    Time frame: Baseline to post-treatment (approx. 1 week apart)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute
    New York, New York 10032, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05918835
Lead sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Eating Disorders Association, Global Foundation for Eating Disorders
Responsible party
Alexandra F Muratore, PhD (Assistant Professor of Clinical Medical Psychology (in Psychiatry), New York State Psychiatric Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 26, 2023
Start date
Apr 24, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2026

Study contacts

Alexandra F Muratore, PhD
Contact
afm2166@cumc.columbia.edu
646-774-8053
Alexandra F Muratore, PhD
principal investigator · New York Sate Psychiatric Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion