CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05868213COBRAUpdated Dec 20, 2024

Cannabis Observations on Brain Waves, Retrieval, and Attention: Experiment 1

An observational study in Cannabis, Memory and Electroencephalography, sponsored by University of Colorado, Boulder. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-20.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Boulder · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
96
Ages
21 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates the impact of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) on recognition memory in healthy, regular cannabis users. Participants complete the same recognition memory task after self-administering one of three different strains of cannabis flower one day and while not intoxicated another day. Event-related potentials (ERPs) are measured via electroencephalogram (EEG) during the recognition memory task. Blood is collected to quantify THC and CBD exposure. Participants also complete self-report measures of medical history, sleep quality, subjective cognitive function, physical activity, psychological functioning, substance use, and acute drug effects.

Read the detailed description

Previous research has established cannabis's harmful cognitive impact, with particularly robust and consistent effects in the domain of verbal episodic memory. However, prior work has not sufficiently considered that the memory effects of cannabis are the compound action of different cannabinoids, which vary in their pharmacology and effects. Specifically, CBD, a non-psychotomimetic component of cannabis (doesn't produce a "high"), is thought to have cognitively protective properties and may mitigate some of the harmful effects of THC. Further, few prior studies have tested the effects of high potency strains that are commonly available.

This study tests the effects of commercially available cannabis flower strains on recognition memory performance and ERPs that are related to different underlying memory processes in healthy, regular cannabis users. An episodic memory task is used to assess recognition memory, which asks participants to discriminate between previously studied and non-studied items using words as stimuli. Participants complete the same memory task while intoxicated one day and not intoxicated another day. A THC-dominant, a CBD-dominant, and a strain containing both THC and CBD are included in the study. Participants self-administer one of the three cannabis strains prior to memory encoding and retrieval.

Blood is collected to determine THC and CBD exposure, as well as to explore how genetic variation in genes related to cannabinoid metabolism, cannabis-related behavior, and neurocognitive function associate with memory function before and after cannabis use. Participants also complete self-report measures of medical history, sleep quality, subjective cognitive function, physical activity, psychological functioning, substance use, and acute drug effects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cannabis
  • Memory
  • Electroencephalography

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cannabis
  • Marijuana
  • Memory
  • Event-related potential
  • Electroencephalography
  • THC
  • CBD
  • Verbal learning
  • Episodic memory
03

In context

Marijuana Abuse

517 studies on the registry are indexed under Marijuana Abuse; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 96 is close to the median of 100 across 78 observational studies indexed under Marijuana Abuse.

Browse Marijuana Abuse studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Boulder is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Community Sample

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be between the ages of 21 and 40 and provide informed consent.
  • Must be right-handed (Laterality Quotient > 60 on Edinburgh Handedness Inventory - Short Form).
  • Must use cannabis at least 4 days during the month.
  • Must be a cannabis user for at least a year.
  • Must self-report not using other illicit recreational drugs (e.g., cocaine, benzodiazepines (non-prescription), opiates (non-prescription), MDMA, sedatives, or methamphetamine) in the past 30 days.
  • Must not test positive on a urine toxicology test for drugs of abuse.
  • Must not be using psychotropic medications, however anti-depressant, non-benzodiazepine anti-anxiety, and ADHD medications are ok. ADHD medication users must be willing to abstain from ADHD medication use on appointment days.
  • Must not be a regular tobacco user (≤4 days per week; cigarette, E-cigs, or smokeless).
  • Must not have used caffeine or tobacco (cigarette, E-cigs, or smokeless) for 4 hours prior to appointments.
  • Must have a breath alcohol level of 0 to sign consent form.
  • Must not be actively seeking or in treatment for any substance use disorder.
  • Female subjects must not be or trying to become pregnant.
  • Must not be in treatment for psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder; or have a history with these disorders.
  • Must not have any physical characteristics (e.g., thick hair, head size exceeding the limit of the net, dyed hair) or experience any technical difficulties during testing that result in a poor-quality EEG recording.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • DrugCannabis (smoked flower)

    Self-Directed Use (ad-libitum)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in ERP amplitude

    Electroencephalography is used to quantify FN400 and parietal ERP effects.

    Time frame: intoxicated session and not-intoxicated session

  2. Difference in recognition memory performance

    Accuracy and reaction time will be used to assess task performance.

    Time frame: intoxicated session and not-intoxicated session (about 1 week)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Flanker Task performance

    Accuracy and reaction time will be used to assess task performance.

    Time frame: intoxicated session and not-intoxicated session (about 1 week)

  2. Difference in Flanker Task ERPs

    Electroencephalography is used to quantify ERN effects.

    Time frame: intoxicated session and not-intoxicated session (about 1 week)

  3. Change in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)

    The PANAS is Self-report measurement of positive and negative affect.

    Time frame: before and after acute cannabis use (about 30 minutes)

  4. Change in Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ)

    The DEQ is a visual analogue scale of measure of acute drug effects.

    Time frame: before and after acute cannabis use (about 30 minutes)

  5. Change in Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI-M)

    The ARCI-M is a self-report measure of subjective effects of marijuana.

    Time frame: before and after acute cannabis use (about 30 minutes)

  6. Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire

    The Marijuana Craving Questionnaire is a self-report measure of marijuana craving.

    Time frame: before and after acute cannabis use (about 30 minutes)

  7. Change in Profile of Mood States (POMS)

    The POMS is a self-report measure of mood.

    Time frame: before and after acute cannabis use (about 30 minutes)

  8. Change in Alcohol Craving Questionnaire

    The Alcohol Craving Questionnaire is a self-report measure of alcohol craving.

    Time frame: before and after acute cannabis use (about 30 minutes)

  9. Change in State Adapted Paranoia Checklist-Brief (SAPC-B)

    The SAPC-B is a self-report measure of paranoia.

    Time frame: before and after acute cannabis use (about 30 minutes)

  10. Difference in circulating cannabinoids

    Blood levels of THC and CBD will be quantified.

    Time frame: baseline, intoxicated session, and not-intoxicated session (about 3 weeks)

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory: Associations between genes related to cannabinoid metabolism, cannabis-related behavior, and neurocognitive function with ERPs and recognition memory performance

    DNA samples are collected from a baseline blood sample.

    Time frame: baseline, intoxicated session, and not-intoxicated session (about 3 weeks)

  2. Exploratory: Moderation of primary effects by baseline health and psychological functioning

    Baseline health and psychological function include measures of sleep quality, affective symptoms, and substance use history.

    Time frame: baseline, intoxicated session, and not-intoxicated session (about 3 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Center for Innovation and Creativity
    Boulder, Colorado 80301, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05868213
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Boulder
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
L. Cinnamon Bidwell (Assistant Professor, University of Colorado, Boulder) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 22, 2023
Start date
Aug 17, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2024
Completion
Dec 15, 2024
Last update
Dec 20, 2024

Study contacts

Tim Curran, PhD
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Boulder
L. Cinnamon Bidwell, PhD
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Boulder

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion