ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05865626dotsappUpdated May 19, 2023

Evaluation of the VOT Among Tuberculosis Patients From Lambaréné

An interventional study of VOT with and without cash incentive in Tuberculosis, sponsored by Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné. Completed at 1 site in Gabon. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-19.

Sponsored by Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2018, registered Apr 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of using an instant messenger to monitor drug intake in tuberculosis patients and to assess cash incentive to improve adherence to drug intake

Read the detailed description

At the initial visit, the inclusion criteria are cross-checked, the subject is informed of the study procedures, and an informed consent form is signed by subjects willing to participate.

For the participants from the intervention group, the research team will provide a smartphone with the WhatsApp application to each participant. At the initial visit, the research team will explain to the participants how to use the phone and the instant messenger application for the study. Briefly, the subject is filmed while taking the drug. This can be via a "selfie" or by a family member. The video is then sent to the study phone contact.

Once the video is received by an investigator, a message will be sent back to the participant's mobile phone acknowledging receipt of the video. An investigator trained on the DOT protocol, will review the video clips to assess if the drug was taken correctly or not. A daily log is filled in to keep track of drug intake for each participant.

Participants from both the control and intervention group are seen once per month in person for follow-ups and getting new drugs. At these time points information on drug intake is gathered.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tuberculosis

1,170 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis; 175 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 150 across 820 interventional studies indexed under Tuberculosis.

Browse Tuberculosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Older than 18 years

  • Signed form
  • Living in an area with mobile phone coverage
  • Have at least 3 months of treatment remaining

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not being able to use a smartphone and unlikely to learn how to
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VOT without cash incentive at the begining

    Participants in this group start VOT without financial motivation. In the second part of their follow-up, VOT is combined with financial motivation.

    Other: VOT with and without cash incentive

  • Experimental
    VOT with cash incentive at the begining

    The participants in this group start the VOT with the financial motivation. In the second part of their follow-up, VOT is no longer associated with financial motivation

    Other: VOT with and without cash incentive

  • No intervention
    Standard care

    The participants in this group self-administer the anti-tuberculosis treatment as is done routinely.

Interventions

  • OtherVOT with and without cash incentive

    Here we are interested in the remote monitoring of TB treatment, and the impact that financial motivation can have on compliance with this monitoring. the cross-over here means that participants in each intervention group will at some point receive VOT without motivation and then VOT with motivation, depending on whether they start with one or the other combination

    Also known as: VOT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. feasibility assessment

    proportion of participants in the intervention groups who regularly send the videos throughout the follow-up.

    Time frame: at the end of study (2 years)

Secondary outcomes

  1. adherence to the VOT

    number of videos received compared to the expected number of videos

    Time frame: at the end of study (2 years)

  2. effect of cash incentives on adherence to the VOT

    comparison of the proportion of videos received during the follow-up phase without financial motivation and the proportion of videos received during the follow-up phase with financial motivation.

    Time frame: at the end of study (2 years)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre de recherches médicales de Lambaréné
    Lambaréné, 242, Gabon
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Belard S, Remppis J, Bootsma S, Janssen S, Kombila DU, Beyeme JO, Rossatanga EG, Kokou C, Osbak KK, Obiang Mba RM, Kaba HM, Traore AN, Ehrhardt J, Bache EB, Flamen A, Rusch-Gerdes S, Frank M, Adegnika AA, Lell B, Niemann S, Kremsner PG, Loembe MM, Alabi AS, Grobusch MP. Tuberculosis Treatment Outcome and Drug Resistance in Lambarene, Gabon: A Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Aug 3;95(2):472-80. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0668. Epub 2016 Jun 27. PubMed 27352879 ↗
  • Elangovan R, Arulchelvan S. A Study on the Role of Mobile Phone Communication in Tuberculosis DOTS Treatment. Indian J Community Med. 2013 Oct;38(4):229-33. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.120158. PubMed 24302824 ↗
  • Sinkou H, Hurevich H, Rusovich V, Zhylevich L, Falzon D, de Colombani P, Dadu A, Dara M, Story A, Skrahina A. Video-observed treatment for tuberculosis patients in Belarus: findings from the first programmatic experience. Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 22;49(3):1602049. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02049-2016. Print 2017 Mar. PubMed 28331042 ↗
  • Garfein RS, Collins K, Munoz F, Moser K, Cerecer-Callu P, Raab F, Rios P, Flick A, Zuniga ML, Cuevas-Mota J, Liang K, Rangel G, Burgos JL, Rodwell TC, Patrick K. Feasibility of tuberculosis treatment monitoring by video directly observed therapy: a binational pilot study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Sep;19(9):1057-64. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0923. PubMed 26260824 ↗
  • Handbook for the use of digital technologies to support tuberculosis medication adherence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
  • Iribarren SJ, Schnall R, Stone PW, Carballo-Dieguez A. Smartphone Applications to Support Tuberculosis Prevention and Treatment: Review and Evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 13;4(2):e25. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5022. PubMed 27177591 ↗
  • Giordano V, Koch H, Godoy-Santos A, Dias Belangero W, Esteves Santos Pires R, Labronici P. WhatsApp Messenger as an Adjunctive Tool for Telemedicine: An Overview. Interact J Med Res. 2017 Jul 21;6(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.6214. PubMed 28733273 ↗
  • Seewoodharry MD, Maconachie GDE, Gillies CL, Gottlob I, McLean RJ. The Effects of Feedback on Adherence to Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of RCTs. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Apr 26. PubMed 28456347 ↗
  • Lutge EE, Wiysonge CS, Knight SE, Sinclair D, Volmink J. Incentives and enablers to improve adherence in tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD007952. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007952.pub3. PubMed 26333525 ↗
  • Stuurman AL, Vonk Noordegraaf-Schouten M, van Kessel F, Oordt-Speets AM, Sandgren A, van der Werf MJ. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 8;16:257. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1549-4. PubMed 27268103 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 20 months.

Of 169 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tuberculosis, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 41. This study's 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 171 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 29, 2023
First posted
May 19, 2023
StartActual
Oct 10, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2022
Last update
May 19, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05865626
Lead sponsor
Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné
Responsible party
EDOA Jean Ronald (Dr, Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2023
Start date
Oct 10, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020
Completion
Jun 30, 2022
Last update
May 19, 2023

Study contacts

Bertarnd Lell, prof.
study director · Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion