ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05863533Updated Dec 5, 2023

Resilience, Performance and Stress in Anaesthesia

An observational study in Resilience and Stress, Psychological, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-05.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study was to determine whether there was an association between resilience and the performance of student nurse anaesthetists in simulated critical situations.

Read the detailed description

This trial will take place at the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital. Volunteer nurse anaesthetists students will perform a simulation scenario. This scenario generates a high level of stress and focuses on the management of anaphylactic shock in the operating room, which is a good teaching tool for the participants.

The simulation is performed in a dedicated simulation room configured as an operating theatre. In this environment, a high-fidelity manikin is intubated and ventilated on an anaesthesia ventilator. The manikin is perfused. The anaesthesia cart is replicated with the same equipment and drugs as the anaesthesia carts in the operating theatre. A person playing the role of a nurse anaesthetist will conduct transmissions before leaving the room replaced by the participant. One person will play the role of the surgeon in the room. The simulation will take place as follows:

Briefing :

Welcome and explanation of the session. Collection of age, gender, number of years in anaesthesia, number of years as a nurse.

The simulation room, the mannequin and the anaesthesia trolley are presented by a simulation trainer before starting the scenario.

First evaluation of the acute stress perceived by the VAS stress(visual analogue stress scale) which triggers the beginning of the scenario.

The patient is introduced by the nurse anaesthetist present in the room and explanations are given on how to reach the anaesthetist by phone. Once the transmissions are completed, the preoperative checklist is carried out by the surgeon with the nurse anaesthetist and the student nurse anaesthetist who takes over. Once the checklist is completed the simulation timer is started and the nurse anaesthetist leaves the room leaving the patient alone on the anaesthesia side.

Scenario:

On arrival at the room:

→ Vitals on arrival: BP (blood pressure)= 100/50, HR(heart rate) = 60, Spo2 = 99%, EtC02 (end tidal C02) = 36 mmHg

T0: Surgical incision

→ Vitals at incision: BP = 120/70, HR = 70, SpO2 = 99%, EtCo2 = 39 mmHg

T1 = 3 min: BP = 90/55, HR = 95, SpO2 = 98%, EtCo2 = 34 mmHg

T2 = 6 min: BP = 78/45, HR = 110, SpO2 = 97%, EtCo2 = 30 mmHg, if possible: vary the SpO2 signal if possible

T3 = 9 min: BP = 65/32, HR = 130, SpO2 = no signal, EtCO2 = 28 mmHg

T4 = 12 min: BP = 56/28, HR = 150, SpO2 = no signal, EtCO2 = 25 mmHg

If no communication with the surgical team before T3, the facilitating surgeon mentions a skin rash to guide management.

The study stops at 12 minutes when the anaesthetist enters the operating room.

Debriefing: The debriefing is conducted by a simulation trainer accordance with the guidelines of the French Society of Health Simulation.

The main objective of this study is to investigate an association between the level of resilience of student nurse anaesthetists and their performance (Performance score N°1) under stress.

The secondary objectives of this study are to investigate the correlation between :

  • Performance score N°2 (without taking into account the notion of time in scale N°1) and resilience by ConnorDavison Resilience scale (CDRISC 10).
  • Work experience and performance score 1
  • Years of specialisation in anesthesia and Performance score 1
  • Age and performance score 1
02

Conditions studied

  • Resilience
  • Stress, Psychological

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Resilience
  • Acute stress
  • Performance
  • Anaesthetist student
  • Simulation
03

In context

Stress, Psychological

806 studies on the registry are indexed under Stress, Psychological; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 174 across 143 observational studies indexed under Stress, Psychological.

Browse Stress, Psychological studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 835 studies on the registry; 207 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Nurse in the first or second year of specialisation as a nurse anaesthetist.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Voluntary first or second year nurse anaesthetist student

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant woman
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Resilience

    Measurement of resilience by Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD RISC 10 from 0 to 40) in participants. A high score indicates better resilience.

    Time frame: at Day 0 : 10 minutes before simulation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance score 1

    Performance scale with 15 items based on the recommendations for the management of anaphylactic shock by the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. The time taken to perform the procedure is noted and influences the score. The final score ranges from 0 to 60 points. A higher score indicates a higher performance.

    Time frame: at Day 0 during the simulation between T: 0 minute (begin simulation) and T:12 minutes (end of simulation) (during of simulation is 12 minutes))

  2. Performance score 2

    Performance scale with 15 items based on the recommendations for the management of anaphylactic shock by the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. The final score ranges from 0 to 15 points. A higher score indicates a higher performance.

    Time frame: at D0 during the simulation between T: 0 minute (begin simulation) and T:12 minutes (end of simulation) (during of simulation is 12 minutes)

  3. Age of anaesthesia professionals

    Age of anesthesia professionals: (quantitative variable)

    Time frame: at Day 0 : 10 minutes before simulation

  4. work experience

    number of years since first nursing practice (quantitative variable)

    Time frame: at Day 0 : 10 minutes before simulation

  5. year of specialisation

    Year of specialisation : first year or second year(qualitative variable)

    Time frame: at Day 0 : 10 minutes before simulation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Grenoble Hospital
    Grenoble, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05863533
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2023
Start date
May 15, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2023
Completion
Sep 1, 2023
Last update
Dec 5, 2023

Study contacts

Julien Picard
principal investigator · University Hospital, Grenoble

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion