ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05861999HINALEA 2Updated Oct 22, 2026

A Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Risdiplam Administered in Pediatric Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Who Experienced a Plateau or Decline in Function After Gene Therapy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Risdiplam in Muscular Atrophy, Spinal, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Active, not recruiting at 17 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 3 Months to 24 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 22, 2026Now Active, not recruitingEnrollment updated+1 moreGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Months to 24 Months
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 13 studies testing risdiplam in Muscular Atrophy, Spinal — none open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Risdiplam · Muscular Atrophy, Spinal.

Enrollment
11th of 13
19 · median 33
Started
2024
with 2 others
Phase 4
4 of 13
none open now
Registered
12th of 13
by date
Lead sponsor
11 of 13
Hoffmann-La Roche

Among the 13 studies testing risdiplam in Muscular Atrophy, Spinal, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment, is one of 3 that started in 2024, is one of 4 in phase 4, and was the 12th registered.

Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

282 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscular Atrophy, Spinal; 72 are open to participants now.

Browse Muscular Atrophy, Spinal studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 13 studies testing risdiplam in Muscular Atrophy, Spinal is open now. The open studies under Muscular Atrophy, Spinal, anywhere →

About risdiplam

Risdiplam: first FDA approval 2020 (EVRYSDI), first EMA approval 2021. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 57 Muscular Atrophy, Spinal studies recruiting now, 28 (49%) set no upper age limit and 26 (46%) stop at 75 or younger; 45 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 3 Months to 24 Months · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 13 studies testing risdiplam in Muscular Atrophy, Spinal as a file.
02

Study summary

This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risdiplam administered in pediatric participants with SMA and 2 SMN2 copies who previously received onasemnogene abeparvovec and experience a plateau or decline in function. Participants to be enrolled are children \<2 years of age genetically diagnosed with SMA.

03

Conditions studied

  • Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Months to 24 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • \<2 years of age at the time of
  • Confirmed diagnosis of 5q-autosomal recessive SMA, including genetic confirmation of homozygous deletion or compound heterozygosity predictive of loss of function of the Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene
  • Confirmed presence of two SMN2 gene copies as documented through laboratory testing
  • Administration of onasemnogene abeparvovec pre-symptomatically or post-symptomatically
  • Has received onasemnogene abeparvovec for SMA no less than 13 weeks prior to enrollment
  • If treated with risdiplam prior to onasemnogene abeparvovec, risdiplam treatment must not have exceeded 3 weeks and must be discontinued 1 day prior to onasemnogene abeparvovec administration.
  • In the opinion of the investigator, has demonstrated a plateau or decline in function post-gene therapy (with a duration of 26 weeks or less) documented by 2 individual time points in the functions as follows: swallowing AND one additional function/ability (respiratory, motor function, other) per appropriate expectation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous or current enrolment in study prior to initiation of study treatment
  • Any unresolved standard-of-care laboratory abnormalities per the onasemnogene abeparvovec prescribing information
  • Concomitant or previous administration of an SMN2-targeting antisense oligonucleotide
  • Concomitant or previous use of an anti-myostatin agent
  • Participants requiring invasive ventilation or tracheostomy
  • Presence of feeding tube and an OrSAT score of 0
  • Hospitalization for pulmonary event within the last 2 months, or any planned hospitalization at the time of screening
  • Any major illness requiring hospitalization within 1 month before the screening examination or any febrile illness within 1 week prior to screening and up to first dose administration.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Risdiplam

    Participants will receive risdiplam orally once daily for 72 weeks (Treatment Period). The Treatment Period will be followed by a 1-year Treatment Extension Period for a total study duration of 120 weeks (approximately 2.5 years) for each participant enrolled.

    Drug: Risdiplam

Interventions

  • Participants will receive risdiplam orally at the currently approved dose. The dose should be adapted for weight and age.

    Also known as: RO7034067

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the Raw Score of Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Third Edition (BSID-III) Gross Motor Score at 72 Weeks of Risdiplam Treatment

    The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate developmental functioning of infants and young children between 1 month and 42 months of age. The gross motor scale measures the movement of the limbs and torso. Items assess static positioning (e.g., sitting, standing); dynamic movement, including locomotion and coordination; balance; and motor planning. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). A higher raw score indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 72

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to 120 weeks

  2. Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to 120 weeks

  3. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to 120 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Bulbar/Swallowing Function Assessment as Measured by the Oral and Swallowing Abilities Tool (OrSAT) at 72 Weeks of Risdiplam Treatment and Over Time

    The OrSAT is a validated assessment composed of a checklist of 12 questions assessing aspects of swallowing abilities thought to be clinically meaningful for a type 1 SMA population and developmentally appropriate for infants during the first months of life. Each item is graded with a score of 0 or 1, depending on the child's ability to perform the activity. As some items are age-dependent, the number of items to be used, and therefore the maximum score, changes with increasing age. In the infants younger than 6 months the maximum score is 7. For those between 6 and 9 months, maximum score is 10. For infants of 10 months or older, maximum total score is 12.

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  2. Change in Swallowing Function Assessment as Measured by the Pediatric Functional Oral Intake Scale (p-FOIS) Over Time

    The p-FOIS is a 6-point scale that assesses feeding ability, 1= Nothing by mouth, 2= Tube dependent for all nutrition/hydration needs with minimal attempts at oral intake for experience and/or pleasure, 3= Tube dependent with consistent intake of food and/or fluid that meets some of the nutrition/hydration needs, 4= Total oral intake but special preparation required, e.g., thickened fluids, puréed diet (where not age-appropriate), 5= Total oral intake but requiring special conditions/modification, e.g., slow flow teat/side lying/pacing or specific food limitations, 6= Total, age-appropriate, oral intake with no restrictions. Higher score indicates higher level of function.

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  3. Change from Baseline in the Raw Score of BSID-III Gross Motor Score Over Time Under Risdiplam Treatment

    The BSID-III is a standardized assessment commonly used to evaluate developmental functioning of infants and young children between 1 month and 42 months of age. The gross motor scale measures the movement of the limbs and torso. Items assess static positioning (e.g., sitting, standing); dynamic movement, including locomotion and coordination; balance; and motor planning. The gross motor scale consists of 72 items scored at 0 (unable to perform) or 1 (criteria for item achieved). A higher raw score indicates improvement.

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Gross Motor Index Between 80-109 as Measured by the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale, Third Edition (PDMS-3) at 72 Weeks of Risdiplam Treatment and Over Time

    The PDMS-3 is used to assess gross- and fine-motor skills in children from birth to 5 years. The PDMS-3 has 3 composite scores: Total Motor (combined scores of the core subtests) and two domain composites (Gross Motor and Fine Motor). By combining the results of subtests, these composite scores are considered to have stronger and better indexes of performance and, therefore, more reliable and valid than the subtests. Score for composite indexes range from \<70 (impaired or delayed) to \>129 (gifted or very advanced). Score of 80-89 indicate below average and 90-109 indicate average skills.

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Fine Motor Index Between 80-109 as Measured by the PDMS-3 at 72 Weeks of Risdiplam Treatment and Over Time

    The PDMS-3 is used to assess gross- and fine-motor skills in children from birth to 5 years. The PDMS-3 has 3 composite scores: Total Motor (combined scores of the core subtests) and two domain composites (Gross Motor and Fine Motor). By combining the results of subtests, these composite scores are considered to have stronger and better indexes of performance and, therefore, more reliable and valid than the subtests. Score for composite indexes range from \<70 (impaired or delayed) to \>129 (gifted or very advanced). Score of 80-89 indicate below average and 90-109 indicate average skills.

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  6. Change in World Health Organization (WHO) Motor Milestone Achievement at 72 Weeks of Risdiplam Treatment and Over Time

    The WHO motor milestones evaluate gross motor development and comprise the time windows of achievement for six gross motor milestones based on data derived from the WHO Multicenter Growth Reference Study (MGRS). The six gross motor milestones are as follows: sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone, and walking alone. A yes response indicates that the participant reached a particular development milestone.

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  7. Percentage of Participants With Improvement or No Change in Respiratory Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)

    In a case of respiratory illness during the study, a range of clinical domain level items will be completed by the investigator, as needed. The CGI-C is a single item measure of change using seven response options: "Very much improved," "Much improved," "Minimally improved," "No change," "Minimally worse," "Much worse," and "Very much worse."

    Time frame: As per respiratory event on Day 10 and Day 20 postevent (up to Week 120)

  8. Percentage of Participants Within 3rd Percentile of Normal Range for Weight-to-Age at 72 Weeks of Risdiplam Treatment and Over Time

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  9. Percentage of Participants Within 3rd Percentile of Normal Range for Length/Height-to-Age at 72 Weeks of Risdiplam Treatment and Over Time

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  10. Percentage of Participants Within 3rd Percentile of Normal Range for Weight-to-Length/Height at 72 Weeks of Risdiplam Treatment and Over Time

    Time frame: From baseline up to Week 120

  11. Number of Respiratory-Related Hospitalizations During the 72-Week Risdiplam Treatment and Over Time

    Time frame: Up to 120 weeks

07

Study locations

17 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This clinical trial evaluates treatment of a rare genetic disease in a small cohort of participants. No data is planned to be shared in order to protect and maintain participant privacy/confidentiality.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2028, 43 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 8, 2023
First posted
May 17, 2023
StartActual
Aug 14, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2029
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Oct 22, 2026
Sites
2 sites removed
Show 2 removed
  • Children'S Hospital of Philadelphia · Philadelphia, United States
  • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughter · Norfolk, United States
Oct 22, 2026
Enrollment
28 (estimated)→19 (actual)
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    2 sites removed
    Show 2 removed
    • Children'S Hospital of Philadelphia · Philadelphia, United States
    • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughter · Norfolk, United States
    Enrollment 28 (estimated)→19 (actual)
    + 1 other change: contact details
  2. Oct 13, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05861999
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 17, 2023
Start date
Aug 14, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Risdiplam

Start the discussion