CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05852470Updated Feb 24, 2026Results posted

Evaluation of Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric

An interventional study of Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric Extended Vision IOL and Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric IOL in Aphakia, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by Alcon Research · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
155
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study seeks to generate clinical data from subjects previously implanted with the Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) or Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric IOLs. This study will assess key performance endpoints to support clinical benefits statements with model-specific data.

Read the detailed description

Both eyes of a subject must qualify for enrollment into this study. A total of 2 scheduled visits are planned. The visits include a Screening visit (Visit 0) and a visit after screening (Visit 1). The subject must be 90-180 days post second eye implant at the time of Visit 1. Visit 1 should occur 1 to 14 days after Visit 0. Subject participation is expected to last approximately 2 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aphakia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cataract
  • Intraocular lens
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Understand and sign an approved Informed Consent form
  • Previously implanted in both eyes with Clareon Vivity/Clareon Vivity Toric or Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric IOLs for at least 3 months and up to 6 months (90 to 180 days) after second eye implant.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of clinically significant ocular co-morbidities that would affect surgical outcomes based on investigator expert medical opinion.
  • Subjects who were targeted to monovision defined as ≥ 1.50 Diopter (D) of anisometropia.
  • Clinically significant PCO (posterior capsule opacification) affecting vision.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
155 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric

    Previous implantation in both eyes with Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric Extended Vision IOL (intraocular lens), with previous implantation defined as 90-180 days post second eye implantation

    Device: Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric Extended Vision IOL

  • Active comparator
    Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric

    Previous implantation in both eyes with Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric IOL (intraocular lens), with previous implantation defined as 90-180 days post second eye implantation

    Device: Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric IOL

Interventions

  • DeviceClareon Vivity/Vivity Toric Extended Vision IOL

    Extended vision intraocular lens implanted in the capsular bag of the eye during cataract surgery. IOLs are intended for long term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient.

    Also known as: Models CNWET0, CNWET3, CNWET4, CNWET5, CNWET6, CCWET0, CCWET3, CCWET4, CCWET5, CCWET6, Clareon Vivity™ Extended Vision Hydrophobic IOL, Clareon Vivity™ Toric Extended Vision Hydrophobic IOL

  • DeviceClareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric IOL

    Single vision intraocular lens implanted in the capsular bag of the eye during cataract surgery. IOLs are intended for long term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient.

    Also known as: SY60WF, CNW0T3, CNW0T4, CNW0T5, CNW0T6, CC60WF, CCW0T3, CCW0T4, CCW0T5, CCW0T6, Clareon with AutonoMe (CCA0T0, CNA0T0), Clareon™ Aspheric Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL, Clareon™ Toric Aspheric Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Binocular Photopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant

    Visual acuity (VA) was assessed with best refractive correction in place under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 4 meters (m) using a visual acuity chart. VA was measured in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). A logMAR value of 0 equates to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity. This was a subject-based assessment. Both eyes were assessed together. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-14 post Screening Visit, coinciding with Day 90-180 post second eye implantation)

  2. Mean Binocular Photopic Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant

    Visual acuity (VA) was assessed with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 66 centimeters (cm) from the spectacle plane using a visual acuity chart. VA was measured in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). A logMAR value of 0 equates to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity. This was a subject-based assessment. Both eyes were assessed together. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-14 post Screening Visit, coinciding with Day 90-180 post second eye implantation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Binocular Photopic Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant

    Visual acuity (VA) was assessed with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 40 centimeters (cm) from the spectacle plane using a visual acuity chart. VA was measured in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). A logMAR value of 0 equates to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity. This was a subject-based assessment. Both eyes were assessed together.

    Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-14 post Screening Visit, coinciding with Day 90-180 post second eye implantation)

  2. Percentage of Subjects Who Respond "Never" to Question 1 of the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction (IOLSAT) Questionnaire at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant

    The IOLSAT is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire. Subjects were asked, "Overall, in the past 7 days, how often did you need to wear eyeglasses to see?" The percentage was calculated as (# of subjects responding "Never") divided by (# of subjects with bilateral implantation and concordant, non-missing data) times 100. A higher percentage is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-14 post Screening Visit, coinciding with Day 90-180 post second eye implantation)

06

Results

Posted Nov 5, 2024

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled at 7 investigative sites located in the United States.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneClareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric
Started7377
Full analysis set7376
Completed7376
Not completed01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Binocular Photopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed with best refractive correction in place under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 4 meters (m) using a visual acuity chart. VA was measured in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). A logMAR value of 0 equates to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity. This was a subject-based assessment. Both eyes were assessed together. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Visit 1 (Day 1-14 post Screening Visit, coinciding with Day 90-180 post second eye implantation)
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Mean Binocular Photopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant
logMARClareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric
Mean Binocular Photopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant-0.028 ± 0.1165-0.062 ± 0.0847
Statistical analysis
  • Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric vs Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric · Difference in means: 0.034 · 95% CI 0.001 to 0.067Parameter Dispersion Type is Standard Error of the Difference in Means. Difference = Vivity/Vivity Toric Extended Vision IOL minus Clareon/Clareon Toric Monofocal IOL
PrimaryMean Binocular Photopic Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 66 centimeters (cm) from the spectacle plane using a visual acuity chart. VA was measured in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). A logMAR value of 0 equates to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity. This was a subject-based assessment. Both eyes were assessed together. This is a co-primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Visit 1 (Day 1-14 post Screening Visit, coinciding with Day 90-180 post second eye implantation)
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Mean Binocular Photopic Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant
logMARClareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric
Mean Binocular Photopic Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant0.035 ± 0.07880.126 ± 0.1033
Statistical analysis
  • Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric vs Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric · t-test, 1 sided · p = <.001 · Difference in means: -0.091 · 95% CI -0.120 to -0.061
SecondaryMean Binocular Photopic Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed with distance correction in place (plus or minus power) under photopic (well-lit) conditions at a distance of 40 centimeters (cm) from the spectacle plane using a visual acuity chart. VA was measured in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). A logMAR value of 0 equates to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity. This was a subject-based assessment. Both eyes were assessed together.

Time frame:
Visit 1 (Day 1-14 post Screening Visit, coinciding with Day 90-180 post second eye implantation)
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Mean Binocular Photopic Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant
logMARClareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric
Mean Binocular Photopic Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant0.205 ± 0.10080.334 ± 0.1410
Statistical analysis
  • Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric vs Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric · t-test, 1 sided · p = <.001 · Difference in means: -0.129 · 95% CI -0.169 to -0.089Parameter Dispersion Type is Standard Error of the Difference in Means. Difference = Vivity/Vivity Toric Extended Vision IOL minus Clareon/Clareon Toric Monofocal IOL
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Who Respond "Never" to Question 1 of the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction (IOLSAT) Questionnaire at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant

The IOLSAT is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire. Subjects were asked, "Overall, in the past 7 days, how often did you need to wear eyeglasses to see?" The percentage was calculated as (# of subjects responding "Never") divided by (# of subjects with bilateral implantation and concordant, non-missing data) times 100. A higher percentage is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Visit 1 (Day 1-14 post Screening Visit, coinciding with Day 90-180 post second eye implantation)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects Who Respond "Never" to Question 1 of the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction (IOLSAT) Questionnaire at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant
percentage of participantsClareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric
Percentage of Subjects Who Respond "Never" to Question 1 of the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction (IOLSAT) Questionnaire at 3 to 6 Months (90 to 180 Days) Postoperatively After Second Eye Implant21.44.1
Statistical analysis
  • Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric vs Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric · Miettinen-Nurminen · Difference in percentages: 17.32Difference = Vivity/Vivity Toric Extended Vision IOL minus Clareon/Clareon Toric Monofocal IOL

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were collected from time of consent until study exit. The total expected duration of participation for each subject was approximately 14 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric - First Eye (Ocular)0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)
Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric - Second Eye (Ocular)0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)
Clareon Vivity/Vivity Toric - Systemic0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)
Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric - First Eye (Ocular)0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)
Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric - Second Eye (Ocular)0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)
Clareon Monofocal/Clareon Toric - Systemic (Subject)0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis Set (FAS): All subjects/eyes bilaterally implanted with the test or comparator IOL

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Clareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon ToricTotal
Mean68.4 ± 8.9271.5 ± 6.9770.0 ± 8.10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Clareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon ToricTotal
Female424688
Male313061
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Clareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon ToricTotal
Hispanic or Latino011
Not Hispanic or Latino7375148
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Clareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon ToricTotal
White6863131
Black or African American279
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian369
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Other000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Clareon Vivity/Vivity ToricClareon Monofocal/Clareon ToricTotal
United States7376149
07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Wolstan Goldberg Eye Associates
    Torrance, California 90505, United States
  • Eye Center of Northern Colorado, PC
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80528, United States
  • Grosinger, Spigelman & Grey Eye Surgeons, P.C.
    Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302, United States
  • Cincinnati Eye Institute
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • Eye Care Specialists
    Kingston, Pennsylvania 18704, United States
  • Carolina Eyecare Physicians LLC
    Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Vance Thompson Vision
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 13, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 23, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05852470
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 10, 2023
Start date
May 23, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 27, 2023
Completion
Oct 27, 2023
Results posted
Nov 5, 2024
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Trial Lead, Surgical CRD
study director · Alcon Research, LLC

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion