ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05851287POECUpdated Jun 9, 2026

The Proactive Ophthalmic Examination Cohort

An observational study in Vision Impairment and Eye Diseases, sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-09.

Sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2023; still recruiting 3 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Proactive Ophthalmic Examination Cohort of Older Adults is a prospective cohort study recruiting community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older. Through comprehensive assessment of demographic profiles, medical histories, and ocular structural and functional parameters, alongside systematic collection of ophthalmic and systemic clinical data and biological specimens, we will establish a multidimensional, high-quality ocular health database encompassing demographic characteristics, socioeconomic factors, lifestyle variables, ocular disease risk factors, subjective ocular symptoms, objective examination findings, and biospecimens. The study will investigate the onset and progression patterns of ocular diseases, associated risk factors, and mechanisms of ocular aging in older populations, while simultaneously providing normal-controlled clinical and genomic data for other clinical studies on eye diseases. Furthermore, leveraging algorithmic innovation and artificial intelligence technologies, we will develop a personalized risk prediction and monitoring platform for age-related eye diseases, enhancing early screening and diagnostic capabilities and advancing precision medicine for ocular health in older adults.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vision Impairment
  • Eye Diseases

Keywords

  • older adults
  • eye health
  • cohort
  • risk factor
  • eye diseases
03

In context

Vision Disorders

360 studies on the registry are indexed under Vision Disorders; 84 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 5,000 is above the median of 126 across 97 observational studies indexed under Vision Disorders.

Browse Vision Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population comprises community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older. Participants are recruited on a voluntary basis and are willing to undergo comprehensive annual ophthalmic examinations throughout the follow-up period. Individuals who are unable to complete required systemic or ophthalmic assessments due to frailty or poor general health are excluded.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Aged 65 years or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete required systemic or ophthalmic examinations due to frailty, poor general health, or other physical limitations
  • Refusal to participate in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
10 Years
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Visual Impairment

    Visual impairment is defined as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 20/40 in either eye, assessed using a standardized Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at each annual visit. Incidence is calculated as the number of new cases per 100 person-years among participants free of visual impairment at baseline. chart at each visit.

    Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

    Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is measured using a standardized Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at each annual visit. Change is calculated as the difference between each follow-up measurement and the baseline value obtained at enrollment.

    Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10

  2. Incidence of Age-Related Cataract

    Incidence of age-related cataract, defined as the presence of lens opacity in one or both eyes, was graded using the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III). New cases are identified among participants who are free of cataract at baseline.

    Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10

  3. Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

    Incidence of AMD, defined as the new development of AMD in one or both eyes, was assessed by fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at each annual visit.

    Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10

  4. Incidence of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)

    Incident diabetic retinopathy is defined among participants with diabetes mellitus and no diabetic retinopathy at baseline as the first detection of any definite diabetic retinopathy, indicated by an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale level ≥20 in either eye on standardized annual fundus photography.

    Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10

  5. Incidence of Myopia-Related Fundus Changes

    Incident myopia-related fundus changes are defined among highly myopic eyes without the specified fundus changes at baseline as the first detection during follow-up of lacquer cracks, myopic choroidal neovascularization, patchy chorioretinal atrophy, or macular atrophy, identified by standardized fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at annual visits. High myopia was defined as an axial length ≥26.0 mm or spherical equivalent ≤-6.00 diopters at baseline.

    Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10

  6. Change from Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

    Global cognitive function is assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a validated screening tool covering visuospatial/executive function, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, and orientation. Change is calculated as the difference between each annual follow-up score and the baseline score obtained at enrollment.

    Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10

  7. Proportion of Participants Reporting Visual Disturbances

    The proportion of participants reporting visual disturbances, including but not limited to photopsia, floaters, diplopia, and metamorphopsia, is collected via a standardized structured questionnaire at each annual visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2033, 119 months after the start.

Of 51 non-industry observational studies under Vision Disorders, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 119 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 58 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 9, 2023
First posted
May 9, 2023
StartActual
Feb 20, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Feb 19, 2033
CompletionEst.
Feb 19, 2034
Last update
Jun 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05851287
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 9, 2023
Start date
Feb 20, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 19, 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 19, 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 9, 2026

Study contacts

Haotian Lin, M.D., Ph.D.
Contact
haot.lin@hotmail.com
+86 13802793086
Xun Wang, M.D.
Contact
wangx48@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
+86 15017541549

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion