An interventional study of Targeted music listening in Stress, Psychological, Stress, Physiological and Discrimination, Racial, sponsored by University of Vienna. Terminated at 1 site in Austria. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-19.
Sponsored by University of Vienna · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Ethnic discrimination is associated with mental and physical health impairments. In view of the negative impact of discrimination on health, it is of great importance to investigate interventions to counteract these negative effects.
Based on findings of a pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04957966), this study investigates the effectiveness of a tailored ecological momentary music intervention to reduce biological (salivary cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase) and psychological (perceived stress, perceived ethnic discrimination) stress reactions after discriminatory and/or stressful events in the daily life of Turkish immigrant women (N = 50, age range 18-65 years).
An intra-individually randomized design will be used, i.e., participants will be assigned on a random basis either to intervention events (they can choose to listen to music for the duration of 10 or 20 minutes) or to control events (participants are instructed to not listen to music). The whole study period consists of 35 days with a baseline period (week 1), intervention period (week 2-4), and post period (week 5).
Ethnic discrimination (ED) represents a complex stressor that triggers psychobiological stress reactions (Pascoe \& Smart Richman, 2009). Experienced chronically, ED can adversely affect mental and physical health (e.g., Lewis et al., 2015; Schmitt et al., 2014), most likely due to dysregulations of psychobiological stress systems (Chrousos, 2009; Schlotz, 2019). In this regard, women may be particularly affected as they face discrimination based on both ethnicity and gender more often compared to men (e.g., Harnois, 2014; Seaton \& Tyson, 2019). Considering the resulting health impairments, it is of great importance to investigate strategies that can mitigate the occurring stress reactions and thereby contribute to health promotion. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to test the feasibility of an ecological momentary music intervention aiming to reduce stress levels of affected individuals (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04957966). Based on the findings of the pilot study and power calculations, we will now conduct a larger main study. The primary aim of our study is to examine the effectiveness of an ecological momentary music intervention to reduce psychological and biological (cortisol, alpha-amylase) stress levels after stressful and/or discriminatory events in the daily life of chronically discriminated Turkish immigrant women.
We hypothesize that listening to self-selected, relaxing music after an event of acute stress and/or ethnic discrimination in daily life will result in stronger decreases of psychological (perceived stress, perceived ethnic discrimination) and biological (cortisol, alpha-amylase) stress levels compared to no music listening (immediate effect). Further, we expect a decrease in diurnal psychological and biological stress levels throughout the study period (intermediate effect).
The study consists of three phases: Baseline phase (week 1), intervention phase (week 2 to 4), post intervention phase (week 5).
During the baseline and post intervention phase, we will assess participants' psychological and biological stress fluctuations and perceived ethnic discrimination in daily life. Therefore, participants will be prompted three times a day (11:00 am, 3:00 pm, 7:00 pm) through a study app to answer questions on their momentary levels of stress, perceived discrimination, positive and negative affect, and their music-listening activities (time-contingent data entries). Additionally, whenever a stressful and/or discriminatory event occurs, participants will be instructed to initiate a data entry by themselves in order to report their momentary levels of stress, perceived discrimination, positive and negative affect, and to answer questions on the current situation. To investigate activities after such self-initiated, event-contingent data entries, the app will prompt the participants 20 minutes later for an additional data entry (post). As part of every time-contingent and event-contingent report, participants will provide a saliva sample for the analysis of biological stress markers: salivary cortisol levels as index of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis) activity, salivary alpha-amylase as index of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity.
Every evening before going to bed, participants will complete a daily diary assessment via the study app. In this diary, participants will be asked about their current perceived stress, perceived discrimination, positive and negative affect, fatigue, and coping strategies. Additionally, they will be asked whether discriminatory or stressful events had happened over the course of the day and if so, to describe the event(s). This data entry will not require the collection of a saliva sample.
During the intervention phase (week 2 to 4), the sampling protocol will be the same as in the baseline and post intervention phase (i.e., time-contingent data entries, daily diary assessment, self-initiated event-contingent data entries, post). Additionally, participants will be randomly assigned (50:50) to either the intervention condition (listening to self-selected, relaxing music; participants can choose between the duration of 10 or 20 minutes) or the control condition (no music listening; participants are instructed to continue their pre-data entry activities) after every self-initiated event-contingent report. This intra-individually randomized study design will allow us to compare the effects of music listening vs. no music listening after stressful/discriminatory events on psychological and biological stress levels.
844 studies on the registry are indexed under Stress, Psychological; 136 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 84 across 688 interventional studies indexed under Stress, Psychological.
Browse Stress, Psychological studies →University of Vienna is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Every participant will be randomly assigned (50:50) to one of the following two conditions: Music listening after a stressful and/or discriminatory event (i.e., intervention condition) or no music listening after a stressful and/or discriminatory event (i.e., control condition).
Behavioral: Targeted music listening
Participants listen to self-selected relaxing music. They can choose between a duration of either 10 minutes or 20 minutes.
Change in Subjective Stress Experience
Momentary stress level: visual analogue scales (VAS; 0-100, higher scores indicate a greater level of momentary stress)
Time frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: 20 minutes after T0
Change in Short-Term Neuroendocrine Stress: Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis
Biological Marker: Salivary Cortisol
Time frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: 20 minutes after T0
Change in Short-Term Neuroendocrine Stress: Autonomic Nervous System
Salivary Alpha-Amylase
Time frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5); during the course of the intervention: T0: directly after a stressful/discriminatory event, T1: 20 minutes after T0
Change in positive and negative affect
PANAS (Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale; Watson et al., 1988; German version by Krohne et al., 1996) is a self-report questionnaire that consists of two scales to measure positive affect and negative affect, each scale consists of 10 items (5-point Likert Scales, for every scale higher scores indicate greater positive/negative affect)
Time frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5)
Change in fatigue
5 items (one of each scale) of the MFI (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; Smets et al., 1995), a self-report questionnaire consisting of 20 items that are assigned to 5 scales: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activity, and reduced motivation (5-point Likert Scales, higher scores on each subscale indicate greater levels of each subscale-specific type of fatigue)
Time frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5)
Change in coping behavior
5 items of the Brief-COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory; Carver, 1997; German version by Knoll et al., 2005), a self-report questionnaire that consists of 28 items to measure effective and ineffective ways of coping with stressful life events; one item of each subscale: active coping, use of emotional support, use of instrumental support, venting, religion; 5-point Likert-Scales with higher scores for each subscale indicating a greater level of the subscale-specific coping behavior)
Time frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5)
Change in avoidance behavior regarding discriminatory events
Combination of the following 4 items to measure change in avoidance behavior: * 3 items of the avoidance subscale of the CSI (Coping Strategy Indicator; Amirkhan, 1990), a self-report questionnaire of situational coping that consists of 33 items with the subscales avoidance, problem solving, and seeking social support (5-point Likert-Scales with higher scores indicating greater levels of avoidance behavior) * one self-developed item to measure avoidance behavior, in particular the item measures if the person avoided situations and/or persons for fear of being discriminated against (5-point Likert-Scales with higher scores indicating greater levels of avoidance behavior)
Time frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5)
Change in anticipation of discriminatory events
3 items of the Racism-related Vigilance Scale (Clark et al., 2006), a 6-item scale to measure heightened vigilance regarding discriminatory events (5-point Likert-Scales with higher scores indicating greater levels of anticipation of discriminatory events)
Time frame: from baseline period (week 1) to post period (week 5)
Perceived burden regarding the intervention
10 items of a self-developed questionnaire on perceived burden regarding the intervention (5-point Likert Scales, higher scores indicate greater levels of perceived burden)
Time frame: after 5 weeks
Satisfaction with the intervention
6 items of a self-developed questionnaire on satisfaction with the intervention (5-point Likert Scales, higher scores indicate greater levels of satisfaction)
Time frame: after 5 weeks
Usage Rate of the App
Timestamped log-data of the app to determine usage rate by the participants (higher usage rate indicates a greater feasibility of the intervention)
Time frame: after 5 weeks
Plan to share: No — Data will be shared upon reasonable request.
Ran from May 2023 to primary completion in Aug 2025, 27 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Vienna