ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05793619Updated Nov 3, 2023

Tolerance and Performance (Mode of Administration) of Cyto-selective Difluoroethane-based Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Brown Spots

An interventional study of Prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) every week and Prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) every two weeks in Lentigo Solar and Senile Lentigo, sponsored by Cryonove Pharma. Completed at 1 site in Georgia. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-03.

Sponsored by Cryonove Pharma · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

CS5_8 study aim to evaluate the tolerance and to adjust the mode of administration of 2 different conditions of cryotherapy treatments applied on the brown spots of the face with 1 prototype (816-v1). Each treatment corresponds to a specific frequency of cryogenic spray application.

The study will evaluate the following prototype :

  • Prototypes from (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355)
Read the detailed description

Rational :

Solar/senile lentigo is a harmless patch of darkened skin. It results from exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which causes local proliferation of melanocytes and accumulation of melanin within the skin cells (keratinocytes). Solar/senile lentigos or lentigines are very common, especially in people over the age of 40 years.

Solar/senile lentigines are found as groups of similar lesions on sun-exposed sites, particularly the face or the back of hands.

Cryotherapy is more and more used to improve skin appearance and currently used to treat lentigo spot. However, the cryogenic gas (conventional cryotherapy - liquid nitrogen) creates a dermabrasion of the skin surface and person receiving this kind of treatment presents an impaired skin during a few days following the treatment as temporary damage of stratum corneum, erythema, scars, burns.

Following the side effects occurring after conventional cryotherapy application, the Sponsor has developed some devices using difluoroethane, manufactured by CRYONOVE PHARMA, already available on the local and international markets, e.g. CRYOBEAUTY MAINS and CRYOBEAUTY CORPS.

To continue it research and development activities, the sponsor selected other sequences of a cryogenic spray (1 prototype of devices for face used according to different frequencies of application, i.e. 2 conditions evaluated) which could be used for lentigo treatment with a same benefit for the consumers without any safety outcomes.

Design:

The study performed is a proof of performance designed to be exploratory, interventional study, monocentric, randomized and double blinded.

Intervention :

1 prototype of devices are evaluated in 2 different conditions. Each treatment corresponds to a specific frequency of cryogenic spray application. A total of 42 brown spots are needed (at least 1 brown spot on the face).The 42 brown spots will be randomized between the 2 conditions and will be attributed to subjects according to the number of spots identified by Investigator.

Prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) will be applied on brown pots located on the face. Each spot will be treated six times by a defined prototype (always the same device on the same spot all along the study) according to specific frequencies (every week or every two weeks).

Prior to any study device application, the dermatologist will assess the adverse events and will decide if the period between two consecutive applications should be extended or not.The dermatologist will verify that the skin has not been treated by cosmetic products (no presence of cream that could interfere with the treatment) and is dry.

As the study will use prototypes, before each treatment, the prototype will be administered to any surface (in order to purge eventually the presence of air). An operator previously trained by the dermatologist will apply the study device to the patient's face.

Subjects will be lying down, and the device will be administered upside down. During applications on the face, subjects will wear diving goggles protecting the eyes from cryogenic gas.

The patient follow-up visits are from Day 0 to 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lentigo Solar
  • Senile Lentigo

Keywords

  • cryotherapy
  • hyperpigmentation
  • Skin Diseases
03

In context

Hyperpigmentation

127 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperpigmentation; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 32 across 113 interventional studies indexed under Hyperpigmentation.

Browse Hyperpigmentation studies →

Lead sponsor

Cryonove Pharma is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female or male.
  • Ages 30 to 75.
  • Phototypes I to IV (according with Fitzpatrick scale)
  • Featuring brown spots (solar lentigos, senile lentigo) on the face ≥ 3 and ≤ 6 mm in diameter (at least 1 spots per subject)
  • Agreeing not to be exposed to the sun (or artificial UV) during the study.
  • Informed, having undergone a general clinical examination attesting to his/her ability to participate in the study.
  • Having given written consent for their participation in the study.
  • No suspicion of carcinoma after investigation by a dermatologist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having performed cosmetic treatments (exfoliants, scrubs or self-tanners, facials, UV ...) in the month before the start of the study, at the level of the face.
  • Having applied a depraving product in the month prior to the start of the study, at the level of the face.
  • Having performed cosmetic treatments in a dermatologist (laser, Intense Pulse Light, peeling, creams, cryotherapy ...), at the level of the face in the last 6 months.
  • With dermatosis, disease, systemic, chronic or acute disease, or any other pathology that may interfere with treatment or influence the results of the study (people with diabetes or circulatory problems, allergic to cold, Raynaud's syndrome...).
  • Receiving treatment by general or local (dermo corticoids, , diuretics ...) likely to interfere with the evaluation of the parameter studied.
  • Participating in another study or being excluded from a previous study.
  • Unable to follow the requirements of the protocol.
  • Vulnerable: whose ability or freedom to give or refuse consent is limited.
  • Major protected by law (tutorship, curatorship, safeguarding justice...).
  • People unable to read and write Georgian language.
  • Unable to be contacted urgently over the phone.

For female subjects:

  • Pregnant woman (or wishing to be pregnant during study) or while breastfeeding.
  • A woman who does not have a method.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Condition 1 : prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) every week

    Application on the brown spots of the face for the prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) at D0, D7, D14, D21, D28 and D35

    Device: Prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) every week

  • Experimental
    Condition 2 : prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) every two weeks

    Application on the brown spots of the face for the prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) at D0, D14, D28, D42, D56 and D70

    Device: Prototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) every two weeks

Interventions

  • DevicePrototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) every week

    Application on brown spots located on the face (6 treatments during the study). An operator previously trained by the dermatologist will apply the study device to the patient's face. Subjects will be lying down, and the prototypes will be administered upside down. During applications, subjects will wear diving goggles protecting the eyes from cryogenic gas.

  • DevicePrototypes (816-v1 301) to (816-v1 355) every two weeks

    Application on brown spots located on the face (6 treatments during the study). An operator previously trained by the dermatologist will apply the study device to the patient's face. Subjects will be lying down, and the prototypes will be administered upside down. During applications, subjects will wear diving goggles protecting the eyes from cryogenic gas.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline skin hyperpigmentation

    The evaluation will be performed visually on the selected spots. A scale in 6 points (0 to 5) will be used : 0=Clear of hyperpigmentation; 1. Almost clear of hyperpigmentation; 2. mild, but noticeable hyperpigmentation; 3. moderate hyperpigmentation (medium brown in quality); 4. severe hyperpigmentation (dark brown in quality); 5. very severe hyperpigmentation (very dark brown, almost black in quality).

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 56, Day 70, Day 84 and Day 0 + 6 months

  2. Change from baseline skin hypopigmentation

    The evaluation will be performed visually on the selected spots. A scale in 5 points will be used (0 to 4): 0=no hypopigmented lesion; 1. very slight area of hypopigmentation of very small size and very slightly fairer than the surrounding skin; 2. slight area of hypopigmentation of small size and slightly fairer than the surrounding skin; 3. moderate : area of hypopigmentation of moderate size and much fairer than the surrounding skin; 4. severe : area of hypopigmentation of large size and much fairer than the surrounding skin.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 56, Day 70, Day 84 and Day 0 + 6 months

  3. Change from baseline skin appearance

    The evaluation will be performed visually on the selected spots and surrounded spotless skin area around the spot skin to assess erythema, oedema blister, bubble, scars, micro-bruise, hematoma, dryness,desquamation, fissures/cracks, roughness,crust, pink spots and papules. A scale in 5 points (0 to 4) will be used : 0=none; 1. very mild; 2. mild; 3. moderate; 4. severe.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 56, Day 70, Day 84 and Day 0 + 6 months

  4. Change from baseline skin sensation

    The evaluation will be performed visually on the selected spots and around the spot skin to assess tightness, stinging, itching, warm and burning sensation. A scale in 5 points (0 to 4) will be used : 0=none; 1. very mild; 2. mild; 3. moderate; 4. severe.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 49, Day 56, Day 70,Day 84 and Day 0 + 6 months

  5. Self-assesment of pain by VAS

    The pain of the treatment will be assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at time T0 on the treated area. The pain assessed is that felt during the application of the devices. It will be collected from the patient within 5 minutes of application. The VAS is made up of a 10-centimeter line anchored by two ends of the pain. 10 is the first end being the "maximum pain imaginable" and 0 is the other end being "no pain".

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 49, Day 56, Day 70,Day 84 and Day 0 + 6 months

  6. Change from baseline spots visibility

    Standardized photographs will be taken using a Dermatoscope C-Cube® (PIXIENCE) which allows realizing high resolution skin pictures. The capture will be taken on the previously selected lentigo and a spotless area.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 49, Day 56, Day 70,Day 84 and Day 0 + 6 months

  7. Change from baseline spots color

    L'OREAL Color-Chart is a visual mode of evaluation chart which includes 4 items : * Color of lentigo spot * Lightness of lentigo spot * Color of spotless area * Lightness of spotless area The items color of lentigo spot and color of spotless area are using a scale redder to yellower in 7 points (G to M). The items lightness of lentigo spot and lightness of spotless are using a scale lighter to darker in 15 points (5 to 19)

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 49, Day 56, Day 70,Day 84 and Day 0 + 6 months

  8. Change from baseline lentigines global improvement scale (LGIS) score

    Lentigines Global Improvement Scale (LGIS) score will be used to assess the spots visibility This is a 7-point scale : * Completely clear - 0 - : No evidence of hyperpigmentation 100% improvement * Almost clear - 1 - : Very significant clearance (about 90%); only minor evidence of hyperpigmentation remains * Marked improvement - 2 - : Significant improvement (about 75%); score evidence of hyperpigmentation remains * Moderate improvement - 3 - : intermediate between marked and slight improvement; about 50% improvement in the appearance of hyperpigmentation * Slight improvement - 4 - : some improvement (about 25%); however significant evidence of hyperpigmentation remains * No change - 5 - : Hyperpigmentation has not changed since baseline * Worse - 6 - : Worse (hyperpigmentation is worse that at baseline)

    Time frame: Day 49 and Day 84

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self assessment of skin appearance

    The skin appearance will be assessed by subjects through a 3 items questionnaire. It allows obtaining the subjective appraisal of subject on the treatments using the following 5-point scale: * agree, * quite agree * neither agree, nor disagree * quite disagree * disagree. The items are the following: * The spot seems clearer. * The size of the spot seems reduced. * The spot seems less visible.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42, Day 49, Day 56, Day 70,Day 84 and Day 0 + 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ltd "Health"
    Batumi, Georgia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2023 to primary completion in Oct 2023, 6 months.

Of 27 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Hyperpigmentation, half reached primary completion within 3 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 10. This study's 6 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 64 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 25.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2023
First posted
Mar 31, 2023
StartActual
Apr 4, 2023
Primary completionActual
Oct 26, 2023
CompletionActual
Oct 26, 2023
Last update
Nov 3, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05793619
Lead sponsor
Cryonove Pharma
Collaborators
Dermatech, CEISO, LTD HEALTH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 31, 2023
Start date
Apr 4, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 26, 2023
Completion
Oct 26, 2023
Last update
Nov 3, 2023

Study contacts

Lela BERIDZE
principal investigator · LTD HEALTH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion