CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05789277Updated Jul 10, 2023

Effects of Eccentric Hamstring Training in Prevention of Hamstring Injuries in Sprinters

An interventional study of Conventional training program and Eccentric hamstring training in Sport Injury, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 28 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-10.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 28 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trail is to determine the effects of eccentric hamstring training, in prevention of hamstring injuries in sports involving sprinting among club level athletes.

The main question it aims to answer is :

  • Will eccentric exercises have an effect in the recovery of hamstring injuries and injury prevention in sprint performance sports among club-level athletes.

Participants will be divided into two groups. Control group will perform conventional training program and interventional group will perform eccentric exercises.

Read the detailed description

The most frequent time-loss injuries in sports are hamstring injuries, which are particularly common in modalities that involve rapid accelerations and decelerations like high-speed running. The hamstring muscle group is more susceptible to stresses because of the way it is anatomically arranged.These injuries are more common in sprinters than in other athletes.Ballistic motions like sprinting are typical in most contact and non-contact sports. The most frequent type of activity during sprinting is the running stride. The muscles aggressively extend and contract throughout each stride, forcing the linked segments to accelerate and slow down.In most club-level sports like football, cricket, sprinters and rugby sprinting is a crucial component of the sports and defines the performance of the athletes. If the athlete is a good sprinter he will perform more efficiently in sports. As sprinting is a high-intensity activity and is beneficial for athlete's general health but there are many injuries involved among these athletes. The injury can be disastrous for the athlete, resulting in extended recovery time and the possibility of persistent damage. Injuries in professional athletes are disproportionately often hamstring-related.The most common form of hamstring injury is hamstring strain which can be caused due these reasons. Hamstring injuries can be divided into three types; Grade 1 which is a hamstring pull or strain, Grade 2 partial muscle tear and Grade 3 complete muscle tear. The hamstring muscle is very important as it is involved in generating forward motion. The cause of hamstring injury can be due to multiple activities but the most common is when athletes are sprinting at maximal speeds.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sport Injury

Keywords

  • athletic injuries
  • hamstring
  • eccentric training
  • prevention
  • sprinters
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 52 across 3,239 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 28 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 28 years.
  • Rugby players
  • Male
  • Athletes who have suffered a hamstring injury in the past 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those athletes who have undergone any surgery in the lower extremity and athletes with any other lower limb pathology are excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional training program group

    The control group will perform conventional training program

    Other: Conventional training program

  • Experimental
    Eccentric hamstring training group

    The interventional group will perform eccentric hamstring training

    Other: Eccentric hamstring training

Interventions

  • OtherConventional training program

    Conventional training program: 5-10 Repetitions ( 0.5-to 1-min rest); 1. Vertical jumps 2. Multiple forward jumps 3. Running exercises 4. Sprints alternating with slow jogging

  • OtherEccentric hamstring training

    Functional training along with specific eccentric hamstrings exercises i.e., prone hamstring curl, exercise ball (or glider) bridge with curl, Nordic hamstring curl, single leg deadlift. The exercise program comprises 3 sets of 15 repetitions once to twice per day for at least 12 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional Assessment Scale for acute hamstring injury

    FASH (Functional Assessment Scale for Acute Hamstring Injuries) questionnaire has recently been developed as a disease-specific and self-administered questionnaire to grade the severity of symptoms (pain and function) in patients with hamstring injuries. The FASH consists of six items, each of which is scored on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating the worst possible function and 10 indicating the normal function. The total score on the FASH ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating better function.

    Time frame: The participants will be assessed at Baseline, 4th week, 12th week and 24th week

  2. Change in Nordic Hamstring Exercise test:

    The nordic hamstring exercise test is used to determine the effectiveness of the Nordic hamstring exercise program on Nordic hamstring exercise performance. From a kneeling position on the device, with the ankles secured under a heavy lifting sling, participants leaned forward in a controlled manner as far as possible (eccentric phase) and then returned to the starting position (concentric phase). A tape measure documented the forward distance achieved by the participants in cm.

    Time frame: The participants will be assessed at Baseline, 4th week, 12th week and 24th week

  3. Change in Single Leg Hamstring Bridge test

    A single-leg hamstring bridge to assess the functional strength of the hamstring muscle group. This activity is performed with the injured limb propped on a 60 cm surface at 20oknee flexion, (plyo box, chair, exercise ball) while the unaffected limb is held in the air. The pelvis is then lifted off the ground in the motion of a bridge. This places demand directly on the hamstring to contract to support the body during the bridge.

    Time frame: The participants will be assessed at Baseline, 4th week, 12th week and 24th week

  4. Change in Lasegue (Straight leg raise test):

    The straight leg raise test measures hamstring tightness. Restricted flexibility in the hamstrings will contribute to lower back, pelvis, hip, and knee mal-alignment. The straight leg raise test focuses on proximal hamstring tightness. The test is performed passively.

    Time frame: The participants will be assessed at Baseline, 4th week, 12th week and 24th week

  5. Change in Slump test with cervical flexion & extension:

    Addressing the lumbar spine and pelvic joints may be important as the presence of pain referred into the leg can change hamstring strength, muscle contraction timing, and willingness to bend. Manual pain provocation tests may be used to clear the lumbopelvic region in the hamstring-injured patient, and the slump test may be used to differentiate hamstrings and sciatic nerve symptoms as the source of posterior thigh pain.The slump test is positive where the patient's posterior thigh pain is reproduced in the final slump position, and reduced with cervical extension.

    Time frame: The participants will be assessed at Baseline, 4th week, 12th week and 24th week

  6. Change in 20m Multistage Fitness Test (Beep Test)

    The 20m multistage fitness test (MSFT) also known as 20 meter shuttle run test or beep test is a commonly used maximal running aerobic fitness test. The equipment required for this test are flat, non-slip surface, marking cones, 20m measuring tape,beep test audio, audio player, recording sheets.This test involves continuous running between two lines 20m apart in time to recorded beeps. The participants start running when the recording tells them to,standing behind one line and facing the other. The first speed is really slow. The subject keeps moving between the two lines while turning when the beeps are captured. The beeps will get more frequent and louder after about a minute, and a sound will signal an increase in speed.The level and number of shuttles (20m) the athlete completed before they were unable to keep up with the recording determines their score.

    Time frame: The participants will be assessed at Baseline, 4th week, 12th week and 24th week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rugby Ground, Sector F-10/1
    Islamabad, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05789277
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 29, 2023
Start date
Apr 1, 2023
Primary completion
May 1, 2023
Completion
Jun 1, 2023
Last update
Jul 10, 2023

Study contacts

Aadil Omer, PhD*
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion